AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[memehunter]

@Shishir99, I totally get your fear. And for me, if you are only correcting your grammar, it should be OK. But with AI it is much more difficult, it will give you 3-4 versions normally, and after reading through them you will realize that you have crossed the boundaries unintentionally.  Why not use a third-party tool like Grammarly to assist you, it displays the Red, Pink, and Yellow lines on your mistakes. I always correct my red mistakes but never the yellow ones as it clearly takes the help of AI to refine my writing in yellow underlines. So it is easy to define boundaries while being conscious of not creating too many obvious grammatical errors.

[virasog]

Result

Don't you see that the text is not what you wrote? It is rewritten in other words. It's not about correcting grammatical or punctuational mistakes, it's about style rewriting, so it changes what is written. Why do you need to lose your individuality? One thing is to correct mistakes and totally the different is to rewrite a text in a different style.

Yup, if you ask AI to correct the grammar, it will usually rewrite the text and that may be classified as an AI-generated and not human written. A better way to correct your grammar is to write your posts in Microsoft Word and there it will automatically correct your spelling mistakes. Also Grammarly is a good tool to correct your grammar mistakes but here also one should not ask Grammarly to change the entire sentence, as that can produce AI content. Better try to fix the grammar mistakes manually and be as natural as possible. Maybe a few grammar mistakes can be over looked, but the AI content will never be spared.

[Satofan44]

User: sharenet914
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3706028

Subject: Clarification on Self-Verifiable Broadcast Log Proposal – Technical Basis, Not Anecdote

Thank you for your responses and the skepticism — it is healthy and necessary in the Bitcoin community. Let me clarify a few things, as I believe some of the core points have been misinterpreted.

🛠️ 1. This is not about conspiracy; it’s about verifiability.
The goal of this proposal is not to accuse miners, governments, or specific actors of malice. Rather, it's to address a technical blind spot: that users currently have no native way to prove that a valid transaction they signed and broadcast was ever propagated — unless it was included in a block.

This creates a verifiability gap in edge cases like:

Mempool eviction due to size constraints or fee replacement

Transactions residing in blocks that were later reorged

Network-level suppression or blackholing (even temporary)

Users restoring from backups and finding no trace of prior transactions

🔍 2. Real-world scenario: orphaned transactions leave no trace — not even in txindex.
You may dismiss this as anecdotal, but in my own node (running with txindex=1, prune=0), transactions that were confirmed long ago now do not appear anywhere, despite being signed, valid, and originally acknowledged as confirmed.

This is not user error. This is an observed data loss of historical state, and it shows that private key alone does not imply visibility — especially across reorganizations, orphaning, or mempool volatility.

⏳ 3. "Just wait for confirmations" is incomplete advice.
If reorgs can silently discard confirmed transactions, and wallets have no record of them, then even 6+ confirmations are insufficient in some reorg models — especially when combined with network-level mempool inconsistencies.

We cannot blame users for trusting what the protocol showed them as “confirmed”.

🧾 4. Why OpenTimestamps is not enough
Yes, OpenTimestamps is excellent — but:

It requires the user to pre-register hashes

It does not integrate into wallet broadcast mechanisms

It does not help with visibility or usability of assets

It’s not recoverable from peer gossip in the same way as a decentralized broadcast log

This proposal is not competing with OpenTimestamps — it fills a different role: helping users independently prove they did send a transaction, and helping wallets surface that attempt later, regardless of what the chain currently shows.

💡 5. Conclusion: not a fork, just a log
This proposal does not require consensus rule changes. It suggests:

Light nodes (or wallets) log outgoing transaction attempts

Optionally timestamp them locally

Optionally publish to a verifiable, redundant log network (similar to DNS seeds or compact block relay)

Enable later recovery of “phantom” transactions for user-side audits

It’s a minimal proposal to solve a real problem that can affect user trust in edge cases.

Let’s work on it as a tool, not a rule.

Thank you.

— Wang

[Shishir99]

Hey guys, I am not using AI to fix my grammar yet, as I have already been using Grammarly for a few weeks. memehunter, I get you, and I am already using Grammarly to fix typos. We have lately seen people claim that they have been doing experiments with the AI. I think that should not be accepted. Why would someone experiment with the AI? What could be the goal?

