AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[memehunter]

It was discussed more than once that Sapling often gives incorrect responses. You have not discovered America.

There is resemblance to what happens in the novel 'One Hundred Years of Solitude' when hero on his own discovered the fact that earth is round. He was unware of that fact that people have already figured this out long before . Author and Director both gave him full credit for his enthusiasm because he felt proud on the fact that he discovered something on his own.
Thank you pointing out that I have not paid attention to previous discussion which happens rarely as I try to pay full attention to whats going on before writing my reply.

[jokers10]

Kanak_Capital_Markets decided to promote his project by spamming using AI texts. No reliable project will ever do so. The links are removed from the quotes below.

Bitcoin’s price movements have always been unpredictable, but 2025 feels different. Some believe we are on the verge of a massive bull run, while others think a major correction is inevitable. So, what’s really happening?

One of the biggest factors influencing Bitcoin’s future is the Bitcoin ETF adoption. Institutional investors are showing increasing interest, but will it be enough to sustain BTC’s growth in the long run? Additionally, we have the 2024 Bitcoin Halving, which has historically led to significant price increases. However, the market is not as simple as before—liquidity conditions, macroeconomic trends, and investor sentiment all play a major role.

Another key concern is regulatory pressure. Governments worldwide are either embracing crypto or cracking down on it. With new regulations on exchanges, taxation, and compliance, will this create a safer environment for Bitcoin or push traders toward decentralized alternatives? Meanwhile, the current market sentiment swings between FOMO (fear of missing out) and fear of a major crash. Are we witnessing strong long-term accumulation, or is this just another hype cycle before a correction?

From my perspective, Bitcoin’s price will likely continue fluctuating in the short term, but long-term growth is still strong. Many analysts believe BTC can break past $100K in 2025, but corrections along the way are expected. The question is—how deep will they be, and when should traders be cautious?

What do you think? Will Bitcoin continue to skyrocket, consolidate, or correct sharply in the coming months?
Let’s discuss! Drop your thoughts below and share your insights on BTC’s next move.

For those looking for in-depth Bitcoin market analysis and real-time trading strategies, check out

copyleaks Percentage of text that may be AI-generated. 100%
GPTZero AI Detection 100% AI generated
sapling.ai Fake: 100.0%

Essentially, trying to live solely off trading profits is like walking a tightrope without a safety net. It's incredibly risky. Think of it this way: trading, by its very nature, involves ups and downs. You might have some winning streaks, but there will inevitably be losses. If you don't have a steady pay check coming in from somewhere else, those losses can quickly become devastating. You could find yourself in a situation where you're forced to sell off investments at the worst possible time, just to pay the bills.

Beyond the financial strain, there's also the emotional toll. The pressure of needing your trades to succeed can lead to really poor decision-making. When your rent depends on your next trade, it's easy to let fear and greed take over, and that's a recipe for disaster. Plus, having a separate income source lets you approach trading with a much clearer head. You can take calculated risks, rather than desperate gambles. So, while it's technically possible to trade without another income, it's really not a wise move. It's much better to have a solid financial foundation before you rely on the unpredictable world of trading.

copyleaks Percentage of text that may be AI-generated. 100%
GPTZero AI Detection 100% AI generated
sapling.ai Fake: 100.0%

[Mahiyammahi]

Just found this SR Member posting AI post. Using AI for  learning isn't a bad but why creating a thread with AI.Not just one multiple post , I wonder If being SR Member no one question and found suspicious about his post. Currently Joined i Rainbet Signature campaign By Hhampuz  and posting AI informative lost

User - KiaKia

If you are just starting your Bitcoin and crypto journey, this advice is essential for you. I have been in this space for a long time and have experienced both successes and regrets, but today I want to share the most important insight.

Look around you—the world is nothing but a rat race. Everyone is running around, chasing after anything they can find just to survive. I’m not saying this is wrong, but I want to remind you that we don’t have an infinite lifespan.

The reason I prefer Bitcoin is because of the potential for a more secure future it offers. Having some BTC can help you achieve a stress-free life compared to someone who may run the rat race until the very end.

