⭐️ [ANN] [STO] Cancer Treatment Proven Since '09 ⭐️ MINIMUM INVESTMENT ONLY $90 ⭐️

[garyn]

I mean, a lot of people don't get well, they die. The problem of human mortality from cancer is very serious. I am not an expert in medicine but I think that it is not necessary to position the treatment of dogs and people as almost the same.

Let me tell you a true story.  In 2003,  the National Institute of Health (NIH) alone with biomedical and veterinary researchers around the globe, started the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A team led by Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Ph.D., of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., and Agencourt Bioscience Corp., Beverly, Mass., successfully assembled the genome of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). The breed of dog sequenced was the boxer, which was chosen after analyses of 60 dog breeds found it was one of the breeds with the least amount of variation in its genome and therefore likely to provide the most reliable reference genome sequence.  They spent $30 million USD doing this.

Now if you read that closely what was started was the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Yet they used a dog for sequencing or mapping the genome sequence.

So you might ask why did they use a dog in a Genome Research project for humans? 

Well one of the reasons is that they believe the cures for most cancer in humans will come from cancer research in dogs.  Because dogs get cancer like humans.  Before this, when working with mice and such, they would insert under the skin a certain cancer tumor and then try to treat it.  But with dogs, they get cancer in the same places as people.  They get lung cancer, breast cancer, prostrate and others.  So when researchers work with treating dogs that have cancer, 90% of that research will translate (also work on) to people.

So the reason the NIH was willing to spend $30 million to map the genome of the dog as part of the National Human Genome Research is WHY I can say confidently that this treatment will work on both dogs and people.  And remember, that it has already been working successfully on people since 2009.

Gary

You can read all about it at this link https://www.genome.gov/12511476/2004-advisory-dog-genome-assembled

[1714672508]

1714672508

[1714672508]

1714672508

[1714672508]

1714672508

[Beoga]

I mean, a lot of people don't get well, they die. The problem of human mortality from cancer is very serious. I am not an expert in medicine but I think that it is not necessary to position the treatment of dogs and people as almost the same.

The main problem of cancer treatment is that the procedure itself kills the patient. This is due to the fact that chemicals are highly toxic. This project proposes to reduce the number of drugs while maintaining 90% efficiency. This will save the lives of many patients.

[farraddy]

In my opinion, the fight against cancer is expensive and the main long-term research and work. When will investors make a profit? People are always waiting for a relatively quick profit from investing in cryptocurrency....well, or they hope for it.

[garyn]

I mean, a lot of people don't get well, they die. The problem of human mortality from cancer is very serious. I am not an expert in medicine but I think that it is not necessary to position the treatment of dogs and people as almost the same.

The main problem of cancer treatment is that the procedure itself kills the patient. This is due to the fact that chemicals are highly toxic. This project proposes to reduce the number of drugs while maintaining 90% efficiency. This will save the lives of many patients.

You are correct Beoga. 

And I want to ask everyone a question.  IF I would to show you exactly how the treatment is done.  And gave you the science to back it up would more people on Bitcointalk invest?  Or are they just scared.  And if I gave show you the exact science how many of you would think that someone would steal the idea and do it on their own?

Please everyone who sees this I would like your answer.

Gary

[defyance]

I can only answer for myself. As I already wrote I not specialist in medicine and I at all fear different medical procedures. Therefore, there can be no question about the theft of your technology even if I have something to see. To invest or not here everyone has to decide for himself.

[Beoga]

And I want to ask everyone a question.  IF I would to show you exactly how the treatment is done.  And gave you the science to back it up would more people on Bitcointalk invest?  Or are they just scared.  And if I gave show you the exact science how many of you would think that someone would steal the idea and do it on their own?

Please everyone who sees this I would like your answer.

Gary

I think that If you showed how exactly the treatment is carried out it could help investors to make a decision.  It's one thing when someone says and promises, and another when you can see the real thing. On the other hand, it is not necessary to disclose all the details of treatment that can be stolen.

[bitmaster.bit]

Multiple Questions and Answers

I never thought that the problem of cancer in dogs is so acute. Are there any bonuses for investors?

There is such a problem. My favorite bulldog died from cancer. I hope these medical developments will help not only animals. I think the project is worth supporting.

 So sorry to hear about your bulldog dying from cancer.  Yes it will help more that animals.  And actually it has been helping people since 2009.  In 2017, I was introduced to Dr. Tsang and that is when I realized this would also work on dogs so we started in 2018 treating dogs for free to establish the proper dose and frequency.

