Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[aysg76]

Actually most of parents already look at his kids activity everyday, but some of them don't really strict that always on the kids where ever they go, they just give their kids privacy since not all things should be controlled. If you say strict parenting is the proper way to teach your kids, I'd say it's wrong since you're just don't let your kids to be more creative and always listen to your words.

Until your children are minor you should have look on their activities and giving them privacy at these levels can turn into leverage making them addicted to gambling.They don't understand how to use the funds and playing in fun manner could turn into worse nightmare soon so they should be strict to them in these cases and try to avoid it any cost.

[lienfaye]

For the record, I have never submitted any form of identification to Roobet aside from the tier 1 identification which doesnt involve submitting anything aside from filling information on the site. Im not sure if this is going to affect me in any way because I havent try to withdraw yet

Thats weird. The verification is for level 2, and i dont think the level 1 kyc has expiration. Maybe this is an error since you said that you only comply on the needed information for level 1. Did you check your account verification level, what does it says? Anyway I dont think it will affect your account unless it is stated as compulsory. Ask the chat support for clarification.

[Juggy777]

For the record, I have never submitted any form of identification to Roobet aside from the tier 1 identification which doesnt involve submitting anything aside from filling information on the site. Im not sure if this is going to affect me in any way because I havent try to withdraw yet

Thats weird. The verification is for level 2, and i dont think the level 1 kyc has expiration. Maybe this is an error since you said that you only comply on the needed information for level 1. Did you check your account verification level, what does it says? Anyway I dont think it will affect your account unless it is stated as compulsory. Ask the chat support for clarification.

@aralimuss there’re two possibilities here according to their AML policy 1) this is a random check being done to ensure your details match with what you entered the first time, second possibility is that they have encountered a discrepancy or feel that something is not right either way you can fill it or you won’t be able to withdraw.  @lienfaye their AML policy clearly states that without submitting level one KYC one can’t withdraw, and that’s why I keep telling people to read about a casino kyc policy before you play there.

[aysg76]

@aralimuss there’re two possibilities here according to their AML policy 1) this is a random check being done to ensure your details match with what you entered the first time, second possibility is that they have encountered a discrepancy or feel that something is not right either way you can fill it or you won’t be able to withdraw.  @lienfaye their AML policy clearly states that without submitting level one KYC one can’t withdraw, and that’s why I keep telling people to read about a casino kyc policy before you play there.

Yeah the KYC topic was a debatable one on Roobet and we all are aware that you can't withdraw funds from Roobet without level one KYC but for me it's fine being a small gambler and yes their could be some issue due to warning on his account which he can check with support to enquire about.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I agree, people think that you need to show proof of your birth certificate or something to play, it is a simple verification that you pass and its fine. I guess it is the fear that one day yo ucould be asked and this could have some governmental backing that will put you in trouble that makes them stay away from the place. I am fine with it because for me it is not illegal, I mean it technically could be, but I am not playing with "real" money based on our laws, hence it is not technically gambling. Laws here see this place, same as playing those slot games on your phone with game tokens, hence I am not worried about KYC anymore, I disliked even hated the decision to ask it, but I got used to it.

there are many minors who are playing and for this reason they do not like KYC, there are many people who do not have their own home and who are still at their parents' house even though they are minors and for this reason there is no way to deliver proof of residence because the water, electricity and internet bill is not in their name, there are many people who are afraid to hand over their passport on a strange website. That's why KYC is a big headache for most people, especially when we know that many casinos have anonymous owners so it wouldn't be fair for an anonymous casino to ask their customers for KYC.

The good thing about asking for a birth certificate or proof of service is to make sure of that, that it is not children who are in front of the PC, lately the world has been in a very digital axis, children have more access to internet tools, perhaps the pandemic has brought you to this world, although this means that we are in a process of protecting children, it is something that we all must sometimes accept for the common good, in my personal opinion, I have seen many programs where they deceive children, they end up being extorted, raped and sometimes killed, I prefer to give a KYC if this helps to avoid all this type of events, if we see it from that point of view, I know that many could make the exception.

Proof of service or birth certificate still cannot ensure that the person sitting behind the PC and playing gambling is an adult. For instance, if parents want they can provide all this kyc stuff and then give their children access to their screen/PC to gamble. In this case, you can still not avoid minors from playing gambling.
The only way to stop them is to force them to turn on their camera while playing, but why casinos take this hassle when parents themselves allow kids to play gambling.

