AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Findingnemo]

Another newbie shitting the technical board with AI generic crap.

User: DenMarkusX

Post 1.

The difference between the two options mainly revolves around how you manage your seed phrase and your hardware wallet's interaction with it.

When you choose "I already have a Seed," you're essentially importing your seed phrase into the software. This means the software has access to your private keys, which could be less secure if the device or software gets compromised.

On the other hand, "Use a Hardware Device" means you're connecting your hardware wallet to the software. In this case, your seed phrase remains securely stored on the hardware device, and the software merely facilitates the transaction. The signing process occurs on the hardware device itself, ensuring that your private keys are never exposed to the computer or software, which is much safer.

So, while entering the seed manually is possible, it's generally recommended to use the hardware device for better security. I hope this clears things up!

GPTZero: 100% Probability AI-Generated
Copyleaks: AI Content D00%
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

The user doesn't have many posts in his profile to meet the requirements but still I am reporting here to use as a reference for my reporting since this is an obvious text created by ChatGPT.

[Lucius]

User : katergde

Despite a 12% decline in Bitcoin prices during the second quarter, market volatility has not dampened the enthusiasm of institutional investors for Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This trend underscores the confidence of institutional investors in cryptocurrency asset allocation and their optimistic outlook on the future potential of the market. JYPRX Exchange has played a pivotal role in this trend, offering a reliable and secure trading platform for global investors.


Institutional Investors Aggressively Expand Bitcoin ETF Holdings

According to the latest report from Bitwise, the primary focus in the cryptocurrency sector is whether institutional and professional investors will significantly allocate assets to cryptocurrencies. While Bitcoin prices fell in the second quarter, this did not deter institutional investors from increasing their Bitcoin ETF allocations. The report indicates that the number of institutional investors holding Bitcoin ETFs grew from 965 in the first quarter to 1,100 in the second quarter, a 14% increase. This growth suggests that institutional investors remain confident in the long-term value of Bitcoin, even amid price declines, and continue to view it as a cornerstone of cryptocurrency assets.

This confidence extends not only to Bitcoin itself but also to the underlying infrastructure of the cryptocurrency market. As a leading global crypto trading platform, JYPRX is actively contributing to the maturation of this market by offering a diverse range of trading tools and a secure investment environment for institutional investors. Through innovative technological solutions and strict compliance management, JYPRX ensures that the platform remains stable and reliable, even in the face of market volatility.

The Growth Momentum of Bitcoin ETFs

The Bitwise report also highlights a significant increase in the share of institutional investors in the total assets under management (AUM) of Bitcoin ETFs, rising from 18.74% in the first quarter to 21.15% in the second quarter. As of this quarter, the value of Bitcoin ETFs held by institutions has reached $11 billion. This data reflects the strong demand and trust institutional investors have in Bitcoin ETFs, indicating that they are steadily increasing their exposure to cryptocurrencies through these financial instruments.

JYPRX Exchange recognizes the importance of this trend and has tailored a range of innovative products and services for institutional investors. From providing more transparent market data to developing high-frequency trading tools specifically for institutions, JYPRX continually optimizes its platform to meet the growing demand. We actively collaborate with major asset management companies to drive the development of financial products like Bitcoin ETFs, ensuring their broad acceptance globally.

Leading Innovation in the Future of the Crypto Market

As more institutional investors enter the cryptocurrency market, the entire market ecosystem is undergoing profound changes. As a driving force behind this evolution, JYPRX Exchange remains committed to providing a safe and efficient trading platform, helping more investors seize opportunities in this emerging market. Through continuous innovation and platform enhancement, JYPRX will maintain its leading position in the global cryptocurrency market, offering institutional investors a trusted trading environment.

Despite the decline in Bitcoin prices during the second quarter, institutional investors have significantly increased their allocations to Bitcoin ETFs. This phenomenon not only reflects their confidence in the long-term value of Bitcoin but also highlights the role of JYPRX Exchange in advancing market development. Looking ahead, we will continue to provide global investors with more investment opportunities and support, helping them achieve greater success in the cryptocurrency space.

GPTZero -> 65% AI
ZeroGPT -> Your Text is AI/GPT Generated 91.53%
Copyleaks -> AI Content Detected

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

A new chatbot diarrhea

User: rowtiz

Hello, everyone.

I've been thinking a lot about the recent surge in Bitcoin's price, especially in light of broader economic trends that seem to be heading in a dangerous direction.

First, global debt has now ballooned to over 300% of global GDP—a level that’s widely considered unsustainable. What's even more concerning is the fact that the rate of debt growth far outpaces that of GDP, a gap that’s especially concerning in economies with declining birth rates. To put it simply, governments are increasing money supply by issuing more debt to pay existing debt, much like covering one credit card bill with another. This cycle is one of the primary drivers of inflation, something Bitcoin was designed to hedge against.

But here’s the big question: How long can inflation remain the problem?

To me, it resembles a house of cards, where each "card" represents more printed money and higher inflation. Eventually, the structure reaches a tipping point—if we keep stacking cards, the house will collapse. When this collapse happens, we could be facing more than just inflationary pressures; we’re looking at potential deflation, bank runs in search of liquidity, and a widespread deleveraging of risky assets.

