Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]

[paxmao]

When Ruzzia decides that itheir fleet is going nowere and sink 3 barges to close their port. They run out of room to escape, now they are just there... forever?




https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/15/europe/ukraine-underwater-drone-submarine-novorossiysk-russia-intl#:~:text=A%20comparison%20of%20satellite%20imagery,not%20show%20the%20boat's%20stern.

[DaRude]

Didn't trump say he was going to end this war before he got into office?

What happened XD

Hate politicians, everyone is full of nonsense, nobody sticks to their word,

Word of men used to be gold, now it's just blabber.

Politician lied to us - insert surprised Pikachu meme here. First he promised to end end war within 24 hours after becoming president. Then it was 2 weeks, deadlines continue to change, we still hear new promises almost every week. Soon it will be 1 year since he become president, but during this time zero progress was made.
And yeah back in the days you had to take responsibility for your words. Now you can talk shit without any consequences.

That's every democracy, politicians get picked on promises, so naturally the one that promises the most gets an advantage. Especially during a downturn no one would vote for a candidate who's just telling the truth.

To be fare, I do think that Trump wants to end this war ASAP. It's just old leadership in Europe is attempting to hold on to their positions a bit longer by prolonging this conflict as much as they can.

Once again words have meanings, odd for you to claim zero progress when literally everyone saying that we're closer to ending this than ever. Zelenskyy said that after the Berlin talks, “we are very close to (a deal on) strong security guarantees.”...U.S. President Donald Trump said: “I think we’re closer now than we have been, ever” to a peace settlement. You must know something no one else does?

[DanWalker]

Politician lied to us - insert surprised Pikachu meme here. First he promised to end end war within 24 hours after becoming president. Then it was 2 weeks, deadlines continue to change, we still hear new promises almost every week. Soon it will be 1 year since he become president, but during this time zero progress was made.
And yeah back in the days you had to take responsibility for your words. Now you can talk shit without any consequences.

That's every democracy, politicians get picked on promises, so naturally the one that promises the most gets an advantage. Especially during a downturn no one would vote for a candidate who's just telling the truth.

To be fare, I do think that Trump wants to end this war ASAP. It's just old leadership in Europe is attempting to hold on to their positions a bit longer by prolonging this conflict as much as they can.

Once again words have meanings, odd for you to claim zero progress when literally everyone saying that we're closer to ending this than ever. Zelenskyy said that after the Berlin talks, “we are very close to (a deal on) strong security guarantees.”...U.S. President Donald Trump said: “I think we’re closer now than we have been, ever” to a peace settlement. You must know something no one else does?

Yeah, the point is politicians always want to appear virtuous to increase their popularity and they promote these messages of peace excessively, it is all a political game. And during election season it is even worse, you will not hear anything but talk of development and peace, lol.

Anyway, I think Trumps statements about ending the war will likely be just another deception. No matter how much discussion took place at the Berlin meeting, have you actually seen any peace deal signed? The issue of how much territory each country will control has not been resolved yet. I will not say that there was absolutely no progress at this meeting, since everyone sat at the same table, yes, there was some progress. There might be a chance of a ceasefire but it would be a mistake to think that everything will return to normal in a sudden

[LTU_btc]

Once again words have meanings, odd for you to claim zero progress when literally everyone saying that we're closer to ending this than ever. Zelenskyy said that after the Berlin talks, “we are very close to (a deal on) strong security guarantees.”...U.S. President Donald Trump said: “I think we’re closer now than we have been, ever” to a peace settlement. You must know something no one else does?

Empty words without real actions means nothing for me. It's not first time when we hear that they're so close to reach peace, but we hear these words for several months already

Anyway, I think Trumps statements about ending the war will likely be just another deception. No matter how much discussion took place at the Berlin meeting, have you actually seen any peace deal signed? The issue of how much territory each country will control has not been resolved yet. I will not say that there was absolutely no progress at this meeting, since everyone sat at the same table, yes, there was some progress. There might be a chance of a ceasefire but it would be a mistake to think that everything will return to normal in a sudden

Yes exactly, they can reach agreement on many questions, but main question - territory remains. Both sides are stubborn with their position. Ukraine aren't going to give away their territory, while Russia aren't planning to make any discounts. So, I don't know how someone can say that they're closer than ever from making a deal.

[montaga]

...........Trumps statements about ending the war ............

............have you actually seen any peace deal signed? ..............

