BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[BlackBaron]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

A KYC free casino can become a KYC mandated casino at anytime due to the pressure of the government.
I know that are so many casinos online and that do not mean that we have to be searching for the one that claim that they are KYC free.
Users are responsible for their privacy and not the casino. Anything can happen and casino can get hacked, good reason we have to be stingy about our document never to be sharing them on several online casinos.

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

[Eternad]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

[BlackBaron]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

I think this is part of their strategy as well in looking at the market that they will touch. They want to get customers from users who do not want to do KYC, with the convenience that the Casino can provide, then when there is a policy that requires KYC users, then they will without hesitation do KYC.

I remember one of the big casinos here too, STake. At first they did not require KYC, but now (if I'm not mistaken a year ago) they require users to do KYC if they want to access all existing services and users do not complain about it (as far as I know), because stake's reputation is very good.

[mitchr4]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

I think this is part of their strategy as well in looking at the market that they will touch. They want to get customers from users who do not want to do KYC, with the convenience that the Casino can provide, then when there is a policy that requires KYC users, then they will without hesitation do KYC.

I remember one of the big casinos here too, STake. At first they did not require KYC, but now (if I'm not mistaken a year ago) they require users to do KYC if they want to access all existing services and users do not complain about it (as far as I know), because stake's reputation is very good.

Online casinos are growing fast, so KYC rules are getting stricter for licensed casinos. KYC helps casinos prevent money laundering, underage gambling, and fraud. Without it, they can lose their license.
Since crypto is now officially recognized as an asset, it makes sense that casinos wanting to operate legally need to implement KYC. This is likely going to be the new standard.

[The Cryptovator]

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

Does that mean the gambling platform will not ask KYC for regular gamblers? I haven't heard of such a KYC policy yet; if it's true, then gamblers would feel comfortable with such a gambling platform. Likely this is one of the marketing strategies to draw attention from gamblers. Who knows if later they implement KYC even for regular gamblers?

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

A few casinos seem to be advertising themselves as non-KYC casinos, but their terms include a KYC policy, and they have the right to ask for it anytime. Due to regulations or for any other reasons, gambling platforms implement KYC systems, but for transparency, it's better to give prior notice to gamblers. So they will be aware of the KYC policy.

[adultcrypto]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

There is no way to confirm if the KYC in the hands of the third party will be handled the way they say they would, I do not even see the merits of using third party if the casino have the means of doing the KYC themselves because avoiding third parties will minimize the chances of data proliferation. Besides, if we can trust casinos enough to deposit our hard-earned money in their platform and hope that we will get paid if we win, then trusting them with our information should not be a big problem. Hence, I prefer the casinos handle everything and not hand over our data to third party who might use the data in a way that they did not tell us.

[Salahmu]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

Any casino who cannot verify there users documents by themselves is not supposed to be a kyc casino because I don't see any hard work in going through those kyc, in a company before anything is created there are team they have to handle the area because what every users of that casino knows is only the casino to examine there documents and not for any other company, is there any casino you believe does what you said?, if there are anything someone is doing with third party they shouldn't use there kyc with third party because it could expose gamblers real identity and from your ID card they could physically known what you are, so actually the risk is going to be both on the internet and in real time.

[always7out]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

[Churchillvv]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Truth is that KYC before withdrawals especially when the amount is huge is a norm culture for casinos, not just B.C games, I’m not defending b.c games but I have used other casinos too that’s exactly how they operate too, so b.c games is not special on this however, what I think people should also do is read TOS incase you might get displeased with the service you get from the casino, since most are always stated there.

[always7out]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Truth is that KYC before withdrawals especially when the amount is huge is a norm culture for casinos, not just B.C games, I’m not defending b.c games but I have used other casinos too that’s exactly how they operate too, so b.c games is not special on this however, what I think people should also do is read TOS incase you might get displeased with the service you get from the casino, since most are always stated there.

I am getting KYC on a $21 withdrawal lol. I have deposited wayyyyyy more than that

[BC.Game Support]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Hello always7out,

We are sorry that you are facing KYC on withdrawals. However, in accordance to our Terms and Service, we reserve the right to ask and collect for consumers data when the situation request for it.

We hope you are willing to get through with KYC as it will give your account unrestricted access to our site.

Please don't hesitate to reach us if you experience difficulties in performing the process.

[Justbillywitt]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

There are third party companies that specialise in providing kyc service for other companies that need to conduct kyc services in their platforms. These third party kyc providers are professional with their services and they don't disclose customers datas. So casinos relying on third party to provide them kyc service are safe. Majority of the kyc services you see being conducted in most of the these casinos are provided by third party companies.

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

There are third party companies that specialise in providing kyc service for other companies that need to conduct kyc services in their platforms. These third party kyc providers are professional with their services and they don't disclose customers datas. So casinos relying on third party to provide them kyc service are safe. Majority of the kyc services you see being conducted in most of the these casinos are provided by third party companies.

No companies say they are unprofessional and will sell their customer data or have security or internal issues that leak their customer data to other companies or public Internet. All companies all claim that they have good security and customer data are secured and kept safely in their companies' database, you know it's only promise.

