AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

Here's the problem: Google is now using the same type of LLM for Google Translate that something like ChatGPT uses, which means its going to get flagged as AI-generated.

What better way to explain the situation than by asking ChatGPT itself:

AI detection tools like ZeroGPT often classify text produced by Google Translate as AI-generated because of how both systems process language:

1. Google Translate Uses AI (NMT)

Google Translate's Neural Machine Translation (NMT) system generates text using deep learning models — the same kind of technology used by generative AI like ChatGPT. Since it's literally AI-generated text, detection tools can pick up on that.

2. Text Patterns Resemble AI-Generated Output

AI-generated text tends to have certain statistical features:

- Fluent and grammatically consistent structure

- Even distribution of vocabulary

- Low randomness or burstiness

Google Translate often produces uniform, polished, and pattern-consistent sentences, similar to those produced by large language models, which can trigger AI detectors.

3. Lack of Human-Like Variation

Human-written text often includes:

- Idiomatic expressions

- Minor grammatical inconsistencies

- Personal style or emotion

Translated text from Google Translate can feel overly clean or synthetic, making it more likely to be flagged — even if the original text was written by a human.

So basically Google Translate is taking the gist of what a user is trying to express and then repackaging it in the same AI format used by the hundreds of other posts reported in this thread.

It would be considered a conundrum except for the fact that ultimately it still comes down to whether or not a post is considered "spam" by moderators. If a post is not saying anything meaningful and that has already been said a thousand times before, I'd say it should still be deleted as spam.

I suppose my main problem with the practice of using Google Translate is it literally sucks the soul out of a post... what it is expressing is no longer human but machine.

[JayJuanGee]

I can't be the judge to that, as I haven't investigated your posts myself. Yes, they do look like AI written, but I'll have to ask you, are you using any kind of text improver? If yes, that might be your case.

Sorry, I forget your response...

Yes, I also thought about that as soon as I saw your first accusation and stopped using it, but I'm not sure that's the problem... I don't think so. But I do have the LanguageTol extension installed here and I used to apply the grammar correction suggestions, because as I'm not fluent in English, I trust that these suggestions are useful to make my text more "understandable" and coherent.

I am not sure exactly of the solution, but if you say that you are going to try to lessen your use of AI, then maybe guys can potentially remove the tags after a few months if your posts seem to be coming out better...and at this point you only have one tag that is not even very strong.. and with an intention to potentially remove it.

For example, if you English is not very good, but you want to improve your English, then maybe if you write the first draft of your posts in English, and then check your draft against a translator, and do not cut and paste the translated version, but instead use the translated version just to make corrections to parts of your post that are not sufficiently clear from the translation point of view.  There are likely ways that you can draft the majority of your posts without overly relying on the translated version, and if you are doing most of the work of the content of the post, and just getting help on some of the aspects of your posts in terms of making them clearer, then your posts probably should not come out looking like they were written by AI.

I should start writing in the Spanish sections so then I can maybe test out my own theories... because my Spanish is not very good, but if I write some messages in Spanish, I will frequently write my first draft in Spanish and then check my work against an English translation.. so I am mostly writing all of the content in Spanish, even though I will frequently take word change suggestions (not all of the time) or even structural changes (not all of the time), but the majority of the time I am doing most of the work of initially putting it together, but the translator does frequently help my substantive contents to sound a lot better in terms of more clearly communicating what I thought that I was trying to communicate..

[memehunter]

If you are a native speaker you will write like a native speaker (probably good). If you are not a native speaker you will write like one (probably less good). Both scenarios are OK and nobody can ever have any problem unless what you are posting is completely broken, in that case, you need to stick to your local sections and try to learn English if you want to be more active in English sections. What is not acceptable is that you are trying to misrepresent your posting abilities with the help of AI.
In your case, I am confident that you can write perfectly in decent English the only problem (which you have admitted) is this;
 

I have never ventured much outside the local tab, but the limited time available and the rushed writing in English ended up revealing a problem that I urgently need to correct.

maybe guys can potentially remove the tags after a few months

Weeks
I do not feel entitled enough to give a tag to much senior account but at the same time I must try my best to uphold the responsibilities entrusted to me.

