🔥 BC.Game - Casino & Sportsbook | Official sponsor of O'Higgins FC

[tbct_mt2]

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

It's not only about information related to user KYC but the other data, when you have your data submitted somewhere or your online activity data is recorded somewhere, you no longer have privacy and anonymity. These companies, their employers or attackers can have data about you and can leak it anywhere else.

[Wakate]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

[Issa56]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

[Odusko]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

In as much as casino use third party services for some reasons and it may seems ok with, i dont trust  in a casinos that have third party KYC service providers, even if it just the verifying process third party is involved alone is still a big risks since the documents will have to pass through them first, is far safer and better to look for privacy security instead of conveniences.

[Ryu_Ar1]

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

You are right.

Kyc should only be completed if you really need. Handling out your documents is always risk, because your documents may leak from the casino database ...

we should always try to avoid sending our documents on the internet. To exchanges,  casinos, or any other service. We should do it only when requested.

Although KYC on trusted sites gives us a little more trust, our personal data is still important so as long as it is not needed, why should we provide it.
This may depend on individual choices as a gambler but I think as long as I can still do without KYC it is very good but if it must be forced to do KYC as one of the conditions especially for withdrawals made then inevitably we have to do it.

For this condition I don't really have a problem as long as it is in accordance with the ToS that applies on the site but as long as it is not really needed (for KYC) then I prefer to avoid it.

[Raflesia]

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

Congratulations mate. That was quite a risk replicating the bet 
On another day, things could have ended quite differently, given the fact that it was even a derby, but Barcelona continues to show resilience. I would have also actually fallen for the live betting option during the match.

Yep, this is indeed very risky and even tends to be very aggressive and not really worth doing but yesterday my confidence was still big enough so I was brave enough to try betting Barcelona at 1x2 and fortunately my luck can still be maintained and the goal at the crucial time was quite extraordinary

At least it was probably an aggressive start to the year and I'll make sure that it doesn't happen again in the future because it was an action that I personally admit was too hasty and it might not be so good in other bets that I make.

[Lida93]

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

It's not a news anymore that these third party data security companies having being falling to hack. The standards are there no doubt but yet doesn't make them inevitable to hack. What these hackers do is patiently waiting for a slightest mistake to breach in through into their system and steal all customers data as they can access within the time of hack. All what these companies can do is to always increase their layer of security and hope they don't make errors that could compromise the system to hackers.

[Wakate]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

A KYC free casino can become a KYC mandated casino at anytime due to the pressure of the government.
I know that are so many casinos online and that do not mean that we have to be searching for the one that claim that they are KYC free.
Users are responsible for their privacy and not the casino. Anything can happen and casino can get hacked, good reason we have to be stingy about our document never to be sharing them on several online casinos.

[BlackBaron]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

A KYC free casino can become a KYC mandated casino at anytime due to the pressure of the government.
I know that are so many casinos online and that do not mean that we have to be searching for the one that claim that they are KYC free.
Users are responsible for their privacy and not the casino. Anything can happen and casino can get hacked, good reason we have to be stingy about our document never to be sharing them on several online casinos.

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

[Eternad]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

[BlackBaron]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

I think this is part of their strategy as well in looking at the market that they will touch. They want to get customers from users who do not want to do KYC, with the convenience that the Casino can provide, then when there is a policy that requires KYC users, then they will without hesitation do KYC.

I remember one of the big casinos here too, STake. At first they did not require KYC, but now (if I'm not mistaken a year ago) they require users to do KYC if they want to access all existing services and users do not complain about it (as far as I know), because stake's reputation is very good.

[mitchr4]

Some people don't care about their identity, but others care a lot about their identity, so some people think long and hard about doing KYC and as long as there is a casino that allows them to keep playing then they will prefer a casino without KYC, of course a reputable casino.

But I agree with you that in the future maybe casinos that do not apply KYC for now in the future they can change to require KYC, it's all done because of the rules of the government. As if that policy didn't exist, I think casinos would also prefer to operate without doing KYC.