The camera thing would be a very good thing, although I don't know how much of an inconvenience it implies for the casino and for the players, but a type of facial security can be done every time the owner of the account does it every time he enters, no It would be wrong, that way it would prevent so many minors from having access.

Sometimes children get into these things without their parents noticing, now they are very intelligent and can pretend and make them think that they are doing something else or even playing a harmless game, when in fact they can be in an online casino playing, or in Dangerous games that are often drawn by sick people to harm them, there are many cases today.

@aralimuss there’re two possibilities here according to their AML policy 1) this is a random check being done to ensure your details match with what you entered the first time, second possibility is that they have encountered a discrepancy or feel that something is not right either way you can fill it or you won’t be able to withdraw.  @lienfaye their AML policy clearly states that without submitting level one KYC one can’t withdraw, and that’s why I keep telling people to read about a casino kyc policy before you play there.

Yeah the KYC topic was a debatable one on Roobet and we all are aware that you can't withdraw funds from Roobet without level one KYC but for me it's fine being a small gambler and yes their could be some issue due to warning on his account which he can check with support to enquire about.

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

[lienfaye]

For the record, I have never submitted any form of identification to Roobet aside from the tier 1 identification which doesnt involve submitting anything aside from filling information on the site. Im not sure if this is going to affect me in any way because I havent try to withdraw yet

Thats weird. The verification is for level 2, and i dont think the level 1 kyc has expiration. Maybe this is an error since you said that you only comply on the needed information for level 1. Did you check your account verification level, what does it says? Anyway I dont think it will affect your account unless it is stated as compulsory. Ask the chat support for clarification.

@aralimuss there’re two possibilities here according to their AML policy 1) this is a random check being done to ensure your details match with what you entered the first time, second possibility is that they have encountered a discrepancy or feel that something is not right either way you can fill it or you won’t be able to withdraw.  @lienfaye their AML policy clearly states that without submitting level one KYC one can’t withdraw, and that’s why I keep telling people to read about a casino kyc policy before you play there.

Yes I know that. I already comply for level 1 kyc a year ago and I believe it has no expiration. The question of arallmuus is the identity verification which is level 2. His question is why he received the notification of expired verification since he didnt apply for identity verification aside from the level 1 kyc.

Moreover even you didnt comply for level 2 you can still play and withdraw without problem, this is based on my experience.

[Betwrong]

While you guys are currently discussing KYC issue (again) for no apparent reason

Does anyone get this notification in their Roobet account?



For the record, I have never submitted any form of identification to Roobet aside from the tier 1 identification which doesnt involve submitting anything aside from filling information on the site. Im not sure if this is going to affect me in any way because I havent try to withdraw yet

I too received such notification several days ago. I don't know what it means, and I just ignored it for the moment. I mean, my Level 1 verification, has not expired, right? It's saying "Completed" here



So should I resubmit my Level 1 verification, or should I do Level 2 now?


Any of you, guys, played this by Booming Games, Blockchain Megaways?



Idk, it looks simple, and normally I don't like playing such slots, but it's the music on the background is what makes it so addictive to me.

[aysg76]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

[Apocollapse]

So should I resubmit my Level 1 verification, or should I do Level 2 now?

Honestly if there's no limitation or restriction on your account, there's no need to resubmit your level 1 KYC or complete the level 2 KYC lol.

Any of you, guys, played this by Booming Games, Blockchain Megaways?



Idk, it looks simple, and normally I don't like playing such slots, but it's the music on the background is what makes it so addictive to me.

It's one of my favorite, but my luck isn't that good in this game.
Boom City and The Rave are currently my favorites games, Roobet team aren't bad to choose a potential/less known games in their top selections. Because most of slots addicts are only playing on Sweet bonanza, The Gate of Olympus and DeadWood.

[suzanne5223]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

I have once said before I believe last month that KYC shouldn't be a problem for gamblers if the casino is trustworthy and they still doing its best to keep the record intact which I believe is a sign of the casino's devotion to its users but I guess some people will still make a big deal while they can easily do it on centralized exchange whereas most of them lack good security and devotion this day.

[OcTradism]

I have once said before I believe last month that KYC shouldn't be a problem for gamblers if the casino is trustworthy and they still doing its best to keep the record intact which I believe is a sign of the casino's devotion to its users but I guess some people will still make a big deal while they can easily do it on centralized exchange whereas most of them lack good security and devotion this day.

KYC or not, like it or not, accept it or not, you decide.

Roobet does not decide it for you. If you like the casino and believe in their reputation, love their games, trust their payout systems, security and privacy protection for users, you would not have much issue with KYC.

