BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[salad daging]

When was the last time you completed that KYC?

Last year when Stake required all users to KYC.

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

[Ryu_Ar1]

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

[bitmover]

Maybe poor quality but not blurry. Or his term blurry is just for low quality but still all details are visible. Some casino is strict on KYC especially on quality but some also accept the KYC immediately if the details is visible using their automated KYC software.

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

YEah now it is easy to do KYC, for me I don't want to once the casino doesn't ask for it, there is no self-initiative for KYC as much as possible for me to still want no-KYC.

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

You are right.

Kyc should only be completed if you really need. Handling out your documents is always risk, because your documents may leak from the casino database ...

we should always try to avoid sending our documents on the internet. To exchanges,  casinos, or any other service. We should do it only when requested.

[Wiwo]

When I tried to log in, I did not have access to 2FA but BC.game let me log in through the last 5 digits of my ID (which I submitted for KYC). IMO, it is a security flaw as it is super easy to get hold of that info if you know someone, or an internal issue (like we have seen recently at another big casino). I did not check the cashout though, is it possible to cashout also without 2fa?
Since Bc.game has PvP game (poker) also, this can easily be exploited and affected player will not even get the notification of cashout let alone the requirement of reenabling 2FA.   

Oh my this is a big risk for users account, having access to the log in if you provide last 5 digits of your ID number is indeed a big flaw.

We need to alert the team to work on that aspect and it shouldn't be alternative to 2FA.

If you lost access to your 2FA it should be another security process as a whole to get you disconnected and provide your the access to the account and with some 24 hours withdrawal restrictions on the account.

[Raflesia]

After the end of the year was not very good I tried at the beginning of the year and the result was the luck I got I wasn't too worried because the last game was Barcelona but that seemed to be the tense part of this multi because until the 80th minute even Barcelona couldn't score.

Luck was on my side and this was my first win of 2026.



This isn't really good to replicate but at the crucial time of the match I saw the odds were pretty good on Barcelona so I tried to add a bet and this made me double the profit from my multi and single bet again.

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

[Bitcoin_Arena]

After the end of the year was not very good I tried at the beginning of the year and the result was the luck I got I wasn't too worried because the last game was Barcelona but that seemed to be the tense part of this multi because until the 80th minute even Barcelona couldn't score.

Luck was on my side and this was my first win of 2026.



This isn't really good to replicate but at the crucial time of the match I saw the odds were pretty good on Barcelona so I tried to add a bet and this made me double the profit from my multi and single bet again.

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

Congratulations mate. That was quite a risk replicating the bet 
On another day, things could have ended quite differently, given the fact that it was even a derby, but Barcelona continues to show resilience. I would have also actually fallen for the live betting option during the match.

[Sanitough]

In general, KYC should be complete easily if you have a valid ID and camera that can generate clear picture that will show ID details clearly.

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

In the past, KYC is only taking a selfie photo, or two photos, no more but recent years with developments and applications of AIs, KYC verification now requires real-time video with different gestures like blinking eyes, shaking head, moving head right and left. KYC nowadays can be done in real time as well and there is no longer too long waiting as it was with manual KYC verification in the past.

With cases like security issues or higher levels of KYC, more requirements with documents and gestures in a video are needed and as users, people simply have to do all things asked by a company if they want to finish KYC and access full features on that platform.

[Wakate]

I understand this. What I’m doing is just enhancing the brightness to make it a document type by removing glares on the picture. There’s no sign that details and other information was edited.

But in case this will not work I can always try again to resubmit the same ID with it’s original quality.

I believe some user have problem on the re-upload of KYC is due to tampering KYC details or using different ID on the 2nd attempt.

Casinos that are using third party companies for KYC verification do have problem with users because of the tough procedures that needed to be followed by users and when it looks like the document is not bright enough making those words to be less visible, they mostly reject it. Stake does not use a third party company for their KYC which shows that they can handle users privacy strictly.

[freedomgo]

Casinos that are using third party companies for KYC verification do have problem with users because of the tough procedures that needed to be followed by users and when it looks like the document is not bright enough making those words to be less visible, they mostly reject it. Stake does not use a third party company for their KYC which shows that they can handle users privacy strictly.

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

Picture quality is honestly a simple issue that can be fixed if the user is really interested. The harder part is whether the document itself will pass, that’s where the real problem usually is.

[Sanitough]

Yes of course, but in the end they’re the ones who decide whether what you submitted passes or not since they’re the evaluator. These days, submitting just an ID and a photo isn’t enough anymore.

KYC has become more advanced, you usually need to be online and take a live photo or video to prove it’s really you holding the ID. That makes it much harder to fake now, and even if it’s still possible, it’s definitely not something I’d recommend doing.

In the past, KYC is only taking a selfie photo, or two photos, no more but recent years with developments and applications of AIs, KYC verification now requires real-time video with different gestures like blinking eyes, shaking head, moving head right and left. KYC nowadays can be done in real time as well and there is no longer too long waiting as it was with manual KYC verification in the past.

