Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[rendravolt]

De Zerbi has not yet left Brighton, but he will definitely leave soon considering that Brighton this season has been truly chaotic under his guidance. He had an extraordinary season last season, but this season it won't happen again. Now there are rumors that Graham Potter will return to Brighton and will replace De Zerbi's job as coach.

We know that Graham Potter was a good coach when he was at Brighton and everything fell apart when he joined Chelsea. This apparently meant that Graham Potter had to complete the unfinished work at Brighton at that time so that the club management would try to reappoint Graham Potter as head coach if they later decided to fire De Zerbi.

So do you think it's better for De Zerbi to stay or for Graham Potter to return to Brighton?

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5534660/2024/06/02/brighton-potter-bloom-return/

[TastyChillySauce00]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

The Chelsea owner wants to see the title so any coach who fails to achieve the target will be fired, we know that since Chelsea was taken over, Chelsea has had several coaches and that will happen before Chelsea actually wins the title or at least is in 2nd place in the standings. I understand what the owner expects is normal because he prepared a sufficient budget to bring in players so there is no reason not to achieve the target.

The better for you try to research into Tuchel and Pochettino's background about why they being sacked by todd last year and last months. Todd Boehly let these people go for asking for an allowance in the player transfers which is strictly prohibited by the club. Todd Boehly told them no, and the management was acquiring the new players without consulting the coach.
What Pochettino feels is this. With such desperation and he begged Todd to allow him to manage the players transfer but Todd promptly fired him after he asked that question to the club. Todd was willing to use chelsea as a money printing. Targeting top position combined with young talents will be really helpful for chelsea to sell its young talents with very high price and this is what todd has been aimed from acqiiring chelsea. Claarke is here for money not for trophy. The new coach has consistently run into this issue. Certainly, a lot of Blues supporters think Maresca will leave the team in the midst of the season.

Discussing the realities of big six ambitions without obtaining approval to reconstruct your ideal club is like dreaming and todd how have zero knowledge about football never try to understand it. Pochettino made it under extreme circumstances.
Regarding transfer season. Todd is not the same as Abramovich when it comes to the transfer policy as todd is far stricted than abramovich. Abra gave the coach carte blanche to choose the players. Perhaps there will never be a solution to this fundamental issue owner by chelsea since todd is having mental issue. This fucker keep destroy his own club with his unbelievable decision.

[Obim34]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

[$anounimus$]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Chelsea is not having a great day after roman was leaving from EPL. The fundamental issue is that the coach with a different philo would always be sacked by the owner and this is happening with some of chelsea players. The moment Chelsea fired Pochettino proved it. Considering that Chelsea was not doing so well the previous season and todd once again did the wrong thing, there was a rather poor choice made by the Blues owner like recruit amateur coach to handle the big club that has spent a half of billions last season just to rebuild the club.

Pochettino proved to the world that he was capable, but the owner was not even giving him a chance. Roman, on the other hand was always substituting a world-class coach for another. It's a very different period now. Todd is just bringing chelsea to the low standard with his owning style. 


This is obviously another setback for chelsea following how todd was once again repeat the same mistake like when he recruited potter as a new coach.
Things have not been going so well for the club.

Tod replaced Pochettino with an amateur coach. It's really inappropriate decision from him.

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

[CryptoBuds]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Chelsea is not having a great day after roman was leaving from EPL. The fundamental issue is that the coach with a different philo would always be sacked by the owner and this is happening with some of chelsea players. The moment Chelsea fired Pochettino proved it. Considering that Chelsea was not doing so well the previous season and todd once again did the wrong thing, there was a rather poor choice made by the Blues owner like recruit amateur coach to handle the big club that has spent a half of billions last season just to rebuild the club.
Pochettino proved to the world that he was capable, but the owner was not even giving him a chance. Roman, on the other hand was always substituting a world-class coach for another. It's a very different period now. Todd is just bringing chelsea to the low standard with his owning style. 
This is obviously another setback for chelsea following how todd was once again repeat the same mistake like when he recruited potter as a new coach.
Things have not been going so well for the club.
Tod replaced Pochettino with an amateur coach. It's really inappropriate decision from him.

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I am very upset with several decisions made by the Chelsea management. I don't know what Chelsea management's goals are. Thomas Tuchel was sacked by Chelsea management. Tuchel is a good enough coach. And with the help of Tuchel, the Chelsea team won the Champions League title. Chelsea management took a bad decision to sack such a coach. But Chelsea should have taken appropriate steps to strengthen the squad.

