Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[kotajikikox]

Does Roobet just became regulated by a government very recently or they have been regulated by a government for a long time? I'm quite curious since they didn't require kyc before.

I don't think they have been regulated by the government for a long period. This was probably a recent change and they had to comply screwing over a major portion of gamblers who prefer to play anonymously without providing KYC.

Yes it might be recently and they need to comply. Its so sudden and no announcement is made before the changes, the reason why gamblers were asking further questions.

go through their TOS and you'll find that KYC was there even before you knew roobet, it's just that was not implemented from the beginning but it was there.

The thought that you cant play anonymously now is one of the cons of complying on their kyc, I still prefer the casino that gives me the right to play anonymously.

You can only count through fingers about the gambling sites that does not implement KYC , most of them are there but just waiting for your their chance to grab implementing .

However roobet is one of the reputed site I have ever use and not easy to let go.

Then that at least Good for the site and the company.

[1715438009]

1715438009

[1715438009]

1715438009

[1715438009]

1715438009

[ReiMomo]

You can only count through fingers about the gambling sites that does not implement KYC , most of them are there but just waiting for your their chance to grab implementing .

That's what exactly right and this was what I said before, that time to time using crypto either gambling or exchange will become regulated soon and the word (Anonymous) that have been tied up of crypto since then will slowly vanish soon.

Let's accept that KYC implementations nowadays are common and just prepare yourself to embrace this.

As far as there are casinos that didn't require this KYC implementation yet and there's an option to avoid it. You can choose which better as what you want. But remember that most regulated casinos are the trusted ones.

[Obito]

That's what exactly right and this was what I said before, that time to time using crypto either gambling or exchange will become regulated soon and the word (Anonymous) that have been tied up of crypto since then will slowly vanish soon.

Let's accept that KYC implementations nowadays are common and just prepare yourself to embrace this.

It's difficult to accept the KYC implementation for many because they find it difficult to move away from what they were used to, I mean as long as people are committing crime, I think that KYC is a good thing to have. It may sound counterintuitive but @ReiMomo is right, we have to move on and accept that we will come to this point.

[peter0425]

That's what exactly right and this was what I said before, that time to time using crypto either gambling or exchange will become regulated soon and the word (Anonymous) that have been tied up of crypto since then will slowly vanish soon.

+1 on that part mate, sooner or later all of aboput crypto will be regulated and none will be using that Anonymity thing so accept it now for your own safety or suffer when you become victim of scams.

Let's accept that KYC implementations nowadays are common and just prepare yourself to embrace this.

Yups, accepting this now will save us from being target and also will let us help the adoption of crypto worldwide.

As far as there are casinos that didn't require this KYC implementation yet and there's an option to avoid it. You can choose which better as what you want. But remember that most regulated casinos are the trusted ones.

best to get use of it , or suffer later.

[Haunebu]

go through their TOS and you'll find that KYC was there even before you knew roobet, it's just that was not implemented from the beginning but it was there.

Absolutely wrong. These KYC stipulations are present in the TOS in literally every cryptocurrency gambling site out there, but they only enforce them only when they find something shady related to the gambler or the withdrawal amount is huge.

Let's accept that KYC implementations nowadays are common and just prepare yourself to embrace this.

But remember that most regulated casinos are the trusted ones.

Nonsense. Why should be embrace KYC all of a sudden just because one popular crypto gambling site made it mandatory? Also, most unregulated casinos are the popular ones(Stake, Crypto-Games, PD, FJ, Bitcasino, Sportsbet etc). Get your facts right.

Yups, accepting this now will save us from being target and also will let us help the adoption of crypto worldwide.

Hilarious. You do realise that you are talking about centralizing crypto gambling sites, right?

[dezoel]

You can only count through fingers about the gambling sites that does not implement KYC , most of them are there but just waiting for your their chance to grab implementing .

That's what exactly right and this was what I said before, that time to time using crypto either gambling or exchange will become regulated soon and the word (Anonymous) that have been tied up of crypto since then will slowly vanish soon.

Let's accept that KYC implementations nowadays are common and just prepare yourself to embrace this.

