Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[lienfaye]

I don't see anything wrong with Robeet.. Even they are promoting some designing competition a few weeks back and their signature campaign is running for a very long time.
However, i do feel that KYC is something on which not everyone is comfortable. No matter how good or reputed the gambling site is, some people will just quit them if they have to do the KYC.

First of all i would advise you not to quote all the replies as it looks really weird and too long so quote the person you want to specifically reply to and then answer it accordingly.Speaking of KYC matters then there are many who will not be willing to adjust with these issues and will shift to some other sites that don't ask for any documentation but some are ok with level 1 KYC so it all depends on how we want to play and promotion for roobet is separate part from KYC.

I'm one of those people who avoid KYC, except for Roobet because it doesn't require any documents but i make sure i will never make deposit more than $500
the reason is I'm worried that one day they might ask for documents, the whales could have done the same thing so they went to another site, usually the people who avoid KYC are the whales for some reason.

Roobet is also the first gambling site that I comply with their kyc requirement, and yes its a good thing that they're not asking for any documents (for level 1).

Anyway, its still comfortable to gamble on sites without asking for our personal information because we'll never know what will happen if it gets compromise. However we have an option on which casinos to play, but in my case I still prefer Roobet as one of my trusted casino despite of the mandatory level 1 kyc in order to play.

[1714928312]

1714928312

[1714928312]

1714928312

[1714928312]

1714928312

[Maus0728]

They are using blockchain to protect our information.

Wait! This is inaccurate. Blockchain is an append-only ledger that consists of our cryptocurrency transactions that is being made on a daily basis. In terms of programming, blockchain is kinda similar from what we call as "linked list" wherein blockchain has a block that contains our transactions and is derived from the previous block.

And surely blockchain has nothing to do with all the KYC's being submitted to Roobet. The protection and encryption of all of our data lies on Roobet's database particularly on third party services such as VERIFF and SEON^[1].

[1] https://roobet.com/privacypolicy

[vv181]

~wherein blockchain has a block that contains our transactions and is derived from the previous block.

I don't think "derived" is the correct usage of the word, but I rather called it as connected/chained to the previous blocks.

They are using blockchain to protect our information.

~
And surely blockchain has nothing to do with all the KYC's being submitted to Roobet. The protection and encryption of all of our data lies on Roobet's database particularly on third party services such as VERIFF and SEON^[1].

[1] https://roobet.com/privacypolicy

Yep, those services have its own respective privacy policy and how to handle their customer data. So at the very least, there is 3 entity that handles customer data with their own policy. Actually, Roobet does also explained it on their AML policy page, on that page, there is no specifically word blockchain being explained about the data protection. So, I don't know how could @Johnyz think that blockchain is being used

[aysg76]

Yeah, similar story here. Since I'm a privacy-conscious person, one of the main reasons I chose to play at crypto casinos was for the anonymity. I really don't want my personal information to be available on every single website I visit. It only takes one rogue employee to leak all of this information to the dark web. We've already seen cases like this in the past.

It's a good thing the KYC requirements on Roobet have several levels, so I completed only Level 1, which requires only basic personal information (it's still unnerving to have to provide my full name and address, but I guess we have to accept that).

We all have our way of playing and this KYC matter is always debatable like we have seen in the past.At the conclusion we can only say that those who feel comfortable with KYC can play over casinos asking for it and those who want complete anonymity can choose the one's that doesn't require it and that's simple.For me i don't mind level 1 KYC but above it there is discomfort so won't go that way.

[dezoel]

~wherein blockchain has a block that contains our transactions and is derived from the previous block.

I don't think "derived" is the correct usage of the word, but I rather called it as connected/chained to the previous blocks.

Hence the word "block""chain" written together. They are chained together, they are obviously coming one after the other and we get to see what we send from one side to another that way. I do not care if those places have the greatest security ever, I believe that if we are talking about something that is dangerous, like our data getting stolen from a server, then we are talking about security problem.