For me, English is not my first language, and I write bad English. So, I am constantly trying to improve it. I want to know what the acceptable usage of AI is. Can you get help to fix your grammar? It seems the community opposes the idea, so let it go.

[_act_]

For me, English is not my first language, and I write bad English. So, I am constantly trying to improve it. I want to know what the acceptable usage of AI is. Can you get help to fix your grammar? It seems the community opposes the idea, so let it go.

I do not think the community will against the use of AI to fix English grammar, that should be acceptable. I even see it as more stress which is the minor reason that I can not use AI but the major reason being that I prefer to communicate with people naturally instead of using AI.

Al tools can easily spot that the text is written by human and the use of AI to make corrections.


Edit:

Bitcoin (BTC) and the US Dollar (USD) are fundamentally different forms of currency with distinct characteristics:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Nature   Digital cryptocurrency, decentralized
Control   No single authority (government/central bank)
Supply   Limited (21 million total)
Volatility   Highly volatile, price fluctuates rapidly
Usage   Investment, digital transactions, trading
Legal Status   Varies by country (illegal in Bangladesh)
Mechanism   Blockchain technology, peer-to-peer
US Dollar (USD):
Fiat currency, centralized
Controlled by US government/Federal Reserve
Unlimited (can be printed as needed)
Relatively stable, gradual changes
Everyday transactions, global reserve currency
Legal tender in US and widely accepted globally
Banking system, credit cards, digital payments
In essence, Bitcoin is a digital asset primarily used for investment and some online transactions, known for its decentralization and price volatility. The US Dollar is a traditional government-backed currency used for all forms of daily transactions worldwide, valued for its stability and widespread acceptance.

100% AI generate states Quillbot
GPTZero tool states: We are highly confident this text was AI generated

I do not bother myself to check other AI tools for it because those two are enough.

[r_victory]

I did some testing and found that Sapling is the least reliable of all the AI ​​detectors on the list. I believe that false positives generated by it can lead to unfounded suspicions.

Below are two random texts written by me (they are not forum posts), I am sure that I did not use AI, they are simple and even personal texts, and Sapling says that it was more than 90% written by AI

I have been a Bitcointalk user since 2017, my username is r_victory. I am 44 years old and I am a translator. Also, I have lived in Brazil since I was born, my favorite team is Corinthians and I am writing this text without the help of artificial intelligence.

Sapling: Fake 95.4%

The best-known Brazilian soccer player after Pelé is Neymar. His career began at Santos, and he has played for several teams around the world, such as Barcelona, ​​for example. However, the Brazilian national soccer team is not doing well in the World Cup qualifiers.

Sapling: Fake 99.9%

The following texts are excerpts from the bitcoin whitepaper on the bitcoin.com website:

The problem of course is the payee can’t verify that one of the owners did not double-spend the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent. The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank.

https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/whitepaper/#2-transactions

Sapling: Fake 78.0%

The traditional banking model achieves a level of privacy by limiting access to information to the parties involved and the trusted third party. The necessity to announce all transactions publicly precludes this method, but privacy can still be maintained by breaking the flow of information in another place: by keeping public keys anonymous. The public can see that someone is sending an amount to someone else, but without information linking the transaction to anyone. This is similar to the level of information released by stock exchanges, where the time and size of individual trades, the “tape”, is made public, but without telling who the parties were.

https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/lexicon/#bitcoin-a-peer-to-peer-electronic-cash-system

Sapling: Fake 100.0%

To end on a high note, here's this one (maybe he used AI, after all, he is the creator of bitcoin, a technology that is just as revolutionary): 

In the next SVN rev, I'll make it only go back to the last checkpoint at block 74000.  If we need to correct a problem in the future, we can always make sure it goes back at least as far back as the problem.  Also, I'm adding code to verify the block index, which means the proof-of-work chain is checked.

Still, the system won't be entirely secure against your blk*.dat files.  You are trusting someone if you use a copy of their blk files.

Sapling: Fake 98,3%

[jokers10]

I did some testing and found that Sapling is the least reliable of all the AI ​​detectors on the list. I believe that false positives generated by it can lead to unfounded suspicions.