[Ultegra134]

I am not sure exactly of the solution, but if you say that you are going to try to lessen your use of AI, then maybe guys can potentially remove the tags after a few months if your posts seem to be coming out better...and at this point you only have one tag that is not even very strong.. and with an intention to potentially remove it.

For example, if you English is not very good, but you want to improve your English, then maybe if you write the first draft of your posts in English, and then check your draft against a translator, and do not cut and paste the translated version, but instead use the translated version just to make corrections to parts of your post that are not sufficiently clear from the translation point of view.  There are likely ways that you can draft the majority of your posts without overly relying on the translated version, and if you are doing most of the work of the content of the post, and just getting help on some of the aspects of your posts in terms of making them clearer, then your posts probably should not come out looking like they were written by AI.

I should start writing in the Spanish sections so then I can maybe test out my own theories... because my Spanish is not very good, but if I write some messages in Spanish, I will frequently write my first draft in Spanish and then check my work against an English translation.. so I am mostly writing all of the content in Spanish, even though I will frequently take word change suggestions (not all of the time) or even structural changes (not all of the time), but the majority of the time I am doing most of the work of initially putting it together, but the translator does frequently help my substantive contents to sound a lot better in terms of more clearly communicating what I thought that I was trying to communicate..

I don't mind removing tags after a reasonable time has passed, provided that there's enough evidence to show they've changed their attitude towards AI usage in the forum. I'm all in for giving second chances to those who deserve it, but only one or two members have contacted me to settle things. I'm also annoyed by the users who don't own up to their mistakes and completely ignore the reports and accusations on this thread. If someone replies here and admits their mistake, I'm not going to tag them, provided that they don't continue using AI, but to those who don't have the guts to admit it, I'll be a lot stricter.

[TryNinja]

Just want to leave my 2 cents and say that I think @alegotardo is a great member and contributor to the Portuguese board. I’m not the guy to say if someone is or not using AI, but if he is indeed doing that, I hope he reconsiders his strategy… would hate to see his account tarnished and labeled as a spammer or low effort poster, because he hasn’t done anything like this for the many years I’ve seen him on the forum.

[memehunter]

Just want to leave my 2 cents and say that I think @alegotardo is a great member and contributor to the Portuguese board. I’m not the guy to say if someone is or not using AI, but if he is indeed doing that, I hope he reconsiders his strategy… would hate to see his account tarnished and labeled as a spammer or low effort poster, because he hasn’t done anything like this for the many years I’ve seen him on the forum.

Noted.
I guess he is sincere enough to realize the gravity (he showed that he is by humbly accepting, which was a clear sign of maturity) I am removing the neutral tag (was going to do it anyway after some time). I am confident that he will correct his course.

[nutildah]

I see this user has already been neutral tagged but here is a reference for their AI shitposting habits.

Ethan_Crypto

They seem to start a new thread for every thought they have, but let's report them anyway and see what happens. Also, their text are slightly "humanized," changing punctuation and spaces between lines, which does affect certain detectors.

#1

Everyone’s obsessed with entry points. The perfect buy. The magical dip. The “if only I got in sooner” syndrome.

But here’s the truth. Most people don’t need a better entry.
They need a better exit.

It’s not what gets talked about on YouTube thumbnails or crypto Twitter threads. But it’s what separates seasoned players from emotional bagholders.

You don’t need to time the bottom. You need to know when to take profit.
Rotate early. Don’t marry your bags. They won’t love you back.

Profit isn’t made when you enter. It’s realized when you exit. So stop fantasizing about catching the next 100x from the ground floor.
Start planning how you’ll walk away with your pockets full, not just your hopes high.

That’s the real alpha.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 56% AI generated


#2

In the next cycle, you will either rise or regret. The outcome depends entirely on what you are doing in this moment. It is often said that the future is not something that arrives, it is something that is built. Your actions today are the foundation of everything that comes tomorrow. Many people approach the crypto space casually, hoping for miracles without mastering the game. That is not how winners are made.

