AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

Why not remove Sapling from the required tools for now? 

There have been several complaints about Sapling sending false positives since last year, and things haven't improved much.

It's not a "required tool." What's wrong with using it in this fashion?

use other detectors first, but if two others say it is likely AI-generated and Sapling does as well, then its reasonable to assume the post is AI-generated.

Its not good to rely solely on this detector in order to declare something AI-generated or not. Thankfully that's never been part of the standard for reports made in this thread.

While its better to give people the benefit of the doubt by letting "false negatives" slide, there's no quantitative proof that the other detectors aren't equally as inaccurate in detecting AI posts.

[Wonder Work]

I've sent quite a few neutral tags to people using AI in the forum. I wouldn't mind changing my initial trust rating on someone who was willing to come forward, apologize and promise to not use it again in the future. I'm all in for second chances, but you have to prove yourself that you're actually worth a shot. So far, no one has contacted me asking to change their rating, which is one of the main reasons I haven't changed it.

You don't see any response from them, even after posting a cautionary message mentioning them. They do not think such a warning post is anything to go by. They are proceeding as they wish. If they had any problem, they would have tried to contact you and asked for a chance later. Since they haven't responded yet, they won't take any action. They will continue to spread rumors, and you will report them. They won't think anything of it. It would be better to consider such users as garbage for the forum.

[DYING_S0UL]

Another post of mine, which I wrote totally on my own, is showing 100% fake by Sapling AI. I checked with Copyleaks, gptzero, and everything was fine (0%). I have not had any false positives by Copyleaks and Gptzero as far as my posts are concerned. This is the 6th or 7th time (3rd time for my post) I have found a false positive from Sapling AI.
~snip~

I completely discarded that AI detector when I became convinced that it was doing far more harm than good. My advice is that no one who wants reliable detection should use it.

This is exactly why I use several detectors on the other forum (D.team). Sometimes just by looking at them we can tell there is something wrong with the results.

Currently using copyleaks, gptzero, undetectable AI, zero gpt, hive AI, scribbr, sapling, quilbot AI detector, in total 8. Some may think this is just too much. But I guess, it doesn't hurt be to absolutely sure whether we are unintentionally harming anyone innocent.

You guys know any other reliable tools?

[Ultegra134]

You don't see any response from them, even after posting a cautionary message mentioning them. They do not think such a warning post is anything to go by. They are proceeding as they wish. If they had any problem, they would have tried to contact you and asked for a chance later. Since they haven't responded yet, they won't take any action. They will continue to spread rumors, and you will report them. They won't think anything of it. It would be better to consider such users as garbage for the forum.

Only one or two users have contacted me throughout all these reports I've made, and about the same number has come forward or has tried to make things right in the AI report thread. The largest majority simply ignore the presence of the report and continue to their regular habits, unless they suffer consequences, such as losing their spot in their signature campaign.

This is exactly why I use several detectors on the other forum (D.team). Sometimes just by looking at them we can tell there is something wrong with the results.

Currently using copyleaks, gptzero, undetectable AI, zero gpt, hive AI, scribbr, sapling, quilbot AI detector, in total 8. Some may think this is just too much. But I guess, it doesn't hurt be to absolutely sure whether we are unintentionally harming anyone innocent.

You guys know any other reliable tools?

I believe that's too much, while I also doubt that all 8 of the detectors you mentioned can accurately come up with the same result. In my opinion, the most accurate ones are Originality (paid, only a few credits for free) and Gowinston.ai (the same limitation with Originality applies), along with GPTZero and Copyleaks.

[memehunter]

In my opinion, the most accurate ones are Originality (paid, only a few credits for free) and Gowinston.ai (the same limitation with Originality applies), along with GPTZero and Copyleaks.