Trumps statements is nothing else as a media filler, the newspapers have something to write about and newsreaders have a job

Russia has said many times that Zelenzky is a illegitimate president because his time did expire.
A, Ukraine constitution does not allow elections in wartime.
B, Russia does not want a election in Ukraine because it would need 3rd parfys in the country for a fair and square election.
Is the "illegal" president suppose to sign a legal binding document? What kind of election observer goes to the front line?
Election would have to be in all of Ukraine. As it stands legally everthing is still Ukrainien territory. It is still your house even with a robber in the house
A war is needed for a peace deal. The Surgeon cant stop a brain operation in the middle of the operation.

Globalist will do anything to help Putin, the last thing they want is to have 20 odd new countries if Russia disintegrated. From there view armageddon to have a election without selected puppets.

The longer this special military operation, is beeng operated on the bigger Poo-tlers problems get. Plenty of videos like this.
Buryats https://youtu.be/hX0lcXVw0JA
Siberia https://youtu.be/xlQq-GZMBzk https://youtu.be/fmcS9Q5LE4I
Bashkir https://youtu.be/t3cPKtp9zKQ

[BADecker]

This video includes several things. There's the real numbers of dead and injured in Ukraine and Russia. There's also some of the strategy of Russia and the US. Some of it will be seem like old news to some of us. But it needs repeating, because Putin is making it active right now.

"Redacted has learned from our sources of new death totals in Russia and Ukraine that we want to share with you. These are incredibly hard to swallow. Until now these numbers have not been fully reported especially on the Russian side. As of today December 18th."


Putin just changed EVERYTHING with this move and NATO can't STOP it | Redacted w Clayton Morris - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyEf_He7B0Y.

[DaRude]

Politician lied to us - insert surprised Pikachu meme here. First he promised to end end war within 24 hours after becoming president. Then it was 2 weeks, deadlines continue to change, we still hear new promises almost every week. Soon it will be 1 year since he become president, but during this time zero progress was made.
And yeah back in the days you had to take responsibility for your words. Now you can talk shit without any consequences.

That's every democracy, politicians get picked on promises, so naturally the one that promises the most gets an advantage. Especially during a downturn no one would vote for a candidate who's just telling the truth.

To be fare, I do think that Trump wants to end this war ASAP. It's just old leadership in Europe is attempting to hold on to their positions a bit longer by prolonging this conflict as much as they can.

Once again words have meanings, odd for you to claim zero progress when literally everyone saying that we're closer to ending this than ever. Zelenskyy said that after the Berlin talks, “we are very close to (a deal on) strong security guarantees.”...U.S. President Donald Trump said: “I think we’re closer now than we have been, ever” to a peace settlement. You must know something no one else does?

Yeah, the point is politicians always want to appear virtuous to increase their popularity and they promote these messages of peace excessively, it is all a political game. And during election season it is even worse, you will not hear anything but talk of development and peace, lol.

Anyway, I think Trumps statements about ending the war will likely be just another deception. No matter how much discussion took place at the Berlin meeting, have you actually seen any peace deal signed? The issue of how much territory each country will control has not been resolved yet. I will not say that there was absolutely no progress at this meeting, since everyone sat at the same table, yes, there was some progress. There might be a chance of a ceasefire but it would be a mistake to think that everything will return to normal in a sudden

I'm not claiming that the deal is signed and 100% finished, but there's a big spread between 0 progress and 100 signed deal. Trump indicated his position and backed it up with NABU investigation, now if he can turn Europe to the "right" he gets to kill two birds with one stone. Macron/Merz/Starmer 's ratings have only one way to go now. I would like to know who convinced Ukrainians that going against Russia in a war of attrition was a good idea.

Once again words have meanings, odd for you to claim zero progress when literally everyone saying that we're closer to ending this than ever. Zelenskyy said that after the Berlin talks, “we are very close to (a deal on) strong security guarantees.”...U.S. President Donald Trump said: “I think we’re closer now than we have been, ever” to a peace settlement. You must know something no one else does?

Empty words without real actions means nothing for me. It's not first time when we hear that they're so close to reach peace, but we hear these words for several months already

Anyway, I think Trumps statements about ending the war will likely be just another deception. No matter how much discussion took place at the Berlin meeting, have you actually seen any peace deal signed? The issue of how much territory each country will control has not been resolved yet. I will not say that there was absolutely no progress at this meeting, since everyone sat at the same table, yes, there was some progress. There might be a chance of a ceasefire but it would be a mistake to think that everything will return to normal in a sudden

Yes exactly, they can reach agreement on many questions, but main question - territory remains. Both sides are stubborn with their position. Ukraine aren't going to give away their territory, while Russia aren't planning to make any discounts. So, I don't know how someone can say that they're closer than ever from making a deal.