I know someone who lost his life after years of working tirelessly without enough rest. His clients would bring him their work, and he would spend all day and night helping them. He was paid in return but barely enjoyed his new home; he died just two weeks after it was completed.

Be wise with your hustle. Bitcoin can be a great solution for a more comfortable life in the future. Accumulate what you can and keep it in a safe place, then focus on doing things that make you happy.

Don’t go the extra mile just for a job. If you pass away, you can always be replaced. In the end, death is inescapable.

Undetectable AI - 99%
Sapling AI - 100%
Copy leaks - 100
GPT Zeero - 100%
Ahref - 80%

What are your thoughts on this? Personally, I keep all my BTC in a single hardware wallet. I’d like to know, from the Bitcointalk community: do you think the saying "don’t put all your eggs in one basket" also applies to those using a single hardware wallet?

Storing things separately is a way to keep things safe. So it's true that what the proverb says is true, not only the ways of guarding have evolved for the better, nowadays scammers also have newer & better ways to deceive their potential victims. But to do those separations, you have to spend more effort & time to manage all of that. In the end, only you know how far you can go.

Let's us look that proverb to be coming from inexperienced users just as Op has made known earlier because splitting you bitcoin to different wallets might demands more tasks to ensure safety to where the seed phrases are being stored.
In the other hand, splitting your bitcoin will help to condone alternative reliance In the case of loosing your funds to scammers on wallet attacks so, you can always have other options of not loosing it all of paraventurely it happens as mistake could be paramount but that is not an excuse to be welcomed.

Operating two hardware wallets can be manageable. I know someone who has four hardware wallets, and it's similar to having multiple smartphones. Many people choose to do this, and while it may be slightly more complicated during the initial setup, it's not particularly challenging.

Today's hardware wallets resemble smartphones, featuring a screen with a tabbing function that allows users to scroll and scan QR codes easily to send out their Bitcoin. Overall, it's not difficult to handle.

I believe both perspectives have merit; it's ultimately a choice that users need to consider. Personally, I prefer using a single hardware wallet, but that doesn’t mean I can’t operate two if necessary.

Undetectable AI - 99% AI
Sapling Ai -  100% Fake
ZPT Zeero - 100% AI
Copy Leaks - 100% AI
Ahrefs - 80% AI generated

[Ultegra134]

Two more AI spammers, the first user was his first post and resorted to AI usage for a simple matter, while the second is a repeating spammer of the Bitget shill network, but hasn't been reported for AI usage before. All posts reported.

User: mr. castle

Post 1.

Before diving into Bitcoin investment, here's what you need to know:

###  Understanding Bitcoin Fundamentals

- Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that operates without central control 7:2
- It uses blockchain technology - a distributed ledger that records all transactions securely 7:11
- Transactions are verified through a process called mining, ensuring the integrity of the network 7:15

###  Key Investment Risks

1. Price Volatility
          - Prices can fluctuate dramatically
  - Example: Bitcoin reached $69,000 in November 2021, dropped to $15,731 by November 2022 6:4
  - No regulatory protections like traditional investments 6:2


2. Security Concerns
          - Requires proper wallet setup and security measures
  - Risk of theft or loss if not stored correctly 6:6
  - No customer support team for self-managed assets


###  Smart Investment Approach

Educate Yourself First- Learn how blockchain technology works
- Understand mining and transaction verification
- Study market dynamics and risks 6:3


Risk Management- Only invest what you can afford to lose
- Consider diversification strategies
- Understand tax implications 6:7

Professional Guidance- Consult financial advisors
- Consider working with reputable exchanges
- Stay updated on regulatory developments 7:23

Bitcoin investment requires careful consideration and education. Take time to understand both the opportunities and risks before making any decisions.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

User: Iamcrypticguy

Post 1.
From my understanding the three last sentences (the last line of the post) are written by him, the rest is AI with a few mistakes on punctuation, perhaps on purpose.

We've seen a new wave of narratives saturating the space since the beginning of last year—AI agents. They’re like memes but with a smaller supply and actual use cases, thanks to AI. Take Siren, for example.

It’s an AI agent that aims to provide users with an intelligent and personalized encryption service experience—essentially simplifying complex data analysis and making it more accessible, according to what they claim.

