Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[SmartCharpa]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Pochettino is a coach who can be categorized as a classier coach compared to many other current Premier League team coaches. It's a shame that Chelsea fired him just because he failed in the first season, it seems like they don't appreciate his work in one season. I think Chelsea will be just as bad if this habit continues, they won't be as successful as before.

Every time a coach changes there will definitely be a change in game plan. Pochettino and other coaches will never have the same style of play and strategic decisions. This will make the players adapt again to a new style of play, different portions of training, and even have to adapt to several new players that the coach has brought into the team. It's unreasonable to expect a season of great success instantly, it's very difficult when the team is really bad.

Chelsea has appointed the 5th coach in a space of two seasons, Chelsea does not trust any coaches they have appointed for the two seasons because they believe it is possible to have a successful season with their current squad, the management has not been patient with the four coaches they fired in between two seasons, no one has been there for two seasons, in their first season without winning any trophy they got fired. I was surprised to see that Pochettino was been sacked either because I don't consider him as a failed manager to Chelsea, since Tuchel left the club he's been the first manager to build the players and secure their chances to play in the next Conference League.

Pochettino has come so far with these players, they have already adapted to each other, the management thinks because Enzo Maresca became successful at Leicester City this season, they think he can manage Chelsea next season. The new coach has to adapt to the players for his first season to have a better year otherwise the management might sack him too if he didn't have a great season as they wanted.

I agree with you, Chelsea might continue to have a bad season if they don't trust any of their coach for like two seasons, I believe if Ten Hags was Chelsea's manager, he could have been sacked since last season, we cannot even remember his existence at the club because they do not have a patient like Manchester United.

[Ayers]

It's a shame that Chelsea fired him just because he failed in the first season, it seems like they don't appreciate his work in one season. I think Chelsea will be just as bad if this habit continues, they won't be as successful as before.

I felt bad when I heard Pochettino had been sacked, I never expected such a thing from Chelsea. I don’t really think Chelsea will be able to achieve anything if they keep on sacking their coach every season. At least they should give a coach more time to understand the club and arrange a perfect squad.

Actually, for this matter, I read that Pochettino himself resigned and it was not a dismissal, so in this case we cannot equate dismissal and resignation because after all they are 2 different things.
So in this case we cannot seem to blame Chelsea for everything that is happening to Poche and Chelsea at the moment because Chelsea also does not have the option to maintain the coaching position that Poche previously had this season.

Now all that has to be done is to see what next steps Chelsea will take because forcing their will on Poche is also not possible now because when Poche decides to resign then indirectly they have to look for a new replacement coach and it is worth seeing what Todd will do. do it this season because of the possibility that a change could occur with the new coach now.

We know that Pochettino was not fired by the Chelsea management. Pochettino voluntarily re-signed. However, Pochettino re-signed because his relationship with Chelsea management is not good. And since Chelsea's change of ownership, no coach has had a good relationship with Chelsea management. And that's why we hold Chelsea management responsible for Chelsea's decline.

Chelsea will now look for a new coach. It will not be easy for the new coach to stabilize the team. It needs time. So it seems very unlikely that we will see Chelsea in the top 4 of the table next season as well.

[barisbilgili]

We know that Pochettino was not fired by the Chelsea management. Pochettino voluntarily re-signed. However, Pochettino re-signed because his relationship with Chelsea management is not good. And since Chelsea's change of ownership, no coach has had a good relationship with Chelsea management. And that's why we hold Chelsea management responsible for Chelsea's decline.

Chelsea will now look for a new coach. It will not be easy for the new coach to stabilize the team. It needs time. So it seems very unlikely that we will see Chelsea in the top 4 of the table next season as well.

There is no one to blame apart from Chelsea management, they are indeed responsible for Chelsea's current downfall due to their inability to manage the team.
I think Pochettino's departure is a repeat mistake made by Chelsea management after the previous season they also did the same thing with Tauchel, they changed coaches as if they wanted instant progress.

It is reported that Enzo Maresca will become Chelsea coach next season and I also don't think there will be any significant progress no matter who the coach is because building a team requires a process and time while Chelsea management does not appreciate the process that has been carried out by several previous coaches including Pochettino.

[makishart]

We know that Pochettino was not fired by the Chelsea management. Pochettino voluntarily re-signed. However, Pochettino re-signed because his relationship with Chelsea management is not good. And since Chelsea's change of ownership, no coach has had a good relationship with Chelsea management. And that's why we hold Chelsea management responsible for Chelsea's decline.