It's rather simple, if Zelenskyy agrees on everything else like no NATO, provide protection for Russian language, culture, religion in Ukraine, run presidential elections etc... and only refuses to sign because of the question of territory, the front lines should decide that issue for him. Unless Zelenskyy mounts some counteroffensive to unblock Mirnograd, it's insane to say that we need to loose even more territory and more people need to die before we sign the deal. Outside of keep fighting until the last Ukrainian, i don't know how else that can be sold? Sure more slavs will get murdered from both sides but how would that exactly benefit Ukraine? Or now no one is representing Ukrainian interests in this?

[DaRude]

...........Trumps statements about ending the war ............

............have you actually seen any peace deal signed? ..............

Trumps statements is nothing else as a media filler, the newspapers have something to write about and newsreaders have a job

Russia has said many times that Zelenzky is a illegitimate president because his time did expire.
A, Ukraine constitution does not allow elections in wartime.
B, Russia does not want a election in Ukraine because it would need 3rd parfys in the country for a fair and square election.
Is the "illegal" president suppose to sign a legal binding document? What kind of election observer goes to the front line?
Election would have to be in all of Ukraine. As it stands legally everthing is still Ukrainien territory. It is still your house even with a robber in the house
A war is needed for a peace deal. The Surgeon cant stop a brain operation in the middle of the operation.

Globalist will do anything to help Putin, the last thing they want is to have 20 odd new countries if Russia disintegrated. From there view armageddon to have a election without selected puppets.

The longer this special military operation, is beeng operated on the bigger Poo-tlers problems get. Plenty of videos like this.
Buryats https://youtu.be/hX0lcXVw0JA
Siberia https://youtu.be/xlQq-GZMBzk https://youtu.be/fmcS9Q5LE4I
Bashkir https://youtu.be/t3cPKtp9zKQ

the "constitution doesn't allow elections" argument is just a convenient excuse for zelensky to keep power indefinitely while the country bleeds

He conveniently leaves out an important fact. Ukrainian constitution does not allow PARLIAMENT elections in wartime, there's nothing in Ukrainian constitution that prevents PRESIDENTIAL elections during the wartime! Thus the head of Ukrainian parliament has legal powers according to the Ukrainian constitution.

As far as running elections during a war time, Americans have already set a precedent in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Europe accepted those results just fine. You'd really have to try very hard to come up with lots of double standards to try and explain why it can be done in Iraq and Afghanistan but cannot be done in Ukraine!

[paxmao]

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/19/eu-agrees-hefty-105b-ukraine-loan-without-using-russian-assets

EU agrees hefty $105bn Ukraine loan without using Russian assets
EU leaders decide to borrow cash to fund Ukraine’s defence rather than use frozen Russian monies, diplomats said.

The good thing is that those Russian assets actually remain in Europe, so the negotiation will include how much is paid in reparations - and do not forget that the bag strings are with Brussels.

Ruzzis got really nervous on this one. Plenty of threatening beyond the usual "will retaliate", etc...

[montaga]

........
As far as running elections during a war time,......

Can you reminde everybody again when US got invaded, some people are not up to date on events?
How far did the Iraq and Afghanistanis manage to advance?


Russian counterintelligend made internal 8 page report warning China is researching "ancient Chinese people".
As per FSB report Beijing is activ promoting the narrative of reclaiming part of Russia.
Russia on the knees begging China for help, China yeh can do lets revisit the border and treaty of 1858 and 1860 Convention of Peking
Chinese name vor Vladivostok ( 海参崴) is "Sea Cucumber Bay".  
All of Ukraine 603 628 km2 and Outer Manchuria 386 000 km² (龍之國度, Land of Dragons)
So, yeh when the dust settles Manchuria will be another independen new country
No not that 1858 treaty

[DanWalker]

I'm not claiming that the deal is signed and 100% finished, but there's a big spread between 0 progress and 100 signed deal. Trump indicated his position and backed it up with NABU investigation, now if he can turn Europe to the "right" he gets to kill two birds with one stone. Macron/Merz/Starmer 's ratings have only one way to go now. I would like to know who convinced Ukrainians that going against Russia in a war of attrition was a good idea.