In this fragile setup, fiat money, which is backed primarily by debt and governmental promises, could lose its foundation. In such scenarios, demand for cash could surge suddenly, possibly leading to a liquidity crisis where capital leaves risk assets en masse.

Many see Bitcoin as a hedge against this very kind of economic instability. However, I have concerns about the role of recent Bitcoin ETFs and large institutional players. Many of these investors may not fully understand Bitcoin's underlying technology, let alone hold their private keys. Yet, they are pushing Bitcoin’s price upwards in the short term, driven by traditional market dynamics rather than long-term conviction in Bitcoin’s potential.

As we know, financial markets move in cycles, and a correction or crash is only a matter of time. When the next crash hits—and I believe it’s on the horizon—it’s plausible that institutional investors may start liquidating assets, including Bitcoin ETFs, to cover their obligations. Such a scenario could lead to a severe price correction for Bitcoin, even if its intrinsic value as a hedge remains unchanged.

What are your thoughts on this? Do you see Bitcoin's current price as a bubble influenced by institutional trading and ETFs? And how do you view Bitcoin’s role in a potentially deflationary scenario, where liquidity is scarce and confidence in traditional assets is eroding?

Looking forward to your insights.

Hivemoderation-> 99.9% AI
ZeroGPT ->  31% AI
Copyleaks -> 43% AI Content Detected

[Alone055]

User: Gaynel

You bring up a good point about inflation and deflation. While they can definitely mess with the economy, I think high unemployment and political instability can be even more damaging. I’ve seen how tough it is for friends struggling to find work; it’s not just about the money—they start feeling lost and frustrated. Plus, when people feel like they’re not getting a fair shot, it can lead to all sorts of unrest. So yeah, while inflation and deflation are important issues, we can't ignore those other factors because they can really shake things up too.

(archived)

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: Mix of AI and human
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake


The guy is a new user, only made 4 posts so far, and already started churning out AI-generated texts, maybe expecting to get through it and rank up possibly quicker since AI can write pretty well. 

[nutildah]

Noticed this bounty hunter (with a 2017 account) fluffing up their post count with some good 'ol ChatGPT:

Queen077

Post #1 - using AI to write a post about AI; the nexus of nothingness

As long as there's human existence on the globe, innovation will never cease. Similar to how Uber and Airbnb have revolutionized the taxi and hotel industries instead of destroying them, artificial intelligence is not going to replace people in any business. Humans are still required to oversee or control AI-based procedures. In order to survive in the upcoming era, which will be dominated by artificial intelligence, humans must accept this transition and prepare to integrate this new technology. One well-known example is the demise of Nokia Mobile, which refused to embrace the recently developed Android operating system, while Samsung did so and now controls the majority of the mobile market.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 99.9% Fake


Post #2

Casino platforms generally do not allow bots in their dice games.

Bots can give players an unfair advantage by automatically placing bets and making decisions based on algorithms, which can disrupt the balance of the game for human players. This can lead to unfair outcomes and undermine the integrity of the casino.  

While some platforms may have more relaxed policies or enforcement, it's important to note that using a bot can result in your account being suspended or banned. If you're unsure about a specific platform's policy, it's best to contact their customer support for clarification.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake


Post #3

Cryptocurrency has rapidly evolved from a niche digital asset to a viable medium of exchange for goods and services. While traditional payment methods like credit cards and cash remain dominant, the adoption of cryptocurrencies is steadily increasing.

Benefits of Using Crypto for Purchases:

Decentralization: Crypto transactions are not controlled by a central authority, making them potentially more secure and resistant to censorship.
Global Reach: Cryptocurrencies can be used to make payments across borders without incurring high transaction fees or conversion rates.
Anonymity: While not entirely anonymous, crypto transactions can offer a degree of privacy compared to traditional payment methods.
Innovation: Cryptocurrencies are driving innovation in various industries, such as gaming, finance, and supply chain management.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake


I thought this was kind of interesting. Its a list of ChatGPT's most overused words. Although the methodology of their collection seems arbitrary, I recognize a lot of these words/phrases and its a good way to help further identify AI posts.

Here's the words/phrases, in alphabetical order:

Additionally    alright    Also    Alternatively    Although    amongst    Arguably    As a professional    As previously mentioned    As well as    Because    Bustling    complexities    Consequently    Crucial    cutting-edge    daunting    Delve into    designed to enhance    Despite    dive    Dive into    diving    Due to    elevate    embark    Embark    Emphasize / Emphasize    Enhance    Enigma    Ensure    Essential    Essentially    Even if    Even though    ever-evolving    everchanging    excels    expanding    Fancy    Firstly    Foster    Furthermore    game changer    Game changer    Generally    Given that    Gossamer    harness    hey    However    imagine    Importantly    In conclusion     In contrast    In order to    In summary    in the realm of    In the world of    In today's digital age    In today's digital era    Indeed    Indelible    it is advisable    It's essential to    It's important to note    It's worth noting that    Journey    Keen    Labyrinth    Landscape    mastering    meticulously    Metropolis    Moreover    My friend    navigating    Navigating    Nestled    not only    Notably    On the other hand    power    Promptly    rapidly    realm    Realm    Remember that…    Remnant    Reverberate    Revolutionize    shall    Sights unseen    Sounds unheard    Specifically    Subsequently    tailored    Take a dive into    Tapestry    Testament    the world of    There are a few considerations    Therefore    Thus    To consider    To put it simply    To summarize    towards    Ultimately    underpins    understanding    unleash    Unless    unlock the secrets    unveil the secrets    Vibrant    Vital    when it comes to    While    Whispering    You may want to

[LoyceV]

Another one: Newbie realtrappers looks like a chatbot diarrhea spammer:

Hello Bitcointalk Community!

