Extra weeks added to bounty campaign

[Odebowa]

though its a choice and if you observe that as its going ooo, they will make it you can continue because in some cases patient dog eat the fattest  bone, and if its the others side pursue your leg. don't know maybe you should run ooo. you can leave the project just take it as you have done your best so leave the rest

[coinsycrip09]

I think the extension of the duration of the bounty does not matter if their project is trusted and has entered the market, I often get projects like that but I always follow the existing rules and continue until the end of the period, but if the project progress is slow even the funds they get a little better leave only

yup! that's right !!
if they run a clear project and the team really works hard for its development, we should keep following it to the end. i have also participated in several such projects and i always follow them to the end, the results are also quite good.

indeed, not all the extra time is good for some projects. some of them are sometimes just cheats and the extra time is just a strategy to attract more investor money into their pockets and after that they disappear. keep careful

[asriloni]

If you're in their signature campaign and participants in the signature is much, just calculate the stakes and do your calculations. If it doesn't favour you, leave and if you think it will, continue it.

Most of the signature campaign doesn't allow leaving in mid of campaign! If you leave your whole works/stakes will be abandoned! That's why people hate extension in bounty campaigns! Though some bounty manager realizes this situation, that's why nowadays they let participants leave the signature after 4 weeks or after the first phase of bounty campaign!

There are some who still do not permit. This is why some users prefer to participate in bounty campaigns that pay weekly, although it is rare to find. Had it ben it is social media bounty, you right not find continuing, because it gives room to participate in as many bounty campaigns as possible. In fact, you can decide to quit when it comes to that and your stakes will remain, except in rare cases.

It's not. There so many campaigns that erased the user's stake when they were leaving the campaign and mostly the projects were doing this. I have been seeing hundreds of campaigns that were doing it dude.
It's rare to see a campaign that still keeps the stake of participants that already leave the campaign.

[isaac_clarke22]

Sometimes extending bounty duration is like expanding the results of the bounty campaign, I don't see anything wrong here, give a good use case and I will promote even if it's over 23 weeks

Yeah extending isn’t a bad even it’s apart of bounty campaign, teams have right to change their general terms. But it’s matter about of allocation, it would be increase. Rather you didn’t expect 20$,50$ rewards instead of 23 weeks. Meanwhile we seeing mostly bounty did extend without increasing. It's seems worst changing in bounty.                    

Sometimes it kinda sucks, but hey it is gonna be an extra earnings due to extra weeks given.
I've read a thread yesterday about some bounties having "phases" of payments.
That's what people should probably avoid. It's synonymous to saying that payments are about to be delayed, even though at some cases delays are pretty much understandable..

[bgaf]

Extending campaign period is not bad because they also rely on their fund raising timeframe. But what is unacceptable is the deletion of stakes once you leave. Its like you already work for it and cannot earned those stakes. Im just talking about when the campaign ended and decided to extend. A lot of projects doing it like forcing hunters not to remove signature, for me its like abusing the rules cause they wanted to have more time on exposure on forum and sometime delaying the counting of stakes. Greedy move, so Its better if you joined only those considerate managers.

[xSkylarx]

Extending campaign period is not bad because they also rely on their fund raising timeframe. But what is unacceptable is the deletion of stakes once you leave. Its like you already work for it and cannot earned those stakes. Im just talking about when the campaign ended and decided to extend. A lot of projects doing it like forcing hunters not to remove signature, for me its like abusing the rules cause they wanted to have more time on exposure on forum and sometime delaying the counting of stakes. Greedy move, so Its better if you joined only those considerate managers.

This happens to a lot of projects. It is understandable that projects need more time for them to gather funds for development. However, as you said forcing participants not to leave by making a rule that stakes will be removed once you left is abusive.  That is why as much as possible I look for BTC payment bounties to avoid this kind of risk when joining bounties.

[SacriFries11]

Some campaigns are reasonable to extend their campaign. I also understand their situation that in order to gain more investors they need to extend their bounty campaign. But I guess they should announce it early if they need to extend it, I'm sure some bounty hunters will also disappointed if they know that after the long time promoting their campaign, they will extend it again. I think additional 1 month is good for bounty extension. Some BM will allow their participants to leave but they should wait for their payments after the campaign. In your case, I think you should better to ask for your total stakes to be summary and leave it. Start to find new campaign.

