AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

Another newbie, who has also woken up from an extensive period of inactivity, and spams multiple posts within the past few hours. Posts reported and user tagged.

User: Tazzy4050

Post 1.

It's an interesting take on Bitcoin. I agree that accumulating 1 Bitcoin is a good goal, especially with its potential for growth. It's definitely not easy, especially in countries with high GDPs where the cost of living is higher.

The "shut the fuck up" part is a bit extreme, but I understand the point. Holding onto Bitcoin, even during market dips, is crucial for long-term gains. It takes discipline and a strong conviction in the technology.

I've been following Bitcoin for a while now, and I've seen its ups and downs. It's definitely a volatile asset, but I believe in its potential to disrupt traditional financial systems.

However, it's important to remember that investing in cryptocurrencies carries risks. It's essential to do your own research, understand the risks involved, and invest only what you can afford to lose.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 71% AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 2.

You make some really good points about Bitcoin's resilience and its dominance in the crypto space.  It's hard to argue with its track record - it has weathered storms that would have sunk many other projects.

I agree that Bitcoin's early adoption and its ability to survive attacks and bans have given it a significant advantage.  It's the OG, and it's earned its place.

However, I think it's important to acknowledge that the crypto landscape is constantly evolving.  While Bitcoin has a strong foundation, it doesn't mean that other altcoins can't challenge its position.  

Ethereum, for example, has been making significant strides in areas like smart contracts and decentralized applications.  It's attracting a lot of attention, and it's certainly possible that it could gain even more traction in the future.

I'm not saying that Ethereum will necessarily overtake Bitcoin, but it's a strong contender.  The crypto world is full of surprises, and we should be open to the possibility of new players emerging and challenging the status quo.  

Ultimately, it's a matter of time and innovation.  The crypto space is still young, and there's plenty of room for new ideas and technologies to emerge.  It's going to be an exciting journey to see how it all unfolds.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 3.

You're right, it's a wild ride right now!  The recent drop in Bitcoin is definitely concerning, especially with all the global economic uncertainty.  It's a stark reminder that even "digital gold" isn't immune to market fluctuations.

I've been watching this closely, and I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. I remember back when Bitcoin was just starting to gain traction, and everyone was excited about its potential. Now, with all the volatility and the fear of a recession, it's easy to feel a little shaken.

Honestly, I think it's a time for cautious optimism.  Bitcoin has proven its resilience in the past, and I believe it will recover. However, it's important to remember that investing in cryptocurrency is risky, and it's crucial to do your research and understand the risks before investing.  I'm hoping that the market will stabilize soon, but for now, it's definitely a time to watch closely and be prepared for anything.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 4.

It's a tough call, and I can see why you're torn. On one hand, a lawyer is trained to handle confidential information and is bound by professional ethics.  But, on the other hand, you have a close relationship with your family member, built on trust and understanding.

I think it depends on your personal comfort level and the specific situation. If you're just starting out and want to share basic information, a family member might be a good first step.  They can learn alongside you, and you can build that knowledge together. However, if you're dealing with significant amounts of Bitcoin or have complex investment strategies, I'd lean towards involving a lawyer. They can provide legal guidance and protect you from potential risks, especially if you're dealing with inheritance or legal issues.

I personally haven't invested in Bitcoin, but I have a friend who is a lawyer who specializes in cryptocurrency. He's been a huge help to his clients, navigating the legal complexities and ensuring their investments are protected. Ultimately, it's your decision, but it's worth considering the potential risks and benefits of both options.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

[ABCbits]

What do people think about post created by user Creeper0? It seems he copy other post and ask AI to summarize and rephrase it, but i could be wrong. Here's an example,

His post:

Annoying messages or voice messages from strangers on Telegram are always annoying. Especially the incident that happened in your case is very annoying. I am really laughing and also feeling annoyed by the intelligence of that user. Because, such border-crossing incidents are annoying for everyone.

To avoid such unwanted incidents, I customize Telegram's voice messages and message options to allow only people in my contract to message or call, although it has to be unlocked and used with the premium required option. I don't know if this advice is useful for you or not? But I am free from the torture of strangers by doing this.

