Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[noormcs5]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

I think feature like 2fa should not be made mandatory and should be keep as an optional. Those who want to implement they can have this option while others who are happy with additional security, let them how they want to control the account.

There are gamblers who have very less funds on the gambling sites and others who may not want the hassle of 2fa, let them how they want to operate their account.

[l3pox]

on a slightly different and updated world view, I'm reading "the network state" by Balajis now, really interesting one as well

I checked out 'The Network State by Balaji Srinivasan' which seemed quite interesting as you mentioned. Didn't expect him to talk about topics like the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war along with crypto related stuff.

Let’s just hope that security for Gambling site are more different, there might be no assurance for this though. The government will always have a choice to regulate everything in crypto, and that can include gambling regulations might be more riskier in the future.

Personally, I would never depend on crypto sites to safeguard my assets which is why I tend to store my funds(Big amounts) in reliable wallets like Trezor, Exodus etc.

Enabling 2FA in regularly visited crypto sites also helps boost security.

yes, the network state was released not long ago
really enjoying the book it has many interesting points of view on how the cards will play out in the future


regarding 2FA, the biggest challenge to implement it in some websites is that it's not descentralized
(that's why we don't have it here in the forum yet, btw)

do you know you can use some hardware wallets as 2FA? it works with Trezor if I'm not wrong

[Stalker22]

~
Even if the site is secured, your data might not be safe outside this site especially if its regulated and the site submitted or all data to the regulator. The best way to protect your assets is to put it on your personally wallet, I'm always withdraw my money and never store any funds to any gambling site, I find this more safe and is a must. Choosing the best site can also lessen your worry, with this Roobet is one of the good choice based on my experience.

I completely agree with you. Personally, I would not want to rely on various sites to secure my assets, which is why I prefer to store my funds (especially large amounts) in reliable non-custodial wallets. It is always important to prioritize the safety and security of your assets. This is why I recommend having at least two different types of wallets: one for long-term storage (cold) and one for everyday transactions (online).

As for the security of our sensitive data, Roobet is a good choice for this. They have a solid reputation that makes them a reliable and trustworthy option. Of course, it is always important to do your own research and evaluate the options available to you before making a decision.

[jrrsparkles]

Let’s just hope that security for Gambling site are more different, there might be no assurance for this though. The government will always have a choice to regulate everything in crypto, and that can include gambling regulations might be more riskier in the future.

Personally, I would never depend on crypto sites to safeguard my assets which is why I tend to store my funds(Big amounts) in reliable wallets like Trezor, Exodus etc.

Enabling 2FA in regularly visited crypto sites also helps boost security.

Even if the site is secured, your data might not be safe outside this site especially if its regulated and the site submitted or all data to the regulator. The best way to protect your assets is to put it on your personally wallet, I'm always withdraw my money and never store any funds to any gambling site, I find this more safe and is a must. Choosing the best site can also lessen your worry, with this Roobet is one of the good choice based on my experience.

If you are a gambler, you cannot put all your money in your personal wallets. If all your money is stored in personal wallets, then how will you gamble?
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Almost every casino offers instant deposit feature so even with one confirmation the balance will show up then why someone has to keep their funds in casino simply because they can't gamble when they wanted, all I am saying is 10 to 20 mins enough for your money to arrive.

2FA is not a bad choice but it is not ultimate security either, personally I had lot of issues with the exchange's 2FA security feature due to many reasons so if something is going to be implemented then it shouldn't have any flaws so users won't be annoyed.

[goaldigger]

~
Even if the site is secured, your data might not be safe outside this site especially if its regulated and the site submitted or all data to the regulator. The best way to protect your assets is to put it on your personally wallet, I'm always withdraw my money and never store any funds to any gambling site, I find this more safe and is a must. Choosing the best site can also lessen your worry, with this Roobet is one of the good choice based on my experience.

I completely agree with you. Personally, I would not want to rely on various sites to secure my assets, which is why I prefer to store my funds (especially large amounts) in reliable non-custodial wallets. It is always important to prioritize the safety and security of your assets. This is why I recommend having at least two different types of wallets: one for long-term storage (cold) and one for everyday transactions (online).

Daily gambler will not hesitate to store their funds on a gambling site as they transact from time to time, but of course to be more secured better to transfer your funds on your personal wallet where you can have control so you can lessen the risk of losing everything. Maybe if you are an active gambler, try to withdraw 50% of your funds on the site you are playing and just redeposit it if you still need more funds. So far, there’s no issue yet with Roobet for a missing funds.