Bitcoin's introduction revolutionized the way we think about money, enabling peer-to-peer transactions without the need for trusted intermediaries. However, as adoption grows and more users interact with the ecosystem, there's one issue that continues to loom large: the double spending problem.

While Bitcoin's blockchain effectively mitigates the risk of double spending through consensus mechanisms, the real-world implications pose a challenge that we need to address. As Bitcoin gains traction in everyday transactions, how can we ensure that double spending becomes a relic of the past?

Real-World Transactions: When we make regular purchases with Bitcoin, how do we assure both parties that the transaction hasn't been duplicated elsewhere?

Merchant Integration: As businesses begin to accept Bitcoin, they need simple and effective ways to verify transactions. What tools and methods can we create or improve to help merchants do this effortlessly?

Lightning Network: While the Lightning Network promises speedy transactions, does it complicate the risk of double spending in practice? How can we make it more secure?

I propose we share our thoughts, insights, and possible solutions to the double spending problem in today's context. Here are some guiding questions to kick off the conversation:

What existing solutions do you think work well, and what and where are their limitations?
Are there any new technologies or methodologies that could be adapted to alleviate this issue?
How can we educate users (both consumers and merchants) about best practices to avoid double spending?
The goal here is to brainstorm collectively, share ideas, and potentially pave the way for innovative solutions that could solidify Bitcoin's role as a viable medium of exchange in everyday life.

Please share your thoughts in the comments below! Let’s make this a collaborative effort. I believe that with our combined knowledge and creativity, we can tackle this challenge head-on. If you have any relevant experiences or anecdotal evidence, those will be super valuable in understanding the real-world implications of this issue!

Let's come together and pave the path for Bitcoin to not only be a store of value but also a legitimate currency for everyday transactions. Looking forward to everyone's insightful contributions!

P.S. If you know developers, economists, or enthusiasts who could contribute, please share this post! The more minds we have tackling this, the better!

[Ultegra134]

I wrote this report a while ago, but due to personal health issues was unable to post it. I first sent it to two valued members of this forum for a second opinion, but now I'm publicly posting it. For this report, I'm going to be using paid services that specialize in academic AI detection, instead of the two or three known ones we use. This is a rather complicated report.

Screenshots can be found here: Screenshots

User: Yatsan

Post 1.

You raise some really interesting points about the current global economic crisis and how governments should focus on savings spending. Indeed, there is that time when the government gets overspent. This is especially so during the social and medical fields. is soon over But during times of financial crises for many countries, budget cuts and cutbacks in spending seem to be very viable solutions. Simultaneously, governments should concentrate on investments in sectors more likely to create long-run impact, such as innovation, education, and infrastructure.

And then there's printing of money, you said it is not a sound solution. Money printing easily causes inflation to everyone. And makes things worse for everyone. At least without increases in goods and services. The biggest challenge for the government now is balancing this with reducing unnecessary spending. And ensuring that the government continues to invest in growth.

The geopolitical situation with Russia and Ukraine has also added several issues to a number of challenges. especially the loss of natural resources like oil and gas. It would be interesting to consider the possibility of a change in leadership in Russia. As this could truly reshape global economic relations, however, countries now have the task at hand to build resilience within their own economies. distribution of resources and investing in sustainable development to weather the storm ahead.

At first, Winston.ai detector doesn’t detect this as AI, only a mere 15-20%, after correcting some “mistakes” though that are in bold, this changes completely, from 20% Human, to 2% human
Winston.ai: 98% AI
Originality.ai:98% AI
Smodin: 100% AI

Post 2.

I understand how that can be, though-open a similar business right across from yours. Makes you feel like you're ripping off your hard work. In my mind, though, you can't avoid business competition. Had the other end not been quite as smoothly covered, I'd take it more as an act of jealousy and personal attack whereas to view it more as a challenge to improve service and customer experience is an effective method of dealing with competition. Another way is to emphasize what makes your business unique. The difference can be customer service. or the quality of your products. or a personal touch that others cannot easily replicate. That is where most people look for a difference-to stand apart by painting themselves as stronger than others. Customers are more likely to be loyal to brands they trust. To create a robust relationship means so much.

The other idea is that of collaboration. At certain points in time, companies offering the same product team up. It could be co-promotion of the same product or recommending a particular product to customers when it's not available in their line. It makes the battle a win-win situation. In the end, Competition is everywhere. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. Competition prepares us and can motivate us to grow. It is important to focus on your self-worth, rather than being distracted by what other people are doing.