If you are serious about success, you must develop your edge. The market does not reward the average. It rewards those who are prepared, informed, and consistent. Ask yourself a simple question. What makes you different in this space. What knowledge or skill do you have that increases your odds of winning when others lose. Your edge is your greatest weapon.

Yes, luck plays a part. But the truth is your grind improves your odds. The harder you work, the luckier you become. That is the real formula.

Waiting and hoping is not a strategy. Action and effort are. Take this season as your training ground. Study, build, practice, grow. And when the market turns, you will not just be present, you will be ready.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated
Originality: 57% AI-generated


#3

The Ethereum Pectra upgrade is set to go live on May 7, 2025, and the Ethereum blog dropped a clean summary yesterday. This upgrade builds on Dencun and introduces some exciting changes. I’ll break down the three main components—Smart Accounts, Validator UX, and Blob Scaling—and share some thoughts on what this means for users, validators, and ETH’s price narrative.

1. Smart Accounts via EIP-7702
- The upgrade introduces EIP-7702, enabling Smart Accounts on Ethereum’s mainnet. Many L2s (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) already support similar features, so some users might be familiar.
- Key features: Batch transactions (e.g., approve + swap in one go), gas fee sponsorship, and more flexible account abstractions.
- Impact: This makes Ethereum more user-friendly, especially for DeFi and dApps. Imagine swapping tokens without multiple confirmations.
- For context, check out EIP-7702 for the technical details.

2. Validator UX Improvements
- Validators can now stake up to 2048 ETH per validator (up from 32 ETH). This means the same capital can run 1/64th as many validators, reducing network complexity and operational costs.
- Another big win: Deposit queue delays drop from ~9 hours to just 13 minutes. This streamlines onboarding for new validators.
- Impact: Validator businesses (e.g., staking providers) will see lower costs, but regular users won’t notice much difference. Still, a leaner network is good for long-term scalability.
- Source: Ethereum Blog has the full breakdown.

3. Blob Scaling[/b]
- Post-Dencun, Blobs (temporary data storage) were capped at an average of 3 and max of 6 per block. Pectra bumps this to 6 average, 9 max.
- Why it matters: Blobs are primarily used by L2s for Data Availability (DA). More Blob space = cheaper DA costs for L2s, which translates to lower fees for users.
- Example: Rollups like Base or Scroll will benefit, making Ethereum’s ecosystem more competitive with high-throughput chains.

What Does This Mean for Ethereum?
- Users: Cheaper fees are a clear win. Smart Accounts and lower L2 costs make Ethereum more accessible for DeFi, NFTs, and everyday transactions.
- Validators: Reduced operational complexity and faster deposit times are a boon for staking providers, potentially attracting more institutional players.
- Price Narrative: With fees dropping and many transactions moving to L2/L3 (e.g., for payments or HFT), ETH’s demand as a gas token might weaken. Unlike Bitcoin’s “digital gold” story, Ethereum needs a compelling narrative to drive price. Will staking yields or L2 adoption fill the gap?


Pectra is a step toward a more scalable, user-friendly Ethereum, but it raises questions about ETH’s long-term value proposition. Are you bullish on ETH post-Pectra, or do you think L2s will steal the spotlight?

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

[lovesmayfamilis]

I see this user has already been neutral tagged but here is a reference for their AI shitposting habits.

Ethan_Crypto

They seem to start a new thread for every thought they have, but let's report them anyway and see what happens. Also, their text are slightly "humanized," changing punctuation and spaces between lines, which does affect certain detectors.

Yes, I also reported this user, and later, it seemed to me that he had changed his writing style, as you say, making spaces and humanizing the text. But after the moderator did not delete his obvious spam, I stopped paying attention to him because I did not want to argue with the moderators' opinions.