Similar post:

Am I the only one who also laughed a bit reading these posts?

@fillippone, don't get me wrong, you know I respect you a lot, but perhaps you should just block them and forget them. Unfortunately people keep harassing others on social media.

If you see my post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5536007.0, you will notice that it's a common tactic for some users to try to find others on Telegram.

I will tell you my privacy & security settings for Telegram below, in case it helps:

Phone Number: Nobody
Last Seen & online: Nobody
Profile Photos: Nobody
Bio: Nobody
Calls: Nobody
Messages: Everybody (because I can't change it without premium plan)
Voice Messages: Everybody (because I can't change it without premium plan)

I have 7 blocked users so far.

+hoping apogio will not be jealous if he reads this, hihi )

I thought we had something unique, but I accept it. 

That's annoying. Anyway, some privacy settings that might help in such cases:

- Phone Number: Nobody
- Calls: My Contacts
- Voice Messages: My Contacts (option available only with Telegram Premium)
- Messages: My Contacts or Premium users (option available only with Telegram Premium)

You also did the right thing by changing your Telegram username to ghost them, but if you have these settings, even if they find your handle again somehow, they will probably not be able to text or call you.

[nutildah]

What do people think about post created by user Creeper0? It seems he copy other post and ask AI to summarize and rephrase it, but i could be wrong. Here's an example,

His post:

Annoying messages or voice messages from strangers on Telegram are always annoying. Especially the incident that happened in your case is very annoying. I am really laughing and also feeling annoyed by the intelligence of that user. Because, such border-crossing incidents are annoying for everyone.

To avoid such unwanted incidents, I customize Telegram's voice messages and message options to allow only people in my contract to message or call, although it has to be unlocked and used with the premium required option. I don't know if this advice is useful for you or not? But I am free from the torture of strangers by doing this.

I don't think ChatGPT would generate something as bad as the first paragraph. But yeah it looks like he is basically paraphrasing a previous post in the second paragraph. I don't think the sample size is big enough for detectors to accurately classify it as AI-generated or not. This is obviously a lazy account farmer doing anything they can do to avoid thinking for themselves.

A run-of-the-mill spammer, hoping to pick up some merits for saying nothing to nobody:

You have a misconception about DCA. You should know that DCA is an investment strategy, it does not guarantee or give you the possibility of success in investment. Because DCA is not a strategy to succeed. To be successful in investment, you need to have a long-term plan and make yourself skilled in investment management. DCA can only give you advantages in buying, to be successful you need to be skilled in management. Even if someone fails in the long term or fails to hold on to DCA, then you are still a failed investor. DCA is considered a good investment strategy, not a strategy to succeed.

[FinneysTrueVision]

slapper Legendary (May require further investigation)

I decided to follow up on slapper, and not only are they still using AI, but it has since been discovered that they are part of an account farm. One of their accounts is Blitzboy, who was tagged for ban evasion and who was previously reported in this thread as an AI spammer. death69 is another alt and after looking at the ETH address on their profile, I found a connection to kabul, who is another spammer, although no longer active.

I have already mentioned how slapper humanizes their posts by inserting subtle mistakes. In this post, you can see how the periods are removed at the end of paragraphs.

What you're describing isn't just hypothetical; it's actually taking place right now. Experts call this the final phase of demand failure, but it's not just consumer demand but also human participation. Antidepressants, survival gigs, and numb compliance support a facade of productivity when people opt out emotionally and mentally. Asking whether a monetary airdrop should be done is absurd. We should be wondering why it hasn't happened already. You bail out banks, industries, even private equity portfolios. Why not the folks maintaining the system? We need to stop seeing inflation fear and human rescue as two separate issues. If you think injecting $10k into broken lives risks inflation, wait till you see what social decay costs

Technically, it's doable. The U.S. did it partially with stimulus checks. Effectively, unevenly, but it turned out that money moves quickly. Stablecoins can make the plumbing easier. You may target it algorithmically, distribute it through digital wallets with spending limits for high-impact use cases: health, debt, shelter