Winston.ai initially detects 65% as human, but after a few corrections on the random periods ( . ) on the text, it detects 94% AI (or 6% human).
Originality, initially doesn’t detect it as ai, after a few corrections, it’s 100% AI. Even Copyleaks detects it after the few corrections.
Starting a hypothetical sentence "Had the other end not been quite as smoothly covered" is generally considered advanced for someone whose English isn't the first language, yet, someone with almost perfect grammar doesn't know where to place simple punctuation marks such as a comma or a period.

Post 3.

Thanks for sharing your experience! This is a great reminder of how important it is to always check the terms and conditions when it comes to promotions. It’s frustrating when casinos make their offers sound more appealing than they actually are. I’ve seen similar promotions where they promote it as a “bonus” only for it to be some form of cashback with strings attached, like wagering requirements.

The part about using the bonus only after the main balance is depleted is something that can easily catch people off guard. These hidden issues can turn what appears to be a positive experience into a serious problem. It is a lesson for all of us to always read good publications, no matter how misleading the announcements may seem. Casino marketing is very clever. And it's easy to overlook the details when you're happy with a bonus. Thanks again for the heads up. Hopefully more players will take care before diving into these plans!

Both detect 98-100% AI usage


Post 4.

I see your point entirely and concedes that the quest to find the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto often diverts from the true nature of Bitcoin. Its greatest appeal is in its structure of governance and the powers it gives users to maintain its identity. Personal and manages their own assets Satoshi's anonymity does not reflect this principle. It emphasizes that the internet doesn't depend on any individual.

Of course, knowing the identity of Satoshi doesn't change the fact about Bitcoin's technology or its value. The protocol is already good to go without needing any intermediate computation to be done. So, Satoshi's disclosure may be uncalled for and bring unnecessary protests or even legal issues that may not go well with Bitcoin's decentralization. As you said, pure Bitcoiners are interested in what Bitcoin can accomplish-financial independence. Accounting resistance and privacy Maybe instead of trying to expose Satoshi it's more important to protect the values ​​of Bitcoin and let the technology speak for itself.

Both show high percentages of AI with a few corrections.

Let's see something else now. Using the first post, we'll try replying via ChatGPT to see what results in yields.

ChatGPT

You raise some very valid points on the balancing act governments face during financial crises. Budget cuts and careful spending can help, but as you mentioned, the right areas need focus—investment in sectors like education, infrastructure, and innovation can support long-term growth and resilience, which is crucial given the current challenges.
Money printing, while often a tempting option for quick relief, does come with heavy risks, especially inflation. Without a corresponding increase in production, it essentially dilutes the currency, impacting everyone’s purchasing power. It’s a tough path, as you said, and the key is reducing unnecessary expenditures while maintaining crucial investments.
The geopolitical instability with Russia and Ukraine adds another layer of complexity, especially around energy resources. It’s forcing many countries to rethink energy dependencies and build more self-sustaining economies, which, in the long run, could lead to significant shifts in global trade and economic policies. A change in Russian leadership could indeed reshape things, but until then, nations would be wise to strengthen their own economies with sustainable development and resource diversification.
In the end, building resilience will likely determine how well nations come out on the other side of this crisis, especially in a rapidly changing global landscape.

Yatsan’s Post
You raise some really interesting points about the current global economic crisis and how governments should focus on savings spending. Indeed, there is that time when the government gets overspent. This is especially so during the social and medical fields. is soon over But during times of financial crises for many countries, budget cuts and cutbacks in spending seem to be very viable solutions. Simultaneously, governments should concentrate on investments in sectors more likely to create long-run impact, such as innovation, education, and infrastructure.
And then there's printing of money, you said it is not a sound solution. Money printing easily causes inflation to everyone. And makes things worse for everyone. At least without increases in goods and services. The biggest challenge for the government now is balancing this with reducing unnecessary spending. And ensuring that the government continues to invest in growth.
The geopolitical situation with Russia and Ukraine has also added several issues to a number of challenges. especially the loss of natural resources like oil and gas. It would be interesting to consider the possibility of a change in leadership in Russia. As this could truly reshape global economic relations, however, countries now have the task at hand to build resilience within their own economies. distribution of resources and investing in sustainable development to weather the storm ahead.

If you look closely, you’ll see many similarities, both posts are raising the exact topics and pointing out the same things, and this is something that can be noticed in many of his posts.

Let's see one more.
Yatsan's Post

An interesting question indeed: Satoshi Nakamoto's anonymity and its implications for the Bitcoin community. On the one hand, with Satoshi's anonymity, Bitcoin operates without central authority. Let it live on its own power. Fact is This probably is one key reason for growth on this decentralized system. Free from personal control, the Bitcoin community finds worth in communities and sovereignty. Therefore, there is a fear that exposure of Satoshi's identity will bring unanticipated psychological effects on the internet and employees. Another reason is that he supposedly holds a huge quantity of Bitcoin, equal to about 1 million BTC. Name recognition can induce the fear of losing much money. This may compromise market stability. Even though Satoshi commits to the principles of Bitcoin, the perception of control or The "founder effect" may still be in opposition to Bitcoin's core value of decentralization.

