Which is better ICO, STO Or IEO ?

[Caishen_Project]

I don't really know much about STO trend but in my opinion, ICO no longer attract investors due to past activities of scam that has been done by some greedy developers, IEO is the latest and it's currently the best, because it's safe, secure and it's hosted by exchanges

[1714299221]

1714299221

[Brunus]

There are small differences in the methods, but the substance is the same.
owever, until something happens that shows that the altcoin market is rising, every investment is just a bet in the dark.

[Jpti]

They are just the same in a way but different ways to collecting funds for a project. ICOs are held in order to attract as many as investors and many offerings are made during ICO. IEO is also launched to attract investors. But IEO is launched on exchanges to increase trust of a project. It aims to assure investment security as well. STO also aims to provide investment security more than ICO. 

[louisBSAS]

If the indicator is investor interest, I believe that IEO is better than ICO. Moreover, lately many ICOs have been a scam, not being listed on the market even though a lot of time has passed. That is why the IEO strategy is more in demand by investors today. However, it also does not guarantee that all IEOs will succeed. It depends on many things, such as exchange, market interest, project strength, marketing strategies, etc.

I agree that recently in the crypto market there are a lot of scammers among ICO. However, there were better times when the right ICOs made huge profits, which none of the current IEOs can compare with. And all investors of such ICOs made a lot of money. And I really miss those days.

[Inu.Guren]

IEO is more better than tradition ICO or STO crowdfund campaign, even STO have more security from scamming investor fund than ICO of course  IEO still safer than other campaign above, because investor fund are escrowed by exchange, and now IEO are expanding to DEX platform too with more safer than CEX

[Furious 7]

After some ICO scams and some other problems I think ICO will sink and this is an opportunity for IEO and other methods.
investors are always looking for something new and more profitable, and IEO has proven it.
although only a few IEO were successful.

[Alohadanc3]

Among three of them I think ieo is better. They all came with same basic fundamental. They all are a process of fund collection. We saw many ICO project in last year and most of them are fake or failed.  Same thing with sto also. But in other hand ieos are more trusted and profitable. So I think oros are far better at least for now.

[adekogbe]

IEOs are significantly more secure than ICO's.
ICOs are known for scams and ought not be incorporated into the rundown, a huge number of dollars (millions) have been lost from ICO and in view of that IEO and STO was made as a decent crowdfunding stage, it offers a more secure condition for financial specialists to contribute, it's simply a question of time before we hear the remainder of ICO
STOs have not been a successful model so far so i believe IEOs are still d best

[bright4mech]

The three stage of coin offering, i preferred IEO, is simply means Initial Exchange Offering and at that stage, the project has been really show how the effort of the project with a low price of the coin, which is more courage to invest during IEO.

[Malamok101]

for me the best thing to say is to invest in IEO Instead of ICO and STO because I have tried IEO since I trust IEO because I have tried it and I have earned a lot here since I invested here.

[Dr.Osh]

After some ICO scams and some other problems I think ICO will sink and this is an opportunity for IEO and other methods.
investors are always looking for something new and more profitable, and IEO has proven it.
although only a few IEO were successful.

since several IEOs have had success this year, people prefer the IEO project to ICO / STO. ICO quality degradation can be felt this year, and IEO came to replace it. although both are sales systems, but IEO offers tokens and their markets. so, when we don't need to wait for the market to sell the assets we have after IEO. IEO is certainly better now than the two sales systems.

[adncoin]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

In terms of security, IEO is relatively better than ICO or STO especially if the exchange holding the said crowdfunding scheme has a good reputation. Convenience-wise, IEO is also better since the exchange facilitating the token sale will instantly list the token on its platform once the crowdfunding has concluded. However, not all platforms are perfect. Given that a majority of cryptocurrency exchanges are centralized, there is the possibility of them getting hacked. Also, since they are not decentralized, they take fees for facilitating the token sale. We believe another feasible option is creating an investment protection mechanism for maintaining ICO security and quality.

[mcnocon2]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

They are all the same concept, to raise funds for the projects but there are some slight difference between them. If I would in these three then I obviously pick STO, real and legal STO though not some claimed STO without legal papers. Then follow by IEO because this is the trend right now and assurance to get listed on exchange is what investors would love to see.

[plast555]

In fact, IEO and STOs are not the same. STOs serve a different purpose. The so-called "Security Token Offering" is more about investment instruments that make up securities.
Therefore, the intended use of IEO projects is different from the intended use of STO projects. But unlike the IEOs, I must say that I have never seen a strong STO project. Because most failed or scam came out.

[microsurfer]

IEO is the best variant of 2019

[kram31]

ICO AND STO, who will be the one we can have to talk on this? the project team? what if they run away?
We have nothing then but to move on.
IEO, if the team project runs and then which we still have? EXHCANGE? yes that is right.
i will definitely go to IEO, Remember they are paid before they list the project on their platform!

[Arsenyo]

All of them have their own advantages and setbacks, but I prefer IEO, it is better than both ICO and STO. It is more secure. According to experts from IBCGroup, IEO is a preferred method for the majority of investors.

[tazmantasik]

All of them have their own advantages and setbacks, but I prefer IEO, it is better than both ICO and STO. It is more secure. According to experts from IBCGroup, IEO is a preferred method for the majority of investors.

Why is it preferred? Because IEO is safer than other options such as ICO and STO. So anyway, IEO is definitely liked by many Investors.
Actually the ICO method is good too, but unfortunately this method is used by many irresponsible people, because that is the emergence of IEO. Many people prefer this method when they want to invest.

[JeffBrad12]

All of them have their own advantages and setbacks, but I prefer IEO, it is better than both ICO and STO. It is more secure. According to experts from IBCGroup, IEO is a preferred method for the majority of investors.

Why is it preferred? Because IEO is safer than other options such as ICO and STO. So anyway, IEO is definitely liked by many Investors.
Actually the ICO method is good too, but unfortunately this method is used by many irresponsible people, because that is the emergence of IEO. Many people prefer this method when they want to invest.

To be more accurate, IEO exist simply because people are tired of getting scammed through unreliable ICO therefore an exchange sees the opportunity of providing IEO (basically ICO with few extra safety steps) and make some profit. If it's to be compared IEO will always be superior it have the liquidation, listed immediately after the funding is done and have been verified its legalities by the exchange. It's such a no brainer that if IEO could best ICO simply because it's an upgraded version of ICO and STO is not that different from ICO anyway but atleast it's kinda a little better than ICO in my honest opinion.

[TaliskerDarkStorm]

I don't think the STOs have achieved the desired success. Take a look around and show me a STO sample that's been successful. It is very rare. Most of the STOs I've been involved with have been scammed, so I don't trust any of them.

Besides, I think there's no difference between the STO and the ICO, at least I don't see any difference in terms of fund-raising.

But IEOs are very different. They vouch for the IEO, which will be held in the exchange, and promises to list it on its exchange. So it's always the IEOs that makes the most sense.

The exchanges handle the IEO's AML process. This eliminates the possibility of defrauding investors and users. But it's also worth reminding, stay away from IEOs made in bad exchanges. Latoken, for example, is one of these.