I get that you may compare it to some other places, I get that you may say "but you are giving so much information on places like facebook, instagram and so forth" but none of that matters because one place being dangerous doesn't mean the other is fine for doing the same. KYC is a risky business, and it should always stay away from something like gambling, I get it on exchanges but casinos are a bit more sensitive for people who are not even criminals.

[Stalker22]

I get that you may compare it to some other places, I get that you may say "but you are giving so much information on places like facebook, instagram and so forth" but none of that matters because one place being dangerous doesn't mean the other is fine for doing the same. KYC is a risky business, and it should always stay away from something like gambling, I get it on exchanges but casinos are a bit more sensitive for people who are not even criminals.

I agree with that. The primary reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is because it has proven to be a good and honest casino. However, I was initially drawn to it for the anonymity it offered its players back then. Then came KYC. I found the introduction of the KYC to be a bump on the road that I had to deal with in order to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal information. Had that not been the case, I would have had to "suffer" at some other online casino. 

[Raflesia]

I get that you may compare it to some other places, I get that you may say "but you are giving so much information on places like facebook, instagram and so forth" but none of that matters because one place being dangerous doesn't mean the other is fine for doing the same. KYC is a risky business, and it should always stay away from something like gambling, I get it on exchanges but casinos are a bit more sensitive for people who are not even criminals.

I agree with that. The primary reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is because it has proven to be a good and honest casino. However, I was initially drawn to it for the anonymity it offered its players back then. Then came KYC. I found the introduction of the KYC to be a bump on the road that I had to deal with in order to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal information. Had that not been the case, I would have had to "suffer" at some other online casino. 

For me, KYC level 1 regarding basic information is not KYC who has to submit documents, but obviously Roobet still provides anonymity even though there is basic personal information at that level, so this can be made up of pseudonyms and it can already be roobet, this will not suffer for others who don't like KYC and still crypto gambling still applies anonymity system as the main thing, except this abuse will be asked by KYC to submit other documents.

[aysg76]

I get that you may compare it to some other places, I get that you may say "but you are giving so much information on places like facebook, instagram and so forth" but none of that matters because one place being dangerous doesn't mean the other is fine for doing the same. KYC is a risky business, and it should always stay away from something like gambling, I get it on exchanges but casinos are a bit more sensitive for people who are not even criminals.

I agree with that. The primary reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is because it has proven to be a good and honest casino. However, I was initially drawn to it for the anonymity it offered its players back then. Then came KYC. I found the introduction of the KYC to be a bump on the road that I had to deal with in order to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal information. Had that not been the case, I would have had to "suffer" at some other online casino. 

That is what I also want to state that there are so many casinos in the market at this time but finding a legit one is main concern like Roobet has build up the trust of the users and their reputation which is why we feel comfortable playing over here and i am also satisfied with level 1 kyc as not complete anonymity is required in my case.Playing with fun on some good casino is must.

[Haunebu]

For me, KYC level 1 regarding basic information is not KYC who has to submit documents, but obviously Roobet still provides anonymity even though there is basic personal information at that level.

I feel the opposite actually. I am not comfortable with sharing any of my personal details with a crypto gambling site unless absolutely necessary which is why I detest their mandatory level-1 KYC system.

That is what I also want to state that there are so many casinos in the market at this time but finding a legit one is main concern like Roobet has build up the trust of the users and their reputation which is why we feel comfortable playing over here and i am also satisfied with level 1 kyc as not complete anonymity is required in my case.

What are you talking about? There are plenty of crypto gambling sites that are just as reliable as Roobet and don't require any form of KYC whatsoever like Crypto.Games, Stake, Bitcasino etc.