With cases like security issues or higher levels of KYC, more requirements with documents and gestures in a video are needed and as users, people simply have to do all things asked by a company if they want to finish KYC and access full features on that platform.

That’s already expected since regulations are getting stricter now. Before, crypto casinos weren’t really regulated, you could gamble anonymously with just an email, even a fake one, and start right away. Back then casinos weren’t scamming people because they cared about their reputation. Now these requirements are basically no different from fiat casinos, it’s just part of the shift as the space matures.

[Wakate]

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

Picture quality is honestly a simple issue that can be fixed if the user is really interested. The harder part is whether the document itself will pass, that’s where the real problem usually is.

If the system is too strict, it will make verification hard for users to complete.

[tbct_mt2]

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

It's not only about information related to user KYC but the other data, when you have your data submitted somewhere or your online activity data is recorded somewhere, you no longer have privacy and anonymity. These companies, their employers or attackers can have data about you and can leak it anywhere else.

[Wakate]

The user information stolen not only by security issues like hacks from external attackers but also by internal data steal. While hacks from external attackers can be very shock and noisy, any data compromisation and leak by internal people would usually be very severe because such people have very deep knowlege about the system and can have internal gates to access most important, secured and biggest data of a company.

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy? I really value my information and I will not support the idea of third party handling my document which can be compromised by the team or through other means.
Don't you think these third party companies might be responsible for most users privacy breach by casinos?

[Issa56]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

[Odusko]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

In as much as casino use third party services for some reasons and it may seems ok with, i dont trust  in a casinos that have third party KYC service providers, even if it just the verifying process third party is involved alone is still a big risks since the documents will have to pass through them first, is far safer and better to look for privacy security instead of conveniences.

[Ryu_Ar1]

I also did the same thing. Because I think when KYC is done on a site for me it is the last choice that I have to do so as long as the site does not ask for it then I will play without KYC but when there is an urge to do it especially when it can be a condition as a withdrawal then inevitably I will do it because I don't want my gambling activities to be disturbed here.

Previously it was even worse when there was a KYC site even I would immediately leave it but now it seems that this is not too doable, although there are still some sites that do not require KYC in it but most of the others make KYC policies tightened so inevitably we have to do it.

You are right.

Kyc should only be completed if you really need. Handling out your documents is always risk, because your documents may leak from the casino database ...

we should always try to avoid sending our documents on the internet. To exchanges,  casinos, or any other service. We should do it only when requested.

Although KYC on trusted sites gives us a little more trust, our personal data is still important so as long as it is not needed, why should we provide it.
This may depend on individual choices as a gambler but I think as long as I can still do without KYC it is very good but if it must be forced to do KYC as one of the conditions especially for withdrawals made then inevitably we have to do it.

For this condition I don't really have a problem as long as it is in accordance with the ToS that applies on the site but as long as it is not really needed (for KYC) then I prefer to avoid it.

[Raflesia]

Now I'm going to sleep comfortably

Congratulations mate. That was quite a risk replicating the bet 
On another day, things could have ended quite differently, given the fact that it was even a derby, but Barcelona continues to show resilience. I would have also actually fallen for the live betting option during the match.

Yep, this is indeed very risky and even tends to be very aggressive and not really worth doing but yesterday my confidence was still big enough so I was brave enough to try betting Barcelona at 1x2 and fortunately my luck can still be maintained and the goal at the crucial time was quite extraordinary

At least it was probably an aggressive start to the year and I'll make sure that it doesn't happen again in the future because it was an action that I personally admit was too hasty and it might not be so good in other bets that I make.

[Lida93]

Don’t they have some kind of standard to follow?
I think those third party verifiers are licensed as well, so it makes sense that they won’t approve anything that doesn’t meet the requirements.

This is not about standard to follow or anything strange you might think. Haven't you heard about most of these third parties companies being hacked and most users information stolen? This is what we get when we stick our information to third party companies.
Even though they are being regulated by the government, that does not stopped them from misappropriation of users information.

It's not a news anymore that these third party data security companies having being falling to hack. The standards are there no doubt but yet doesn't make them inevitable to hack. What these hackers do is patiently waiting for a slightest mistake to breach in through into their system and steal all customers data as they can access within the time of hack. All what these companies can do is to always increase their layer of security and hope they don't make errors that could compromise the system to hackers.

[Wakate]

Do you think casinos using third party companies  for KYC verification is safe for users privacy?

I think some people don’t care about their identity, they believe it cant be used for anything, that’s why they just submit their KYC whenever they like. If you are after privacy, then the best thing that you can do is not to submit your kyc to anyone, if you are making use of a casino, then make use of the ones that are KYC free, but as long as you can submit your KYC on any platform, then you should know that your KYC can get leaked. If you are the type that prefers privacy, then casino with KYC isn’t safe for you. I don’t even care if the KYC is being managed by third party or not.

A KYC free casino can become a KYC mandated casino at anytime due to the pressure of the government.
I know that are so many casinos online and that do not mean that we have to be searching for the one that claim that they are KYC free.
Users are responsible for their privacy and not the casino. Anything can happen and casino can get hacked, good reason we have to be stingy about our document never to be sharing them on several online casinos.