But do they really achieve this? Has anyone actually utilized what AI agents are offering? If so, please share your experience

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 63% Probability AI Generated

Post 2.

It's actually a good thing that we're seeing more liquid staking options in the crypto space right now, especially for DeFi enthusiasts. And who says we can't explore decentralized finance on BTC?

That's why I find PumpBTC interesting. From what I've discovered, it's a platform designed to bring decentralized finance (DeFi) to Bitcoin holders by enabling liquid staking through Babylon. Its mission is to maximize yields for BTC holders while keeping the process simple. These kinds of processes are usually complicated, in my opinion, but with this, you can stake BTC in a single action and instantly receive liquidity tokens.

Anyway, I'll be exploring this further over the weekend to check blockchain compatibility and other aspects. Are you familiar with this concept? Share your opinion below.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

[igebotz]

Go back to the history of the beginning of this topic.  It was discussed more than once that Sapling often gives incorrect responses. You have not discovered America. Therefore, you need to use at least three detectors, and in some controversial cases even more.  At the moment, Quillbot seems the most accurate.

Quillbot tools are more advanced; they have been around for few years now and put too many resources into developing their tools. If I recall well, last year or the year before Royse reported someone on the reputation board using Sapling detector tool results, and the community eventually discovered that the results were false positives, and the user was given back signature campaign slot. Reputable almost ruined.

Still missing some part of the story but Sapling was just the problem. I stopped using it for a long time now..

[Ultegra134]

Quillbot tools are more advanced; they have been around for few years now and put too many resources into developing their tools. If I recall well, last year or the year before Royse reported someone on the reputation board using Sapling detector tool results, and the community eventually discovered that the results were false positives, and the user was given back signature campaign slot. Reputable almost ruined.

Still missing some part of the story but Sapling was just the problem. I stopped using it for a long time now..

I'm sometimes using Quillbot instead of sapling.ai, but my first choice when seeing a suspicious post is Copyleaks or GPTZero, the latter of which has tremendously advanced over the past few months. I believe that Sapling.ai doesn't reproduce the best results, which is the reason why I only use it in conjuction with the other two I mentioned earlier and/or when it's 100% evident that the posts are AI written. Certainly, as it has already been mentioned before, at least two detectors must be used, preferably three if possible.

[nutildah]

Its time to address this user again as they are now using AI to troll other members of the forum:

kingbj21

Their favorite threads to post in is a remarkably similar list to that of BlackyJacky (aka game-protect). They are obsessed with trolling Stake, as well as anyone who points out the inconsistencies in their logic, and even fellow complainants that point out their nonsense. I am only reporting posts not from their threads, although they mostly use AI for their threads as well.

#1

Ah yes, the self-proclaimed “bridge” between casinos and players—except when the bridge conveniently collapses whenever Stake is involved.

@holydarkness, for all his pretend neutrality, has turned a blind eye to multiple legitimate cases, including mine. Stake outright stole my monthly bonus, and despite presenting clear evidence, he did absolutely nothing. Sound familiar? Just like Eddie, he vanishes when it’s inconvenient.

If he truly had the influence he claims, why hasn’t he taken a single step to call out Stake’s rigged games, illegal INR deposits, or VIP manipulations? Instead, he cherry-picks cases that don’t challenge Stake’s corrupt model.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 84% AI generated


#2

Happy St. Patrick’s Day to you as well, Symphonized! 🍀

Now, while we're celebrating luck, let's talk about how Stake.com manipulates RTP and refuses to provide GDPR data to players. Wouldn't it be nice if transparency and fairness were as common as four-leaf clovers? Instead, we get rigged games, hidden betting histories, and selective KYC enforcement.

So, while some are out there trusting the "luck of the Irish," Stake players are just unlucky by design. Care to comment, or are we pretending this isn’t happening? 🤡💰

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


#3

Holydarkness, your attempt to flip the narrative is a classic deflection tactic. You keep harping on "fabricated statements" but conveniently ignore the real issue—why do you spend so much time defending casinos with a known history of fraud?