That's why we don't make the final conclusions based on any single one detector. Each can give a false positive. And that's why we are searching for multiple cases of AI usage, so that to be sure that the user is using AI for his posts and that's not an occasional false positive.

[r_victory]

I did some testing and found that Sapling is the least reliable of all the AI ​​detectors on the list. I believe that false positives generated by it can lead to unfounded suspicions.

That's why we don't make the final conclusions based on any single one detector. Each can give a false positive. And that's why we are searching for multiple cases of AI usage, so that to be sure that the user is using AI for his posts and that's not an occasional false positive.

I understand how it works, and all detectors mention this possibility in the footer of their websites. I know that other factors will be considered when evaluating the misuse of AI in posts. Likewise, I did the same test with the others on the list as well, and only demonstrated it here because I found the results of the tool in question to be extremely inaccurate compared to the others.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I understand how it works, and all detectors mention this possibility in the footer of their websites. I know that other factors will be considered when evaluating the misuse of AI in posts. Likewise, I did the same test with the others on the list as well, and only demonstrated it here because I found the results of the tool in question to be extremely inaccurate compared to the others.

You need to visit this topic more often because what you have recently discovered has been discussed for a long time and several times. In addition, I have noticed that Copyleaks sometimes works by detecting AI where there is none. Therefore, relying on one or two results with today's improvements in AI and humanizers will be quite unfair.

[memehunter]

I have noticed that Copyleaks sometimes works by detecting AI where there is none.

Hmm, can you share some false positives that you encountered while scanning? IMO, Copyleaks will give you false negatives way more than false positives, unlike Sapling AI. I mean, I am not arguing with you in any sense, but to me it is very rare to have a false positive in Copyleaks, compared to other detectors (even GPTzero).   

[Shishir99]

I do not think the community will against the use of AI to fix English grammar, that should be acceptable. I even see it as more stress which is the minor reason that I can not use AI but the major reason being that I prefer to communicate with people naturally instead of using AI.

The problem is, when you ask AI to find the grammatical errors and fix them, it actually changes the wording and rewrites it for you. It provides you with a similar response if your prompt is like "write a reply to this post,". Your original content does not remain original anymore. According to ChatGPT, that is a polished version of your text.

But I tried a command "find grammatical errors and fix them without changing any words," and it worked fine. It just changes the punctuation and the typos. I couldn't even notice what changes it made. But I don't think I need it since I am using Grammarly already, which fixes typos automatically.

[_act_]

The problem is, when you ask AI to find the grammatical errors and fix them, it actually changes the wording and rewrites it for you. It provides you with a similar response if your prompt is like "write a reply to this post,". Your original content does not remain original anymore. According to ChatGPT, that is a polished version of your text.

What I noticed is that some AI tools will tell you that it is written by human but AI is used to correct it. People on this forum also against this?

But I tried a command "find grammatical errors and fix them without changing any words," and it worked fine. It just changes the punctuation and the typos. I couldn't even notice what changes it made. But I don't think I need it since I am using Grammarly already, which fixes typos automatically.

Is Grammarly not using AI for the correction? Everything I later realized about Grammarly was that it is an AI tool. I remember a time my brother told me about it like 3 years ago or more, that is good and I later consider to download it. It truly fixed typos but it corrected the sentences sometimes like it reconstructed it. It increased my posting time, it increased the time I used for the corrections and yet I still have to read what it corrected it to. All these later made it boring to me and it takes more of my time and I deleted it.

I do not use AI or any other tools but I post naturally. As for me, f**k AI and any other correction tools.

[BitBakerr1]

I do not think the community will against the use of AI to fix English grammar, that should be acceptable. I even see it as more stress which is the minor reason that I can not use AI but the major reason being that I prefer to communicate with people naturally instead of using AI.

The problem is, when you ask AI to find the grammatical errors and fix them, it actually changes the wording and rewrites it for you. It provides you with a similar response if your prompt is like "write a reply to this post,". Your original content does not remain original anymore. According to ChatGPT, that is a polished version of your text.

But I tried a command "find grammatical errors and fix them without changing any words," and it worked fine. It just changes the punctuation and the typos. I couldn't even notice what changes it made. But I don't think I need it since I am using Grammarly already, which fixes typos automatically.

