Which is better ICO, STO Or IEO ?

[lienfaye]

IEO guarantees the security of the assets we invest in and does not have to wait long for listings, which makes IEO safer than ICO or STO. because ICO and STO have killed investor confidence

Well yes IEO is better because its already in the market, we just need to choose the best exchange to have a high chance that it will be profitable and likely to succeed. On the other side if you look into it deeply they are just the same, they just have different system. The point is whatever you choose make sure that you're aware of the consequences of your action because there's no guarantee of sure money in crypto space.

[1714310042]

1714310042

[Jackl87]

Personally i like STO's quite a lot. They are legal and they represent a digital share of the company with all rights that are connected to it.
The downside is, that there a no big exchanges yet where you can trade security tokens comfortably because of legal reasons.
I dislike IEO's. Just look whats happening with every Binance IEO: People are selling their tickets OTC. Then they use bots and scripts to buy as fast as possible when the IEO starts and to immediately sell it again on the exchange. 
It's just a quick flip for most people.

[Eco_111]

STO is a complete failure, way worse than ICO, have any of you guys seen a successful STO project? All I've seen are total failure, honestly I expect STO to be better than even IEO but I was wrong, if I come across any project that plans to use STO for find raising I quickly move on, a latest example of recent STO project is RelictumPro, they failed to raise fund because no investors have interest

[shoreno]

STO is a complete failure, way worse than ICO, have any of you guys seen a successful STO project? All I've seen are total failure, honestly I expect STO to be better than even IEO but I was wrong, if I come across any project that plans to use STO for find raising I quickly move on, a latest example of recent STO project is RelictumPro, they failed to raise fund because no investors have interest

why blame the type of funding if no investors interested on the project ? you should blame the project itself because they dont make a quality product .  on what year did sto existed anyway because i have never seen one , i dont know if its earlier than ico or later than ieo but if its new , people should praise it because we love to see new stuffs and we will got curious if how theyl work . i dont experience sto and ieo's yet , only ico and i have a good experience with it on the past

[Ceyflix-Rez]

Scammers were able to get away with stolen funds through ICO because all it takes is a well attractive website and ICO rating websites that gives good rating depending on how much scammers paid them but things are a bit different with IEO, with top exchanges scammers have lesser chances to go on binance for fund raising, they will be detected, IEO is better

[Itsmylife]

The IEO is now a game for whales, the rules for participating IEO projects of any exchange sites is built to the rich can buy as much as possible.
Anyway, I think IEO is still good for stopping scammers than ICO.

[ololajulo]

I think we know better that it is not about the ICO or STO nowadays, maybe IEO may look better with good exchange. Who is supporting your project matters now because the trust for the supporter is so attractive to traders even when traders or investors does not understand your project. If binance or some strong crypto holders with big fund are supporting any project it gets attractive and likely pump the price. We might need sustainability in the space but most investors came to get profit

[Apostlekin$$$]

IEO is more reliable right now than other crowdfunding in crypto space right now, forget ICO and STO, I'm looking forward to a probably better crowdfunding called DYCO, only a single project used DYCO as at now, I hope we see more good results in near future

[LazerPanther]

They are all the same, have the same purpose is to raise funds for the project, and they only differ in the way they work. At the moment, IEO is the best and safest option for investors. If they participate in the IEO of the major exchanges in this market, the investors will surely have twice as much profit from it.

[Crypto_lion]

I might slightly lean towards the IEO because you are guaranteed that the token is going to be listed in the exchange and also it's about easy to keep track of the snout if coins sold in the ico. But ico has its advantages as well.

[ElmedoRator]

IEO will be the best at the moment, in 2018 there were too many scam ICOs and it died, then the IEO was born and made the projects successful and investors profit from it. If you want to invest in new projects then it is best to join the IEO of the leading exchanges in this market.

[wack slacker]

I think that STO is a top priority for investing in a project because it ensures the legal element for the project if you want to invest safely and long term. The next priority order is IEO because you will be sure of the price competition when you buy your tokens and make sure they are listed as soon as possible. Finally
ICO, quite risky and everyone can participate if eligible for the project. The ICOs of 2013-2015 was quite good because the majority of projects were large and prestigious. That is Ethereum, Ripple ...

[bitkanu]

IEO is more reliable right now than other crowdfunding in crypto space right now, forget ICO and STO, I'm looking forward to a probably better crowdfunding called DYCO, only a single project used DYCO as at now, I hope we see more good results in near future

ICO and IEO are still exist and both are still being used by some developers but the only worst thing that should be STO as almost all of the projects were getting the funds through STO were scam project and it's even worst than ICO when we back at 2017. STO is the worst thing that ever exists in crypto

[Gorosden]

STO is the worst one out of the three, unfair rules are forced on investors and STO is more like a centralized platform, IEO is pure enough of you invest through top exchanges launchpad, ICO is still good but more dangerous than IEO, the choice is yours OP

[bayudndy]

STO is the worst one out of the three, unfair rules are forced on investors and STO is more like a centralized platform, IEO is pure enough of you invest through top exchanges launchpad, ICO is still good but more dangerous than IEO, the choice is yours OP

We just need to participate in IEOs, there are so many good IEO projects popping up every day and we just need to follow and invest in it. Don't waste your time with ICOs and STOs because it won't bring you too much profit

[budi691]

I agree with many that IEOs are the best between ICOs and STOs because they no longer think about where the exchange will take place, with many cases of fraud against investors when participating in ICO and STO projects making people rethink investing in ICO and STO projects,
but not all projects that use fake ICO and STO, some are successful and good, but for now the best IEO..

[kaseygriffin]

I have seen quite a lot of STO project in 2019, and thought that might be a new trend that could replace ICOs. But in the end, no STO project was successful. IEO is still good and we can get a lot of profits from it if we join Binance, Okex's IEO .. And the leading exchanges in the market