[anhhung409]

Some of the projects I have been involved in have also experienced additional time for several weeks and at that time most of the participants were successful in the project. If you want to continue, you should first check how much sales the project has received since most of the projects last a long time because they are not achieving their sales goals, by extending the bonuses and the sale time. In sales, they hope they can achieve their goals in sales.

[TrevorS]

Alas, there are many precedents when a company was extended up to one year and as a result, payments were tiny.
Unfortunately, one cannot predict what outcome awaits you.

However, the following can be said. If the project extends the Bounty company, then the project has problems with raising funds,
and if the project has problems with raising funds at the initial stage, it is not known what will happen to it in the future.

Maybe it won’t collect anything at all.
Therefore, first of all, be interested in how much the project raised funds and ask for evidence.

[cabron]

If the team already express the plan to extend their campaign right before the first round started I believe they truly meant what they said.

But it could mean they didn't get much funds thru their IEO/ICO. Keep an eye to the team's telegram channel because there must be something out there you will notice like if the team members who was once busy there started not appearing for days.

[Zemomtum]

That is too risky, that is almost half of a year promoting a project. If the compensation worth it and you have look at the experience of the project team if they can deliver on the promises, you can go ahead. It will be most painful if you proceed and the project failed.

[Walangkopo]

I haven't seen it, so far I've only seen 12 weeks. but if there is extra time, it will be very boring for prize hunters. not to mention, waiting for the distribution of tokens.

[lobo13hf]

I haven't seen it, so far I've only seen 12 weeks. but if there is extra time, it will be very boring for prize hunters. not to mention, waiting for the distribution of tokens.

If that was adding more reward to the participants and that could be fine. We can take a look at oikoss which has added more reward as the duration will be doubled from 4 weeks into the 8 weeks.
If that 's also a trusted coin and why not? as long as you will get a good result at the end of campaign.

[Santri]

if your stake can be saved in spreadsheet you should not continue in the extra weeks because I have quite bad experience with projects that do that but if you have confidence that the project will give you a lot of money then continue

[chmod755]

Sometimes is a bad sign and sometimes is not, I saw a few Icos extending it because they need to collect more fund and after that just fail and a few bounties just extend with more tokens/coins allocation to keep spreading the word about the project.

[khiholangkang]

An extended bounty is not a problem, as long as the allocation is added surely the participants do not mind. But sometimes there are also bounties who don't want to add allocations and always extend the duration, which is what the bounty participants don't like.

[Mianae]

What you should consider is
1. What was the reason for such extension?
2. Was the reward increased?
3. Does the reward worth the time allocated to the campaign?
and finally, what attracted you to the campaign. If you like the project, it's best you hang in there and finish up with the campaign.

[Kotone]

I dont like being extended when you are doing a long time campaign already. The managers were not to blame for having an extension but we cant also blame the team. Maybe their goal was not expected or did not raised any good sales. Like most projects that doing these are surely will have a chance to fail, Im not saying they are not sucesful but having not enough budget for the project means ita gonna have a delay and that word is one thing many hunters hate to hear.

But I appreciate some managers who are keen and understandable that can let you exit the campaign while your stake for previous weeks are save and acknowledge.

[bakasabo]

It's ok when projects describes why they decided to add extra weeks to bounty campaign. But the description must be clear and connects current economic situation.

Reasons like: "the projects show so much interest, so we decided to extend bounty campaign" or "we extend campaign, because lots of investors wants to make an investment" and something like that are lame excuses. All this means that there is no interest in the projects and they just want to raise more money.

Also one must look on current bounty length. If it runs already for 3-6 months, extra weeks is an indicator that you will waste time with them.

But if campaign runs for 1 month and team decided to add one more month - it is ok with me. 1 month of advertising is not always enough to introduce projects the World.

[Dr.Osh]

An extended bounty is not a problem, as long as the allocation is added surely the participants do not mind. But sometimes there are also bounties who don't want to add allocations and always extend the duration, which is what the bounty participants don't like.

some people do not like extending the bounty period, but some people don't mind this as long as the reward is added. but, it will be very good when they pay a reward every week, so it doesn't matter if they want to extend the bounty period. unfortunately, sometimes they increase the bounty period by a few months, then the rewards are not added, sometimes it makes some people lose faith in a project.