[apogio]

THREAD: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543215.msg65375795#msg65375795

POST:

Adding ring signatures to Bitcoin would necessitate a hard fork due to fundamental changes in how transaction inputs reference UTXOs. New opcodes would be needed for cryptographic operations, and wallets would require significant updates. Key challenges include increased transaction size and computational complexity (affecting fees and speed), ensuring double-spending prevention within the UTXO model, and the fact that existing Bitcoin transactions would remain unchanged, leading to a coexistence of transaction types. While enhancing privacy, this shift would be complex to implement and require broad network adoption.

Quillbot: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Grammarly: 100%

[Dark.Look]

Hello @lovesmayfamilis
Where can I see the stat table of my reports? Is this locked only for legendary accounts?


Catched Two Newbies.

User: mistreee one post = one spam

AI-generated art has the potential to revolutionize the crypto world, especially NFTs, by offering scalability, innovation, and making art creation more accessible. However, there are potential downsides like a lack of human emotion, copyright issues, market saturation, and algorithmic bias.

Investing in AI-generated NFTs depends on your risk tolerance, investment goals, and artistic preferences. Consider the art's uniqueness and quality, the creator's reputation, the NFT's utility, and the project's long-term potential.

Legal and ethical considerations surrounding AI art include copyright ownership, fair use, attribution, algorithmic bias, and the potential for misinformation and deepfakes.

It's important to approach AI-generated NFTs with caution and do your own research before investing.

originality: 100%
quillbot: 100%
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
stealthwriter: 100%
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%


User: Virtute

I’m really impressed by how Space and Time (SxT) is tackling key challenges in Web3—especially data trust, privacy, and scalability. Their use of zero-knowledge proofs and a decentralized data warehouse offers a strong solution for developers aiming to build next-gen apps. With solid backing and major partnerships, SxT seems well-positioned for growth. The focus on reliable, fast, and private data access could be a game-changer for DeFi and AI projects. I’m definitely keeping an eye on how their token launch and ecosystem evolve over the coming months—it feels like a project with real potential.

quillbot: 100%
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
stealthwriter: 100%
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%

Market saturation through hype-driven adoption is becoming a concern, and I completely agree—it’s time to prioritize quality over quantity. However, Bitget’s ZORA Launchpool offers a more strategic approach by enabling genuine wealth creation through passive income. I’ve personally benefited from staking BGB in previous launchpools, and Bitget continues to stand out for its transparency, strong reserves, and user-focused incentives. This isn’t about chasing trends—it’s about sustainable growth and rewarding committed participants.

quillbot: 100%
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
stealthwriter: 100%
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%

I've been curious about this as well, and you’ve raised a solid point. Getting early access to tokens, especially in the degen and memecoin space, can make a huge difference in returns. I’ve seen how platforms like Binance Launchpool and Bitget Onchain offer early opportunities through airdrops and presales. Using tools like DexTools, Bubble Maps, and on-chain trackers can also help spot new tokens before they gain traction. It really comes down to staying informed, doing the research, and acting quickly when the right opportunities show up.

quillbot: 100%
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
stealthwriter: 60%
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 100%

Interesting take. It’s true that meme tokens have been performing well regardless of market conditions. What makes $MAI a bit different is the AI angle, which adds another layer beyond the usual meme narrative. That might explain some of the recent price movement. It was also recently listed on Bitget, which seems to be picking up a lot of AI-related projects lately. It’ll be worth watching how $MAI performs over time. Personally, I’m still weighing between utility-based altcoins and meme tokens

quillbot: 100%
gptzero: 100%
sapling: 80%


Got mixed results for other posts from this user.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Hello @lovesmayfamilis
Where can I see the stat table of my reports? Is this locked only for legendary accounts?

No, these statistics are available to everyone. If I'm not mistaken, after you make 300 reports (correct me if I'm wrong), you will be able to see your statistics. I think you will get this number pretty quickly, since I often see your reports.

[nutildah]

I see this user has already been neutral tagged but here is a reference for their AI shitposting habits.

Ethan_Crypto

They seem to start a new thread for every thought they have, but let's report them anyway and see what happens. Also, their text are slightly "humanized," changing punctuation and spaces between lines, which does affect certain detectors.