You say you’re not involved, yet every time Stake or other shady casinos are called out, you rush in to discredit victims and shift the conversation. That’s not the behavior of a neutral observer; that’s the behavior of someone with skin in the game.

Instead of trying to gaslight people with vague accusations, why don’t you address the real questions?

Why does Stake refuse to provide full bet histories under GDPR requests?
Why does their RTP significantly deviate from what’s advertised?
Why did StakeExposed.com get wiped from archives?
If you actually cared about transparency, you'd demand answers instead of running defense for a billion-dollar gambling empire. But we both know that’s not your job, is it?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


Also, I noticed an inconsistency when using undetectable.ai. They claim to run text through several different AI checkers, but they say text that is found to be 84% AI-generated by GPTZero (one of the checkers in their list) is actually human written. So I don't know what's going on with them but I'm not using them going forward.

[memehunter]

Also, I noticed an inconsistency when using undetectable.ai. They claim to run text through several different AI checkers, but they say text that is found to be 84% AI-generated by GPTZero (one of the checkers in their list) is actually human written. So I don't know what's going on with them but I'm not using them going forward.

I noticed the same on another forum.

undetectable.ai is not up to the standards, look at this example;

The cryptocurrency sector has experienced significant growth, and as this trend continues, cryptocurrency trading will likely expand further and attract more government involvement but that is another discussion. The image below shows the downloads of cryptocurrency exchanges in February 2025.

This data supports my previous assertion about substantial growth within the sector. Binance, OKX, and Bitget occupy the top three spots, and it's remarkable how popular Bitget has become; the exchange has achieved record growth.

Which exchange do you use, and what is your opinion on this data?

Here is the report from https://undetectable.ai (look for the copyleaks report in green)


Now here is the report from Copyleaks itself;




In my experience of catching AI spammers, the combination of copyleaks + GPTzero is the gold standard.

[Ultegra134]

Reporting another newbie account with AI usage. The user seems to be advertising their own exchange and replying to questions, but are also replying in topics that are completely irrelevant with it, using AI of course. Posts reported and would advise caution with the service he's providing, although I doubt anyone in the right mind would use his exchange.

User: Macro Exchange

Post 1.

In my opinion, staying safe in crypto is all about smart security and community awareness. Avoiding shady sites and downloads is a start, but hackers are always one step ahead. Use hardware wallets, enable 2FA, and never trust "easy money" schemes.

Scammers thrive on ignorance, so educate yourself and others. Report fraud, call out bad actors, and stay alert. Crypto is a wild space, but with the right precautions, you can avoid becoming a target. Security isn’t a one-time thing—it’s a mindset. Stay sharp!  

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Quilbot: 100% AI
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated

Post 2.

As for me, I don’t believe in meme coins as a reliable investment. While some gain temporary hype, they lack real utility and long-term stability. Many investors have faced losses, realizing that meme coins rarely bring sustainable profits. Relying on them is risky, as most fade away, leaving holders with little to no returns. In the end, they are more of a gamble than a solid investment.  

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Quilbot: Not enough words
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 98.7% Fake

Post 3.

At this stage, we do not have the ability to request KYC data. Regarding refunds, if a customer refuses to provide the required information, we currently do not offer an automatic refund option. However, we are actively working on improving our processes to ensure compliance and user convenience.

We use both the company's assets and third-party APIs—a combined approach. It is not always possible to fully process a client's request solely from our own reserves. Therefore, we utilize additional liquidity when needed.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 79% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 4.

Thank you for reaching out. We would like to address your inquiries as follows:

Legal Information: We are currently in the process of registering our company. At this stage, we are unable to provide the legal information you have requested. Once the registration process is completed, we will promptly notify all our users.

Bitcoin Reserve: The 100 Bitcoin is not a reserve in the traditional sense. Rather, it represents the company’s working capital, used for operational purposes.

Source of Funds Verification:  All cryptocurrency transactions undergo verification through the Cristals service. This allows us to perform detailed analysis and determine the origin of funds, including identifying any connections to banned mixers, even those that are no longer operational.