Besides, local leaders may believe that the name should be retained as Satoshi to retain the nature of Bitcoin as a "leaderless" currency, true to its principles. And it can also be feared that anonymity will attract There is a high level of scrutiny by governments or organizations and other bodies that can view Bitcoin in another light if they knew the origins of its creator. It is possible that Bitcoin activists pay little heed to any effort. Proving Satoshi's identity would be a diversion from the great value that Bitcoin has: it is a permissionless, distributed financial system. That being said, some believe that knowing who Satoshi is will "uncover some of the mystery surrounding Bitcoin" and, as such, improve its reputation.

ChatGPT's Reply

That’s an interesting take! The topic of Satoshi’s identity has always sparked debate in the community, and it’s true that some leaders seem cautious about the idea of Satoshi re-emerging. But rather than fear, many probably see it as preserving the unique foundation that makes Bitcoin what it is.
When Satoshi stepped away, they left Bitcoin as a truly decentralized, leaderless network. Bitcoin’s power comes from its community-driven nature, not from a single figurehead, and that’s a huge part of its appeal. If Satoshi were to come back and reveal themselves, it might shift focus away from the technology and toward the individual, which could introduce unwanted attention or even influence on Bitcoin’s direction. That’s a risk to the decentralized vision a lot of people want to protect.
So, I’d say it’s less about “privilege” and more about maintaining the decentralized, trustless nature that’s given Bitcoin its strength. Satoshi’s anonymity has become a powerful symbol of Bitcoin’s independence, which is probably why so many in the community would prefer it stays that way.

To summarize, there are a few tools, such as humanizers that make text almost undetectable on AI detectors. These services paraphrase the initial text, for example from "a truly decentralized leaderless network" to "permissionless, distributed financial system", in an attempt to retain the initial meaning of the sentence, but changing the wording completely. Moreover, because sometimes that's not enough, it purposely messes up your text, as we've seen here, by ending grammatically perfect sentences with random periods ( . ) in the text, and capitalized letters. This might be happening in conjuction with the humanizer and manually by the poster.

[nutildah]

Thanks to Ultegra134, we can be assured that accounts are still editing ChatGPT output to make it appear to be non-AI. Its like, they could have just spent an equal amount of time writing an organic post using their own brain at this point.

Post 3.

For this one, not much is changed (if anything), as Hivemoderation says 99.4% likely AI and Sapling says 100% fake. So we know for sure they are using ChatGPT.

Reading through some of Yatsan's other posts, it seems like the humanizer does stuff like

- add "In my opinion" to the start of sentences
- start sentences with "And" (a no-no in proper English)
- use "very" as an adjective too many times
- remove commas
- capitalize words for no reason
- tack on "as you said" to the end of sentences

These things do make ChatGPT text seem a bit more human written, but in a very perfunctory and calculated manner.

Here's an example of what I'm talking about (and what Ultegra134 is pointing out as well):

Original post (Hivemoderation = 11.5%):

It is very important to view gambling as a hobby rather than a means of acquiring wealth. And setting clear limits on losses and profits helps keep things in perspective. Another point I want to make is emotional satisfaction. People tend to get caught up in the moment. Especially when trying to recoup losses. This is where discipline really comes into play. Adhering to a fixed strategy Even if you want to chase your losses But it can prevent you from moving up and losing more than you planned.

Another useful strategy is to regularly track your gambling habits, such as how often you bet. Was the profit/loss target achieved? and whether your strategy will be sustainable in the long run. This way, you'll continually evaluate your game and make adjustments based on actual results. It all boils down to discipline, control, and the understanding that no strategy is foolproof, as you said. Moderate risk taking would be the key, and when combined with self-discipline, it will allow for fun play without the risk of crashing in that area.

Edited for grammar (Hivemoderation = 88%):

It is important to view gambling as a hobby rather than a means of acquiring wealth. Setting clear limits on losses and profits helps keep things in perspective. Another point I want to make is emotional satisfaction. People tend to get caught up in the moment, especially when trying to recoup losses. This is where discipline really comes into play. Adhere to a fixed strategy, even if you want to chase your losses. It can prevent you from moving up and losing more than you planned.

Another useful strategy is to regularly track your gambling habits, such as how often you bet. Was the profit/loss target achieved? This way, you'll continually evaluate your game and make adjustments based on actual results. It all boils down to discipline, control, and the understanding that no strategy is foolproof. Moderate risk taking would be the key, and when combined with self-discipline, it will allow for fun play without the risk of crashing in that area.

As this account is a part of the Stake campaign, which has one of the lowest thresholds for accepting spammers, I doubt a neutral tag will have any effect on their behavior. But if they notice and want to rebut it, I'd be more than happy to hear what they have to say.

[Who is John Galt?]

3starcoin

I recently came across $PNUT, and I have got to say, it’s different from most meme tokens I have seen. Built on Solana, it offers the usual meme fun but with a bit more structure quick transactions and lower fees. The token itself is inspired by a quirky real-world story about a New York squirrel, which adds a unique charm to it.

After seeing it listed, I decided to give it a go. The process was simple, and there’s even a prize pool event for those getting involved early, which is a nice touch. It’s not overly complicated or hyped, just straightforward and easy to explore.