So the bottom line is, you can argue all day about who is right and whose political intentions are what. But until all the parties sit down at the same table and sign the agreement, saying we are getting closer is just trash, but the battle on the ground has not stopped yet and I do not see any reason to think that Russias public stance is changing much

It's rather simple, if Zelenskyy agrees on everything else like no NATO, provide protection for Russian language, culture, religion in Ukraine, run presidential elections etc... and only refuses to sign because of the question of territory, the front lines should decide that issue for him. Unless Zelenskyy mounts some counteroffensive to unblock Mirnograd, it's insane to say that we need to loose even more territory and more people need to die before we sign the deal. Outside of keep fighting until the last Ukrainian, i don't know how else that can be sold? Sure more slavs will get murdered from both sides but how would that exactly benefit Ukraine? Or now no one is representing Ukrainian interests in this?

I understand your logic of the front line will have the final say but real politics is not that simple. The main issue in the current peace talks is about this border or territory. The leaders and generals of Ukraine have made it clear that they will not give up even an inch of land however  Russia has one thing in mind if Ukraine does not give up the areas they have occupied then they will not compromise

A diplomatic agreement is not made based on who pushed whom on the front line and how much. If both sides do not sincerely accept the conditions then this war will not just stop but the flames of fire will increase even more

[BADecker]

I'm not claiming that the deal is signed and 100% finished, but there's a big spread between 0 progress and 100 signed deal. Trump indicated his position and backed it up with NABU investigation, now if he can turn Europe to the "right" he gets to kill two birds with one stone. Macron/Merz/Starmer 's ratings have only one way to go now. I would like to know who convinced Ukrainians that going against Russia in a war of attrition was a good idea.

So the bottom line is, you can argue all day about who is right and whose political intentions are what. But until all the parties sit down at the same table and sign the agreement, saying we are getting closer is just trash, but the battle on the ground has not stopped yet and I do not see any reason to think that Russias public stance is changing much

It's rather simple, if Zelenskyy agrees on everything else like no NATO, provide protection for Russian language, culture, religion in Ukraine, run presidential elections etc... and only refuses to sign because of the question of territory, the front lines should decide that issue for him. Unless Zelenskyy mounts some counteroffensive to unblock Mirnograd, it's insane to say that we need to loose even more territory and more people need to die before we sign the deal. Outside of keep fighting until the last Ukrainian, i don't know how else that can be sold? Sure more slavs will get murdered from both sides but how would that exactly benefit Ukraine? Or now no one is representing Ukrainian interests in this?

I understand your logic of the front line will have the final say but real politics is not that simple. The main issue in the current peace talks is about this border or territory. The leaders and generals of Ukraine have made it clear that they will not give up even an inch of land however  Russia has one thing in mind if Ukraine does not give up the areas they have occupied then they will not compromise

A diplomatic agreement is not made based on who pushed whom on the front line and how much. If both sides do not sincerely accept the conditions then this war will not just stop but the flames of fire will increase even more

The Ukraine war is something between Ukraine and Russia. Even if Europe or NATO work in Ukraine to support them, the war is a Ukraine/Russia thing. And that is basically the way Russia is treating it... only wiping out EU and NATO forces in Ukraine.

That being said, Russia isn't focusing on Ukraine only. Russia is preparing for ANY force in the world that is willing to make war with her. Part of this has to do with making friends with nations around her, including China and India.

In the following article, look deep, and see that this is what is really going on.


Russia Is in a Security Dilemma – Europe Pretends To Be in One


https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/12/no_author/russia-is-in-a-security-dilemma-europe-pretends-to-be-in-one/
This is a yearly event meant to recap the developments in the military sphere over last year and to give a high level outlook of the future. This goes from strategic overview to details of operations. It touches on weapon supplies, technical development, medical, social and housing issues of the military. The addressee is mainly the Russian military but also the national and international public.

President Vladimir Putin spoke first, followed by a detailed presentation by Defense Minister Andrey Belousov followed by another Putin talk. Both Putin parts are available in English at the Kremlin site. Belousov's presentation is only available in the Russian language transcript of the event. Karlof1 has put up an English machine translation of all parts at his website. There is also a video of the event available with English live translation.

The whole thing is lengthy.

The most important point, in my opinion, of Putin and Belausov said is about the potentially upcoming conflict with NATO. Russia feels threatened!

This from Putin's first part [emph. add.]:

We are aware that that the Kiev regime is backed by the potential of the countries comprising the world's largest military-political bloc, NATO. Large-scale military assistance is being continuously provided, with advisers, instructors, and mercenaries dispatched, and intelligence data shared.