Still, the money comes but it is not the end. It should be matched with dignity. Otherwise, people treat the help like crumbs from the table. Airdrops should carry a story: "We see you. You are important. You belong to this". Stabilizing the economy through emotional repair is more reliable. Rebuilding GDP on broken minds is impossible. But you can build a new world order by acknowledging that survival is no longer about ambition. Then asking them to return into the game as citizens once more rather than consumers

In this case, their attempt to evade detection wasn't entirely effective.
Originality: 100% Likely AI
GPTZero: 79% AI Generated, 1% Mixed, 20% Human


Here is a post from death69. For a while, I could not figure out how they were evading detection, because most of the time the results say their posts are human-written despite looking very obviously AI-generated. After reading the text in the following post really carefully, I noticed how they inserted words like “enchantment” and “face injection assaults” which make no sense, but it seems to be one of their tactics for trying to avoid being detected as AI.

With KYC verification, casinos are engaging in a dangerous game. Although AI-driven systems can detect fraud and identity theft, in practice these systems are only as good as the data they are supplied. Without proper entry points, AI cannot enchantment determine authenticity. The idea that casinos can fight AI-powered fraud with more AI? It is a never-ending circle, a defense mechanism that never truly wins. We have liveness detection, face injection assaults, and all kinds of fresh approaches emerging quicker than security can handle.

Casinos, like any other institution, are motivated by money. Sure, they can apply all these high-tech solutions, but it's starting to seem like this KYC verification game might only be a show, a formality to acquire that valuable licence. Although they would say they are combating fraud, how can they ensure anything without actual access to national ID data? Their struggle is practically a performance, a mirage of protection based on unstable foundation. And whose gains result from this? The scammers, the abusers, the ones manipulating the system.

GPTZero: 100% AI - We are highly confident this text has been rewritten by AI, an AI paraphraser or AI bypasser.
Copyleaks: 100% AI content found

Yes, I can feel the annoyance. That ghost of the win is basically blue-balling you, the universe, or the house. You begin to fantasize about upgrading as you spend the spoils in your mind. That's not like losing your stake entirely. The score is known and the possibility of a tie or a loss is accepted when placing a bet.

The "almost-win", though? That represents a higher order headfuck. The destruction of the almost-reality you lived for a second marks more than just the loss of the money. The hope felt more like a confirmed signal, momentarily true than it did just hope. Then, poof. Your predictive mind is about to take a swift and decisive hit. A clean loss lets you start over. This almost-miss leaves a residue, a poisonous "what if" that taints your judgment. You're not just sad about losing the money; you're also dealing with a fake glimpse of a different life, a psychological trick meant to make the loss feel personal and targeted. It's more about your intentional weaponizing of your own expectations than about the result of the gamble.

Winston AI: 2% Human
Originality: 84% Likely AI

 

[Ultegra134]

I decided to follow up on slapper, and not only are they still using AI, but it has since been discovered that they are part of an account farm. One of their accounts is Blitzboy, who was tagged for ban evasion and who was previously reported in this thread as an AI spammer. death69 is another alt and after looking at the ETH address on their profile, I found a connection to kabul, who is another spammer, although no longer active.

I have already mentioned how slapper humanizes their posts by inserting subtle mistakes. In this post, you can see how the periods are removed at the end of paragraphs.

Nice detective work! I've been wanting to check the previously reported users for a while now, especially higher ranking members, but I haven't had the time to do so. I definitely sensed that something was off about slapper but didn't check thoroughly, which is why I placed the tag "More investigation is necessary".

I'm also not sure if it's just my idea, but the number of reports has lowered over the past few months, it seems what we're doing is efficient and AI usage isn't as common as it used to be, especially in newer accounts.

[Findingnemo]

I'm also not sure if it's just my idea, but the number of reports has lowered over the past few months, it seems what we're doing is efficient and AI usage isn't as common as it used to be, especially in newer accounts.

Continuous reporting made them fade away, but AI is getting better too if someone uses the correct prompt they might create contents close to humanized version and I am saying this because I found some of them which I am sure were generated by AI because it vastly differs with their posting habits but none of the ai detectors gave the results as it contains AI-generated when I tried them.