We hope this clarifies your questions. If you have any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Just found this SR Member posting AI post. Using AI for  learning isn't a bad but why creating a thread with AI.Not just one multiple post , I wonder If being SR Member no one question and found suspicious about his post. Currently Joined i Rainbet Signature campaign By Hhampuz  and posting AI informative lost

User - KiaKia

Someone also needs to do a thorough check on this user as well, as this report has gone quite unnoticed. I stumbled upon this post, decided to check it for AI and GPTZero shows 79%, Copyleaks doesn't detect AI, and Originality shows 100% AI.

We have different levels of scammers, and some of them are quite clever. The reasons why they become scammers are complex, but those stories often fuel their determination to continue their deceitful activities.

Scammers tend to be one step ahead of their targets. Unfortunately, they quickly learn how to outsmart people most of the time. Many scam schemes go to waste or get known after people have already fallen victim to them. Once a particular tactic is used multiple times, it becomes less effective, demonstrating that scammers are continuously adapting and improving.

Additionally, there will always be newcomers entering the crypto space. Since this space is filled with money and opportunities, people will continue to fall into the traps set by scammers until they become more cautious.

[Ambatman]

Reporting a newbie account giving a reply to a thread.
It was so obvious that I (low talent on detecting AI)  could tell easily.

Hello! It's wonderful to connect with you, and I appreciate your kind words. I hope you're having a great week as well. Let's address your questions about using Bisq with a focus on anonymity and node usage.

Using a VPN with Bisq

Yes, using a VPN with Bisq is a common practice for those seeking to enhance their privacy. A VPN masks your real IP address, making it more difficult to trace your internet activity back to your physical location. Here's a breakdown:  

How it helps:
It hides your IP address from your internet service provider (ISP) and other potential observers.  
It adds a layer of privacy by routing your internet traffic through an encrypted tunnel.
Important considerations:
Choose a reputable VPN provider that prioritizes privacy and has a strict no-logs policy.
Be aware that even with a VPN, complete anonymity is not guaranteed. Other factors, like your operating system configuration and browser usage, can still reveal information.
Using a VPN in conjunction with the tor network, could increase your anonymity.
Bisq Nodes and Anonymity

Running your own Bisq node serves a different purpose than simply increasing transaction anonymity. Here's how it works:

Node functionality:
Bisq is a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. Running a node means you're contributing to the network by relaying transaction information.
Nodes help maintain the decentralized nature of Bisq.
Running a node allows you to use your own local copy of the Bisq software and data, rather than relying on a remote server.
Anonymity vs. Security:
Running a node doesn't significantly increase the anonymity of your individual transactions. The core anonymity comes from Bisq's P2P design and the use of Tor.
However, running a node enhances the overall security and resilience of the Bisq network, which indirectly benefits all users.
Running your own node does provide a level of increased security, by eliminating the risk of a malicious 3rd party server.
For a $40 transaction:
For a small transaction like $40, running your own node is not strictly necessary. You can use Bisq effectively without one.
The main benifit of running a node is to support the network, and to increase your own personal security.

I have not bothered to check using any AI detectors though.

Edit :
Just checked with Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero : 100% probability

[bchannel]

My first report so far...

User: koinforum

Scibbr - 91% of text is likely AI
Quillbot - 100% of text is likely AI
Copyleaks - 100% AI content Found

Beware of DN Miner: A Suspicious Crypto Mining Platform Promising Unrealistic Profits

As the cryptocurrency market continues to grow, so do the number of fraudulent platforms exploiting inexperienced investors. DN Miner.com is one such platform that presents itself as a legitimate crypto mining company, but in reality, operates a highly suspicious scheme that has already resulted in serious financial losses for many.

In this article, we’ll break down how DN Miner works, its red flags, and how you can protect yourself from similar crypto scams.
❗ What is DN Miner?

DN Miner claims to offer users passive income through crypto mining packages. It promotes slogans like “Start your first Bitcoin mining experience with us,” while luring investors with guaranteed monthly returns — an offer that is fundamentally unrealistic in the world of genuine crypto mining.

More.....