I scanned one of my posts which has been flagged by Sapling.ai as 100% fake (AI generated) in Originality (free version) after you praised this detector, to my surprise it is also showing my post as 94% AI (almost same as sapling.ai)



While with GOwinston.ai (free version) it is showing right results : 0% AI (I know it is right because I wrote the post lol), along with Copyleaks (0%) and  GPTzero (0%).
In my opinion, the combo of Copyleaks+GPTzero is very accurate.
I have scanned a few more posts, and Originality is giving me results similar to those of Sapling.ai. 
I think some detectors are just using perplexity in order to detect AI but the right method is to compare it with previous human written texts + perplexity, which is exactly what Copyleaks and GPTzero are doing.   

[Don Pedro Dinero]

User: Obulis

Topic: The difference between businessman and entrepreneur

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUSINESSMAN AND ENTREPRENEUR

The terms "businessman" and "entrepreneur" often  get use in a circle as if they have same meaning, actually they represent different mindsets and ideas. Let’s break down the key differences between the two:

       1. Definition and Focus
*****Businessman:
A businessperson is usually someone involved in commercial activities, primarily focused on managing established businesses. Their main job revolves around handling resources, boosting profits, and sticking to tried-and-true business models.
*****Entrepreneur:
An entrepreneur, on the other hand, is someone who spots opportunities and takes the leap to create new ventures or improve existing ones. They are innovative, take risks, and turns ideas into successful businesses or products.

       2. Innovation vs. Management
*****Businessman:
While businessmen might make improvements, their main job is always about good management and efficiency within existing structures. Their focus is sustaining and growing the business through conventional methods.
*****Entrepreneur:
Entrepreneurs are often viewed as innovators, motivated by a desire to tackle problems or fulfill unmet needs in the market or even creat problems

          3. Risk Attitude
*****Businessman:
Businessmen generally are more cautious in their approach to risk. They prefers stable, established markets and tend to optimize existing processes rather than diving into uncharted territory.
*****Entrepreneur:
Entrepreneurs accepts and takes more risks as they aim to create something fresh or reform existing markets. They’re often willing to take calculated risks to chase innovative ideas.
           
           4. Motivation
*****Businessman:
Many businessmen are financial success oriented. Their main objectives often center around profit making, increasing market share, and maintaining a competitive edge.

*****Entrepreneur:
While entrepreneurs also aim for financial success, their motivations often run deeper. They might be fueled by a passion for their ideas, a desire to make a difference, or a commitment to social change. Their goals can include personal fulfillment or addressing societal challenges.

             5. Growth Orientation
*****Businessman:
  Businessmen typically concentrate on steady growth within their established markets, optimizing operations to ensure ongoing success. Their strategies often involve gradual scaling and sticking to tried-and-true methods.
*****Entrepreneur:
Entrepreneurs usually set their sights on rapid growth and scalability, constantly on the lookout for ways to shake up industries and dive into new markets. They’re often quick to adjust their strategies based on what the market tells them.

       6. Vision vs. Execution
*****Businessman:
A businessman usually works within a set vision, then trying to execute that vision effectively. They might not be the originator of the business idea, but they play a crucial role in keeping things running smoothly and profitably.
*****Entrepreneur:
Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, often develop their own vision and take charge of making it a reality. They actively steer their businesses and make key decisions that can influence the entire industry.


In summary
Both businessmen and entrepreneurs are important to the economy, but there're lots of difference between them, like in their approaches, mindsets, and definitions. Businessmen definitely focus on managing established companies and targeting success, whereas entrepreneurs pay attention to innovation and taking risks to create new ventures or transform existing ones. Recognizing these differences can shed light on the various ways individuals contribute to economic growth and progress.

Copyleaks:

AI Content Found
Percentage of text that may be AI-generated.
100%

GPTZero: 99% AI generated

Quillbot:

82 % of text is likely AI

[Alone055]

From his post history, it's clear that the guy started using AI to generate his posts just recently. Before April 17th, his posts were self-written, but from 17th, he started using AI.

(Note: I'm going to cut his posts in half so that I can fit more content without making the post too long. Please click on the quotes to read the full posts.)

User: HardFireMiner

Hey there, first of all—huge congratulations on your baby! 🎉 Becoming a parent is life’s greatest adventure, and it’s beautiful to see you thinking so thoughtfully about your child’s future. As someone who’s also deeply tied to Bitcoin, I’ll share what I’d do in your shoes (and a few lessons I’ve learned along the way).