Chelsea will now look for a new coach. It will not be easy for the new coach to stabilize the team. It needs time. So it seems very unlikely that we will see Chelsea in the top 4 of the table next season as well.

It's difficult to to predict it it caused by chelsea is always changing it. Some changes are absolutely required by the new coach in order to fulfill his expectation but im doubting chelsea will allow him to buy the new player. Chelsea was also unfamiliar with Maresca's gameplay but I knew she was frequently building from the bottom similar to Zerbi, I remember when leicester city of maresca lost against chelsea in the FA cup. This also forces the club to outperform itself this season in order to qualify for the UCL the next season. Leicester city was not even better than chelsea. Picking him as a new appointment is a ver risky decision at this moment.

I don't have high expectations at the moment for chelsea under marsca. Maresca has had a significant impact as a new Premier League coach and he considerably as amateur coach. This is also his debut in the Premier League as a new coach and im doubting maresca for sure. Maresca may be struggling to handle Chelsea considering even pochettino was not able doing it. The players were confident enough in Pochettino but poch sacked by todd.

It's unfortunate to replace him with a new coach but since the new owner is a money-oriented individua and I advise Chelsea players to always be patient with their clubs. It's disappointing to see Chelsea pass on an opportunity like this by recruiting the bad coach like maresca. To recruit a good coach instead of know coach
The team chose to hire an unknown coach with no track record of managing big clubs which is a very risky decision for sure.

[entertheabyss]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

[klidex]

They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.

No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.

We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.

[Weawant]

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Going by that which you have just mentioned about Chelsea, pochettino doesn't fit into any of the displeasure you have expressed in this post but was still sacked so I don't think it's a problem with the coach it's a problem with the management not been patient enough because there are Coaches who may not do so well in their first season but will be the best they will have in subsequent seasons.

The case of ten hag, he has been given what feels like morethan enough time yet he was unable to deliver and he just keep using some kind of light weighted victory to creat relevance by saying he won a trophy a d all that meanwhile he's performance is just too inconsistent that he's not productive,r the trophies he has won in the last two seasons are such that feels like consolation and not the type the team will celebrate well enough as them been able to have won something really great for the season. There are trophies you win a d it sounds like result of hard work and there are others that everyone see as something you could just win.

FA cup actually isn't really light weighted but more were expected of ten hag and if the management of Manchester united still decides to keep him then for whatever reason it may be I think it's rather going to be more detrimental than beneficial except they will seel of some players aswell and bring in new ones as recommended by ten hag which will be seen as those he can work with.

[bering]

I think Tottenham under Ange Postecoglou is quite good this season because although Tottenham was failed to playing at Champion League but on his first season with Tottenham Ange Postecoglou was able to bringing this team to finish at 5th place or Europa League zone and this achievement is much better compared to when Tottenham still train by Antonio Conte because last season Conte only able to bringing Tottenham to finish at 8th place and finally after 3 years absense Tottenham will playing again at Europa League

It's very interesting to know Tottenham movement this summer for player transfer because so far they are lack of rumour moreover people only talking about rumour transfer for other teams just like Manchester United or Chelsea but this summer Ange Postecoglou confirmed he will bought at least 1 forward player because Ange Postecoglou feel front lines is became an Tottenham weaknesses this season and indeed so far for front lines Tottenham has Son Heung-Min and this season he is Tottenham top scorer in Premier League

Besides Son Heung-Min indeed Tottenham has Richarlison but this player is injured prone and this season Richarlison has several times to gets injured which makes Tottenham was unable to playing him for important matches and about Tottenham player target recently they have been thinking the possibility to bought Serhou Guirassy from Stuttgart and why Tottenham want him because Serhou Guirassy performing well last season besides that his price is not expensive

[Barikui1]

They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.

No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.

We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.

To me I don't really think the players or the coaches are to blame, who is the major cause of the struggling of Chelsea football club is the owners, they have practically reduced the club to an average club, why would they be buying young star that haven't been proven for a very large amount of money against the manager wish, and to make matter worse, they have practically interfere in every decision of the manager, and that is the main reason Thomas tuchel was sacked, because their was a pushback from him, he refused to concur to their style of doing things, so he was sacked.