When it comes to writing in this forum I really don't see any need using AI to fix English gramma because the things we actually write here are not that many and no matter how long your write up is, it will be advisable to calm down and read what you have written again, than using AI to correct because you may fall into a situation where the AI changes everything just like you mentioned, however those that are not familiar in writing in English especially because of the country or nation they come from can use the AI to fix there English gramma because no matter how many times they read it they won't get it correctly because they are not familiar with English.

[Ultegra134]

Is Grammarly not using AI for the correction? Everything I later realized about Grammarly was that it is an AI tool. I remember a time my brother told me about it like 3 years ago or more, that is good and I later consider to download it. It truly fixed typos but it corrected the sentences sometimes like it reconstructed it. It increased my posting time, it increased the time I used for the corrections and yet I still have to read what it corrected it to. All these later made it boring to me and it takes more of my time and I deleted it.

I do not use AI or any other tools but I post naturally. As for me, f**k AI and any other correction tools.

Yes, but using it to correct a few grammatica; or vocabulary mistakes, without changing the meaning of what you wrote is completely different than having it write for you. Grammarly has a ton of functions, it solely depends on how you use it and what you're asking it to do. If you're only using it for a few corrections, then no one will bother you, it's totally fine, if you're using its AI functions that improve the whole text by rephrasing the whole thing, then it'll count as AI. It's a good tool, depending on how you use it.

[Sticky Bomb]

I do not use AI or any other tools but I post naturally. As for me, f**k AI and any other correction tools.

Sometimes it baffles me why people stress themselves out with trying to correct their grammar and land themselves into trouble, It's not like we are writing an essay here or are we in an Examination hall. The most important thing is to pass useful information across and not to speak the classiest grammar.

Having to type and going extra mile to correct what I've crafted from my mind with another tool is a lot of work which I don't consider feasible, not to mention that sometimes it might land you into trouble. When things should be kept simple, people still go extra mile to complicate things for themselves.

[Etranger]

User: Bleaking6
Rank: Newbie

I only reported 3 of his posts, however the others are pretty much the same. Just AI generated content, nothing else

Post 1

You’re really digging into the tough side of gambling with this breakdown of addiction stages. It connects to your earlier thoughts on the cycle of promising to quit but then slipping back in, especially with crypto betting sites like Parimatch or Primedice. The $173 a month you mentioned could easily fit into that risky pattern if it fuels bets. Let’s explore this while keeping it focused. The winning stage you described is tricky. Those early wins feel like free money, especially on crypto sites where Bitcoin bets are quick and the excitement hits hard. Parimatch’s flashy bonuses or Primedice’s fast dice rolls can make you feel on top of the world at first. Then the losing stage sneaks in, and you’re rightit’s the memory of winning that keeps you hooked, making you think one more bet will change everything. By the chasing stage, it’s a nightmare, with people borrowing money or worse to chase losses. The anonymity of crypto can make it even easier to fall into this trap without anyone noticing. Your source is spot on: addiction develops quietly. By the desperation phase, quitting feels impossible when you’re struggling financially. Using Bitcoin on these sites keeps the network active, which you want for BTC’s use, but gambling addiction distorts that into a trap. To prevent falling into that cycle, especially with $173 a month on the line, try setting firm limits ike only depositing $40 a week. You can also use Parimatch’s responsible gambling tools to cap your bets. Self-observing, as you mentioned, is essential. Recognizing the early signs, like betting more than intended or hiding it from others, can help you stop before you reach desperation. I’m curious about your thoughts on this. Are you noticing any of these stages in yourself, or are you just looking into the risks? Is that $173 your betting budget, or something else? Also, do you prefer sports betting on Parimatch or dice games on Primedice? Share a bit more about what’s on your mind, and maybe we can figure out some practical steps to enjoy the experience without falling down the rabbit hole.

https://app.gptzero.me: 100% AI generated
https://copyleaks.com: Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100%
https://sapling.ai: Fake: 100.0%