Today, we can see that the geopolitical situation remains tense throughout the world, and even critical in some regions. NATO countries are actively building up and modernising their offensive forces, and creating and deploying new types of weapons, including in outer space.

Meanwhile, people in Europe are being indoctrinated with fears of an inevitable confrontation with Russia, with claims that preparations must be made for a major war. Various figures who have held or continue to hold positions of responsibility appear to have simply forgotten what that responsibility entails.

They are whipping up hysteria, guided by momentary, personal or group political interests rather than the interests of their people. I have said many times that this is a lie and an irrational narrative about an imaginary Russian threat to European countries. But they are doing this deliberately.
...

[montaga]

To win a war, three things are needed and the are: Money, Money and Money

Europe and now Japan play the long game with the new reconstruction loans. Rebuild faster than Russia can destroy.
https://youtu.be/iEMR0hpWFwc

When the dust has settled the Kuril Island dispute (Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan, Habomai)
will also be done with because there want be a Russia on the Asian Continet. Even on the European side it will be called Moscowien's or something.

[BADecker]

To win a war, three things are needed and the are: Money, Money and Money

Europe and now Japan play the long game with the new reconstruction loans. Rebuild faster than Russia can destroy.
https://youtu.be/iEMR0hpWFwc

When the dust has settled the Kuril Island dispute (Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan, Habomai)
will also be done with because there want be a Russia on the Asian Continet. Even on the European side it will be called Moscowien's or something.

The American revolutionary war was won without very much money. It was the British that had the money.

With the EU and NATO crashing (which is happening right now), Russia will become much stronger.

Russia bit off a big chunk when it 'conquered' Siberia. But the fact that it could do this, shows that Russia has way more strength than the nations around it.

One of the things that seems to be against any nation, is the big mouths who control the map making. They suggest borders that are not exactly what they suggest. One example of this is the nation of Thrace. Thrace does not exist today, but the Thracian people hold to their Thrace heritage as though it existed. This is the same for many groups of people in Russia and Europe, and maybe around the world... like Hawaii.

Things change, and nobody can do more  than guess what will happen, until it happens... like the EU and NATO are collapsing.

[montaga]

...................
Russia bit off a big chunk when it 'conquered' Siberia. ...............

The war is now systematic, Ukraine has become a side show, Siberia is only one of many issues.
Kaliningrad residence used to drive across the border to shop or whatever, now it is a prison, they are not happy.
China is happy to put petrol in the fire because the next time Putin asking for help on his knees the concession will be much more than Manchuria.

What has Turkeys news to say about https://youtu.be/iQCQlZQb2oQ

[DaRude]

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/19/eu-agrees-hefty-105b-ukraine-loan-without-using-russian-assets

EU agrees hefty $105bn Ukraine loan without using Russian assets
EU leaders decide to borrow cash to fund Ukraine’s defence rather than use frozen Russian monies, diplomats said.

The good thing is that those Russian assets actually remain in Europe, so the negotiation will include how much is paid in reparations - and do not forget that the bag strings are with Brussels.

Ruzzis got really nervous on this one. Plenty of threatening beyond the usual "will retaliate", etc...

Those funds will go to Ukraine either way. The question is if the funds will be used as part of peace agreement to rebuild Ukraine, or they will be used up now just to prolong the fighting a bit, and leaving nothing for reconstruction. The ones that want to maximize damage to Russia and to fight until the last Ukrainian, want to use up the funds now to fund weapons purchases from the US, and don't care about reconstruction or what happens to Ukraine once this is all over.
 
Stealing funds is not free and come with repercussions, the reason why Brussels is against it.

........
As far as running elections during a war time,......

Can you reminde everybody again when US got invaded, some people are not up to date on events?
How far did the Iraq and Afghanistanis manage to advance?

...historical silliness...

You're all kinds of confused, US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraqi army, Taliban, and lands under their control couldn't vote and everyone was fine with that. There were US military with guns at every "allowed" voting stations only in "safe" areas under their control. And no one, including European countries, found any major issues with those results and accepted them as free and democratic (essentially putting in their puppet head in power)! Oh now i see, you're going with American exceptionalism. Elections can be democratic only if US is doing invading?

I'm not claiming that the deal is signed and 100% finished, but there's a big spread between 0 progress and 100 signed deal. Trump indicated his position and backed it up with NABU investigation, now if he can turn Europe to the "right" he gets to kill two birds with one stone. Macron/Merz/Starmer 's ratings have only one way to go now. I would like to know who convinced Ukrainians that going against Russia in a war of attrition was a good idea.