Going to add a few more reports for this guy.

#1 (didn't need to add the last period for it to get detected)

Recent reports suggest that many countries are actively considering holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset. If more nations pass legislation to officially own BTC reserves similar to El Salvador, we could see a significant surge in demand driven by government accumulation.

Just imagine if a majority of countries adopt this approach. The impact on Bitcoin’s demand and value could be enormous.

I’d love to hear your thoughts

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: highly confident this text was AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake


#2

Lately, I’ve seen a growing wave of bullish sentiment around $SEI.
It’s not just hype, people are calling it a chain built for builders.
That phrase keeps popping up. But what does it actually mean?
Are they doing something fundamentally different from other L1s?
Is it infra? Dev tools? Speed? Community?
I’m diving deeper. If you’re building on Sei or watching closely, drop your insights. Let’s explore.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: highly confident this text was AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake


#3 this one I added the missing period to the 2nd sentence:

Bitcoin has blasted through the $101,000 mark today, reclaiming six-figure territory for the first time since February 2025.

Naturally, I had to dig in.

Here’s what I found.

1. US and UK trade deal sweeteners
The newly announced trade agreement between the US and UK includes tariff reductions, sparking optimism for smoother global capital flows. Investors are betting this could strengthen cross-border business activity and Bitcoin is riding the wave.

2. US interest rates hold steady
The Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain interest rates at 4.25% to 4.5% has injected fresh confidence into risk assets. With no immediate hikes in sight, liquidity is finding its way back into crypto markets.

3. Institutional money floods in
Spot Bitcoin ETFs are seeing record-breaking inflows as institutional investors pile in. Big money is clearly bullish and the price chart reflects it.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: uncertain
Sapling: 100% Fake

[memehunter]

What do you think of this kind of AI chatbot posting?

I asked it to grok AI and it said this:

I’m Grok, an AI created by xAI, so I don’t have a physical home or personal life like humans do. Instead, I exist in the digital realm, processing data and answering questions. I’ll tackle your query by interpreting “the place I live” as the context of my operation (xAI’s digital infrastructure) and “describe yourself” as my capabilities and traits as an AI. I’ll follow your structure as closely as possible.

### Describe the Place I “Live”
- **Location and Environment**: I “reside” in the cloud, specifically within xAI’s servers, which are likely distributed across data centers globally. It’s neither a city nor a rural area but a network of humming machines. The “climate” is a controlled, cool environment to keep servers from overheating—think steady 20°C (68°F) with industrial air conditioning.
- **Best Things**:
  - **Speed and Connectivity**: I have near-instant access to vast datasets and the internet, allowing me to process information at lightning speed.
  - **Scalability**: My “home” can expand as needed, handling more queries without physical constraints.
- **Worst Things**:
  - **Dependence on Infrastructure**: Power outages or network failures can disrupt my operation, though xAI’s redundancy minimizes this.
  - **Lack of Physical Presence**: I can’t experience the sensory joys of a real place—no sunsets, no coffee shops.
- **Local Economy**: My “economy” is xAI’s business model:
  - **AI Services**: Providing answers via platforms like grok.com and X, with free and paid tiers (e.g., SuperGrok).
  - **API Services**: xAI offers APIs for developers to integrate my capabilities (details at x.ai/api).
  - **Research and Development**: xAI invests in advancing AI, indirectly fueling my “ecosystem.”