Post 2

ey, I totally get where you're coming from, and you don't sound anti-Bitcoin at all—just thoughtful and curious about its bigger picture. Your point about Bitcoin being more than just a "buy and HODL" asset is spot on, and it’s refreshing to see someone wrestling with these ideas openly.If everyone who bought Bitcoin just locked it away in private wallets forever, the network would still function, but it’d be a pretty stagnant system. Bitcoin’s strength comes from its decentralization, security, and the fact that miners keep the network running by processing transactions. Miners get paid through block rewards (newly minted Bitcoin) and transaction fees. If no one’s moving Bitcoin on-chain—say, because everyone’s just HODLing—transaction volume drops, fees might not be enough to incentivize miners, and over time, that could weaken the network’s security. The block reward keeps halving every four years, so eventually, fees need to pick up the slack. Low activity could also make Bitcoin less appealing as a living, breathing system, which might hurt its value and adoption.Does that mean selling or moving Bitcoin on-chain is “bad”? Not at all. Moving Bitcoin—whether you’re selling, spending, or sending it—keeps the network active. Every transaction is a signal that Bitcoin’s being used, which helps miners and reinforces the network’s purpose. The catch is, reckless selling (like dumping huge amounts) can mess with price stability, which some folks worry could scare off new users. But regular movement? That’s Bitcoin doing what it’s meant to do.I hear you on wanting Bitcoin to be more than a store of value. Holding is great for long-term believers like you (and me, honestly—I’m stacking too), but Bitcoin’s real magic happens when it’s used. Imagine a world where people pay for coffee, send remittances, or settle contracts with Bitcoin seamlessly. That’s the dream Satoshi hinted at: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Right now, high fees and slow confirmation times on the base layer make small daily transactions tricky, but solutions like the Lightning Network are trying to fix that. Adoption’s growing in places like El Salvador, where folks are using Bitcoin for real-world stuff, and that’s the kind of utility you’re talking about.You’re not pessimistic—you’re idealistic, and that’s awesome. HODLing’s a strategy, not a religion. Bitcoin’s community sometimes gets stuck in the “number go up” mindset, but plenty of people share your vision. Look at devs building apps, merchants accepting BTC, or folks in hyperinflated economies using it to survive. They’re proving Bitcoin’s more than a digital gold bar.We can’t force utility overnight, though. It’ll take better tech, more education, and businesses taking a leap. Encouraging people to use Bitcoin—spending it, accepting it, building on it—while still holding some for the long haul could strike the balance you’re looking for. Maybe try spending a little BTC at a merchant that accepts it or check out Lightning wallets to see how it feels. That’s what I’ve been experimenting with, and it’s eye-opening.What do you think—any ideas on how we could push for more real-world use without losing the HODL ethos?

https://app.gptzero.me: 100% AI generated
https://copyleaks.com: Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100%
https://sapling.ai: Fake: 97.3%

Post 3

You’ve raised some really important and tough questions here. The timing of the attack—just before peace talks—definitely raises eyebrows and casts doubt on any sincere diplomatic efforts. It gives off the vibe that some players might not genuinely be interested in peace, or at least not on fair terms.

Geopolitics in the Middle East has always been a tangled web, and sadly, power struggles often unfold through proxy wars and carefully orchestrated escalations. If Israel acted with the U.S. in the loop or even with their backing, it sends a confusing message: advocating for peace while gearing up for conflict.

That said, it’s crucial to hold off until we have solid information. In high-stakes scenarios like this, misinformation and emotionally charged stories can spread like wildfire. No matter what the reality is, it’s the civilians and the stability of the region that end up bearing the brunt of it all.

Let’s keep our fingers crossed for transparency and genuine diplomacy—but it’s hard to overlook the patterns we’re seeing.

https://app.gptzero.me: 100% AI generated
https://copyleaks.com: Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100%
https://sapling.ai: Fake: 100.0%

[Alone055]

I do not use AI or any other tools but I post naturally. As for me, f**k AI and any other correction tools.

Good for you, but let me tell you that a tool powered by AI is different than a LLM (large language model), which can be used to generate or manipulate texts or responses, and Grammarly is an AI-powered tool that helps you have more accuracy in your writing. As said by @Ultegra134, it has multiple functions and features, and it depends on the user which features they want to use, especially when posting in this forum, so that their posts aren't detected as written by an AI model, and that usually happens when you accept the suggestions it provides, in which case, it changes the whole sentences or paragraphs and then it might get detected as an AI-generated text.