So the bottom line is, you can argue all day about who is right and whose political intentions are what. But until all the parties sit down at the same table and sign the agreement, saying we are getting closer is just trash, but the battle on the ground has not stopped yet and I do not see any reason to think that Russias public stance is changing much

It's rather simple, if Zelenskyy agrees on everything else like no NATO, provide protection for Russian language, culture, religion in Ukraine, run presidential elections etc... and only refuses to sign because of the question of territory, the front lines should decide that issue for him. Unless Zelenskyy mounts some counteroffensive to unblock Mirnograd, it's insane to say that we need to loose even more territory and more people need to die before we sign the deal. Outside of keep fighting until the last Ukrainian, i don't know how else that can be sold? Sure more slavs will get murdered from both sides but how would that exactly benefit Ukraine? Or now no one is representing Ukrainian interests in this?

I understand your logic of the front line will have the final say but real politics is not that simple. The main issue in the current peace talks is about this border or territory. The leaders and generals of Ukraine have made it clear that they will not give up even an inch of land however  Russia has one thing in mind if Ukraine does not give up the areas they have occupied then they will not compromise

A diplomatic agreement is not made based on who pushed whom on the front line and how much. If both sides do not sincerely accept the conditions then this war will not just stop but the flames of fire will increase even more

Your first fallacy leads to false conclusion that progress is binary and can only be at 0% or 100%. Your second fallacy is that the signing of peace agreement cannot happen without Russia changing is public stance, as if those things are mutually exclusive. Obviously the peace agreement can be signed without Russia changing it's public stance, whether you prefer that outcome is a different question.

All sides have spies, intelligence, think tanks, annalists, researchers that all build prediction models, and computer models that assign probabilities for different scenarios/outcomes. The whole point of peace agreement is to avoid unnecessary loss of life if the outcome is already known. To refuse agreements and continue fighting knowing that i won't change anything is just madness. Unless of course you have alternative motives, like if your sole priority is to cause as much damage to Russia disregarding Ukrainian interests, a.k.a. keep fighting until the last Ukrainian. Typically the president should control his generals, those that oppose or disagree in Ukrainian military capabilities, should be provided the opportunity to prove their position at the front lines, i.e. send them to the front to unblock Myrnohrad. But like you said this only woks if motives are sincere, but if those (NATO/EU) generals that don't want to give up an inch of Ukrainian land, are saying that from the safety of Ramstein, Germany, Zelenskiy can't do much about them, thus the Ukrainian role as a sacrificial pawn in all of this.

[BADecker]

^^^ Great observations. I might add:


Russia is freezing more Western funds in Russian banks than Brussels has frozen Russian funds in Europe.


All politicians says one thing, and then changes their minds 180 degrees when it benefits them to change their minds.


There will be peace. Peace might take Russia conquering all of Ukraine. But there will be peace. The warmongers of the West will probably keep on with their war advertising even after they are forced into peace.

[montaga]

The purge has begun! “War heroes” in Russia are suddenly dying. Kremlin Mafia eating itself.

On top of that Russian general  Fanil Sarvarov was elimineted with a car-bomb, its the third general now with the same faith.

If things are not bad enough Kadyrov said he wants ot resign to give up power. That is not someting Putin wants to hear.
The Chechnian warlord has a private army the size the Canadian military.

[BADecker]

Russia is taking Odessa, thereby making Ukraine a landlocked country - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBjizbJVxaE and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvzRlqUkpNo&pp=0gcJCU0KAYcqIYzv.

[montaga]

.................
Russia bit off a big chunk when it 'conquered' Siberia. But the fact that it could do this, shows that Russia has way more strength than the nations around it.
.........

In a legal sense the sale of Alaska to US is not legitimate because unlawfully taking land from natives is not rightful ownership.
It is like holding a gun to someone's head and demanding the keys for his car and selling ill-gotten car.
Abusing, mudering, mistreading people might be strenght in satans world, but not in a rightous one.


Beautiful, white Russia (Belarus) in revolt, Transnistria seen the light wants to rejoin Moldova, Serbia breaking ties with evil.....
Putin's relative injured and crime boss Viktor Averin, second-in-command of the Solntsevskaya Russian crime gang died in hovercraft crash in Moscow.
Dmitry Kozak Putins lawyer, closesed confider resigned from his positon as deputy chief of staff

Story has it that Putin is president on paper only for the last few days, aka paper tiger.
Russia is now run by a military junta and the nuke briefcase is with Valery Garasimov.

https://youtu.be/RKFKt2uQyF8