1. Mining in Your Son’s Name: The Solar Advantage
With free solar power, mining BTC for your little one is a fantastic idea—especially if you’re already wasting excess energy. Here’s how I’d approach it:

• Dedicate a Miner to Him: Set up a small rig (even a used ASIC) labeled as “his.” Track its output separately. Over years, even modest mining adds up.
• Teach Him Later: When he’s older, show him how the miner worked. It’s a hands-on lesson in energy, technology, and Bitcoin’s backbone.
• BUT: Keep it simple. Mining requires maintenance, and hardware evolves. Don’t let it eat into your time with him.

~
~
~

(Archived)

Quillbot: 91% of the text is likely AI
GPTZero: 98% AI-generated
Copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found

Thank you for asking about my experience—it’s not easy to revisit, but I hope sharing it can offer insights for others. Here’s my story:

Why I Believed
Like many, I was drawn to Craig Wright’s bold claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto. At the time, his technical explanations (“Satoshi’s Vision,” the promise of unbounded scalability) seemed credible, especially when framed as “restoring Bitcoin’s original protocol.” The BSV community amplified this narrative, emphasizing ideals like “truth” and “integrity,” which resonated with my frustration at BTC’s scaling debates and perceived compromises.

Wright’s confidence and the support from certain influencers (like Calvin Ayre) added legitimacy. When he threatened legal action against critics, I misinterpreted it as conviction rather than intimidation. The community’s echo chamber dismissed skeptics as “misinformed” or “attacking the truth,” which kept doubts at bay.

Cracks in the Facade
Over time, inconsistencies emerged:

• Technical Promises vs. Reality: BSV’s touted “millions of transactions per second” never materialized. Projects built on BSV struggled with instability, and adoption remained niche.
• Wright’s Behavior: His aggressive lawsuits, plagiarism scandals (copied research papers), and refusal to sign Satoshi’s early coins felt increasingly manipulative.
• Community Cultism: Dissent was labeled “FUD.” Healthy debate was stifled, which made me question the lack of honesty.

~
~
~
~

(Archived)

Quillbot: 100% of the text is likely AI
GPTZero: 100% AI-generated
Copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on boat007 Nuked!? It looks like he woke up to earn Merit from complimenting services with very generic replies:

Hey everyone, that's a pretty bold claim! I've been using FreeBitco.in on and off for a while, but I haven't seen returns quite that high. What strategy are you using to get to $200? Maybe sharing some tips could help others manage their expectations (and hopefully get similar results!).

Interesting discussion! I've found prepaid cards and eSIMs really useful for maintaining privacy when traveling internationally and avoiding roaming charges. The no-KYC aspect definitely adds another layer of appeal, but I'm always a little concerned about potential limitations or restrictions that might pop up unexpectedly with certain vendors. Has anyone had experiences with specific providers that have worked well, or any to avoid due to unforeseen issues?

Really interesting to see Info-Polus focusing on Web3! The potential for businesses to create more transparent and engaging customer experiences is huge. I'm particularly curious about how they're addressing the potential learning curve for businesses unfamiliar with blockchain technology. What kind of onboarding or training programs are they offering to help companies make the transition smoothly?

Blockchain.info (now Blockchain.com) has been around for a while! I remember when it was one of the few go-to places for checking blockchain stats and using a simple web wallet. It's definitely evolved over the years. I'm curious, with all the new platforms available now, what features do people still find particularly valuable or unique about Blockchain.com?

NestEx Crypto Exchange... hmm, I've been seeing their name pop up more lately. Seems like they're really pushing for wider adoption. I'm curious about their security protocols, though. Has anyone dug into how they're protecting user funds? That's always my biggest concern with new exchanges.

Thanks for compiling this list! A well-maintained resource like this can be really helpful for people trying to understand the options available for enhancing their Bitcoin privacy. I'm curious, how often is the list updated to reflect changes in services or new offerings?