Ok let's look at Mauricio pochettino, he took the Chelsea job as a yes man. initially they told him that he wouldn't have a say on who goes in and out of the club, and he agreed, but toward the end of the season when he kicked against the idea of selling Gallagher, he was sacked, so with this type of leadership, I don't see Chelsea achieving anything big, because their is too much interference and the owners wouldn't let his employees to do their jobs.

[len01]

-snip

FA cup actually isn't really light weighted but more were expected of ten hag and if the management of Manchester united still decides to keep him then for whatever reason it may be I think it's rather going to be more detrimental than beneficial except they will seel of some players aswell and bring in new ones as recommended by ten hag which will be seen as those he can work with.

If indeed the reason for retaining Ten Hag is because of his success in winning the FA Cup title, it seems reasonable and natural for Man United management to try to give him another chance after winning the title and according to my predictions it looks like Ten Hag will be given the opportunity in several matches after the next season begins and will see whether there is any development in terms of Man United performance.
and if there are good developments, maybe it will be maintained until the end of the season, but if there are no changes, maybe in the second half of the season, Ten Hag will be replaced by a new coach and this is just my speculation.
what happened to Man United last season is actually understandable to me because this team had several problems which made Ten Hag team fail to finish in the best position and the real problems were only the main players who were not performing optimally and the new players who brought in last season didn't seem to make a maximum contribution.

after Ten Hag is given the opportunity next season, it looks like he will be more careful and will choose truly quality players who can make a difference to Man United appearance and win several titles which can give confidence to the fans of this team again.

[knowngunman]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

It's not about having trust in their couch, it's their tradition and I don't blame them because I will definitely do the same thing if I should be in their shoes. Take a look at Ten Hang in Manchester united since you used him as example, can you continue to have trust in such couch if you are the owner of the club? I guess your answer will be No. I know it takes more than just a season to build a team but even at the beginning, there suppose to be signs to show that the team is on the right track and the couch is worthy to be given more years to build a dream team but what can you tell of Ten Hang at Manchester united to prove he should be trusted for more seasons?

If Ten Hang is in Chelsea, he would have been the least serving couch in the club if his performance will be as same as it is now in Manchester united. I like how Abrahamovic was making good use of his sack letter because some of these couches are just there to earn a living without impact on the club development. Todd is too calm and tolerate what shouldn't be tolerated in order to maintain the standard of the club.

[Warkop]

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Yes of course, during the Abramovich period, Chelsea was known to be very strict with its manager. The decision to fire a manager is often made quickly if expected results are not achieved. This was done as an effort to ensure the club remains competitive at the highest level and wins trophies consistently. This philosophy has brought much success, including several Premier League titles, the Champions League and other domestic trophies.
However, it should be noted that each club has different policies and managerial philosophies. Some clubs prefer to give managers time to build a team and achieve long-term results, as seen at Manchester United with Erik Ten Hag. This approach can provide stability and sustainable development although it requires patience and time.

[Bobrox]

Yes of course, during the Abramovich period, Chelsea was known to be very strict with its manager. The decision to fire a manager is often made quickly if expected results are not achieved. This was done as an effort to ensure the club remains competitive at the highest level and wins trophies consistently. This philosophy has brought much success, including several Premier League titles, the Champions League and other domestic trophies.
However, it should be noted that each club has different policies and managerial philosophies. Some clubs prefer to give managers time to build a team and achieve long-term results, as seen at Manchester United with Erik Ten Hag. This approach can provide stability and sustainable development although it requires patience and time.

During Abramovic era the manager keep existing around more than one until two season without sacked them such as did by Todd Boehly era because some manager leaving their position without one season over. Chelsea faced difficulty return back to be big four team of premier league since acquisition by Todd Boehly and never yet participants in Champion League or Europe League competition. Chelsea under Todd Boehly era made more interventions in recruiting players, even Pochettino had to leave his position after not being given the freedom to recruit new players.

Build up one team with full youth player need time for development and I think Chelsea owner more patience waiting for giving opportunity more longer time to manager find right tactician. In this season Chelsea will perform in UEFA Conference League and its opportunity after absent last two season with European competition.

[Leviathan.007]

They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.

No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.

We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.
 