I don't think any crypto enthusiast will stop using Binance only because they require KYC, mandatory to start trading, on all users. In comparison, Roobet in gambling industry, has good reputation similar to Binance reputation in exchange industry.

[coinerer]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

I have once said before I believe last month that KYC shouldn't be a problem for gamblers if the casino is trustworthy and they still doing its best to keep the record intact which I believe is a sign of the casino's devotion to its users but I guess some people will still make a big deal while they can easily do it on centralized exchange whereas most of them lack good security and devotion this day.

It is true, If it is a trusted gambling site then kyc is not a big problem there. But if KYC is done on a scam gambling site.  Those documents may be sold on the black market. So customers must kyc carefully.  And before doing KYC know about that site as well. I believe Roobet is a trusted  casino site so i haven’t any excuse for done kyc here

[stomachgrowls]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

I have once said before I believe last month that KYC shouldn't be a problem for gamblers if the casino is trustworthy and they still doing its best to keep the record intact which I believe is a sign of the casino's devotion to its users but I guess some people will still make a big deal while they can easily do it on centralized exchange whereas most of them lack good security and devotion this day.

It is true, If it is a trusted gambling site then kyc is not a big problem there. But if KYC is done on a scam gambling site.  Those documents may be sold on the black market. So customers must kyc carefully.  And before doing KYC know about that site as well. I believe Roobet is a trusted  casino site so i haven’t any excuse for done kyc here

Roobet had been here on this market for a couple of years already and we've known on how they had made out their name established into this market which means that when it comes to trust then i dont

really have any doubts with Roobet which i could say that informations are on the good hands but we shouldnt really remove into our minds about the probabilities of hacking incident or
simply some internal transactions which havent been known.
This is why no matter how reputable the site is then i do always have those kind of doubts which cant really be avoided in some point.

[FanEagle]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

That is the difference, people who do not want to do it at all could play somewhere else, but people who are fine with it, also could play somewhere else too, there is nothing stopping them. You gave Stake as example, so if you are a person who do not want to share their KYC then you will use them, but if you are fine with giving it... then you can still use Stake, I doubt anyone who feels fine about giving it, would mind not giving it neither.

So all in all, roobet is limiting themselves on people who are fine with it and also like their website all at the same time. This is still allowing them to make a good chunk of money as we have seen, just not as much as they possibly could.

[LUCKMCFLY]

I agree, having minors is something you have to accept when you are building an online business, no matter what kind of business it is, minors will always have a way to get in. I remember myself at 18 and under and I was going around in darknet let alone lie about my age, and I have seen things there I will never forget and never got in there ever again in my life, and never will again. ToR browser is done for me, and will never install it on my computer in my entire life. Some things scar you for life, gambling is not one of them. If you are a kid, you shouldn't gamble, but Roobet can't stop them even if they tried, impossible, even with KYC.

They can’t stop them but at least prevented those who are trying to cheat on the site, Roobet might not be able to catch all those minors, with this KYC they can at least lessen them. Well, there’s a lot of minors already exposed to gambling, its really bad that the site forces KYC just to help those minors getting away from gambling. KYC with Roobet has been running for years already, I believe we cannot change this anymore.

The darknet can turn out to be very disturbing if you enter pages that are of that style, that depends on the experience that the person has or what they want to search for, usually on the darknet you get information that you can't normally get on google or on the stage or channel that we normally navigate, but a person must be very careful, however, this is as you say, no player under 18 years of age should enter Rootbet or any other type of online casino, but this is very difficult to control, such and as they had stated before, one of the ways is to be able to make a login record with facial recognition.

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

That is the difference, people who do not want to do it at all could play somewhere else, but people who are fine with it, also could play somewhere else too, there is nothing stopping them. You gave Stake as example, so if you are a person who do not want to share their KYC then you will use them, but if you are fine with giving it... then you can still use Stake, I doubt anyone who feels fine about giving it, would mind not giving it neither.

So all in all, roobet is limiting themselves on people who are fine with it and also like their website all at the same time. This is still allowing them to make a good chunk of money as we have seen, just not as much as they possibly could.

Yes, I understand your point, for some time now I have been reading and watching some videos, and everything is focused on the fact that in the near future we will have very little privacy and anonymity may be coming to an end, I do not know if when we reach full adoption crypto is everything and what you want is to achieve the highest degree of privacy, and for that you have to pay a lot, I think that the casinos will have different positions and the policies can change to be more flexible, the case of roobet and other casinos It may be that they make changes, it is what I imagine can happen and that will be in the near future.