[barbara44]

I'm not really sure that Roobet does a lot of promotions like this where Roobet sends special offers to each user's e-mail, because if there were many there would definitely be many forum members here who would share their experiences in this thread regarding the offer, or whether Roobet is no longer choice of places for a forum member to play there? although I believe not because Roobet is one of the casinos that is quite trusted on this forum and is one of the choices to play, so in my opinion not all Roobet users get this offer and maybe players get this offer to get them back to actively playing on this gambling site

There are a lot of promotions from roobet, is it all like this? Probably not, this one is a bit rare, but there are definitely a lot of promotions from roobet, that's what was discussed I think. It is definitely trusted, and there is no way that anyone would think that roobet would scam them neither so there is a big trust going on but the community of it is smaller than some of the other places.

First of all, people prefer sports betting over anything else these days, and I have absolutely no idea why but that's the reality, and I think there is a good possibility roobet could grow a lot more with that method if they want to, because right now they are trusted a lot by a smaller amount of people.

[Haunebu]

Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

You are missing the point. Hackers attack all kinds of sites(Legit and scam) all the time which is why storing large amounts of funds in any crypto site isn't advisable at all which is why I suggested storing them in wallets etc.

regarding 2FA, the biggest challenge to implement it in some websites is that it's not descentralized
(that's why we don't have it here in the forum yet, btw)

do you know you can use some hardware wallets as 2FA? it works with Trezor if I'm not wrong

Agreed. I don't use my hardware wallet as 2FA, but I know that it's possible with Trezor and U2F.

[Eureka_07]

<snip>

As far as I know, if the casino has 2fa feature, most of the time it is optional when it comes to logging in. On the other hand, though I had experienced some which has 2FA in withdrawal transactions, for some, it is not mandatory. But for me this one should be always mandatory since this is a withdrawal. On top of if, I think casino can make it mandatory but probably they had chosen to be on the "user preference" side, so they did not.

[lienfaye]

<snip>

As far as I know, if the casino has 2fa feature, most of the time it is optional when it comes to logging in. On the other hand, though I had experienced some which has 2FA in withdrawal transactions, for some, it is not mandatory. But for me this one should be always mandatory since this is a withdrawal. On top of if, I think casino can make it mandatory but probably they had chosen to be on the "user preference" side, so they did not.

In Roobet this is optional, you can still use their casino even 2fa is disable. However, once you need to withdraw your funds, you need to enable the 2fa because it is mandatory for withdrawal transaction. Well, 2fa is a good layer of security, but I opted not to use this in the casinos where I play unless necessary. Because I don't leave funds in my account so I do not worry. But of course it is advisable for our own protection.

[Bushdark]

Let’s just hope that security for Gambling site are more different, there might be no assurance for this though. The government will always have a choice to regulate everything in crypto, and that can include gambling regulations might be more riskier in the future.

Personally, I would never depend on crypto sites to safeguard my assets which is why I tend to store my funds(Big amounts) in reliable wallets like Trezor, Exodus etc.

Enabling 2FA in regularly visited crypto sites also helps boost security.

Even if the site is secured, your data might not be safe outside this site especially if its regulated and the site submitted or all data to the regulator. The best way to protect your assets is to put it on your personally wallet, I'm always withdraw my money and never store any funds to any gambling site, I find this more safe and is a must. Choosing the best site can also lessen your worry, with this Roobet is one of the good choice based on my experience.

To me no site is safe even though the team has enough tools in place to make sure that things does not go out out hands. We have heard about so many sites that had been probe to hack which was not due to there weak securities but the smartness 9f the hackers getting I formation from insiders to achieve their plans.

Many of these sites has 2FA verification that is used to ensure funds are withdrawn by the rightful owners.
That is one of the reasons why many gambling sites requires little KYC verification to help users get more safety when the need arises.
Roobet is my favorite casino for since the team are very reliable and generous.

[so98nn]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

I think feature like 2fa should not be made mandatory and should be keep as an optional. Those who want to implement they can have this option while others who are happy with additional security, let them how they want to control the account.

There are gamblers who have very less funds on the gambling sites and others who may not want the hassle of 2fa, let them how they want to operate their account.