As far as there are casinos that didn't require this KYC implementation yet and there's an option to avoid it. You can choose which better as what you want. But remember that most regulated casinos are the trusted ones.

That's true about the exchanges but it is not true about casinos at all. I mean sure there are places that ask KYC if something is wrong, but that's it, they are not asking KYC from the start like roobet and that is a big difference, you take a risk there if you want to or not. In those places I can put up $50 and if they ask me KYC then I can just ignore the money I have there and move on and nothing else, however if I end up requiring to give my KYC beforehand, then I can't just ignore it I have to either do it or not.

So that is a big difference, the amount of places that ask KYC even before you start versus places that do not ask KYC right at the start, sure there are tons that "may" ask later on, but at the start there are only few places that does this. This is the complaint, ask people KYC if there is anything suspicious but otherwise I would be against it.

[seleme]

<snip>

<snip>

This has to be understand by some gamblers because Roobet is being regulated by the government and stop comparing this to other site who are also regulated under their Curacao license, Roobet might be on a different situation right now, we all have to follow the law after all and if you feel unsafe with KYC, you still have the choice so don’t panic.

I get it now why they implemented a mandatory level 1 KYC to all Roobet accounts. Does Roobet just became regulated by a government very recently or they have been regulated by a government for a long time? I'm quite curious since they didn't require kyc before.

Like other alternatives increasing rewards for verified accounts and letting the rest do whatever they do will make both parties happy. Since the 1 KYC level is mandatory, it wouldn't be a pleasant experience for high rollers unless they are ready to sacrifice anonymity. For withdrawing the funds, I have to fill the KYC and I will play less on Roobet after these modifications.

P.S: Roobet team should give double bonuses or promotions for verified users since it is mandatory to pass KYC 1 for withdrawing funds. More problems will appear on the website if someone fails to comply with the stated rules, IMHO.

[Lanatsa]

<snip>

<snip>

This has to be understand by some gamblers because Roobet is being regulated by the government and stop comparing this to other site who are also regulated under their Curacao license, Roobet might be on a different situation right now, we all have to follow the law after all and if you feel unsafe with KYC, you still have the choice so don’t panic.

I get it now why they implemented a mandatory level 1 KYC to all Roobet accounts. Does Roobet just became regulated by a government very recently or they have been regulated by a government for a long time? I'm quite curious since they didn't require kyc before.

Like other alternatives increasing rewards for verified accounts and letting the rest do whatever they do will make both parties happy. Since the 1 KYC level is mandatory, it wouldn't be a pleasant experience for high rollers unless they are ready to sacrifice anonymity. For withdrawing the funds, I have to fill the KYC and I will play less on Roobet after these modifications.

This current changes will surely affect user base or number of players in the site who do really mind off with their privacy or anonymity but this sudden change would really generate different impressions
which isn't surprising.

Its up to someone though if they would decide to stay or would choose another gambling site to play.Its just a matter or choice and no one do forces you in.

[Vaskiy]

<snip>

<snip>

This has to be understand by some gamblers because Roobet is being regulated by the government and stop comparing this to other site who are also regulated under their Curacao license, Roobet might be on a different situation right now, we all have to follow the law after all and if you feel unsafe with KYC, you still have the choice so don’t panic.

I get it now why they implemented a mandatory level 1 KYC to all Roobet accounts. Does Roobet just became regulated by a government very recently or they have been regulated by a government for a long time? I'm quite curious since they didn't require kyc before.

Like other alternatives increasing rewards for verified accounts and letting the rest do whatever they do will make both parties happy. Since the 1 KYC level is mandatory, it wouldn't be a pleasant experience for high rollers unless they are ready to sacrifice anonymity. For withdrawing the funds, I have to fill the KYC and I will play less on Roobet after these modifications.

This current changes will surely affect user base or number of players in the site who do really mind off with their privacy or anonymity but this sudden change would really generate different impressions
which isn't surprising.

Its up to someone though if they would decide to stay or would choose another gambling site to play.Its just a matter or choice and no one do forces you in.