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Iamgoat? It doesn't sound very human to me:

Before I talk about of the possible solutions to your problem, the first thing I will advise you to do is to check if your browser is updated, if it isn't, try and update it first. I want to also know if you will be able to identify the reason for the error by pressing the following command in the keyboard; Cmd + Option + J in the Chrome app to be able to access the Developer Console then check if you could find the root cause of the error will appear when you try to upload without reloading the page. If you do, try and search for the solution to the specific problem, if you do not, you can explore these other options.

Try and Disable the all the active browser extensions by clicking the 3-dots menu (• • •) at the top right corner of the browser then navigate to Extensions and Manage Extensions. Try and disable all the extensions then check if it works. If it doesn't, this is the second option.

Try and clear the Cached and Cookies of the browser. In order to do this, click on the lock icon close to the address bar when you visit the website, then choose Site Settings and scroll down to Clear Data then click on it. The other option is for you to allow Javascript and Pop-ups for the Talkimg.com page. To do this, go to Chrome settings, Privacy and security then Site settings. Allow Pop-ups and redirects for Talkimg.com and also allow Javascript under the Content tab. If the problem still persist then it is most probably something which has to do with the website itself.

Going by the population of China and their technological advancements, China has the potential power to take control of the Bitcoin technology if they chose to. I am saying this on the basis of the two factors I mentioned earlier, which are the population and the advancements in the technology of the country and amongst its people. Although, we do not know the founder of Bitcoin by identity due to his anonymity, however, from his name, Satoshi Nakomoto, he is an Asian by thoughts and could have come from those axis. Interestingly, China is great enough to take charge of the financial technologies but may not be able to do so, because the government in itself have banned the adoption of such.

There's a lot more in his post history.

[igebotz]

Reporting a newbie account giving a reply to a thread.
It was so obvious that I (low talent on detecting AI)  could tell easily.

A mod has taken care of it, please next time use the format on the OP and always add at least 3 checks to your reports to make it easy for mods.

My first report so far...

User: koinforum

That's pure copy and paste with no citations- You can also report it on the plagiarism thread

[Dark.Look]

User: Adams0001
AI content posts:

I agree with you that Manchester United had a better head-to-head against Nottingham Forest, but before you believe that Manchester United will beat Nottingham Forest next month because of their head-to-head against Nottingham Forest, I want you to know that football has changed, and Manchester United is not performing well, and they aren't in the position of maintaining their tradition of beating Nottingham Forest. Please analyze the Nottingham Forest and Manchester United match very well to know if Manchester United can beat Nottingham Forest. Using the past record of Manchester United against Nottingham Forest to say that Manchester United will beat Nottingham Forest is wrong because Manchester United failed to beat Nottingham Forest at Old Trafford this season.

I read something about this past performance of Manchester United, quite right Manchester had a very fantastic and excellent performance in the past but what will always think of is the current situation because the current performance determines the position of the team. I don't think head to head matter in this situation, all those are past and that wasn't a most for Manchester United to win Nottingham Forest any time the meet. Currently Nottingham Forest are extremely good beyond what we thought of them. Manchester United last meeting against Nottingham Forest was a defeat at their own home, this time around the will be hosted by Nottingham Forest and many are still doubting the victory of Nottingham Forest forgetting what they have done in the first leg. Meanwhile everyone have a son opinion on how they view things.

History tends to repeat itself at times. Even if Manchester United are not in the best of shape, they can outperform Nottingham Forest and get three points. Nottingham Forest are in better shape, and if they keep up their current form, they will almost certainly qualify for the UCL next season. Amorim is a good coach who knows how to manage players, and I still believe that it will be difficult for Nottingham Forest to defeat Manchester United, but because they are playing at home, they may be the favorites to win the match because Manchester United is not in great shape, but anything is possible. Amorim has tough games coming up after playing against Nottingham Forest; they will face Manchester City again, as well as Newcastle, which will be a difficult game for them.  Did you think Manchester United could win every game they played?  They must do all necessary to maintain their position in the league rankings.  Because if they do not try to win some of the games, they can end up on 16th in the league table.