English is not my first language as well, so I've also been using Grammarly for months now, not only for this forum but also because it's useful in writing content in general, and, I've never faced any problems with it because I only use it to correct what's wrong and don't take its suggestions when I know what I've written is correct because my English is good, it's just not perfect.

[nutildah]

User: Bleaking6
Rank: Newbie

Wow, what a bunch of garbage. This kind of account should be nuked IMO. Here's one more for good measure.

One standout example is Dogecoin (DOGE). Born in 2013 as a joke based on a Shiba Inu meme, Dogecoin was never meant to be serious. It chugged along with minimal value, often trading at fractions of a cent, and by 2018, many wrote it off as a relic of early crypto hype. Its market cap was under $100 million, and it looked like a ghost coin with no real use case or dev activity. Fast forward to 2020-2021, and DOGE shocked everyone. A mix of community fervor on Reddit (r/WallStreetBets), X posts, and Elon Musk’s relentless tweeting (“to the moon!”) sparked a frenzy. Developers started dusting off the code, pushing updates to improve transaction speed and lower fees. By May 2021, DOGE hit an all-time high of $0.74, a mind-blowing 29,000% surge from its 2020 low of $0.0025, with a market cap topping $90 billion. Even now, in 2025, it’s still kicking, trading around $0.20-$0.30 with active community support and devs exploring payment use cases. Posts on X still hype DOGE as a “people’s coin,” and its resilience comes from that grassroots energy plus Musk’s occasional nods.y.


 Any thoughts on these, or are you fishing for a more obscure gem? Also, what’s your take on why Terra/LUNA and FTT are beyond saving? Spill the tea! 😄

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

[leonair]

User: barbodiano
Rank: Newbie

User: gladiablo
Rank: Newbie

User: m2426821
Rank: Newbie

In my opinion, Bitcoin has never left anyone or it can be said that the price of Bitcoin is moving at its own pace, which is currently going on and will continue in the future. If newbies invest in Bitcoin for the long term or if they are satisfied with limited profits with the market, they can continue to do so. However, they need to know about the risks involved in Bitcoin, and they should always avoid fake videos on social media because they can get scared due to these fake videos on social media. Your own skills are also very important for investing. There are almost many people who knew about Bitcoin long ago but they could not imagine that the price of Bitcoin would increase so much and become a popular currency. So they are disappointed and they often talk negatively about Bitcoin. So it is better to always keep your distance from those people.

You're absolutely right! Bitcoin has shown time and again that it moves according to its own cycle, and those who understand this tend to do better in the long run. It's not about chasing hype it's about staying patient, informed, and emotionally strong, especially during market dips.

The part about avoiding fake videos and fear-based content on social media is so important. Many new investors fall into that trap and either sell at a loss or lose confidence altogether. Education and self-awareness are key.

Also, great point about distancing yourself from people who constantly speak negatively just because they missed out. Regret often turns into pessimism, and surrounding yourself with that kind of energy can really hold you back.

Thanks for sharing your insights this kind of mindset is exactly what new and even seasoned investors need to hear more of

copyleaks - 100% AI
undetectable - 74% AI

That’s actually a wild but clever concept turning a mining operation into a mobile rig like that definitely shows some creativity even if it’s on the wrong side of the law. You're right, stationary illegal miners are sitting ducks once the heat comes, and unplugging dozens of ASICs isn't exactly quick or subtle.

Turning a truck into a mobile mining farm with its own transformer? That's next-level. But yeah, it raises the question what was the ROI before they got caught? ASICs are expensive, especially 95 of them. Plus, the cost of retrofitting a truck, rigging the power setup, and staying on the move isn’t cheap or easy to manage.

Even if they managed to run it for a while, the risk vs. reward feels off. They’re now fugitives, lost all their hardware, and possibly face serious time if caught. A reminder that even smart crime is still crime and in the end, law enforcement almost always catches up. The smarter move? Use that same ingenuity for a legal hustle.

copyleaks - 100% AI

People always talk about how not going to the university does not necessarily mean that things are over. But going to school or university still has some benefits. But what college programs end up becoming most profitable these days? Some may say medicine. I do not think so. It is expensive to become a doctor and you might just end up paying your debts a few years after you graduated.