When there is lot of other gambling services with similar kind of games and bonuses providing anonymity, surely users will tend to move. However some gets more attached to the platform for different reasons, particularly some find this platform to be lucky and gives higher winning probability. In such cases, they'll stand on using it whereas the one preferring anonymity will find the alternate.

[2double0]

When there is lot of other gambling services with similar kind of games and bonuses providing anonymity, surely users will tend to move. However some gets more attached to the platform for different reasons, particularly some find this platform to be lucky and gives higher winning probability. In such cases, they'll stand on using it whereas the one preferring anonymity will find the alternate.

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

[tbterryboy]

When there is lot of other gambling services with similar kind of games and bonuses providing anonymity, surely users will tend to move. However some gets more attached to the platform for different reasons, particularly some find this platform to be lucky and gives higher winning probability. In such cases, they'll stand on using it whereas the one preferring anonymity will find the alternate.

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

When I go to a real life casino that means I am doing something knowing that I will be known, but I am not going there which means I am not giving any info. You have to realize there are tons of people who do not give their information to others and just gamble in secret. Hell I remember I gambled on Pokerstars, one of worlds biggest poker websites (probably biggest) and I didn't give any info. How?

There is a transfer of chips type of deal there, so I paid someone bitcoin back in the day when bitcoin was cheaper to send me chips there and in return I just created an account and got those chips there without giving any information, obviously I would be forced if I won big but it was small amount and I just wanted to have fun so I kept gambling until I run out of funds (unfortunately didn't take that long). So long story short not everyone goes somewhere and gives their info.

[Quidat]

When there is lot of other gambling services with similar kind of games and bonuses providing anonymity, surely users will tend to move. However some gets more attached to the platform for different reasons, particularly some find this platform to be lucky and gives higher winning probability. In such cases, they'll stand on using it whereas the one preferring anonymity will find the alternate.

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

When I go to a real life casino that means I am doing something knowing that I will be known, but I am not going there which means I am not giving any info. You have to realize there are tons of people who do not give their information to others and just gamble in secret. Hell I remember I gambled on Pokerstars, one of worlds biggest poker websites (probably biggest) and I didn't give any info. How?

There is a transfer of chips type of deal there, so I paid someone bitcoin back in the day when bitcoin was cheaper to send me chips there and in return I just created an account and got those chips there without giving any information, obviously I would be forced if I won big but it was small amount and I just wanted to have fun so I kept gambling until I run out of funds (unfortunately didn't take that long). So long story short not everyone goes somewhere and gives their info.

You can really find ways if you wanted too but there are instances on where you dont have any choice but to do go on whats been asked if you do decide to play or deal with it further.
Its true that there are people whom really that too keen when it comes on giving their information and tends to be private as they can and this is why such changes would really
affect other people or gamblers view on a particular site but well we can choose up whenever site that suits out our needs or interest.No one is been forcing you to stay though.

[UserU]

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

Because for physical establishments, there's a sense of security since their names are household compared to online counterparts that can simply go poof.

[semobo]

When there is lot of other gambling services with similar kind of games and bonuses providing anonymity, surely users will tend to move. However some gets more attached to the platform for different reasons, particularly some find this platform to be lucky and gives higher winning probability. In such cases, they'll stand on using it whereas the one preferring anonymity will find the alternate.

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

KYC in a real world casino? Probably to check the age factor while the thing is completely different in the online world. Your data can be breached and can be used for illicit purposes so if government tracks the person who scammed someone then you will be showing as the who did that,

Are you ready to face the legal penalty if there such things happen?

Not everyone can even afford for legal advice so they have to take the punishment and lead their remaining life in a prison?

[lienfaye]

Your data can be breached and can be used for illicit purposes so if government tracks the person who scammed someone then you will be showing as the who did that,

Thats the worst that can happen if our details get compromised. It seems casinos are slowly getting regulated which means we cant gamble anonymously.

Not everyone can even afford for legal advice so they have to take the punishment and lead their remaining life in a prison?