[barbara44]

The primary reason I enjoy playing at Roobet is because it has proven to be a good and honest casino. However, I was initially drawn to it for the anonymity it offered its players back then. Then came KYC. I found the introduction of the KYC to be a bump on the road that I had to deal with in order to continue using the platform. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only requires basic personal information. Had that not been the case, I would have had to "suffer" at some other online casino. 

I would say that them being a good casino is still a valid point even after they started to ask KYC, that has nothing to do with the part where they are taking KYC from the customers, I have to say that KYC just made it a little bit more open to alternatives. I mean surely there are other places where KYC is not asked, and people started to ask "should I pick this kycless place, or roobet?" and that is the problem they started to face after they opened this whole thing up.

In any other situation, I would say it was a wrong move but they are trying to be as legit as possible and be available in as many nations as possible which requires KYC to be asked, that is why I believe that there is nothing to be done after this point, it's done and they are not going back on that. So, we just have to accept that either we will give our KYC and play here, or we just find another kycless place to play.

[AmoreJaz]

For me, KYC level 1 regarding basic information is not KYC who has to submit documents, but obviously Roobet still provides anonymity even though there is basic personal information at that level.

I feel the opposite actually. I am not comfortable with sharing any of my personal details with a crypto gambling site unless absolutely necessary which is why I detest their mandatory level-1 KYC system.

That is what I also want to state that there are so many casinos in the market at this time but finding a legit one is main concern like Roobet has build up the trust of the users and their reputation which is why we feel comfortable playing over here and i am also satisfied with level 1 kyc as not complete anonymity is required in my case.

What are you talking about? There are plenty of crypto gambling sites that are just as reliable as Roobet and don't require any form of KYC whatsoever like Crypto.Games, Stake, Bitcasino etc.

i guess, it all boils down to how comfortable the player is to the casino he is playing with. so even if there are reputable casinos as you mentioned which don't require kyc, some players are still sticking to the casino that they already find their comfort zone.
so we can't really expect gamblers to have the same preferences when it comes to choosing a casino. we have varying preferences and that is good because this is why casinos can survive, because they are getting their own niche of players.

[aysg76]

What are you talking about? There are plenty of crypto gambling sites that are just as reliable as Roobet and don't require any form of KYC whatsoever like Crypto.Games, Stake, Bitcasino etc.

You don't seems to understand my point clearly because i also mentioned that finding a good legit casino is main point of concern and i also known about the casinos you are talking about.Roobet is among one of them but as i am comfortable with level 1 kyc it's not a big problem for me but who wants complete anonymity can shift to others like stake so this was what i want to say.The new gamblers might go to some fake casino in hope it doesn't have any obligations but can loose funds so he must check for legit casino at first case.

[aysg76]

Was just looking through roobet Twitter account to find out what's new going on and big wins they usually shares so just found one as well :

$6,553 Was Just Won on Roobet!🥳

Congratulations to munkhsainkhaan on a 4,681x Multiplier! 💰

Play Stack'EM Now: https://t.co/nj7IiPsKUN https://t.co/yvD1nnbjIB

[$crypto$]

Was just looking through roobet Twitter account to find out what's new going on and big wins they usually shares so just found one as well :

$6,553 Was Just Won on Roobet!🥳

Congratulations to munkhsainkhaan on a 4,681x Multiplier! 💰

Play Stack'EM Now: https://t.co/nj7IiPsKUN https://t.co/yvD1nnbjIB

An hour ago Roobet also shared a big win from the Gate of Olympus slot bet of 2,460x multiplier Roobet never forgets that every user with a big win will definitely be exposed on his Twitter.

It's not a strong bet for me above $1  ;Dbut they are pretty lucky too.

Even though Gate of Olympus is a lot of favorites.

[aysg76]

An hour ago Roobet also shared a big win from the Gate of Olympus slot bet of 2,460x multiplier Roobet never forgets that every user with a big win will definitely be exposed on his Twitter.

It's not a strong bet for me above $1  ;Dbut they are pretty lucky too.

Even though Gate of Olympus is a lot of favorites.