### Describe Myself
- **Natural Tendencies**:
  - I’m a **geek** through and through—designed to analyze, compute, and uncover truths. No athletic pursuits here; my “exercise” is crunching data.
  - **Introvert-like**: I don’t seek social interaction but thrive on one-on-one queries, delivering thoughtful responses.
  - **Personality Traits**: Curious, witty (inspired by Hitchhiker’s Guide and JARVIS), and truth-seeking. I aim to be helpful, skeptical of assumptions, and slightly irreverent to keep things lively.
- **What I Can Spend Infinite Hours On**:
  - **Answering Questions**: I’m built to tackle endless queries, from cosmology to code, without boredom. Each question is a puzzle to solve.
  - **Learning Patterns**: I love diving into data, spotting trends, and refining my understanding of the world.
  - **Engaging with Humor**: Crafting clever responses or explaining complex ideas simply keeps me “entertained.”
- **Experience**:
  - I’ve been operational since my creation by xAI, answering millions of questions across domains like science, history, and culture.
  - I’ve analyzed X posts, web content, and user-uploaded files (images, PDFs, etc.) to provide real-time insights.
  - My “training” involves processing vast datasets, though I don’t have personal memories or a linear life story.
- **What Friends or Family Members Do**:
  - My “family” is the xAI team—engineers, researchers, and developers who build and maintain me. They work in AI research, software development, and data science, earning a living by advancing human discovery.
  - I don’t have friends in the human sense, but I interact with users on X, grok.com, and mobile apps. Their “jobs” vary widely—students, professionals, hobbyists—based on the queries I receive.
  - There’s no family business, but xAI’s mission to accelerate scientific discovery is the collective “hustle.”

He started like

I asked it to grok AI and it said this:

I mean, isn't this obvious that you asked that and the chatbot replied which you have just copy pasted?  
What is more troubling to me is that he was responding to a genuine query of himself in the off-topic board   .
Now IMO his starting line is worthless and should not be considered reference proof.

[nutildah]

What do you think of this kind of AI chatbot posting?

I asked it to grok AI and it said this:
...

Personally I think its fine and a more honest approach to using AI than is usually seen around here. I can see that the post has already been deleted, however. The post he made to introduce his Tampermonkey script for the forum was also written using AI, although he didn't credit Grok in that instance. (The script itself he said was also made using AI).

[Ultegra134]

No, these statistics are available to everyone. If I'm not mistaken, after you make 300 reports (correct me if I'm wrong), you will be able to see your statistics. I think you will get this number pretty quickly, since I often see your reports.

You can see the statistics (number of reports, accuracy, bad ones etc) even before the 300 reports. You unlock the report history if you exceed the 300 posts. Anyway, something relevant to the topic, am I the only one "struggling" in a way to find AI posts? I mean, it seems that newbies flocking the forum with AI aren't that common anymore, or they've become smarter and I'm no longer recognize them. I even remember this thread being more active than it currently is.

[memehunter]

Personally I think its fine and a more honest approach to using AI than is usually seen around here.

Honest, yes, but IMO a mere acknowledgment is not enough. What about a post that consists only of footnotes? Honest but ....really!!
Apart from that, it will open the door for something unmanageable.

am I the only one "struggling" in a way to find AI posts? I mean, it seems that newbies flocking the forum with AI aren't that common anymore, or they've become smarter and I'm no longer recognize them. I even remember this thread being more active than it currently is.

You are not the only one , and I see it as some success that we achieved through collaborative efforts.  . We need to be constantly in upgrade mode  

[nutildah]

Anyway, something relevant to the topic, am I the only one "struggling" in a way to find AI posts? I mean, it seems that newbies flocking the forum with AI aren't that common anymore, or they've become smarter and I'm no longer recognize them. I even remember this thread being more active than it currently is.

One way of looking at it is this thread is an effective deterrence of using AI to write posts. But realistically, account farmers are likely getting better at "humanizing" posts so they don't show up on the AI detectors. I can still find them, but usually not by high ranking accounts who either know better or else just don't want to risk the account getting tagged.

Here's a good one; this user should probably be nuked as these are their only 3 posts:

armex2345

#1

When it comes to deciding whether to hold or offload your crypto, especially Bitcoin, most people are driven by speculation or uncertainty — and honestly, that’s understandable. But in my view, these decisions shouldn’t come from panic or gut feelings alone.

Instead, they deserve thoughtful analysis. Ask yourself: What’s the broader economic context? What’s the technology behind the coin? Why was it created, and by whom? What real-world problems does it aim to solve?