In history, there are many data breaches from small to big companies and it's realistically to imagine that third-party companies with KYC verification products have risk of data breaches, exploitations too.

KYC or not, you decide but make sure you know about risk of KYC and data breaches. Sometimes you simply don't have options and choices, but make sure you know about risk before and after doing KYC.

[Lakai01]

There are third party companies that specialise in providing kyc service for other companies that need to conduct kyc services in their platforms. These third party kyc providers are professional with their services and they don't disclose customers datas. So casinos relying on third party to provide them kyc service are safe. Majority of the kyc services you see being conducted in most of the these casinos are provided by third party companies.

No companies say they are unprofessional and will sell their customer data or have security or internal issues that leak their customer data to other companies or public Internet. All companies all claim that they have good security and customer data are secured and kept safely in their companies' database, you know it's only promise.

In history, there are many data breaches from small to big companies and it's realistically to imagine that third-party companies with KYC verification products have risk of data breaches, exploitations too.

[...]

Basically, you are absolutely right, of course. We don't know what happens to the data and how KYC providers handle it.

However, I am somewhat involved in this area professionally and can therefore tell you that a company that decides to become a KYC service provider is subject to extremely high requirements in order to be allowed to offer these services at all. This starts with small things such as employee training and extends to very precise specifications on how the data must be stored and archived. So, personally, I would have no problem providing my data to a verified KYC provider!

[boyptc]

No companies say they are unprofessional and will sell their customer data or have security or internal issues that leak their customer data to other companies or public Internet. All companies all claim that they have good security and customer data are secured and kept safely in their companies' database, you know it's only promise.

In history, there are many data breaches from small to big companies and it's realistically to imagine that third-party companies with KYC verification products have risk of data breaches, exploitations too.

KYC or not, you decide but make sure you know about risk of KYC and data breaches. Sometimes you simply don't have options and choices, but make sure you know about risk before and after doing KYC.

That is true.

And so why many of us don't want to comply to the KYC and as long as we're just fine playing and we're not asked for it, we'll continue.

By the time that it comes, it's usually on that moment when you're about to withdraw with notable amount and they'd ask you that.

You said, we don't have option but to accept, comply and just be aware of the risk that it has because the handlers of our data could be compromised without us being informed.

[Wakate]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

You need to go through casinos terms for you to know if the casino can force you to do KYC at anytime blocking your withdrawal.
There are casinos that do this often and you need to understand what their terms says. If KYC is required for you to withdraw your funds, you will have no option than to do it or else withdrawal will be blocked.

[bitmover]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

I agree that before depositing the casino should demand kyc, if they will demand kyc on withdrawal.

However,  most casino have a free kyc limit to withdrawal.

 Also, regulated casinos are forced to demand kyc before the payment of big wins, for tax and regulagory reasons.

[Lakai01]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

You need to go through casinos terms for you to know if the casino can force you to do KYC at anytime blocking your withdrawal.
There are casinos that do this often and you need to understand what their terms says. If KYC is required for you to withdraw your funds, you will have no option than to do it or else withdrawal will be blocked.

The much bigger problem here (and probably the reason for the term "criminal") is that

you don't know until the withdrawal process whether your KYC will be accepted or rejected for whatever reason. However, by this point, you have already deposited money on the platform, which you will usually not see again if your KYC is rejected.

For the casinos, this approach is of course justified. Mandatory KYC for deposits would deter customers, who would then most likely switch to other platforms, resulting in a loss of revenue.

[tbct_mt2]

The much bigger problem here (and probably the reason for the term "criminal") is that

you don't know until the withdrawal process whether your KYC will be accepted or rejected for whatever reason. However, by this point, you have already deposited money on the platform, which you will usually not see again if your KYC is rejected.

For the casinos, this approach is of course justified. Mandatory KYC for deposits would deter customers, who would then most likely switch to other platforms, resulting in a loss of revenue.

The most comfortable practice is KYC completely before funding your account. If you are not ready with KYC, you know that you are taking risk of account problems, fund issues, withdrawal disapprovals, and even KYC failure in the future.

Even you are not a cheater, you use your legitimate personal documents, nothing you can be sure that your KYC verification will go well. It's your belief but in life, there is always probability of something strange to happen. So, if anyone worries about their account and fund, KYC first before using an account on any website.

This advice is not only for practice at BC.Game.

[virasog]

The most comfortable practice is KYC completely before funding your account. If you are not ready with KYC, you know that you are taking risk of account problems, fund issues, withdrawal disapprovals, and even KYC failure in the future.

Even you are not a cheater, you use your legitimate personal documents, nothing you can be sure that your KYC verification will go well. It's your belief but in life, there is always probability of something strange to happen. So, if anyone worries about their account and fund, KYC first before using an account on any website.

This advice is not only for practice at BC.Game.

There are two more things that one needs to know before doing KYC at any site. First, doing KYC does not grantee that the site will not scam, they can still scam if they see you withdrawing big amount and deny your withdrawal. So better look for only trusted sites to gamble and you can find them by getting the player's review who plays on that site.

Secondly, KYC should be done only at legit sites. Because if your KYC goes in wrong hand, then they can misuse your data and you can be in big trouble that you have never anticipated.