Perhaps having a feature like that should be mandatory considering the fact that we are getting brut forced many times. Look at the 2022, so many attacks on highly secured exchangers, yet they failed to overcome the hackers and gave away the money and personal data just like that. Whether it is hospital in Romania or India, OR its a gambling site, we should have the additional security measures up and running all the time.

In fact for small gamblers it should be mandatory because we already have less funds and they would be viable for stealing without security. Could be oouch movement for us to see them go.

[FanEagle]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

It shouldn't be preference because if you let people have some sort of preference on it, then there will be thousands of people who would not use it, and if you get the database hacked, so if mails and passwords are hacked, which it could be, then you are going to end up with a ton of problems. This is why it's not acceptable to end up with it as preference. 2FA should be a forced thing, no account if you do not have 2FA, no gambling, no nothing.

This way it would be lot better to handle it and the chance to get hacked would drop down to very low amounts. It's much better to do it that way. This is my understanding though, maybe I am wrong about the risks of it, and it's not that risky.

[Strongkored]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

It shouldn't be preference because if you let people have some sort of preference on it, then there will be thousands of people who would not use it, and if you get the database hacked, so if mails and passwords are hacked, which it could be, then you are going to end up with a ton of problems. This is why it's not acceptable to end up with it as preference. 2FA should be a forced thing, no account if you do not have 2FA, no gambling, no nothing.

This way it would be lot better to handle it and the chance to get hacked would drop down to very low amounts. It's much better to do it that way. This is my understanding though, maybe I am wrong about the risks of it, and it's not that risky.

For accounts in casinos how many of us hold funds there? for occasionally players like me it will be very small or never even let my funds there, will only make a deposit when playing and withdraw it if we can get a profit or the funds in our account run out because of a loss so for me 2FA is not something that must always be done at all my casino account, so far I have only used it in one casino account because I do have investment funds there, the rest even ignore offers from the casino if you add 2FA you will get FS.
and Roobet before the update some time ago will provide a verification number via email if you want to log in to the account it seems enough for me but now it's no longer needed in Roobet but I prefer this method instead of adding 2FA.

[klidex]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

I think feature like 2fa should not be made mandatory and should be keep as an optional. Those who want to implement they can have this option while others who are happy with additional security, let them how they want to control the account.

There are gamblers who have very less funds on the gambling sites and others who may not want the hassle of 2fa, let them how they want to operate their account.

Perhaps having a feature like that should be mandatory considering the fact that we are getting brut forced many times. Look at the 2022, so many attacks on highly secured exchangers, yet they failed to overcome the hackers and gave away the money and personal data just like that. Whether it is hospital in Romania or India, OR its a gambling site, we should have the additional security measures up and running all the time.

In fact for small gamblers it should be mandatory because we already have less funds and they would be viable for stealing without security. Could be oouch movement for us to see them go.

Yes indeed for gamblers who have more funds will carry out additional security and maybe features like that can be more helpful.
However, things like excessive additional security will not even be thought of by gamblers who are classified as having fewer funds.
I'm sure they prefer to operate the account by themselves without having to think about security and risks that can be accepted at any time.
Maybe this happened because they thought that their funds were few and impossible for someone to hack.

[vv181]

~

~I'm sure they prefer to operate the account by themselves without having to think about security and risks that can be accepted at any time.
Maybe this happened because they thought that their funds were few and impossible for someone to hack.

A security measure in any platform should be taken into measure considerably. Nevertheless, a platform like a gambling site should not make a 2-factor authentication setting being enforced as mandatory.

A unique complex strong password is enough for those gamblers, it won't be possible for a hacker to aggressively brute force any account since another layer of security measures will prevent such a scenario from happening. This is one of the reasons why many digital security recommendations are suggesting using a strong and unique password on every site.

[hd49728]

A unique complex strong password is enough for those gamblers, it won't be possible for a hacker to aggressively brute force any account since another layer of security measures will prevent such a scenario from happening. This is one of the reasons why many digital security recommendations are suggesting using a strong and unique password on every site.

Use unique, strong passwords are good because if they are weak, they can be bruteforced but don't store your passwords in email, any account, on any server.
Are your passwords in the green?

LastPass has data breach and other password manager softwares can have data breaches too.

https://twitter.com/LastPass/status/1598047380305104896

We recently detected unusual activity within a third-party cloud storage service, which is currently shared by both LastPass and its affiliate GoTo. Customer passwords remain safely encrypted due to LastPass’s Zero Knowledge architecture. More info: http://bit.ly/3gLH2i0

More info, Notice of recent security incident

[redsun114]

A unique complex strong password is enough for those gamblers, it won't be possible for a hacker to aggressively brute force any account since another layer of security measures will prevent such a scenario from happening. This is one of the reasons why many digital security recommendations are suggesting using a strong and unique password on every site.