There is more detailed information about the discount sale of tokens in the form of a 20% discount?

Here you go:

https://res.cloudinary.com/gnice104/image/upload/v1564604810/Bonus.fw_tgpqds.png

Very generous bonuses. I think I have time to get into this hundred. I just hold 1k dollars for investment.

Great. Here is a direct link to start the investment process https://adsana.io/homepage/registration/

Will you have a referral system and a system of referral accumulative bonuses in the future in your platform?

Yes, once you make a investment please post it onto the ANN thread.  Then PM me with your Legal Name you made the investment under and I will find it on the Prime Trust Escrow Account.  Once confirmed that the investment is completed I will send the purchase SANA tokens and bonus SANA tokens to you ECR-20 wallet.  Our SANA tokens are minted through Polymath.

Gary

Thank you Gary, you are very attentive as for the founder of the project. How's it going with fundraising?

It is starting to get more active.

It's great. I'm happy for you. Today the market is sleeping, very few active people.

[bitinka]

There is no sense to talk about IEO, because here is an STO, so better discuss this type of fundraising. It seems like one of the first STOs from what I know

Tell for those who do not understand. And what is the difference between STO, IEO and ICO for example?

STO is a security token offering, for example. SO, otken with dividends minimum are selling, or with vote right in addition, like Adsana's SANA.

That is, when buying tokens through a STO, does the owner have more rights and opportunities regarding ICO?

There are several types of security tokens, but when we are talking about SANA security token, they give a holder a vote right and a right for dividends.

Thanks for the competent answer. So it makes sense to hold tokens for a long time in order to earn interest?

That would be a wise move bitinka and while you are collecting those dividends the price of the SANA token could rise in value so that you basically have equity in the company that grows.  Like a saving account.  I hope that makes sense.

Gary

Sounds interesting. I think I can hold tokens to good growth, at least. Part to sell, and the rest to leave for the future. Thanks Gary.

Its hard to predict will be token x10 in this year or in near few years. So you have a good startegy

Of course, no one can predict this. The market will put everything in its place when the time comes. I definitely do not plan to sell my tokens cheaply.

[Nevsky]

Multiple Comments and Response

The price of the token will be stable only if there are no sellers, or there will be more buyers than sellers. Or the price will be kept artificially - that is, speculatively. This can be achieved with the right monetary policy.

Hi ardor, there will always be people selling but when the news hits about the clinics there will be more wanting to buy in my opinion

Also this is NOT a ICO with no real product so it will NOT have to be kept stable artificially.  This is a real business, a real working product and will have revenue and profit.  So this will behave more like stocks instead of cryptocurrency.

Four things will affect it:

1.   Supply and Demand. 

2.   Earnings of the company

3.   Investors look at the capitalization of the company

4.   And fourth, the industry itself.

We know the industry is huge.  Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, two University of Chicago researchers, estimate a 1 percent reduction in mortality from cancer has a value to Americans of nearly $500 billion. A cure for cancer worldwide would be worth about $50 trillion. — Science Daily.

True to notice. I myself am watching with great interest and plan to invest in the project. Really unusual idea and approach.
[/quote]

I hope to see your investment soon

Gary



[/quote] As soon as the money is returned to me, I am going to invest in your project. Thank you, Gary, you are a very nice person.

[artdor]

Multiple Comments and Response

The price of the token will be stable only if there are no sellers, or there will be more buyers than sellers. Or the price will be kept artificially - that is, speculatively. This can be achieved with the right monetary policy.

Hi ardor, there will always be people selling but when the news hits about the clinics there will be more wanting to buy in my opinion

Also this is NOT a ICO with no real product so it will NOT have to be kept stable artificially.  This is a real business, a real working product and will have revenue and profit.  So this will behave more like stocks instead of cryptocurrency.

Four things will affect it:

1.   Supply and Demand. 

2.   Earnings of the company

3.   Investors look at the capitalization of the company

4.   And fourth, the industry itself.

We know the industry is huge.  Kevin M. Murphy and Robert H. Topel, two University of Chicago researchers, estimate a 1 percent reduction in mortality from cancer has a value to Americans of nearly $500 billion. A cure for cancer worldwide would be worth about $50 trillion. — Science Daily.

True to notice. I myself am watching with great interest and plan to invest in the project. Really unusual idea and approach.
[/quote]

I hope to see your investment soon

Gary



[/quote] Hi Gary! Thanks you explained very well. If you can build a network of clinics, then the profit will be very substantial. From this, the capitalization of the company itself and stocks will grow.