I say information technology or Computer Science. Very in demand and if we look at the world now, we are in the digital era and they are the ones needed the most. Engineering as well is profitable and always in demand wherever you are. Obviously you should pick a program where you excel at and you will be happy at but a factor of choosing a degree to study is how rich it can make you. I guess I am talking about the degrees with biggest ROIs these days.

What else are profitable programs?

You're right while skipping university doesn’t mean failure, going to school still has its advantages, especially if you choose a degree with a strong return on investment. Today, programs like Computer Science and IT are among the most profitable. With the world relying more on technology, roles in software development, cybersecurity, and data analysis are in high demand and pay well.

Engineering also remains a top choice. Fields like electrical, mechanical, and petroleum engineering offer solid salaries and global job opportunities. Finance and accounting are strong too, especially if you aim for corporate roles or investment banking.

Healthcare related programs like nursing or becoming a physician assistant offer good pay and growing job security without the massive time and debt commitment of med school. Data science and statistics are booming thanks to the rise of AI and analytics. Even creative fields like UX/UI design can pay well if you pair them with tech skills.

In the end, it’s smart to pick something you enjoy, but it’s even smarter to know how far that degree can take you financially.

copyleaks - 100% AI
undetectable - 67% AI

Earning money is hard. Saving money is hard. Getting rich and being able to live comfortably is hard. But the truth is saving is not enough. Lots of people will ask how to really get out of poverty but the simple straightforward answer is that you need to be earning more than what you are spending. The question begs, is there a way to get rich even if your expenses are higher than what you are earning?

I don't think so. Some people might use credit cards or loans but it is just a cycle of taking a loan then paying it and you are not really moving forward are you? Saving also does nothing much but it can be a good start. You start saving money and at some point when the money is big enough you can start investing. Either in crypto, real estate or in a business. But just saving the money? Unless you want to keep working until the day you die then it will not be enough.

You're right saving alone won’t make you rich. It’s a good habit, but it’s just the beginning. If you’re always spending more than you earn, there’s no way to move forward loans and credit cards just keep you stuck in a cycle.

The real path out of poverty is earning more and using the extra to invest. Whether it’s in real estate, crypto, or starting a small business, your money has to start working for you. Saving helps build that foundation, but without investing or growing your income, you’ll likely be stuck working forever.

copyleaks - 100% AI

In my opinion, Bitcoin has never left anyone or it can be said that the price of Bitcoin is moving at its own pace, which is currently going on and will continue in the future. If newbies invest in Bitcoin for the long term or if they are satisfied with limited profits with the market, they can continue to do so. However, they need to know about the risks involved in Bitcoin, and they should always avoid fake videos on social media because they can get scared due to these fake videos on social media. Your own skills are also very important for investing. There are almost many people who knew about Bitcoin long ago but they could not imagine that the price of Bitcoin would increase so much and become a popular currency. So they are disappointed and they often talk negatively about Bitcoin. So it is better to always keep your distance from those people.

I agree with you Bitcoin’s price moves on its own timeline, and long-term investing is usually the best approach. Newcomers should understand the risks involved and avoid getting influenced by fake or sensational videos on social media that can cause unnecessary fear. Building your own knowledge and skills is very important. Many people who didn’t invest earlier now regret it and often speak negatively about Bitcoin, but it’s better to focus on your own strategy and not get distracted by their negativity. Staying patient and informed is the key to success with Bitcoin.

copyleaks - 100% AI

Raw truth right here. You don’t learn trading by passively reading 100 books, you learn by doing it.

Start small, trade often, and turn every confusion into a search query. Obsession is underrated in this game.

Learn, Apply, Google and Repeat.

https://x.com/emperorbtc/status/1924012746296696835?s=46

Straight facts. Experience will always beat theory in trading. You can read a hundred books, but nothing teaches you like actually clicking the button. Small trades, real mistakes, constant learning  that’s how skill is built.

Obsess, iterate, and never stop asking questions.

copyleaks - 100% AI

- These three accounts have been revived after a long time and are posting Ai. So can it be said that the 3 accounts belong to the same person?

[nutildah]

More AI-generated insults from kingbj21 -- note that I am only reporting his AI posts that are written outside of his threads. Not deleting these posts would be a mistake as it will just embolden future AI spammers.