Unfortunately you're right, some people has no capability to defend themselves due to lack of money. Anyway this is only some of the possible cases that can happen but hopefully it wont.

[semobo]

Not everyone can even afford for legal advice so they have to take the punishment and lead their remaining life in a prison?

Unfortunately you're right, some people has no capability to defend themselves due to lack of money. Anyway this is only some of the possible cases that can happen but hopefully it wont.

But the actual reason for the identity theft is to use it for wrong things which are illegal as per the laws, gambling sites may not going to take any responsibility if this happens to us so its our decision whether we toom the KYC things in online as easy or serious as per our knowledge.

[Haunebu]

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

This is the 21st century where privacy matters a lot to many people around the world. Majority of the crypto investors invested in the crypto world primarily because of the anonymity factor. Providing KYC negates the anonymity factor.

Also, do you have any idea how smart some hackers are these days? They were able to hack huge exchanges like Binance etc which is why hacking Roobet is not entirely impossible.

If that ever happens in the future, all our KYC information could get leaked. This is the primary reason why I hate submitting KYC unless absolutely necessary in the crypto world.

[Taskford]

I don't quite understand the behavior every gambler has towards kyc because when they visit to a real world casino, they are revealing their identity themselves as they cannot gamble without going there. So if an online service asks them for kyc, what is so big an issue here about anonymity? If after completing kyc, they are going to continue to have their favorite games played on the same casino they are used to, then why not go for kyc? I know about data sales, but all gambling sites cannot be the same type.

This is the 21st century where privacy matters a lot to many people around the world. Majority of the crypto investors invested in the crypto world primarily because of the anonymity factor. Providing KYC negates the anonymity factor.

Also, do you have any idea how smart some hackers are these days? They were able to hack huge exchanges like Binance etc which is why hacking Roobet is not entirely impossible.

If that ever happens in the future, all our KYC information could get leaked. This is the primary reason why I hate submitting KYC unless absolutely necessary in the crypto world.

We can say before many people are into privacy since bitcoin is not yet known to be a good option since it is always link on illegal activities but now everything changes as bitcoin got a good exposure to the public and there are laws needed to comply so anonymity is not a big deal for now. It will be an issue if you are been ask to do so with small and untrusted platforms since we don't know on how they will keep our private identity, but if legit sites like Roobet ask it well lets not b worried since they are reputable and for sure they will not leak it, they also have a reputation to protect and they are trusted casino exist here.

[Haunebu]

but now everything changes as bitcoin got a good exposure to the public and there are laws needed to comply so anonymity is not a big deal for now. It will be an issue if you are been ask to do so with small and untrusted platforms since we don't know on how they will keep our private identity, but if legit sites like Roobet ask it well lets not b worried since they are reputable and for sure they will not leak it, they also have a reputation to protect and they are trusted casino exist here.

Absolutely wrong on so many levels. Majority of the cryptocurrency investors will always hate KYC no matter how popular BTC and other cryptocurrencies become due to the anonymity factor.

Don't you read the news? You clearly have no idea how scary some hackers are these days. They have hacked way bigger powerhouses when compared to Roobet.

[bitgolden]

KYC in a real world casino? Probably to check the age factor while the thing is completely different in the online world. Your data can be breached and can be used for illicit purposes so if government tracks the person who scammed someone then you will be showing as the who did that,

Are you ready to face the legal penalty if there such things happen?

Not everyone can even afford for legal advice so they have to take the punishment and lead their remaining life in a prison?

Can we just all agree that it was a bad move to do this without asking the gamblers first? I mean that legal advice thing alone itself is good enough, if I have money here I want to be in charge of my money here, if they take decision based on whatever they want, that is the peak point of any centralization, roobet basically made a decision about my money without asking me, how could that be acceptable.

I understand that they can keep growing, they could be a 2x bigger casino in a year even after this, it is all about marketing and if they are making a good amount of profit that means they will be capable of doing it all over again. However one thing is for sure, if people are not sure about if they want to give KYC or not, one thing they have to ask themselves is : "Would you mind if your government knew how much and where you gamble?", if you do not mind go ahead and play, if you do then stop.