[Ultegra134]

Continuous reporting made them fade away, but AI is getting better too if someone uses the correct prompt they might create contents close to humanized version and I am saying this because I found some of them which I am sure were generated by AI because it vastly differs with their posting habits but none of the ai detectors gave the results as it contains AI-generated when I tried them.

That's true, not only that, but also platforms such as Grammarly or Quillbot have massively improved their services by adding AI automisations which improve, re-write or even continue writing for you. These cases are harder to detect, because the post is not entirely written by AI, or it's slightly improved in a way that's not 100% detected, which is the main reason why some posts may look AI written, but scanners detect inconsistent results. It's something I've noticed it myself as well. There's a clear reduction of pure 100% AI written posts copy/pasted from ChatGPT.

Do you have any user particular in mind? Have you tried Originality and Winston.ai? These two platforms are supposely the most accurate and I've caught high ranking members who used humanizers in their posts, or just like @FinneysTrueVision mentioned, deleting the punctuation marks also works.

[Findingnemo]

Do you have any user particular in mind? Have you tried Originality and Winston.ai? These two platforms are supposely the most accurate and I've caught high ranking members who used humanizers in their posts, or just like @FinneysTrueVision mentioned, deleting the punctuation marks also works.

I mostly use sapling ai detector and gptzero that were useful in finding obvious ones but I will try those mentioned above to see if that makes a difference. Yeah some users who are high ranking but I don't want to accuse someone unless I have a solid reason to do, so thanks for the tools that might change things now.

[Ultegra134]

I mostly use sapling ai detector and gptzero that were useful in finding obvious ones but I will try those mentioned above to see if that makes a difference. Yeah some users who are high ranking but I don't want to accuse someone unless I have a solid reason to do, so thanks for the tools that might change things now.

If you have someone in mind but you're unsure of the conclusion, you can send me or nutildah, or a few others you'll frequently find here to check as well. If you're not 100% certain or have inconsisent results, you cannot report someone and accuse them. Unfortunately, as I mentioned earlier, the advance of tools with AI functions such as Quillbot and Grammarly might cause uncertain results. This, along with humanizers and you might be unable to successfully detect an AI written post.

[Dark.Look]

Got another spammer he/she usually writes meaningless posts by using AI. I could find even more.
User: Ararbermas

True, being confident in our predictions can sometimes lead to losses. This confidence can make us complacent and less motivated to research whether the team we’re betting on and their opponents are actually in good condition. In sports like basketball, for example, we might not realize that key players are absent or injured, which often leads to unexpected losses. It's great to be confident, but we should always make sure we've checked everything thoroughly before placing our bets.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%
copyleaks: AI Content Found 100%
undetectable: 99%
stealthwriter: 100%

Every time Bitcoin makes a correction, it's actually a good idea to accumulate, especially if you're a long-term holder, because it's like buying at a discount. However, if you want to get the timing right or avoid buying before the price drops further, it's important to learn how to analyze the market. That way, you'll know whether it's the right time to take advantage of the discount or not. For me, it's a great advantage as a long-term holder who wants to buy more during Bitcoin's price corrections.

sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 100%
undetectable: 99%

Gambling addiction is driven by emotional and psychological factors, such as the rush from winning, using gambling to escape stress, and the hope of quick rewards.

And also greed and the belief that they can control outcomes lead gamblers to take bigger risks. This cycle of craving, chasing losses, and seeking instant rewards makes people ended in addiction, until it hard to stop despite the risks.

copyleaks: AI Content Found 100%
gptzero: 100%
undetectable: 99%

Many people believe that betting on teams or players with low odds gives them a higher chance of winning, since low odds usually indicate a stronger advantage. However, they often forget that outcomes are still uncertain, and underdogs with higher odds can and do win. That’s why, in my opinion, it’s always better to carefully analyze the team you're betting on, rather than relying solely on odds. Using that strategy alone will more likely lead to losses.

gptzero: 100%
copyleaks: AI Content Found 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 75%
undetectable: 99%

It's always wiser to play only what you can afford to lose, rather than trying to force yourself to avoid becoming addicted to a game that you find highly entertaining and fun. No one can truly prevent themselves from falling into this common gambling issue, especially when there's money involved, as it often leads to repeated playing. Therefore, it's important to set a specific amount for playing and develop a strong mindset. This includes learning how to control yourself and resist the temptation to touch money that should be reserved for essential expenses.

gptzero: 100%
copyleaks: AI Content Found 100%
sapling: 100%

There's no need to be shocked by the results in gambling—honestly, unexpected situations and outcomes happen all the time, especially in sports betting.