[Hamphser]

Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.

Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.

That is the difference, people who do not want to do it at all could play somewhere else, but people who are fine with it, also could play somewhere else too, there is nothing stopping them. You gave Stake as example, so if you are a person who do not want to share their KYC then you will use them, but if you are fine with giving it... then you can still use Stake, I doubt anyone who feels fine about giving it, would mind not giving it neither.

So all in all, roobet is limiting themselves on people who are fine with it and also like their website all at the same time. This is still allowing them to make a good chunk of money as we have seen, just not as much as they possibly could.

Not all would be sharing up on the same idea and same decisions towards things whether they do really mind much about their identity or wouldnt really care at all.Cant really blame out some people who are really that mindful or too sensitive when it comes to their information which if they ever encounter some site that do ask out verification then its up on someones choice whether they would comply and ignore the risk
or would simply find another place in the market which doesnt really ask out  for any verification.Some people wont mind on sharing up their information but the risk and probabilities for those info to be
sold on black markets but if you dont really care and you know the risk then its your choice.

[lionheart78]

So all in all, roobet is limiting themselves on people who are fine with it and also like their website all at the same time. This is still allowing them to make a good chunk of money as we have seen, just not as much as they possibly could.

I think Roobet is more leaning to follow authorities rules with implementing KYC than getting more profit from Non-KYC lover.  They don't want any headaches in the future so they rather implement it early on and besides those who trust Roobet will have no problem with KYC implementation.  They maybe missing out on those kind of gambler(non-kyc lover) but it is better to be safe from any future problems.

[babygun]

I think Roobet is more leaning to follow authorities rules with implementing KYC than getting more profit from Non-KYC lover.  They don't want any headaches in the future so they rather implement it early on and besides those who trust Roobet will have no problem with KYC implementation.  They maybe missing out on those kind of gambler(non-kyc lover) but it is better to be safe from any future problems.

Roobet was one of the earliest big crypto casinos to implement KYC and after that a lot of casinos have followed their way. It is a bit of a pity as the whole goal of crypto casinos was to gamble anonymous compared to fiat bookies while full KYC is always required.

[goaldigger]

I think Roobet is more leaning to follow authorities rules with implementing KYC than getting more profit from Non-KYC lover.  They don't want any headaches in the future so they rather implement it early on and besides those who trust Roobet will have no problem with KYC implementation.  They maybe missing out on those kind of gambler(non-kyc lover) but it is better to be safe from any future problems.

Roobet was one of the earliest big crypto casinos to implement KYC and after that a lot of casinos have followed their way. It is a bit of a pity as the whole goal of crypto casinos was to gamble anonymous compared to fiat bookies while full KYC is always required.

Maybe we can’t totally skip the regulations and that’s why most of the gambling site today slowly implementing the KYC, though it kills the purpose of being anonymous but we have no other choice but to follow or else you’re still with the site that didn’t require any KYC. Time will come, we will see of other countries will continue to regulate cryptocurrency, if this things happen most probably KYC sill become a major problem of many gamblers.

[stomachgrowls]

I think Roobet is more leaning to follow authorities rules with implementing KYC than getting more profit from Non-KYC lover.  They don't want any headaches in the future so they rather implement it early on and besides those who trust Roobet will have no problem with KYC implementation.  They maybe missing out on those kind of gambler(non-kyc lover) but it is better to be safe from any future problems.

Roobet was one of the earliest big crypto casinos to implement KYC and after that a lot of casinos have followed their way. It is a bit of a pity as the whole goal of crypto casinos was to gamble anonymous compared to fiat bookies while full KYC is always required.

Maybe we can’t totally skip the regulations and that’s why most of the gambling site today slowly implementing the KYC, though it kills the purpose of being anonymous but we have no other choice but to follow or else you’re still with the site that didn’t require any KYC. Time will come, we will see of other countries will continue to regulate cryptocurrency, if this things happen most probably KYC sill become a major problem of many gamblers.

We know that gambling platforms which most of them are regulated which does simply means that they are abiding government rules which it would really be understandable that they are really following on

whats been mandated or been asked out and if they do tend to oppose then they do know on what would happen into their business.Whether they do like it or not they dont really have any choice but to
deal with it because its of the sake of the business.It might affect player numbers but as long they could still get revenue then they would really be doing it.

The good thing on this market is that you could really see lots of options which you could choose from if you do see the other one who doesnt have any verification.