Hey everyone, thanks for starting this discussion about the Kryptex Pool. I've been running it for a little while now and I'm generally pretty happy with the stability and payout consistency. I'm curious, has anyone else noticed any significant changes in profitability recently with the fluctuating crypto market? Just trying to gauge if my experience is typical.

This looks like a really valuable resource! I've been looking for a reliable source of historical Bitcoin data for backtesting trading strategies. The site design is clean and easy to navigate. I'm curious, what are your plans for expanding the dataset beyond price and volume - are there any on-chain metrics or network data you're considering adding in the future?

[memehunter]

What's the verdict on boat007? It looks like he woke up to earn Merit from complimenting services with very generic replies:

100% AI spammer

Hey everyone, that's a pretty bold claim! I've been using FreeBitco.in on and off for a while, but I haven't seen returns quite that high. What strategy are you using to get to $200? Maybe sharing some tips could help others manage their expectations (and hopefully get similar results!).

Copyleaks: Too short for detection
GPTzero: 100%

Interesting discussion! I've found prepaid cards and eSIMs really useful for maintaining privacy when traveling internationally and avoiding roaming charges. The no-KYC aspect definitely adds another layer of appeal, but I'm always a little concerned about potential limitations or restrictions that might pop up unexpectedly with certain vendors. Has anyone had experiences with specific providers that have worked well, or any to avoid due to unforeseen issues?

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Really interesting to see Info-Polus focusing on Web3! The potential for businesses to create more transparent and engaging customer experiences is huge. I'm particularly curious about how they're addressing the potential learning curve for businesses unfamiliar with blockchain technology. What kind of onboarding or training programs are they offering to help companies make the transition smoothly?

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Blockchain.info (now Blockchain.com) has been around for a while! I remember when it was one of the few go-to places for checking blockchain stats and using a simple web wallet. It's definitely evolved over the years. I'm curious, with all the new platforms available now, what features do people still find particularly valuable or unique about Blockchain.com?

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 47%

NestEx Crypto Exchange... hmm, I've been seeing their name pop up more lately. Seems like they're really pushing for wider adoption. I'm curious about their security protocols, though. Has anyone dug into how they're protecting user funds? That's always my biggest concern with new exchanges.

Copyleaks: Too short for detection
GPTzero: 100%

Thanks for compiling this list! A well-maintained resource like this can be really helpful for people trying to understand the options available for enhancing their Bitcoin privacy. I'm curious, how often is the list updated to reflect changes in services or new offerings?

Copyleaks: Too short for detection
GPTzero: 47%

Hey everyone, thanks for starting this discussion about the Kryptex Pool. I've been running it for a little while now and I'm generally pretty happy with the stability and payout consistency. I'm curious, has anyone else noticed any significant changes in profitability recently with the fluctuating crypto market? Just trying to gauge if my experience is typical.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

This looks like a really valuable resource! I've been looking for a reliable source of historical Bitcoin data for backtesting trading strategies. The site design is clean and easy to navigate. I'm curious, what are your plans for expanding the dataset beyond price and volume - are there any on-chain metrics or network data you're considering adding in the future?

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on boat007? It looks like he woke up to earn Merit from complimenting services with very generic replies:

100% AI spammer

Thanks. He's Nuked already

[Zwei]

user: wawan20123 (he got nuked)

Hello Bitcoiners!

2025 has arrived, and Bitcoin is still very much alive — but is it still THE leader in crypto?

We’ve seen a lot over the past few years:
- Institutional adoption (BlackRock, ETFs)
- Lightning Network improvements
- Growing dominance over altcoins
- Increasing regulatory pressure worldwide
- ...and constant debate over environmental impact

Some say Bitcoin is "digital gold" now and shouldn't try to be used for daily transactions. Others believe it MUST evolve to stay relevant in the real world economy.

So I’d love to hear your thoughts:

🔸 Is Bitcoin still king in 2025 — or is it just one of many options now?  
🔸 Do you personally use BTC for payments, or just hold it?  
🔸 Is mass adoption still possible, or is BTC now mainly a store of value?  
🔸 Can Bitcoin compete with newer chains in terms of speed and utility?