Use unique, strong passwords are good because if they are weak, they can be bruteforced but don't store your passwords in email, any account, on any server.
Are your passwords in the green?

LastPass has data breach and other password manager softwares can have data breaches too.

Constantly changing them is a better method. It would allow your passwords to be never known because even if it ever gets hacked, like lets say lastpassword, then you would not be really using the same one anyway. My mail was exposed years ago, so people try to achieve something while using my mail, like try to convince me to click links and such.

But, obviously I don't fall for it and change ALL my passwords every 6 months. This allows me to not get hacked, and I fear that hackers are aware that I am dirt poor lol. So they don't even try to, imagine spending 150 hours bruteforce hacking into an account and it has 22$ in it, lol. Who would want to do that, am I right? .

[aysg76]

Use unique, strong passwords are good because if they are weak, they can be bruteforced but don't store your passwords in email, any account, on any server.
Are your passwords in the green?

LastPass has data breach and other password manager softwares can have data breaches too.

https://twitter.com/LastPass/status/1598047380305104896

We recently detected unusual activity within a third-party cloud storage service, which is currently shared by both LastPass and its affiliate GoTo. Customer passwords remain safely encrypted due to LastPass’s Zero Knowledge architecture. More info: http://bit.ly/3gLH2i0

More info, Notice of recent security incident

Yeah the password manager data breach was there which automatically have resulted in leak of data and personal information of the users so you should be very careful in them also following the security measures.The password should be combination of words, letters, numbers and character we all know but it should be kept safely without any carelessness because if someone else got your access your fund will be gone.We should be responsible in these matters and if you are having password manager goes with trusted one only.

[goldkingcoiner]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

I think feature like 2fa should not be made mandatory and should be keep as an optional. Those who want to implement they can have this option while others who are happy with additional security, let them how they want to control the account.

There are gamblers who have very less funds on the gambling sites and others who may not want the hassle of 2fa, let them how they want to operate their account.

Perhaps having a feature like that should be mandatory considering the fact that we are getting brut forced many times. Look at the 2022, so many attacks on highly secured exchangers, yet they failed to overcome the hackers and gave away the money and personal data just like that. Whether it is hospital in Romania or India, OR its a gambling site, we should have the additional security measures up and running all the time.

In fact for small gamblers it should be mandatory because we already have less funds and they would be viable for stealing without security. Could be oouch movement for us to see them go.

I think it should be mandatory for everyone who wants to gamble. Everytime you give people a choice whether or not they wish to implement and use a security feature, most people would rather choose the more comfortable and convenient way to gamble. Without additional security steps.

And when their lack of security eventually becomes a problem and they find out that they have lost a lot of money to some hacker, they suddenly become all uppity and start blaming the casino for not forcing protection on them or not protecting them enough.

Which of course is complete BS.

[Slow death]

<snip>
Since most of the trusted gambling sites are centralized like Roobet, we need to deposit some money on the gambling site and therefore it is always better to have additional layer for security like 2fa.

Security feature like 2fa is always very useful for accounts that are related to money and sensitive information. Thus, a site like Roobet (a casino fits that).
However, 2fa is most of the time a preference. It will be depending on the user if he/she wants to maximize the account security that Roobet is offering. Personally, I would like to have that on transactions like withdrawals.

I think feature like 2fa should not be made mandatory and should be keep as an optional. Those who want to implement they can have this option while others who are happy with additional security, let them how they want to control the account.

There are gamblers who have very less funds on the gambling sites and others who may not want the hassle of 2fa, let them how they want to operate their account.

I agree with you, casinos and exchanges should take into account that there are times when people don't have smart phones, I know that even some people may find what I'm talking about funny but it's true, there are times when people don't have smart phones headphones so that there is no way to install an authenticator app, so that at least all casinos put an authenticator by sms, that would be more advantageous for everyone, at least for me it would be very comfortable

and I think that casinos should also review this KYC issue by putting something like the person sending residence declaration documents, ID and phone number and not asking for more things as a source of income, because it doesn't even make sense that a person deposits 1000$ and win and keep 3000$ and the casino asks you for a source of income knowing that that person won the money at the casino