I remember this one time I bet on a basketball team that had a clear advantage: great record, full lineup, everything looked solid. Meanwhile, the opposing team had most of their star players out due to injury. Based on the odds, it should’ve been an easy win for the team I picked.

But guess what? They ended up losing to a team made up mostly of bench players—and the underdog odds were insanely good. LMAO, that was seriously unexpected!

So yeah, at the end of the day, gambling is all about luck. You just have to accept that.

gptzero: 100%
copyleaks: AI Content Found 100%
sapling: 100%
stealthwriter: 71.43%

[Ultegra134]

Two more newbies posting AI gibberish, just when I said that I've noticed a reduction in AI usage from new accounts.  

Anyway, posts reported.

User: asifbabbar

Post 1.

I love watching CS:GO tournaments, especially now that LAN events are back. The intensity and atmosphere just don't compare to online play. Some teams really thrive on stage, while others struggle without their usual setup. Betting on these matches makes it even more interesting, but I try to be careful since upsets happen all the time.

If you're into CS:GO trading, it's worth checking out OPMarket. It’s a solid option for buying and selling in-game items, and the process is super smooth compared to the Steam market.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 2.

I’ve seen how drug abuse messes up the lives of young people, not just in terms of health but also their relationships and future plans. A friend I grew up with started using in high school and it quickly got out of hand. He dropped out, got into trouble with the law, and ended up needing serious intervention. I think one key thing missing is early education, not just telling teens “drugs are bad,” but teaching them how addiction actually works and how it ruins decision-making and relationships. Family support and trusted mentors really make a difference, especially when young people feel lost or pressured.

When it gets to the point of full-blown addiction, though, regular talks or school campaigns can’t always help. That’s when proper rehab programs matter a lot. I came across Abbeycare's website while trying to support someone in recovery. They offer structured help and the kind of environment that actually supports change. Worth checking out for anyone dealing with this directly.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 3.

Dota 2's esports scene is always full of surprises, and Team Liquid has been interesting to follow lately. Their performance at PGL Wallachia S3 has been solid, and while I know some people have mixed feelings about Boxi, the team is holding firm. I think roster changes are always tricky, but sticking together might be the best move unless there's a significant issue.  

If you're into Dota 2 and want to cash out on some skins, there's a good way to do it. You can sell your items from Dota here, and the process is fast and secure.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 99.7% Fake
User: martinaloewe

Post 1.

You're absolutely right — while some tariffs can support domestic industry, Trump’s extreme approach risks hurting innovation. Higher costs on electronics slow down tech growth, which directly impacts sectors like crypto. Bitcoin and many digital assets rely on affordable tech infrastructure.

Platforms like LCX https://www.lcx.com/ focus on building a regulated, tech-forward crypto ecosystem in Europe — offering stability amid such volatility. Contrast that with Binance https://www.binance.com/en, which often faces uncertainty due to regulatory pushback. The balance between policy and innovation is key, and excessive tariffs disrupt that balance globally.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 2.

Interesting twist, but let’s be real, a hacked email doesn’t mean Satoshi’s back. Feels more like a clever marketing stunt riding on nostalgia. Instead of chasing mystery coins, I’d focus on platforms like LCX https://www.lcx.com/ and Coinbase https://www.coinbase.com/ , both building under regulatory frameworks and listing real utility projects. That’s where the real future of crypto is unfolding, not in someone’s inbox from 2009.

Copyleaks: 0%
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Undetectable.ai: 99% AI


Edit:

Here's a third one,

User: Whatuneed303

Post 1.