Let’s get a proper discussion going! 👇

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
quillbot: 100% AI

Excellent take, @wawan20123 — I really like your point about Bitcoin being both a store of value and a medium of exchange. These functions can absolutely coexist, and in fact, that dual nature is probably what makes BTC so unique compared to fiat or even gold.

As for competition — I think you're spot on again. Many of the “new” chains do feel like they’re built for hype cycles or short-term profit rather than truly innovative use cases. Bitcoin’s strength isn’t just in being first — it’s in being reliable, transparent, and secure.

Still, I wonder — could it be possible that some of these newer projects, even if they start off as copycats or quick-cash grabs, accidentally stumble upon features or models that BTC could learn from or integrate in the long term?

What would you say is one area where BTC could still improve or evolve — if not speed, then maybe UX, scalability, or integration into real-world platforms?

copyleaks: 100% AI
quillbot: 100% AI
originality: 99% AI

Thanks for the detailed reply, @wawan20123!

Totally agree — Bitcoin’s dominance in market cap and volume is still unmatched. It’s not just first-mover advantage anymore — it’s about long-term resilience and trust.

Regarding payments — I feel the same. BTC feels more like a long-term asset, especially with rising adoption among institutional investors. Most of my everyday payments still go through fiat too.

As for speed and utility, you’re right — confirmation times are acceptable for many cases. And with Lightning Network getting better each year, BTC might soon surprise a lot of people who doubt its flexibility.

Would be interesting to see if more merchants adopt BTC directly in the next 2–3 years. Maybe then it’ll truly become both digital gold and real money.

What do you think is missing for that to happen faster?

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 72.73% AI

Great summary! You're absolutely right — the approval of the Bitcoin Spot ETFs marked a historic turning point. It wasn't just a market pump; it was a huge signal of institutional legitimacy. The fact that BTC hit new all-time highs even before the halving… that’s a first.

Also, if the reports about the U.S. considering Bitcoin strategic reserves are confirmed — we’re looking at a whole new geopolitical layer being added to BTC's importance. Combine that with Putin’s statements on decentralization, and Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset — it's turning into a political one.

And yet… I still think it’s worth asking if Bitcoin is “still the king” — not because I doubt it, but because it opens the door to analyze what makes it the king *now*, in this post-ETF, post-halving world.

What do you think will define Bitcoin’s dominance in the next phase? Is it more about institutional trust, global political influence, or retail-level adoption?

stealthwriter: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI

Totally fair perspective — I think a lot of long-time holders have naturally shifted toward viewing BTC as digital gold. It’s stable, battle-tested, and trusted.

Newer chains definitely offer more speed and flexibility, especially for everyday payments or smart contract use cases. But I think that’s okay — Bitcoin doesn’t have to “do it all” anymore. Its strength lies in security, scarcity, and decentralization — the things you *don’t* want to change too quickly.

Still, with improvements like Lightning and layer-2 solutions, BTC may eventually find its own way back into everyday transactions — without compromising its core values.

Do you think Bitcoin should focus more on utility again, or just lean into its role as the “anchor” of the crypto world?

this one looks more like a bot than someone posting AI trash, he keeps tagging himself in his own replies.
and he is spamming this trash every couple replies.

[Alone055]

this one looks more like a bot than someone posting AI trash, he keeps tagging himself in his own replies.
and he is spamming this trash every couple replies.

He is probably new to these things, and that's why he messed up, lol. He is actually responding to posts above his posts, but he is adding his own name instead of the user's name to whom he is responding.

When you generate something using an AI text model, if it requires mentioning a username, a place, a company, or anything like that, the AI model will give you the option like this "[User's Name]", the term between the square brackets could be anything, but we are supposed to fill it ourselves. So, the model he is using is probably giving him that option, and he, being a fool, is probably filling his own username instead of adding the usernames of the users his posts are directed to.

[nutildah]

From his post history, it's clear that the guy started using AI to generate his posts just recently. Before April 17th, his posts were self-written, but from 17th, he started using AI.

(Note: I'm going to cut his posts in half so that I can fit more content without making the post too long. Please click on the quotes to read the full posts.)