For those who enjoy tokens with a bit of personality, PNUT could be worth checking out. I’m curious to see how it performs long-term. Has anyone else taken a look at #PNUTxBingX? DYOR and see if this is a project that fits your goals.

copyleaks AI Content Detected
hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
sapling Fake 100.0%

Let's talk about $GRASS, a blockchain project that's shaking things up in the world of data sharing. It's a bit like a digital gold rush, where people can earn rewards by sharing their unused internet bandwidth. Think of it as a win-win: users get paid, and AI gets a boost from the data they're providing.

Right now, BingX is hosting a pretty cool event where you can snag a chunk of GRASS tokens. It's a prize pool bonanza, with up to 28,000 GRASS up for grabs. All you need to do is register, deposit some GRASS, and trade. The best part? You'll see your rewards within a week, so no waiting around.

Here's the lowdown on the key dates:

Deposits open: October 28, 2024, at 7:00 UTC
Withdrawals start:October 29, 2024, at 10:00 UTC
Trading pair:GRASS/USDT

But wait, there's more! You can earn GRASS in two ways: by using the platform itself and by referring your friends. It's a bit like a pyramid scheme, but instead of shady business practices, it's just a good old-fashioned referral system.  You get Grass Points for each level of referral – primary, secondary, and tertiary – which helps build a sense of community and encourages everyone to get involved.

So, what's the deal with $GRASS? It's a unique approach to data sharing, putting the power in the hands of the users. It's a fascinating concept, and it begs the question: can decentralized models like this really change the way we think about digital rewards?

What are your thoughts on $GRASS? Do you think it has the potential to revolutionize the data ecosystem?

copyleaks AI Content Detected
hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
sapling Fake 99.4%

X Empire has taken the crypto gaming world by storm. With its unique blend of play-to-earn mechanics and a vibrant community, it's definitely worth checking out.

I've been having a lot of fun leveling up my character, battling other players, and earning in-game rewards. It's a great way to relax and earn some extra crypto at the same time.

Have you tried X Empire yet? What are your thoughts on the game and its potential?

copyleaks AI Content Detected
hivemoderation 94.2% likely to contain AI Generated Text
sapling Fake 100.0%

[Lucius]

I wrote this report a while ago, but due to personal health issues was unable to post it. I first sent it to two valued members of this forum for a second opinion, but now I'm publicly posting it. For this report, I'm going to be using paid services that specialize in academic AI detection, instead of the two or three known ones we use. This is a rather complicated report.

Screenshots can be found here: Screenshots

User: Yatsan
~snip~

Good job and all praise for the effort invested in exposing another "genius" who obviously thinks that with the help of AI he can spam the forum and at the same time make money from the campaign that pays him for it. I noticed the same member a long time ago (even publicly called him out like some others) because he is terribly irritating with his abuse of the quote option and his support of that troll with a bunch of alt accounts who is destroying the Economics board.

I hope you report all the detected posts with a reference to the proof post?

[lovesmayfamilis]

User: Yatsan

Heh, I've seen his posts before too; they're always pretty big and informative. That's what makes them eye-catching, and for those familiar with AI texts, they always raise suspicions. I've also checked a few of his posts before, but since I was checking them on public free resources, I didn't see any consistent results. Finding this account was obvious, but it took time.
My applause to @Ultegra134; feel free to add tags to your investigations; you're on my trust list, and I don't regret it for a minute.

[igebotz]

As this account is a part of the Stake campaign, which has one of the lowest thresholds for accepting spammers, I doubt a neutral tag will have any effect on their behavior. But if they notice and want to rebut it, I'd be more than happy to hear what they have to say.

At Stake, we no longer tolerate spam; the new rating system does not allow it, however there may be some still floating around, and no campaign is without one. The said user was already on the verge of being removed for low-quality posts when they suddenly began writing some meaningful posts. I suspected they were using an AI chatbot and left that user a note "AI chatbot suspected" on 9th Sept (check the rating spreadsheet). I tried all of my detector tools but none of them could detect anything. I also advised that user against using a longer quote, and they stopped. They tricked the forum, they tricked all of us, and we would not have known if it hadn't been for Ultegra134's genius. Thank you, Ultegra134.

There has been a major improvement since I joined Stake management, I'm open to suggestions, and I am constantly checking this thread for defaulters in our campaign; you guys are doing an excellent job here. Yatsan will be taken care of.

[Ultegra134]

At Stake, we no longer tolerate spam; the new rating system does not allow it, however there may be some still floating around, and no campaign is without one. The said user was already on the verge of being removed for low-quality posts when they suddenly began writing some meaningful posts. I suspected they were using an AI chatbot and left that user a note "AI chatbot suspected" on 9th Sept (check the rating spreadsheet). I tried all of my detector tools but none of them could detect anything. I also advised that user against using a longer quote, and they stopped. They tricked the forum, they tricked all of us, and we would not have known if it hadn't been for Ultegra134's genius. Thank you, Ultegra134.

There has been a major improvement since I joined Stake management, I'm open to suggestions, and I am constantly checking this thread for defaulters in our campaign; you guys are doing an excellent job here. Yatsan will be taken care of.