Bitcoin is like a special kind of money that exists only on computers and phones. It's the most popular cryptocurrency, which means it's like the leader in its field. One of the cool things about Bitcoin is that there's only a certain amount of it that can ever exist—21 million. This makes it valuable because it's scarce, like a rare collectible.

>> https://medium.com/@textbotmatt/ai-takeover-how-to-use-artificial-intelligence-to-make-money-8d5a79bbc3fa

Big companies and even some countries are use Bitcoin, which makes it more important and valuable. It's also seen as a safe place to put your money when other investments might be risky, kind of like gold. Bitcoin has done really well compared to other investments, and it's getting easier for people to buy and sell it.

If you're interested in learning more about how Bitcoin works and why it's such a big deal, read the full article now to discover how you can be a part of this exciting future!

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 81.3% Fake

[apogio]

USER: girayeser

TOPIC: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5538185.new#new

Quillbot AI Detector -- 100% AI content on both quotes
GPTZero -- 100% AI content on both quotes
Copyleaks -- 100% AI content on the 2nd quote
Sapling AI -- 99.1% AI content on the 2nd quote

Hey,

Thanks a lot for your comment and for bringing up memo.cash — it's a great example of what's possible with OP_RETURN and on-chain social media, especially on the BCH network. Respect for the work that's been done there.

Yes, I'm the creator behind this project, and while it might not feel revolutionary compared to earlier implementations like Memo, my goal here is to build upon those ideas and take things a few steps further — especially in terms of privacy, user identity, and modular expansion.

Feedback like yours helps a lot, happy to connect. Thanks again!

GitHub Repository: https://github.com/theRomanMercury/BitcoinMessagingApp

A revolutionary Windows-based application that enables you to send and receive secure messages using Bitcoin Core. Take your communication to the next level by leveraging the Bitcoin blockchain!

Features:

🔹 Blockchain-Based Messaging:

Send and receive messages via Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN field for maximum security and transparency.

🔹 Inbox Updates:

A real-time inbox automatically checks for incoming blockchain messages using an integrated Timer system.

🔹 Easy-to-Use Interface:

Simplified login with Bitcoin Core RPC credentials and a clean design for seamless interactions.

🔹 Open Source:

Fully open-source and ready for contributions!

Why This Matters:

Bitcoin isn’t just a currency—it’s a powerful decentralized platform. By using the Bitcoin Messaging App, you can:

- Ensure your messages are immutable and secure.

- Leverage the blockchain for creative use cases beyond transactions.


Support Development:

💡 Love the project? Consider contributing to its growth:

Bitcoin Donation Address: bc1qqx2asqpelkh0trqhd44qgx9xsklnw0pu3n559u

Join the movement!

[nutildah]

USER: girayeser

These kind of posts annoy me but the mods are unlikely to take any action on them, especially if its the first post in a thread by an account not in a signature campaign. From what I've deduced, AI is (generally) considered OK by mods if its for advertising a product or service. Its just up to the reader (potential customer) if they want to use a product made by someone too lazy to use their own words to talk about it.

Thankfully the ICO era is long dead, otherwise there would be floods of ANNs that were nothing but GPT outputs... "make me a white paper for a token that raises funds for endangered species of eagles", etc.

[Desyationer]

I didn't know that AI generation is a violation. It's sad because my level of English is bad, and AI allows me to translate qualitatively, unlike Google, I look like a native English speaker and not a Slav.

[nutildah]

I didn't know that AI generation is a violation.

Its not a violation. You can use it to your heart's content, but don't be surprised when your posts are deleted as spam.

It's sad because my level of English is bad, and AI allows me to translate qualitatively, unlike Google, I look like a native English speaker and not a Slav.

You don't look like a native English speaker though, you look like a robot. For your posts in the 32 BTC puzzle thread, I mean that's fine with me; I don't have any qualms with those ones. Ultimately, its up to the moderators whether or not a post is considered "spam", which is the usual reason that AI posts are deleted. Your posts from 2021 seem fine, and ChatGPT wasn't around back then.