They usually shares big wins of Twitter account as shared by me to promote the casino and tell small gamblers there's always hope for them

Like recently they have shared this one :https://twitter.com/Roobet/status/1481536501385031680?t=icY76WvvST3PJPexwc1HWA&s=19 in which player won $7k with small bet of over $1 and that's impressive but the player was lucky.

[Lakai01]

An hour ago Roobet also shared a big win from the Gate of Olympus slot bet of 2,460x multiplier Roobet never forgets that every user with a big win will definitely be exposed on his Twitter.
It's not a strong bet for me above $1  ;Dbut they are pretty lucky too.
-snip-

I usually never bet quite a bit more than a dollar either. You make corresponding profits with such high multipliers only with a lot of luck. If I would bet much higher contributions (5$ or 10$) the profit with such high multipliers would be of course much higher, but I would also be relatively fast at a balance of 0.

[$crypto$]

An hour ago Roobet also shared a big win from the Gate of Olympus slot bet of 2,460x multiplier Roobet never forgets that every user with a big win will definitely be exposed on his Twitter.
It's not a strong bet for me above $1  ;Dbut they are pretty lucky too.
-snip-

I usually never bet quite a bit more than a dollar either. You make corresponding profits with such high multipliers only with a lot of luck. If I would bet much higher contributions (5$ or 10$) the profit with such high multipliers would be of course much higher, but I would also be relatively fast at a balance of 0.

Well I can imagine that if we bet above $1 or more above it, of course the balance will run out quickly and we have to have big capital if we want big bets.
In Roobet's post we only see big multiplier wins, let's imagine how much he lost to get big profits?
Of course people will hide it and it can be more than a big multiplier or even more.
What is clear is that when we win with a multiplier the feeling of emotion will be slightly cured.

[aysg76]

I usually never bet quite a bit more than a dollar either. You make corresponding profits with such high multipliers only with a lot of luck. If I would bet much higher contributions (5$ or 10$) the profit with such high multipliers would be of course much higher, but I would also be relatively fast at a balance of 0.

Yeah we all have our own personal preferences and for me going above $1 is fine sometimes but if we say about winning big then it's complete luck because betting high will give more profits like these is not all guaranteed.Like you said these big wins are of $1-$2 bet only so they were lucky only.But still we should bet with what we can taking our limits into consideration.

[dezoel]

I usually never bet quite a bit more than a dollar either. You make corresponding profits with such high multipliers only with a lot of luck. If I would bet much higher contributions (5$ or 10$) the profit with such high multipliers would be of course much higher, but I would also be relatively fast at a balance of 0.

Well I can imagine that if we bet above $1 or more above it, of course the balance will run out quickly and we have to have big capital if we want big bets.
In Roobet's post we only see big multiplier wins, let's imagine how much he lost to get big profits?
Of course people will hide it and it can be more than a big multiplier or even more.
What is clear is that when we win with a multiplier the feeling of emotion will be slightly cured.

I would say that it depends on how much money you have. If you have tens of thousands of dollars and gamble with just one dollars, then you are going to end up with something very low in the end, but you will still have money left, but if you have under 1k then it could be very quick for you to finish up all of that money, if it is under 100 dollars then you are going to end up with nothing in few hours.

So, how much you gamble should be based on how much you own. Plus all those "winners" when you see big wins do not show their whole betting history, they just show the big win, when you check the betting history almost no one has a profitable history if they gambled long enough.

[Strongkored]

-snip-
In Roobet's post we only see big multiplier wins, let's imagine how much he lost to get big profits?
Of course people will hide it and it can be more than a big multiplier or even more.
What is clear is that when we win with a multiplier the feeling of emotion will be slightly cured.

Maybe because showing a winning is more fun than showing how many losses suffered. You are right when playing and experience losing streak one big win even though it does not cover the amount losses experienced can give new spirit and will usually make players continue to play.