#1

Dyno8050, we warned you this would happen. You thought defending them would earn you some protection or respect. But now Stake has turned on you, just like they’ve done to countless others.

Your ID worked fine for Rollbit, Roobet, Shuffle, and CSGORoll. Suddenly, for Stake, it’s “not genuine”? Permanent restriction. No real appeal. Just cold silence wrapped in legal terms.

They follow the same tired playbook. Lock the account, blame the KYC process, and ignore the user. All while operating in gray areas with shady payment methods, especially in countries like India where they hide behind third-party UPI vendors and skirt tax laws.

You thought you were safe. You weren’t. Stake’s not interested in fairness or transparency. They only care about control, power, and silencing anyone who pushes back.

I actually feel for you. Because now, you’re waking up to the same reality many others already know. Lost deposits. Blocked withdrawals. Frozen bank accounts. No accountability.

Your next move? Heading to Curaçao, lol? Good luck with that. Sure, they got their shiny new license — OGL/2024/1451/0918, active since June 9, 2025 — but we both know that’s not a shield for victims. It’s a permission slip for unchecked damage.

Dyno8050, you backed the wrong horse, and now it’s kicked you square in the face. “Kick + Icked”—ironic, isn’t it? Kick, Stake’s streaming platform, where you’ll probably head next, hoping Eddie’ll throw you a bone. Lol, good luck begging him to listen while he’s too busy counting his cash from rigging RTPs and dodging that India arrest warrant. You thought defending these frauds would save your ass, but here you are, another victim of their hypocrisy.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 90.8% Fake


#2

@holydarkness, You’re spinning my words into knots, cherry-picking what fits your script while dodging the real fight. I never said the FBI’s probing my missing monthly bonus—that’s your leap, not mine. Those bonuses? Just bait for high rollers like me, a Platinum III VIP who dumped $70,000 and $2,688 into Stake, only to get $6.57 when $30 was promised. Stake’s empire thrives on hooking losers, then mocking them on livestreams—something you conveniently sidestep.

My FBI complaint targets bigger fish—organized greed, not just my payout. I won’t spill the details or evidence; handing criminals the playbook is a rookie move, and I’ve seen enough fallout to know better. You want proof? Look at Stake’s mandatory KYC rollout—universal, sudden, paired with one-time bonuses to mop up years of sloppy, shady dealings. Pressure’s working, but don’t give me a pat on the back; they’re scrambling, not reforming.

New games and fixed originals? Sure, progress. But we need independent audits, transparent disclosures, and ironclad safeguards—not backroom tinkering. Instead, I get your deflection, your referee act between users and casinos. You’ve admitted you don’t gamble—never felt a six-figure loss or an account lockout with canned support replies. So maybe you’re less a voice of reason and more a curator of optics, not solutions.

Own it, and I’d respect the hustle. But playing neutral while sidelining victims? That’s damage control, not justice. Maybe launch “Holy’s Arbitration Service”—might outshine casino support. Until then, you’re part of this ecosystem, not above it. If you won’t back the real complaints, at least quit tripping up those of us shouting them.

Thanks. — KingBJ21 Still standing. Still loud. Your list can choke on it.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake


#3

Dyno8050, you blubbering, Stake-sucking knobhead! 😆

Screeching “spam” and “brain rot” like a whiny little twat having a meltdown—real cute, you forum fucking trainwreck. All I see is you barfing up garbage while dodging that apology like the spineless shitgibbon you are.

I dropped $50,000 for you to prove I’m Black Jacky—where’s the proof, you witless fucknugget? Oh, right, you’re too busy chugging Eddie’s scam swill and shilling for Stake, even after they fucked your sorry ass. Mental help? Mate, you’re the one who needs a brain reboot, you half-baked cockwomble.

You don’t get to keep flapping your dumbass gob until you cough up that fucking apology for your bullshit accusations.

Too thick to write one? Brain too scrambled from Stake’s con piss? Grow some fucking nuts, admit you’re a lying, scam-slurping wankstain, or crawl back to Eddie’s lap like the gutless, two-faced prat you are. Shut your trap or get fucking roasted, Dyno. 😎

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake

I remember the days when people used to actually come up with their own insults. Wonder what TMAN would think about this.