[slapper]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

It's a shark tank. You either eat trophies or are chum. We've seen this movie with Abramovich: the manager turnover, enormous expectations, and ruthless pursuit of trophies. Ten Hag is next in line? He's a tactical genius. At Chelsea? Come on, guy. A titanium spine and steel nerves are needed to handle that pressure cooker. The Chelsea way, right? Zero patience, constant churn. The ride is chaotic but effective. Check their trophy case. It overflows

Chelsea managers, prepare for the hot seat. If you can endure the heat, you could become a legend. Just ask Mourinho. Or Ancelotti. Or one of the other dozen managers who've been through that meat grinder

[rendravolt]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

If we think that Pochettino can lead Chelsea to finish in a better place than last season, he will immediately be fired, especially if we compare him with Erik Ten Hag, of course they already did in the first season. Each club has its own stance on handling this matter and Chelsea is known to be quite serious about their coach's problems.

I think Chelsea is really targeting results beyond their capabilities so any coach will think twice before deciding whether to handle a team that is still in the transition process. Apart from that, Enzo Maresca certainly wants to take this job considering that his name will also become more popular if he can manage Chelsea and compared to other experienced coaches, they are definitely reluctant to take this job.

[Altryist]

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.
 

Boehly did not spend money on acquiring new players, just when Pochettino arrived, Chelsea sold a lot of players, and therefore Pochettino was in a comparatively worse position with his predecessors. Boehly is a businessman, perhaps at first he wanted to achieve some titles, now I assume that he will try to get some kind of profit from the team. It is clear that he does not understand how to manage a team, at the moment he is learning how to do it.

[hahay]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

If we think that Pochettino can lead Chelsea to finish in a better place than last season, he will immediately be fired, especially if we compare him with Erik Ten Hag, of course they already did in the first season. Each club has its own stance on handling this matter and Chelsea is known to be quite serious about their coach's problems.

I think Chelsea is really targeting results beyond their capabilities so any coach will think twice before deciding whether to handle a team that is still in the transition process. Apart from that, Enzo Maresca certainly wants to take this job considering that his name will also become more popular if he can manage Chelsea and compared to other experienced coaches, they are definitely reluctant to take this job.

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either. Unless the team finishes outside the top five, then of course Chelsea will immediately fire their head coach when the league is over. But indeed, Chelsea also looks like they are making a big effort to get the right coach but unfortunately, Chelsea wants quick success, because Chelsea doesn't respect the process.

[BALIK]

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.

Boehly did not spend money on acquiring new players, just when Pochettino arrived, Chelsea sold a lot of players, and therefore Pochettino was in a comparatively worse position with his predecessors. Boehly is a businessman, perhaps at first he wanted to achieve some titles, now I assume that he will try to get some kind of profit from the team. It is clear that he does not understand how to manage a team, at the moment he is learning how to do it.

I think Chelsea Management is not experienced enough in managing the renowned club like Chelsea. At the same time, management's relationship with coaches and players is not good. And this is one of Chelsea's bad performance.

Chelsea management now wants to make money from the Chelsea Club. This is why they are not very worried about Chelsea's over -performance. Coach changed many times in the last few years. As Chelsea is now in a situation, the coach change cannot be any solution. Wanting to change Chelsea's over -standing position, the experienced coach is needed. At the same time, big funds need to buy players.

[Oluwa-btc]

When it comes to the Manchester United, what is broken is the manager himself. He's not gotten that true and real connection with the team players, rather he just work with them as their manager is what I feel. Hence he's not able to get the motivation he needs from.each and every player he needs in his toolbox. All I advice the team to do and the club in the entirely is to sit well and have an open discussion between the players and the manager of the club so as to fix all the differences between them. This is if Eric Ten Hag is to continue as a manager. Personally, I like the guy and he's hardworking but I need him to control himself the more to become more of a sportsman than a boss to the players. Let him.be more magnanimous at heart.

Even the new owners seem dump to me because they should already be making moves for players in my opinion. I still don't know why it's taking too long with the evaluation.
They should know it's taken too long already, it's time for them to start backing up the manager if they have no plans sacking him.

Erik Ten Hag is a good coach, tactically sound and reads the game very well, during his first season I can boast of him having all of his decisions correct because he also had enough options of players to make selections from. It's not the same since that lose to Sevilla during the European Europa League Competition.

Manchester United lose some of them most important players to Injury even before the preseason even the decisions from the medical team affected his decisions as he sent back Sergio Regulon back to Tottenham Hotspur after completing him loan deal for the club.
All Erik Ten Hag needs is the right backing.