[JayJuanGee]

I didn't know that AI generation is a violation.

Its not a violation. You can use it to your heart's content, but don't be surprised when your posts are deleted as spam.

It's sad because my level of English is bad, and AI allows me to translate qualitatively, unlike Google, I look like a native English speaker and not a Slav.

You don't look like a native English speaker though, you look like a robot. For your posts in the 32 BTC puzzle thread, I mean that's fine with me; I don't have any qualms with those ones. Ultimately, its up to the moderators whether or not a post is considered "spam", which is the usual reason that AI posts are deleted. Your posts from 2021 seem fine, and ChatGPT wasn't around back then.

There could be ways that members could use AI to write better posts and to keep their own style, yet it becomes too easy for members to get lazy, so then even if a member were to write the initial draft and then ask the AI to make their post sound better, the AI may well end up adding content, so then the member would need to still figure out the extent to which to include that additional content that was not originally within the members thinking on the topic.  I doubt that there is any easy solution, yet probably any member who attempts to interact with the content would likely fare a lot better...and also it seems that writing the initial draft would be helpful.. yet it seems to me that frequently if a person already writes the initial draft then maybe he has said most things that he knows on the topic, so if he has AI re-write the draft, there surely are going to be new ideas inserted and sure maybe improvements over the writing style and even taking away some of the repetition.

In recent times, I have been noticing a lot of posts that are way better written, but they still kind of sound like gobbledy-gook and are not really saying much of anything beyond perhaps repeating ideas from some of the prior posts, so yeah, frequently I am suspecting that some kind of AI had been involved in those kinds of gobble-dee-gook posts.. Furthermore, it can be frustrating to be reading through a lot of posts that do not really seem to be saying much of anything and trying to figure out which one might actually be a human that put some actual work into drafting out the ideas, even though such posts still may well contain a decent number of good buzz words (or buzz ideas) contained within them.

[memehunter]

Another post of mine, which I wrote totally on my own, is showing 100% fake by Sapling AI. I checked with Copyleaks, gptzero, and everything was fine (0%). I have not had any false positives by Copyleaks and Gptzero as far as my posts are concerned. This is the 6th or 7th time (3rd time for my post) I have found a false positive from Sapling AI.

I get the argument that MI is playing on home ground, but really? This home-ground theory does not really work in IPL, because of sheer diversity among the players. Vankhede stadium is known for batting-friendly pitch and fast-paced outfield, and considering the boosted morale of SRH after chasing a massive score against Punjab, I don’t think MI is the favorite. What are your opinions? IMO it is massively profitable to bet on SRH with Stake.com's early six promotion.

IMO opinion, it would be good if we could make a repository of all the false positives we are finding across all detectors, it will help us a lot in our fight against AI chatbots. I know it is very hard to do it for others, but if some reputed members just scan their posts before posting, it will be a good resource. 

[Lucius]

Another post of mine, which I wrote totally on my own, is showing 100% fake by Sapling AI. I checked with Copyleaks, gptzero, and everything was fine (0%). I have not had any false positives by Copyleaks and Gptzero as far as my posts are concerned. This is the 6th or 7th time (3rd time for my post) I have found a false positive from Sapling AI.
~snip~

I completely discarded that AI detector when I became convinced that it was doing far more harm than good. My advice is that no one who wants reliable detection should use it.

[nutildah]

I agree that Sapling causes a lot of false positives. The problem is it needs at least 200 words or so to make an accurate detection, but the lower limit is only 50 words (that's what it says anyway).

Going forward I would treat it this way: use other detectors first, but if two others say it is likely AI-generated and Sapling does as well, then its reasonable to assume the post is AI-generated.

[igebotz]

I agree that Sapling causes a lot of false positives. The problem is it needs at least 200 words or so to make an accurate detection, but the lower limit is only 50 words (that's what it says anyway).

Going forward I would treat it this way: use other detectors first, but if two others say it is likely AI-generated and Sapling does as well, then its reasonable to assume the post is AI-generated.

Why not remove Sapling from the required tools for now? 

There have been several complaints about Sapling sending false positives since last year, and things haven't improved much.