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

I think this is part of their strategy as well in looking at the market that they will touch. They want to get customers from users who do not want to do KYC, with the convenience that the Casino can provide, then when there is a policy that requires KYC users, then they will without hesitation do KYC.

I remember one of the big casinos here too, STake. At first they did not require KYC, but now (if I'm not mistaken a year ago) they require users to do KYC if they want to access all existing services and users do not complain about it (as far as I know), because stake's reputation is very good.

Online casinos are growing fast, so KYC rules are getting stricter for licensed casinos. KYC helps casinos prevent money laundering, underage gambling, and fraud. Without it, they can lose their license.
Since crypto is now officially recognized as an asset, it makes sense that casinos wanting to operate legally need to implement KYC. This is likely going to be the new standard.

[The Cryptovator]

Many new casino has less aggressive KYC requirements to the point that you will not need to complete if you gamble regularly without any irregularities on your gambling activities.

Does that mean the gambling platform will not ask KYC for regular gamblers? I haven't heard of such a KYC policy yet; if it's true, then gamblers would feel comfortable with such a gambling platform. Likely this is one of the marketing strategies to draw attention from gamblers. Who knows if later they implement KYC even for regular gamblers?

However, I think we should start embracing that KYC is already part of any services that has license to operate since crypto currencies are already considered as money unlike before that it’s not yet regulated.

A few casinos seem to be advertising themselves as non-KYC casinos, but their terms include a KYC policy, and they have the right to ask for it anytime. Due to regulations or for any other reasons, gambling platforms implement KYC systems, but for transparency, it's better to give prior notice to gamblers. So they will be aware of the KYC policy.

[adultcrypto]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

There is no way to confirm if the KYC in the hands of the third party will be handled the way they say they would, I do not even see the merits of using third party if the casino have the means of doing the KYC themselves because avoiding third parties will minimize the chances of data proliferation. Besides, if we can trust casinos enough to deposit our hard-earned money in their platform and hope that we will get paid if we win, then trusting them with our information should not be a big problem. Hence, I prefer the casinos handle everything and not hand over our data to third party who might use the data in a way that they did not tell us.

[Salahmu]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

Any casino who cannot verify there users documents by themselves is not supposed to be a kyc casino because I don't see any hard work in going through those kyc, in a company before anything is created there are team they have to handle the area because what every users of that casino knows is only the casino to examine there documents and not for any other company, is there any casino you believe does what you said?, if there are anything someone is doing with third party they shouldn't use there kyc with third party because it could expose gamblers real identity and from your ID card they could physically known what you are, so actually the risk is going to be both on the internet and in real time.

[always7out]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

[Churchillvv]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Truth is that KYC before withdrawals especially when the amount is huge is a norm culture for casinos, not just B.C games, I’m not defending b.c games but I have used other casinos too that’s exactly how they operate too, so b.c games is not special on this however, what I think people should also do is read TOS incase you might get displeased with the service you get from the casino, since most are always stated there.

[always7out]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Truth is that KYC before withdrawals especially when the amount is huge is a norm culture for casinos, not just B.C games, I’m not defending b.c games but I have used other casinos too that’s exactly how they operate too, so b.c games is not special on this however, what I think people should also do is read TOS incase you might get displeased with the service you get from the casino, since most are always stated there.

I am getting KYC on a $21 withdrawal lol. I have deposited wayyyyyy more than that

[BC.Game Support]

forcing kyc on withdrawals and not deposits is criminal.

Hello always7out,

We are sorry that you are facing KYC on withdrawals. However, in accordance to our Terms and Service, we reserve the right to ask and collect for consumers data when the situation request for it.

We hope you are willing to get through with KYC as it will give your account unrestricted access to our site.

Please don't hesitate to reach us if you experience difficulties in performing the process.

[Justbillywitt]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

There are third party companies that specialise in providing kyc service for other companies that need to conduct kyc services in their platforms. These third party kyc providers are professional with their services and they don't disclose customers datas. So casinos relying on third party to provide them kyc service are safe. Majority of the kyc services you see being conducted in most of the these casinos are provided by third party companies.