Chelsea's performances have been erratic at the start of this season. However, Chelsea performed very well in the final matches of the season. And Chelsea finished the season sixth in the table. Pochettino has done well enough with Chelsea. Chelsea management should not have let Pochettino go. Now if Chelsea change coach, we will see erratic performance of Chelsea players at the beginning of next season too.

[piebeyb]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

[pusaka]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

[Oluwa-btc]

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

If they should get him sacked, who then should be appointed? And how good is the name to be appointed? So far, there are no good managers in the transfer window available. I would never go back to another waste and dump products f Chelsea and Bayern Munich again ( Thomas Tuchel ) not even Thomas Frank who struggled to survive with Brentford.
Whoever thinks of these two names replacing Erik Ten Hag has seen it all wrong and it'll never end well for Manchester United ahead.

No matter how bad this season has been, he deserves some proper backing after he had a great first season.
Fingers crossed, I'm a good fan, I would love Erik Ten Hag to stay for a season to finally proven himself. I don't think he'll be sacked, I'm also seeing news of Kudus and Cuhna who has experience in the Premier League Competition.

It'll be a god start, bringing these qualities, also they need extend contract for Sofyan Amrabat if they don't have no plans of getting a proper defensive midfielder that's young.

[bering]

De Zerbi has not yet left Brighton, but he will definitely leave soon considering that Brighton this season has been truly chaotic under his guidance. He had an extraordinary season last season, but this season it won't happen again. Now there are rumors that Graham Potter will return to Brighton and will replace De Zerbi's job as coach.

We know that Graham Potter was a good coach when he was at Brighton and everything fell apart when he joined Chelsea. This apparently meant that Graham Potter had to complete the unfinished work at Brighton at that time so that the club management would try to reappoint Graham Potter as head coach if they later decided to fire De Zerbi.

So do you think it's better for De Zerbi to stay or for Graham Potter to return to Brighton?

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5534660/2024/06/02/brighton-potter-bloom-return/

De Zerbi and Brighton have agreed to end their partnership this summer which mean De Zerbi will not being an Brighton manager anymore and recently De Zerbi has been give the main reason why he decide to leave this team because he and Brighton has different visions in terms of player transfers and about the replacement of De Zerbi actually Brighton was targetting Ipswich manager Kieran McKenna as the replacement of De Zerbi because they were impress with what Kieran McKenna done at Ipswich but they must be disappointed because Kieran McKenna has decided to extend the contract with Ipswich

This also ends the speculation about Kieran McKenna who was recently targeted by Manchester United and Chelsea however about Graham Potter since sacked by Chelsea last season Potter has no job now and indeed Brighton is thinking possibility to make Potter as their new manager because they know Potter is a good manager even before moved to Chelsea we all know Brighton under Potter is quite stable and this team can able to finish at 9th place on season 2021/2022 but until this rumour appears Potter hasn't respond this rumour yet

[FanEagle]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

[mammusu]

Next season is a season that will be tougher for Manchester City in my opinion, they have defended the title for 4 consecutive seasons and next season will be the 5th season for them to be able to defend their Premier League title. This will not be easy, because other teams will definitely step up to put pressure on Manchester City. Arsenal is the first team that I see who might apply that pressure, because this season alone they performed well, and if we look at each season they always improve too.

However, a solid foundation will be the main asset for Manchester City, it will not be easy to shake, so it is very likely that they will still be able to compete to defend the title. Pep Guardiola must also know this and he will definitely plan new things to make Manachester City even better and be able to defend the title. There are players who leave and there are players who come, but he must be able to ensure that the players who come will make a big contribution to the team.

[Agbamoni]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Chelsea is a team that adores their fans when they worship them, they are a team with pride even when they are failing. What were you expecting from them? Its so sad they always have to make there coaches put up the best performances in there debut season. And its the same time they did in the case of Pochettino. First the players he is working with was not signed by him but by the club and he is only a manager which would manage the players to win but he cant join them in the field. I think Pochettino had dome more tha enough for the club Chelsea, the fans value the things he did, i also believe that if he would coach Chelsea one more season they will perform better than their previous.

[hyudien]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

We only predict the possibility of what will happen next season based on what we see this season, I think this is something that is valid, because this is just a prediction that we make. and also from the previous season some of our predictions were also not far from what happened.
However, I also won't deny that we also have to follow developments at all times, such as players being recruited and leaving the team, because that will also have an influence on their game, whether it becomes better or vice versa. We also cannot miss the figure of the coach, especially if they play with a new coach who was brought in at the end of this season.
The English League is a very competitive league, the competition here is very tight, so it is not easy for coaches to immediately provide something good for their new team. A strong mentality is also very necessary here, because when we are beaten by a weaker team, that mentality will decline, and when we don't have a good mentality, that will also have an effect.