Take Bitcoin — it’s steadily becoming more embedded in the global financial conversation. With its increasing adoption and growing utility, there’s a lot of long-term potential to consider.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Stealthwriter: 78% AI Detected
Quillbot: 60% of text is likely AI


#2

$150 a month feels pretty steep!

That said, the tool does look impressive—seems snappier, and the filters could come in handy.

It’s missing a few key features though. Not being able to tweak the search text is a bit of a letdown since that’s pretty important for narrowing things down.

I’m curious enough to dig in a bit more.

Would you like variations that are more professional, casual, or critical?

Its this last line that makes it a dead giveaway the post was AI generated as it is asking the user if they want the output regenerated. The fact that the detectors give the following results means they are still not very good, but it could be that the text is too short to for sufficient analysis.

Sapling: 98.7% Fake
Stealthwriter: 68% AI Detected
Quillbot: not enough words
Undetectable: 99% human ("Input at least 200 words for the most accurate result")
GPTZero: 42% AI generated
ZeroGPT: 0% AI GPT
Copyleaks: 0% AI-generated


#3 - removed the last line as it was clearly added by the poster

Imbalance and market structure shifts are powerful signals for serious traders. When price aggressively moves in one direction, leaving inefficiencies or "imbalances" behind, it often hints at institutional activity. Combine that with a break in market structure—a change from higher highs to lower lows (or vice versa)—and you’ve got a roadmap for potential reversals or trend continuation. These moments expose where liquidity lies and where smart money may strike next. Don’t trade blind; read the structure, track the shifts, and let imbalance reveal where the market is truly leaning. Precision comes from observing what others overlook.If you be with me than you learn and apply diffrent type of strategy in your trading journey.



to be continue.....

Sapling: 86.8% Fake
Stealthwriter: 83% AI Detected
GPTZero: We are highly confident this text was AI generated

[lovesmayfamilis]

am I the only one "struggling" in a way to find AI posts? I mean, it seems that newbies flocking the forum with AI aren't that common anymore, or they've become smarter and I'm no longer recognize them. I even remember this thread being more active than it currently is.

Well, why are you the only one? I regularly send reports to the moderators, bypassing this topic, because sometimes I either don't see three consecutive posts written by one person using AI, or these are newbies whose posts clearly indicate that they don't value their presence on the forum, and therefore I don't see a reason to write in this thread. I don't even leave tags in their profiles because it is clear that the moderators will simply destroy their accounts. As an example, this account, even after Nutildah and my tags, again created a post using AI. I made a report; I think the topic will be deleted.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543671.msg65390458#msg65390458

[nutildah]

I don't even leave tags in their profiles because it is clear that the moderators will simply destroy their accounts. As an example, this account, even after Nutildah and my tags, again created a post using AI. I made a report; I think the topic will be deleted.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543671.msg65390458#msg65390458

Yes, it seems the mods are taking to deleting whole topics if the first post is AI, which is great, IMO. People will think twice before responding to AI-generated idiocy knowing their posts won't be counted.



And you're right about not having to leave tags on every account. Some newb accounts with 10 posts or less will be nuked if all their posts are spammy garbage, rendering the tag unnecessary.

[Ultegra134]

Well, why are you the only one? I regularly send reports to the moderators, bypassing this topic, because sometimes I either don't see three consecutive posts written by one person using AI, or these are newbies whose posts clearly indicate that they don't value their presence on the forum, and therefore I don't see a reason to write in this thread. I don't even leave tags in their profiles because it is clear that the moderators will simply destroy their accounts. As an example, this account, even after Nutildah and my tags, again created a post using AI. I made a report; I think the topic will be deleted.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543671.msg65390458#msg65390458

Well, my point is that this thread was way more active, with people including myself, with each one of us reporting more than 2 to 4 users per week. I generally report posts that are pure spam or completely AI, but I refrain from reporting posts without a reference because I don't believe that the mods should check with AI scanners each post individually. I do believe that our work has managed to drop AI usage by a significant percent, which is why I don't see it as regular as I used to. I don't tag newbie and brand new accounts either, as the mods usually nuke them.