[wwzsocki]

...And I want to ask everyone a question.  IF I would to show you exactly how the treatment is done.  And gave you the science to back it up would more people on Bitcointalk invest?  Or are they just scared.  And if I gave show you the exact science how many of you would think that someone would steal the idea and do it on their own?

Please everyone who sees this I would like your answer.

Of course, a lot more people would invest if they will be able to verify if the procedure works in real life.

I just don't believe that you are not exposing all details because are afraid that somebody stills your technology.

To be honest, if there is a working treatment against cancer then this is like a holy grail and pharmaceutic companies would pay billions to get it. Additionally, if this really works from 2009 then multiple treatments have to be made to this date so I assume if anybody wants he could have all the details a long time ago.

Sorry, but i don't believe it. I haven't heard anything about a cure for cancer so far.

[defyance]

I mean, a lot of people don't get well, they die. The problem of human mortality from cancer is very serious. I am not an expert in medicine but I think that it is not necessary to position the treatment of dogs and people as almost the same.

Let me tell you a true story.  In 2003,  the National Institute of Health (NIH) alone with biomedical and veterinary researchers around the globe, started the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A team led by Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Ph.D., of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., and Agencourt Bioscience Corp., Beverly, Mass., successfully assembled the genome of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). The breed of dog sequenced was the boxer, which was chosen after analyses of 60 dog breeds found it was one of the breeds with the least amount of variation in its genome and therefore likely to provide the most reliable reference genome sequence.  They spent $30 million USD doing this.

Now if you read that closely what was started was the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Yet they used a dog for sequencing or mapping the genome sequence.

So you might ask why did they use a dog in a Genome Research project for humans? 

Well one of the reasons is that they believe the cures for most cancer in humans will come from cancer research in dogs.  Because dogs get cancer like humans.  Before this, when working with mice and such, they would insert under the skin a certain cancer tumor and then try to treat it.  But with dogs, they get cancer in the same places as people.  They get lung cancer, breast cancer, prostrate and others.  So when researchers work with treating dogs that have cancer, 90% of that research will translate (also work on) to people.

So the reason the NIH was willing to spend $30 million to map the genome of the dog as part of the National Human Genome Research is WHY I can say confidently that this treatment will work on both dogs and people.  And remember, that it has already been working successfully on people since 2009.

Gary

You can read all about it at this link https://www.genome.gov/12511476/2004-advisory-dog-genome-assembled

Many medicines and medical techniques are tested on animals. But develop and real use are not the same, especially if it's for people. I don't know all the testing stages, but should be clinical trials at least. I also think that different types of cancer need different drugs and techniques. Therefore, between the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from the point of view of official medicine  must be a very big difference.

[ufolly]

As I understood the project does not promise investors a quick profit, but promises them to participate in the profits of the company and ensures that the price of the token will not fall. That's interesting.

[Babyrica0226]

Certainly. Profitability indicators, which are presented above, everything looks good but these are indicators of existing business. It is necessary to consider the project in terms of buying tokens and prospects for the introduction of blockchain. Will it give profit to investors?

Well definitely, they will give profit to any investors, this is the reason why they held this kind of projects here in this business industry
of crypto world as well. But they're not giving any promises to any investors who will get interest to support this one.

[zzortyx]

A really working cancer drug would be a revolution in medicine. and people with only a small part of the rights (investment) to this drug could become very rich people. But the problem is that no one knows when such a drug will be created.

[garyn]

As soon as the money is returned to me, I am going to invest in your project. Thank you, Gary, you are a very nice person.

What do you mean the money is returned to you?

[garyn]

...And I want to ask everyone a question.  IF I would to show you exactly how the treatment is done.  And gave you the science to back it up would more people on Bitcointalk invest?  Or are they just scared.  And if I gave show you the exact science how many of you would think that someone would steal the idea and do it on their own?

Please everyone who sees this I would like your answer.

Of course, a lot more people would invest if they will be able to verify if the procedure works in real life.

I just don't believe that you are not exposing all details because are afraid that somebody stills your technology.

To be honest, if there is a working treatment against cancer then this is like a holy grail and pharmaceutic companies would pay billions to get it. Additionally, if this really works from 2009 then multiple treatments have to be made to this date so I assume if anybody wants he could have all the details a long time ago.

Sorry, but i don't believe it. I haven't heard anything about a cure for cancer so far.