[tusandii]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Chelsea is a team that adores their fans when they worship them, they are a team with pride even when they are failing. What were you expecting from them? Its so sad they always have to make there coaches put up the best performances in there debut season. And its the same time they did in the case of Pochettino. First the players he is working with was not signed by him but by the club and he is only a manager which would manage the players to win but he cant join them in the field. I think Pochettino had dome more tha enough for the club Chelsea, the fans value the things he did, i also believe that if he would coach Chelsea one more season they will perform better than their previous.

I'm worried that the bad things that Chelsea always do, which always fire coaches like this, will make experienced coaches out there afraid to join Chelsea because their reputation will be bad if they only get mediocre results in one season and after that they are fired and the coach is considered a failure. in handling Chelsea's performance.
Like Pochettino's case, fans initially doubted it, but after approaching the FA Cup title race, Chelsea fans became convinced that Pochettino had a positive influence on Chelsea's performance, but after that he was fired from Chelsea, which made fans angry with Chelsea management who ignored Pochettino's contribution.

I agree with you that in the coming season, if Pochettino is retained, Chelsea will definitely get their best performance when Pochettino already knows what to do and now everything is in vain.
At the start of the upcoming season, Chelsea will have to start the game by adapting to a new coach which will take a long time and will only take time to build chemistry with the new coach.

[Rampagoe004]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

[Strongkored]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

[Docnaster]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

The three clubs that were promoted to the English Premier League last season were all relegated back to the championship because in my own opinion, I think they were too relaxed as well as being carried away with the joy that comes with playing in the top flight of English football. Leicester City were once playing in the second division of the English Premier League before they were promoted to the Premier League in the 2014/15 season and in their second season after that promotion, they went on to win the English Premier League title.
Leicester might not repeat that history again any time soon because of how strong and consistent some of the top clubs in the league is and will continue to be but I strongly believe that the Foxes will not be relegated anytime soon. Their manager who helped them get promoted Enzo Maresca have just left the club after he was signed by Chelsea but I still believe that Leicester City will get another manager that'll further improve the team.

[Weawant]

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

Ten hag has not performed well enough and has aswell not even showed signs of wanting to improve his performance any soon as well with the way he's going with his team so far, some times I even think it's best for the team to look into letting go of him so they will be able to get another coach who can help them build back the team to their optimum performance as they should be because the results they got this season isn't befitting to the team.

For Chelsea it's even different for me because I feel they are even in a better position as they had a coach who has been able to get them through to the point of finishing fairly on the table as compared to what Manchester united performance was like at the very beginning of the season which they didn't get to get to even keep of well enough, using the FA cup trophy as a cover up for why they should be considered to have had a successful season is another funny aspect of the whole situation because winning the FA cup isn't good enough reason why you shouldn't have finished decently in the premier league.

Firing a coach is usually dependent on the decision of the management of the team and it usually has to do with the performance and productivity of the team and that's why stable teams still have their coaches in place without having them sacked just yet as some others have done this season, this can be seen with Manchester city and Arsenal who's performance this season were quite impressive and productive.

[BALIK]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

Although Manchester United won the FA Cup, Manchester United's overall performance was not good. I was not satisfied with Manchester United's performance. Even against lesser teams we have seen poor and erratic performances from Manchester United players.

Manchester United's performance in both attack and defense was poor. Chelsea scored 77 goals in 38 matches and Manchester United scored just 57. With such a weak attack it is impossible to be in the top 4 in the Premier League. Even with Ten Hag as coach, we don't seem to see any improvement in United's performance next season. Manchester United's performance is likely to be unstable in the next season as well.

[zaim7413]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

Boehly has made major changes to the Chelsea squad after replacing Pochettino as main coach, appointing Maresca as the new coach as a result of being inspired by Arsenal success in improving the team's performance. Arteta and Maresca once worked as Guardiola assistants, Boehly hopes a lot from Maresca to improve Chelsea performance like Arteta did at Arsenal. Boehly must be more patient, just as Roman Abramovich built Chelsea from a mediocre team into a team capable of winning the title, Boehly must give full confidence to Maresca to build Chelsea into a team capable of providing competition for the title.