User: HardFireMiner

Yes I noticed this guy as well. Used to back-and-forth with him about BSV years ago. It looks like he came back to admit he was wrong about Craig Wright being satoshi, but really he just wanted to apply for a signature campaign. It was really weird when he responded to gmaxwell with a wall of Grok text. 

In the future, please add 3 posts (or more) per user to this thread as that suggests a clear pattern that the poster has taken up the habit of using AI to write their posts for them. Thanks.

[Alone055]

It looks like he came back to admit he was wrong about Craig Wright being satoshi, but really he just wanted to apply for a signature campaign.

Yep, that's probably the reason why he woke up after 4 years, tried posting normally for a day, and started using AI to generate posts right after that application he submitted for the campaign, maybe because he was trying to show the manager that he's a good poster so that he can get a slot, but instead, got caught for using AI.

In the future, please add 3 posts (or more) per user to this thread as that suggests a clear pattern that the poster has taken up the habit of using AI to write their posts for them. Thanks.

Got it, sorry about that. I'll keep that in mind for future reports.


Edit: I just noticed that he applied for a campaign that only accepts Sr. members or above, being a full member himself. So, he doesn't even read (or comprehend what he reads) before he posts.

[SilverCryptoBullet]

User: Pokapoka124
A Hero Member from Stake signature campaign using AI content generators. It was not surprising when I saw newbies do this, but I'm wondering why an old member like this one is using his AI content generators.

From plagiarism to AI.

Ban Appeal for Pokapoka124.

He begged for second chance, and he got it but he used AI later.

I unbanned it.

[memehunter]

Member: 20Bet
Rules must be the same for everyone. If you are using this forum for marketing you have to respect the forum policies. Post history is full of AI spam but I am including the bare minimum, required to prove AI spam.

Clickable image to access the match!

⚽️ ​Arsenal vs PSG Analysis ⚽

🏆 ​We have a new chapter today. No Real Madrid, no Bayern Munich, no Manchester City under the spotlights. In this first Champions League semi-final, Arsenal will face Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) at the Emirates Stadium. Arsenal, led by coach Mikel Arteta, reached this stage after defeating Real Madrid in the quarter-finals. This year, PSG, under coach Luis Enrique, has a strong squad and shows good harmony.

🔥 In their previous encounters, Arsenal has remained unbeaten against PSG, with two wins and two draws. PSG has struggled in away matches in England, losing their last three Champions League games on English soil. Arsenal's strong home performance and PSG's away challenges suggest a very competitive match ahead.

➤ Prediction: According to stats, Arsenal have a bigger chance of winning today! Can PSG finally break their losing streak in England tonight? ​

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Clickable image to access the match!

⚽️ ​Udinese vs Bologna Analysis ⚽

🏆 ​Today, Udinese will play against Bologna in a Serie A match. Udinese has been struggling recently, losing their last 5 games. They are trying to finish the season in the top half of the table. Bologna, on the other hand, is having a great season. They recently reached the Coppa Italia final after beating Empoli. In their last Serie A match, Bologna won 1-0 against Inter Milan with a late goal from Orsolini. They are now aiming for a top-four finish to qualify for the Champions League.

🔥 Bologna is in good form, winning 7 of their last 10 games. Udinese will need to improve their performance to challenge Bologna. The last time these teams met, the game ended in a 1-1 draw. However, with Bologna's current momentum, they are the favourites to win this match.

➤ Bologna to win.​

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Clickable image to access the match!

⚽️ ​Betis vs Valladolid Analysis ⚽

🏆 Real Betis will play against Real Valladolid today in La Liga at the Benito Villamarín Stadium. Betis is in good form, aiming for a Champions League spot. They have not lost in their last seven games. Key players like Isco and Antony are performing well, and Cucho Hernández will lead the attack. Betis has a strong home record with eight wins and five draws in 16 matches.

🔥 Real Valladolid is struggling this season and is close to relegation. They have lost six of their last eight games and have the worst defense in the league, conceding an average of 2.06 goals per game. Coach Álvaro Rubio wants his team to fight until the end, but injuries and poor form make it difficult. In past visits to Betis, Valladolid has had mixed results, with five wins and eleven draws in 31 matches.