GPTZero: 79%
Originality ai: 99%
the-ghost-ai:100%

Want to invest in bitcoin or anything else, you need to understand the characteristics of the investment instrument, don't just put your money in an asset but you don't understand the risks. Moreover, bitcoin tends to be more volatile and its price movements cannot be predicted in the short term, making the wrong decision then the investor will sell their assets at the wrong time causing them to lose money due to their carelessness. Increase your knowledge and read more often, especially if you are a user on this forum, there are some good threads for you to read to increase your knowledge of investing in bitcoin.

That is the essential point, everything you want to do in this world if we don't understand is better, it will be extremely tough for you to succeed on it. Bitcoin investment is really good investment, but you won't know the benefits. Expect to have a thorough understanding of it and to devote time to studying it. Anything you do is risky, but you must know what type of risk you will take.  They understand the type of risk that, if taken, will result in a total loss. Investing in something you don't know anything about, you just hear it's making a lot of money, and you know you're going to lose, and trading if you don't know anything about it, you're going to lose because you have no idea what you're doing.With no expertise and no strategy, you will undoubtedly lose since you lack comprehension of the situation. Bitcoin if you understand it and invest in it, means that he will reduce your risk because you know how he operates and what types of money you will be risking. This will reduce danger because you know what you're doing.

GPTZero: 100%
Originality ai: 97%
the-ghost-ai:100%

Of course holding is less stressful compared to trading, although is just a matter of choice because actually there are people at their that is also make money in their trading but the truth still remains the same no two ways about because the chance of losing is always higher than the chance of getting profits from it, so however, I think is just depends on individuals decisions because everybody can not do the same thing at a time, but for me I think holding is more reliable than trading.

It's not about reliability but it's more about experience and knowledge, I would say. People who lack knowledge about the market and general experience in trading are better off only investing in Bitcoin and holding for the long term. On the other hand, those who understand the market very well and have trading knowledge can do short-term trading and it can be profitable for them because they know how to play with the market and when to open and close their trades.

Newbies usually lack the necessary knowledge that one needs for trading which is the reason why it's better for newbies to stick to investing. If you have a capital, invest it in Bitcoin at once if you are getting a good price or keep doing DCA and just hold for the future and sell when the price is higher than when you bought so that you can take profit and exit.

Yes, it is all about experience and knowledge.  But everyone has an option and should do what works best for him. For example, if someone invests in bitcoin for the long term, it may indicate that he lacks expertise or experience in trading, which is why he did not focus on it.  Some people have expertise and understanding of how to deal with the market, but because they lack the cash to accept the risk, they will most likely reconsider and focus on long-term investing since is the long investment that will minimise there risk. Some newbies are willing to take risks at any moment and do all it takes to reach their goals; others are not patient enough to invest for the long term and seek to obtain money immediately. And you will most likely lose if you rush into trading because the market is not stable and can change at any time. Only experience can understand the market, which is why you must take your time and thoroughly study the market before embarking on your trading journey.

GPTZero: 84%
Originality ai: 100%
the-ghost-ai:100%


He is also reported in the past: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5448111.msg62664285#msg62664285

Also, I saw the other posts look like AI content to me.

[memehunter]

What's the verdict on Iamgoat? It doesn't sound very human to me:

I looked at his posts and did not see anything wrong. I have no reason to even suspect him of anything. IMO he is really putting in an effort to make quality posts (recently). When you stated that it does not sound human to you, I somehow understand where this assumption is coming from but without any proof it is merely a hunch (a hunch of a very reputed member, but still a hunch).
If you cannot substantiate your intuition, I am sure @Iamgoat will take it as a compliment. Clean chit from me .     

[igebotz]

User: Adams0001
AI content posts:

I understand you're trying to improve the forum, which is commendable, but please stop trying too hard.  I have this topic on notification, and every time I see your report, it is always incomplete (using random detection tools to back up your findings).  You must use reliable tools, as others on this thread are doing. Use the same tools..

The posts you quoted are just random spam to spam discussion, and you should have used the "report to moderator" button so that a moderator could remove them.

Please- this point of this post is to correct and motivate you to do better. Keep up.