Hi wwzsocki, if you look over this thread I have said countless times THIS IS NOT A NEW DRUG.  We are using two already existing FDA approved drugs in a way never used before.  So since we do not have a new drug, there is no pharmaceutical company that would pay us billions.  They only buy new drugs so they can make billions.  Cancer treatment is a big industry that drives high costs to create new drugs which then cause high prices for the new drugs.  We don't play that game.

You have not heard this for one very good reason.  Ready?  Because hospitals, and drug companies cannot make billions off of our treatment. 

Dr. Tsang once convinces a Oncologist to treat a patient in Hong Kong.  The Oncologist treated the person and after they were cancer free Dr. Tsang asked if the Oncologist would like to treat more people and the Oncologist said "No I can't make any money with this treatment".

There is the best answer I can give you.  Hospitals, Oncologist and other have too much money invested in equipment, expensive drugs to give it up to treat people for less than most co-pays for present day cancer payments.  Oncologists on the average make $500,000 a year.  They have to make that and their overhead some how.  We pay our employees well but we are NOT going to over charge for the treatment.

Now to this comment of yours

I just don't believe that you are not exposing all details because are afraid that somebody stills your technology.

.  So are you saying that if you had spent years developing this treatment that uses in combination various chemotherapy drugs along with one other drug that has been used daily for over 25 years that you would just go out and tell everyone how to use these two drugs.  Don't you think that other doctors and veterinarians would not just go start using the treatment themselves.  We are not trying to hide it forever.  We know that is impossible.  But we want for a few years to be the only clinics with the treatment so we can give our investors a fair return on their investment.  Then we will start teaching it and licensing out the treatment to others.

Gary

[farraddy]

If you look at things more soberly that the project can be seen as an investment in running the business treatment of dogs. In my opinion, the victory over cancer is still very far away.

[garyn]

Many medicines and medical techniques are tested on animals. But develop and real use are not the same, especially if it's for people. I don't know all the testing stages, but should be clinical trials at least. I also think that different types of cancer need different drugs and techniques. Therefore, between the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from the point of view of official medicine  must be a very big difference.

Hi defyance,  You talk about testing on animals and you talk about the treatment of dogs and treatment of people from official medicine must be very different

I posted a response to you saying basically the same thing yesterday.  Here is that post below.  But let me add something first.  So if a dog has an infection and an person has an infection do you think the treatment is different.  The use the same drugs.  90% of all drugs used to treat dogs for various issues are actually human drugs that are use on humans for the same thing.  The are very few drugs created just for dogs.  And only ONE cancer drug.  The rest of the drugs used to treat cancer in dogs are human cancer drugs being use as "grey label or off label" when using a human drug on dogs.

So again here is the post from yesterday to your comment

Let me tell you a true story.  In 2003,  the National Institute of Health (NIH) alone with biomedical and veterinary researchers around the globe, started the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A team led by Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Ph.D., of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., and Agencourt Bioscience Corp., Beverly, Mass., successfully assembled the genome of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). The breed of dog sequenced was the boxer, which was chosen after analyses of 60 dog breeds found it was one of the breeds with the least amount of variation in its genome and therefore likely to provide the most reliable reference genome sequence.  They spent $30 million USD doing this.

Now if you read that closely what was started was the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Yet they used a dog for sequencing or mapping the genome sequence.

So you might ask why did they use a dog in a Genome Research project for humans?  

Well one of the reasons is that they believe the cures for most cancer in humans will come from cancer research in dogs.  Because dogs get cancer like humans.  Before this, when working with mice and such, they would insert under the skin a certain cancer tumor and then try to treat it.  But with dogs, they get cancer in the same places as people.  They get lung cancer, breast cancer, prostrate and others.  So when researchers work with treating dogs that have cancer, 90% of that research will translate (also work on) to people.

So the reason the NIH was willing to spend $30 million to map the genome of the dog as part of the National Human Genome Research is WHY I can say confidently that this treatment will work on both dogs and people.  And remember, that it has already been working successfully on people since 2009.

Gary

You can read all about it at this link https://www.genome.gov/12511476/2004-advisory-dog-genome-assembled

[wwzsocki]

...are you saying that if you had spent years developing this treatment that uses in combination various chemotherapy drugs along with one other drug that has been used daily for over 25 years that you would just go out and tell everyone how to use these two drugs...

Of course not but there are multiple ways to secure your product (in this case treatment) with special trading marks, licenses or even patents.

This is a simple and honest answer. I think it would be hard for you to convince me that there is no legal way to secure your product.

Just after one treatment, your special formula will be lost. If this is so special then they would send somebody who will make the treatment and describes everything with details later on.