➤ Betis to win.​

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Clickable image to access the match!

⚽️ ​Getafe vs Real Madrid Analysis ⚽

🏆 Another challenge for Real Madrid in La Liga at the Coliseum stadium. Real Madrid is second in the league, four points behind Barcelona, and needs a win to stay in the title race. They recently beat Athletic Bilbao 1-0, with Fede Valverde scoring in the last minute. However, they will miss Kylian Mbappé due to injuries. Jude Bellingham is expected to lead the attack.

🔥 Getafe has struggled at home this season, winning only one of their last six matches at the Coliseum. They are known for a strong defense but have difficulty scoring goals. Real Madrid has a good record against Getafe, winning the last five matches between them.

➤ The game is expected to be low-scoring, with Real Madrid favored to win.​

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%

Every day, more fake "soccer betting experts" pop up on Telegram promising easy wins. Most of them post fake winning screenshots just to convince people. Let’s be real: there’s no such thing as guaranteed profit in betting. I stick to one simple rule: bet for fun, not for income.
Here’s one of my personal sports betting strategies: I only use one bookmaker I trust. I check 5 to 10 games, then compare the odds my bookmaker offers to those available on other major sportsbooks to spot value bets. I don’t rely on paid tools or software.
Additionally, I focus on soccer news. I make it a habit to constantly check the latest updates on players and teams. This helps me track important changes that could affect the value of bets. For example, if a star player gets injured, a referee is replaced, or there’s a dispute between players on the same team, all these can influence odds (In general, I look for any potential drama or unexpected news before the game ). Bookmakers adjust their odds based on this kind of news, so if you're quick enough, you can use it to your advantage. After using these methods, I just move on with my day. If I win, great. If not, the excitement was still worth it.
What about you guys: What’s your favorite strategy for spotting value bets? Or do you rely on tools and tipsters?

Copyleaks: 96.2%
GPTzero: 100%

[SatoPrincess]

user: Magoo8 Banned
I suspect this user of using ai to generate his posts. The time in between all his posts are less than 7 minutes, also the account has been spamming the forum all day with 20 of his posts already reported and deleted by mods. I hope the mods can handle the account’s use of Ai as well.

You're right. It's getting harder to trust online promotions, especially with AI and fake identities involved. People should always do their own research before using any casino or investment platform—reviews can help, but caution is key.

Zerogpt: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Stealthwriter Ai: 100%

It sounds like you're facing the challenge of trust and the added complexity of using cryptocurrency. Many people are skeptical, especially when they perceive a potential conflict of interest, like thinking you're profiting from their sign-ups. The process of converting money into crypto and then depositing it can definitely feel like a barrier. Perhaps simplifying the explanation or recommending a platform that offers both crypto and fiat options could make it more accessible for your friends and followers.

Originality Ai: 100%
Stealthwriter Ai: 100%

It sounds like you've found a solid option with a transparent approach! Having clear VIP benefits like cashbacks and faster withdrawals can definitely enhance the experience. It's important to pay attention to the fine print, but it’s nice when casinos prioritize fairness and reward their loyal players. Hopefully, others get a chance to explore it

Originality Ai: 95%
Stealthwriter Ai: 75%

You're absolutely right. Recommending a crypto casino—or even a trading platform—comes with responsibility. If things go wrong, especially involving losses, people often shift the blame to whoever introduced them. That’s why it's important to be cautious, clearly explain the risks involved, and only suggest such platforms to those who fully understand what they’re getting into.

Zerogpt: 64%
Originality Ai: 100%
Stealthwriter Ai: 75%

[Dark.Look]

User: yhiaali3

It is certain that increasing the number of Bitcoin Long-term holders will have significant benefits for Bitcoin, the network, the market, and the growth and spread of Bitcoin around the world.