Thank you for your kind words, it's certainly impossible to eradicate all spam or all campaign participants (not specifically talking about Stake, but in general) who are producing spam content. Managers often have multiple projects simultaneously, so it's logical one or two eventually slips away. The truth is that I've been watching Yatsan for quite some time now, and I was also frustrated at first because most detectors didn't show much, till I decided to try another approach, do some digging and find evidence that I could present, rather than claiming that his posts look like AI written, but simply remain undetectable for whatever reason I couldn't comprehend back then. It was definitely more time-consuming that the usual suspects, and along with some personal stuff I had to deal with, the case was almost forgotten, till I finally posted it.

He has probably already seen this thread but prefers to ignore it, as he was logged in a while ago.

[logfiles]

User: Yatsan

Heh, I've seen his posts before too; they're always pretty big and informative. That's what makes them eye-catching, and for those familiar with AI texts, they always raise suspicions. I've also checked a few of his posts before, but since I was checking them on public free resources, I didn't see any consistent results. Finding this account was obvious, but it took time.
My applause to @Ultegra134; feel free to add tags to your investigations; you're on my trust list, and I don't regret it for a minute.

There's something sinister about that account. I remember trying to investigate it sometime back but gave up along the way due to little time but it looks like it changes hands at one point. The user does a good joke by keeping away from drama  

Edit:
These are some of the posts I started off from during that time

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082015.msg48819867#msg48819867
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082015.msg48950683#msg48950683
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg50333329#msg50333329

[Lucius]

There's something sinister about that account. I remember trying to investigate it sometime back but gave up along the way due to little time but it looks like it changes hands at one point. The user does a good joke by keeping away from drama  
~snip~

Those who will investigate further should pay attention to all those profiles that spam the Economic board, and @Yatsan was often one of the first to respond in such topics. It is possible that these are his alts and that they use the same AI content masking techniques.

Profiles that are suspicious:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3537888 (@Squaremile777)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3588422 (@Waldorf77)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3557924 (@Shortmaster)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3616802 (Mansory22022)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3511476 (@Fullbear2222)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3637722 (@Mrbuck)

[Ultegra134]

Those who will investigate further should pay attention to all those profiles that spam the Economic board, and @Yatsan was often one of the first to respond in such topics. It is possible that these are his alts and that they use the same AI content masking techniques.

Profiles that are suspicious:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3537888 (@Squaremile777)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3588422 (@Waldorf77)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3557924 (@Shortmaster)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3616802 (Mansory22022)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3511476 (@Fullbear2222)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3637722 (@Mrbuck)

I've also noticed a few of those profiles (those with the numbers in the end) that created spam megathreads in which Yatsan was often posting. I wouldn't be surprised if he purposely created new topics through the alt accounts in an attempt to create more content.

Some of Yatsan posts have been deleted after reporting them; he has been active since yesterday; it's unknown if he has been kicked from Stake. His ignoring this thread is proof enough for admission of guilt. Perhaps he has other accounts as well, since this account had changed hands since 2018 or 2019, but for some reason it wasn't a big deal back then.

[lovesmayfamilis]

niyvi

Thank you for sharing your experience and feedback. We truly value our community's input, and your comments have sparked an important change. We understand that limitations like the one mentioned can be discouraging for players looking to get the most out of their gaming experience.

After considering your feedback, we've decided to remove the rule limiting maximum winnings from wagering bonuses to 5x the initial bonus amount.

We strive to create an environment where players can enjoy their favorite providers, even when using a VPN for accessibility, as long as it complies with our terms. Your voice helps shape this space, and we appreciate your contribution to making our platform better.

We hope this change will enhance your experience and reignite your interest in joining our community

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 99.5%

Thank you for sharing your concerns. I understand how important it is for players to feel confident about potential winnings, especially on high-stakes games. We’ve listened to player feedback, and I’m happy to clarify that we’ve removed the “max win” rule for regular gameplay.

Currently, our bonuses come with a fixed max withdrawal limit. For example, the first deposit bonus has a maximum withdrawal of $15,000, the second deposit bonus is capped at $20,000, and the third at $25,000. For the first deposit bonus, the minimum deposit is $30, and players can withdraw up to 500x their deposit.

We value transparency and want our players to feel secure, knowing they can access their winnings. Thank you for helping us improve with your feedback! 😊


Thank you for bringing this up. At our casino, we pride ourselves on being a KYC-free platform. We don’t require KYC for deposits or withdrawals, and our goal is to keep the process as smooth as possible for our players.

We only request KYC verification in rare cases where there’s clear evidence of fraudulent activity. For example, if a player is found to be using two accounts to cheat or exploit bonuses unfairly, we may need to verify their identity to protect the integrity of the platform. However, simply having multiple accounts without fraudulent behavior does not trigger KYC. Otherwise, players can enjoy their experience with us without any KYC requirements on withdrawal.

We’re committed to keeping our platform straightforward and trustworthy. Thank you for your feedback!

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 99.5%

Thank you for your input. It's true that bonuses are attractive to slot players, especially since slots contribute 100% towards wagering requirements. However, we want to be transparent that our bonuses come with a maximum withdrawal limit. This is because we see bonuses as a way to provide extra playtime and enjoyment, with the trade-off of certain restrictions.