[Iamgoat]

What's the verdict on Iamgoat? It doesn't sound very human to me:

I looked at his posts and did not see anything wrong. I have no reason to even suspect him of anything. IMO he is really putting in an effort to make quality posts (recently). When you stated that it does not sound human to you, I somehow understand where this assumption is coming from but without any proof it is merely a hunch (a hunch of a very reputed member, but still a hunch).
If you cannot substantiate your intuition, I am sure @Iamgoat will take it as a compliment. Clean chit from me .     

Absolutely! I already took it as a compliment and an encouragement to do more, sir. It is awe-inspiring to see a respected and reputable member of the forum comment on my post. To reiterate, I am 100 percent a human being sir, who's working day by day to improve on my post pattern and more importantly bring about real time solutions to problems. At least I have a very basic knowledge on the internet or computer and how most of these devices operate, makes it even easier for me to find solutions to problems.

[nutildah]

User: Adams0001
AI content posts:

I understand you're trying to improve the forum, which is commendable, but please stop trying too hard.  I have this topic on notification, and every time I see your report, it is always incomplete (using random detection tools to back up your findings).  You must use reliable tools, as others on this thread are doing. Use the same tools..

All 3 posts he reported have been deleted, so that's good enough. He is using 2 detectors from the list in his last post which is also good enough.

The posts you quoted are just random spam to spam discussion, and you should have used the "report to moderator" button so that a moderator could remove them.

I'm not sure about that as they are extremely average posts for Gambling and Bitcoin Discussion, to the untrained eye. The only thing that separates them from the other posts is the use of AI.

But yes, for everyone reading this thread, please make sure your posts here contain the following as a bare minimum:

- a link to the submitted poster's Bitcointalk profile & their profile name
- 3 or more posts where at least 2 detectors have found a post to be >70% AI generated

[Dark.Look]

User: Adams0001
AI content posts:

I understand you're trying to improve the forum, which is commendable, but please stop trying too hard.  I have this topic on notification, and every time I see your report, it is always incomplete (using random detection tools to back up your findings).  You must use reliable tools, as others on this thread are doing. Use the same tools..

The posts you quoted are just random spam to spam discussion, and you should have used the "report to moderator" button so that a moderator could remove them.

Please- this point of this post is to correct and motivate you to do better. Keep up.

Thanks for your attention Igebotz. 
I'm glad to see you are paying attention to my reports. I already "reported all three posts to the moderator" and also gave enough description and sources there.
I think tools like GPTZero and Originality are strong enough. Also, I found the-ghost-ai recently, and I think it's working well.
Even if the-ghost-ai is not famous enough, but I used GPTZero and Originality.
You are definitely experienced much more than me and I will use your suggestions on my reports after this.

- a link to the submitted poster's Bitcointalk profile & their profile name
- 3 or more posts where at least 2 detectors have found a post to be >70% AI generated

That's what I try to do.
Thank you for your help Nutildah. These suggestions and tips you gave are useful to me and I will try to use them and learn more,

[LoyceV]

I looked at his posts and did not see anything wrong. I have no reason to even suspect him of anything. IMO he is really putting in an effort to make quality posts (recently). When you stated that it does not sound human to you, I somehow understand where this assumption is coming from but without any proof it is merely a hunch (a hunch of a very reputed member, but still a hunch).

If he's putting an effort to post quality, he's failing. Let's look at his 10th last post:

DCA doesn't only inspire newbies but everyone in the industry is inspired by DCA investment.

That's not true.

Aside from its affordable

What is or isn't affordable totally depends on your budget.

it is also more durable

The word "durable" doesn't make any sense in this context.

and bring about comfortability in investment.

That completely depends on anyone's personal preference.

It allows you manage your risks

Every investment strategy is about managing risks.

and take profits at good intervals.

That's not true. Profits aren't guaranteed.

It also helps you keep your mind up and eye on the goal.

Another generic statement that adds absolutely nothing.

The benefits of DCA cannot be overstated

Everything can be overstated!

hence the reason it will be more encouraged than the other forms of investment

By whom?

Here's another great "quality post":

With the little knowledge I possess over the DCA ~snip~ It is a life changer for me too.

So his life changed because of something he barely knows anything about. Right.

Maybe you're right, maybe he manually types the same level of generic BS as a chatbot. That's not a compliment, and he's now on my Ignore list.