DO WE NEED TO REGULATE ICOs?

[Bagorrr]

Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.

[Huntler1993]

Regulation to some extent will be cool but total regulation will lead to the break in principle of the whole crypto fraternity. I think some checks should be done to rule out the necessary areas that need regulation.

[Kiefner]

Everything leads to the fact that soon will be regulated by the ICO. The cryptocurrency market also needs to be regulated, as now almost the entire market belongs to the whales.

[seleme]

Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.

Regulation seems to have a positive effect on the development of the market. But it opposes the very idea of ​​blockcain and BTC. They must be independent.

Regulation has both pros and cons in this industry. I doubt cryptocurrencies will develop better with regulation than without finger of government. Decentralization will provide better opportunities than traditional banking methods.

[akishang]

YES. We should regulate ICO's. Maybe this will be the answer for those people who were using ICO to scam. There should also be a requirement to show the identity of those people who were planning to sell ICO so that when they plan to do something terrible, we can just file a lawsuit against them. If people are not getting caught doing something that is unacceptable, other people will think that is right and they will do it on their own.

[ronnis.gomes]

The regulation of the crypto market is crucial to providing guarantees and protection to investors. Without it, the market will not attract big investors and will be at the mercy of speculation and scams projects.

[Endikadija]

Well i say yes! Currently there are so many projects with similar goals and visions and some of them even don't have the needed capacity and resources to see to the success of the project but yet still competes with the capable funds when funds are being raised. This has also increased the number of scam projects in the cryptospace and this is really tarnishing the image of crypto investment. Let's not forget that if men were angels there would be no need for laws. I am not talking of a Centralized Regulating Body but we can use the concept of masternodes and run a decentralized ICO regulating body. Let's explore all the possible ways of how we can actually curb this menace in the cryptospace.

Regulation seems to have a positive effect on the development of the market. But it opposes the very idea of ​​blockcain and BTC. They must be independent.

Regulation has both pros and cons in this industry. I doubt cryptocurrencies will develop better with regulation than without finger of government. Decentralization will provide better opportunities than traditional banking methods.

Crypto will be better with regulation, imagine having no regulation people will throw stupid ICO and make their own version even if that's doesnt make sense because it's just too easy to create that and also money grabbing.
Regulation is good if it's not too much, they are just trying to prevent money laundering so that the project you invested to is legal.

[cryptofuturologist]

Many people think that the regulation of this industry will make it better. But I think that this will not happen.

[valek.bruno]

Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.

No, today it is far from what can now be found on the market. Wild West has already left the current situation in the cryptocurrency market. I assure you today it is more beginning to look like an ordinary scam until there is no interference of regulators

[Benarand]

I believe that ICO projects should be regulated. There should be one authority that will check projects for all criteria before launching it. That's when I think the ICO market will get better.

[ka4ok1331]

I am 100% sure that we need some regulations and improvements for the ICOs. There are too many scams

[valek.bruno]

I believe that ICO projects should be regulated. There should be one authority that will check projects for all criteria before launching it. That's when I think the ICO market will get better.

What kind of regulation are we talking about, I just can't understand? If you speak in general about regulation by the state, then I also think that something similar is needed, if only for the data of our personal information to be there, so I think that the situation as a whole is very squeaky.

[owlman]

Crypto is like Wild West till nowadays. Regulation has two sides of the same coin. It may kill huge profits but make investing more safe at the same time.

No, today it is far from what can now be found on the market. Wild West has already left the current situation in the cryptocurrency market. I assure you today it is more beginning to look like an ordinary scam until there is no interference of regulators

Why are you so sure that the situation on the market for ICO projects can improve only when it is regulated Perhaps then, the market will not be so volatile and therefore not attractive for investors. In addition, tight control is possible not only for projects, but also for investors.

[dizzy1996]

Yes indeed, I agree with you that there are many fraudulent projects on the market and at the moment a certain regulator is needed, but unfortunately it is not and it is necessary to think of some tools to implement this problem.

[KLACC]

I am against ICO regulation. It seems to me that the government will kill this industry. In addition, this industry may become inaccessible to most people.

[lotfipro]

I think that it would be much better if ICO will get special license for their work. Also it shoud be a comission which will be control every tokensale. So there will be punishments for Scam organizers.

[Karlblaise1]

I'd say a big yes to the regulation of ICO's

-  With proper regulation; people behind scam projects will easily be apprehended and made to vomit all that they have stolen from the public

-  With proper regulation, there will be an enhanced confidence in the system; creating investment drive into the crypto system hence; increased capitalization and stable market

-   With proper regulation, Bounty hunters will not be subjected to such inhumane treatment occasionally meted out to them by some ICO projects

-  With Proper regulations; the cryptocurrency community will be cheat free

- With proper regulation; Cyber attacks and hacking will be of no need as the stolen funds can easily be traced.

so i'd say; some proper regulations be adopted.

[InGODweTrast3]

Yet experience proves that regulation is necessary, because the amount of deception is indecently large.

[CleverOracle]

I see some project that is focusing on regulating ICO's by checking the identity of team members and legitimacy of a project. I'm not sure how it works but it will be good if we can eliminate those fraud ICO's on this space and create a good image to attract more investors to join in crypto.

[IndianaJons]

ICO regulation is long overdue. Look what is happening in the crypto market now. Every month there are dozens of new projects. Of these, clearly fraudulent at least half.