The increase in the number of long-term holders, especially large institutions like Strategie and others, will instill greater confidence in Bitcoin and contribute to maintaining and increasing its price over time. Governments are now considering holding Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, which will provide greater confidence, stability, and increased adoption.

copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 66.67%

Got mixed results for other posts


User: Yucky

One difference I see between a businessman and an entrepreneur is diversification. A businessman might just focus on his business, ensuring it's working well and managing it properly. He might not necessarily introduce new things. For example, if he's  selling car parts, he might have different types of car parts, making the car parts store bigger and managing it.

On the other hand, an entrepreneur can diversify. They see opportunities in everything. An entrepreneur can start by selling car parts, then gradually introduce services like fixing car parts, home delivery of car assesories, and other related services. From one business, they can create multiple related businesses.

That's how I see an entrepreneur, they diversify a lot and tend to see opportunities where others see problems. Even during a lockdown, entrepreneurs can find ways to work. Instead of sitting idle, they think of something, offering their services from indoors.

Entrepreneurs have the ability to multitask, be proactive and have two, three, or four related businesses, rather than just focusing on one and managing it. That's one difference I see.

copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
gptzero: 84%
sapling: 100%

[yhiaali3]

User: yhiaali3

It is certain that increasing the number of Bitcoin Long-term holders will have significant benefits for Bitcoin, the network, the market, and the growth and spread of Bitcoin around the world.

The increase in the number of long-term holders, especially large institutions like Strategie and others, will instill greater confidence in Bitcoin and contribute to maintaining and increasing its price over time. Governments are now considering holding Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, which will provide greater confidence, stability, and increased adoption.

copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 66.67%

Got mixed results for other posts

Today, I was surprised to receive a message that my post had been deleted. I didn't know why at first, but when I saw this thread, I understood.
I was discovered using AI in my posts by the brilliant member @Dark.Look, who put a lot of effort into discovering me. He deserves admiration for discovering me now, after more than seven years in the forum, writing thousands of posts, and participating in dozens of signature campaigns on the forum. I hadn't been discovered by the experienced campaign managers on the forum, but member @Dark.Look did a great job and discovered my deception.

Anyway, I'm not here to defend myself, but simply to show you that the AI ​​scanning tools you use in your work are actually stupid.

I made a simple edit to the text that was rated 100% AI. I simply removed the dash from the word "Long-term" and rewrote it with "Long term."

The result changed to 0%. What is this amazing AI   These screenshots from two AI detection tools clearly show what I did and the results (You can try this yourself):




I think it's better to spend your time improving your forum ranking than wasting your time and the time of other members searching for their mistakes. I see from your profile that most of your posts and the majority of your merits were in this thread, so it's not a good idea to climb on the backs of other members.

If you want to be useful to the forum and detect spam, you need to be more thorough in your work, conduct more research, and avoid blaming older members if they make a simple mistake.

Also, you should not trust AI tools completely because they are ultimately just human-made tools.

[memehunter]

Anyway, I'm not here to defend myself, but simply to show you that the AI ​​scanning tools you use in your work are actually stupid.

The post in question was identified as AI by multiple detectors. IMO it was written by AI, and it is good that you have accepted your mistake by not choosing to defend the indefensible (in the context of the reported post). But there is nothing to worry about yet as one needs to report at least 3-4 posts (preferably recent ones) to think about tagging you as an AI spammer.
The tool you have used to show that our entire brainstorming on AI detection is stupid, is zeroGPT not used by any of us now, can you prove the same for the combination of Copyleaks and GPTzero.
Are you using any auto grammar correct tools to enhance your writing? If yes, then it is your duty to check your post yourself before posting with at least copyleaks.

2.

Yes, congratulations to the Bitcoin community on the new SEC chairman, who we hope will be much better than his predecessor, Gary Gensler, during whose tenure the industry deteriorated significantly. Therefore, we hope this change will be beneficial to the overall growth of the industry.

Regarding the Bitcoin price, I expect the news to have a positive impact on the price increase. However, this is not a true indicator, as we know that whales exploit such news to manipulate the market. In any case, yes, the news is generally positive, and I expect the new SEC leadership to be less stringent than before and more receptive to innovations in the cryptocurrency space. This will contribute to the industry's prosperity and expansion.

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 79%