While it's true that players take on more risk when trying to meet wagering requirements, bonuses can still be an ideal option for those who prioritize fun and extended gameplay. If a player prefers fewer restrictions and more straightforward play, using their real balance is a better option, as it avoids the wagering risks and withdrawal limits associated with bonuses.

We appreciate your understanding and hope this helps clarify the options

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 100%

Thank you for your thoughts . We welcome players who use bonuses as intended, but unfortunately, we do encounter cases where some try to exploit our offers in ways that go against the spirit of fair play. For example, there have been instances where players use bonus funds to collect high-value features on large bets, then switch to real money to activate these features for profit. This type of tactic is unfair to other players and goes against the purpose of our bonuses, which are meant to enhance the experience for everyone.

Regarding VPN access, we allow it specifically to help players affected by game provider restrictions, not to bypass our platform’s policies. With over 30 global game providers, our platform already offers functionality to access games from virtually anywhere. Additionally, we have systems in place to detect multi-accounting and other activities that could unfairly impact other players, ensuring a fair gaming experience for everyone.

Thank you again for allowing us to clarify our stance on fair play!

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 97.2%

[nutildah]

3-post newbie, all are ChatGPT... he picked the wrong topic to post in... I recognized the smell of ChatGPT's stinky humor from a mile away.

reverseHooligan

#1

DooMAD, you’re hitting the nail on the head. The current political landscape in the U.S. is like watching a slow-motion train wreck. On one side, we have a president who seems to be sleepwalking through his term, and on the other, a former president with more legal baggage than a mob boss. It’s no wonder people are losing faith in the system.

As for Bitcoin, it’s caught in the crossfire. One day, politicians are calling it a scam; the next, they’re cozying up to it for votes. It’s hard to take their newfound enthusiasm seriously when it feels more like a ploy than genuine support.

The real question is, where does this leave us? With the economy teetering and trust in leadership eroding, Bitcoin’s decentralized nature becomes more appealing. But without clear regulatory guidance, it’s like navigating a minefield.

In the end, it might be up to the community to steer the ship. Relying on politicians to champion Bitcoin is like expecting a cat to bark—it’s just not in their nature. We need to keep pushing for clarity and advocating for the benefits of decentralization, regardless of who’s in office.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

#2

Yeah, the crypto world loves a good mystery, and the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is the ultimate whodunit. The recent HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery” throws Peter Todd into the spotlight as the potential creator of Bitcoin. But let’s not get carried away. Todd himself has laughed off these claims, calling them “ludicrous.” (CBC)

Remember when Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright claimed to be Satoshi? That turned out to be a load of nonsense. (CBC) And now, this documentary is pointing fingers at Todd without solid proof. It’s like a game of crypto Clue, but without any real evidence.

Until someone moves coins from Satoshi’s known wallet or provides irrefutable cryptographic proof, all these theories are just hot air. So, let’s not get distracted by every new claim that pops up. The real Satoshi remains as elusive as ever, and maybe that’s for the best.

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

#3

Bitcoin has undergone a remarkable transformation, evolving from a decentralized refuge for personal freedom to a highly sought-after asset for nation-states. The idea of the United States creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve, similar to President Bukele’s initiative in El Salvador, indicates a significant shift in how we view cryptocurrency. This change implies that Bitcoin is moving beyond its original purpose, which could reshape its function in the global financial system.

Hivemoderation: 71.4% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

[Ultegra134]

This goes towards Stake management and to @Igebotz because he replied earlier. Of course, it's not intended to be a personal attack, but it actually got me wondering about Stake's management; after this, I'm going to drop this case here. You mentioned that you no longer tolerate spam on Stake; however, Yatsan got a simple pat in the back: a user who has been proven to be using a sold account back in 2019, has been using AI for months, and you've paid him for it, yet he still remains in the campaign, and his only repercussion is a warning on the rating sheet (one being "suspected AI usage") and not being paid for the previous week. (His post rating was 7.2 and 7.1, only Bere gave him a lower score of 6.1)

On top of that, he still continues to spam the forum, making posts every 20 to 30 minutes in between, which isn't a major issue if he wasn't posting gibberish, and also continues using megaquotes, quoting several members in a single reply, which is annoying to even look at.

Letting a user who has been using AI for months, and I can easily prove that it didn't suddenly happen in the last few weeks, remain on a campaign notorious for having many participants who had contributed to the spam issue in the past, is like giving the green light to AI usage and spam. Trust me, some users may get away with it; he was running his scheme for months; it's possible that he's not the only one.

On top of that, he hasn't even taken accountability for his actions and continues to post like nothing happened. He could have at least explained himself, even though there's nothing to explain.

[Lucius]

@Ultegra134, you must know that those who are behind everything communicate one thing in public and something completely different in private. The fact that after everything you exposed they still consider that AI spammer a valuable member of their sig campaign speaks for itself how much they care about having first-class AI spammers in the campaign or legitimate users who create their own posts using only their brains.

This leads me to the next thought, which is that the @Yatsan account may have just been bought by the Stake team to do what it is doing right now - and you don't give up such an investment so easily. However, it is something that would be more appropriate to discuss (if someone thinks there is a need) in a new topic.