🐳 Whale.io - Casino & Sportsbook 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰

[Lakai01]

Yes, it’s not clickable. I managed to make a withdrawal and tried to check the transaction ID, but the transaction link is not clickable. Most online crypto casinos provide a transaction ID link. For sure, some users rely on this to verify payments with the receiver. Hopefully, Whale.io will work on enabling clickable transaction ID links.

Just a shot in the dark because I can't try it myself right now: does the link work in another browser? I had this experience with the initial account creation, which didn't work for me in a Chrome-based browser, but everything ran smoothly in Firefox.

I also checked and i do not think such a feature exists in Whale.io, i also do not think i have seen such a feature in a crypto casino before, correct me if you have. However, i think you can send a personal message to @Whale to see if they could do it for you, because i don't think it is possible for a player to manually do that.

This used to be a standard feature of a casino (~ 2017) if I remember correctly, but you had to put up with quite poor conversion rates. Nowadays, I imagine this is actually more difficult, as online gambling platforms are also much more heavily regulated and the border to an exchange becomes quite blurred.

However, I would very much welcome it if whale.io offered such a feature, for example in cooperation with services such as changelly.

[examplens]

I can't really brag about my gambling luck, but the first bet was a winner.



Is it normal that there are so many reloads of the game itself, so I get the message Unauthorised so often? After refreshing the page, everything works normally. Desktop, chrome browser.

[SamReomo]

I can't really brag about my gambling luck, but the first bet was a winner.

Well, that shows how lucky you're actually! it was your first bet and you won it and that shows you have a good luck mate! However, I believe our luck is different each time and that's why winning once is possible but winning multiple times might not be possible. There're guys who win multiple bets consistently and those're really lucky fellows, but we all understand that such type of extremely lucky people are not high in number.

[Woodie]

Trying my luck to see if lady luck can share some of it, fingers crossed.

--------

Champions league night today we gat plenty of stuff to play for.

[Peanutswar]

No need to wait because the Whale fam brings you the next event of Price Prediction!

What a roller coaster happens in the market after we saw the 104k the market drops with the 90k and bought back again into 100k it seems the traders doesn't want to pull over back again the bitcoin price!

Congrats to our winners of 🐳 Whale.io | Bitcoin Price Prediction ' Jan 26 🎁 Prize $100!!

1st 🎖️ - strunberg
2nd 🎖️ - Su-asa
3rd 🎖️ - Woodie


But wait there's more! Happy to announce that the next event is already up!

🐳 Whale.io | Bitcoin Price Prediction ' Feb 09 🎁 Prize $100!

[strunberg]

1st 🎖️ - strunberg
2nd 🎖️ - Su-asa
3rd 🎖️ - Woodie

The prize has been credited to my account. Thanks to Peanutswar and the Whale team!
I tried my luck in the game last night. 2 wins and 1 loss is not so bad.



Btw after several failed combo bets I finally won it. It feels so great!!  

[Real-Duke]

But wait there's more! Happy to announce that the next event is already up!

Many thanks for another chance. Will try my luck

[Cityhunter34]

I can't really brag about my gambling luck, but the first bet was a winner.

Well, that shows how lucky you're actually! it was your first bet and you won it and that shows you have a good luck mate! However, I believe our luck is different each time and that's why winning once is possible but winning multiple times might not be possible. There're guys who win multiple bets consistently and those're really lucky fellows, but we all understand that such type of extremely lucky people are not high in number.

Indeed is actually a lucky one, because nothing makes someone happy reach when you have a winning in your first bet, the joy is always different because is not easy for a gambler to experience winning in the first day. Normally each and everyone us here have different luck in betting, that is why you see that most people normally have winnings almost everytime, because the luck is always on their side.

[Lakai01]

What do you think of the following tips for tonight? I will probably place the following combination bet, the odds are very tempting, although you don't really need to add the Bayern game, because the odds hardly change.




@Whale

I always log in via e-mail using the web browser. After entering the e-mail you get a code sent to you and have to switch tabs, open Outlook, etc. Unfortunately, it happens to me regularly that I click next to the pop-up and it closes immediately and I have to start all over again. Would it be possible for the popup to be closed only by a cancel button or something similar?

[famososMuertos]

://::

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know,  anyway, good luck with your selection.

Here is one of my bets:




Thanks Whale.io I have received the corresponding payment for the  "Whale.io 🐳 Casino & Sportsbook | Review Campaign"/[OPEN]

[Woodie]

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know

Let's be honest here, looking at this slip tells me bookies actually make more on these small bets because punters/ gamblers have to put in more money to get a decent profit and if we think about it.. it's unsustainable for the players in the long run because if you can have 99 wins from such game plays and lose only one...then technically this sweeps all your profits and likely to touch some of your capital and you being to chase your loses 

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

[babygun]

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know

Let's be honest here, looking at this slip tells me bookies actually make more on these small bets because punters/ gamblers have to put in more money to get a decent profit and if we think about it.. it's unsustainable for the players in the long run because if you can have 99 wins from such game plays and lose only one...then technically this sweeps all your profits and likely to touch some of your capital and you being to chase your loses 

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

.
I used to do the same in the past and betted a lot on odds below 1.2; most of the times it went good, but it can go wrong also easily and in the end I got busted a couple of times so stopped doing it. It is much better to look for value bets with a minimum odd of about 1.6 or 1.7

[SamReomo]

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

That's the reality we all should accept. In gambling we can't win all the time, sometimes we lose in those matches where odds are very low and still such matches turn into losses. I read once that a person lost a $1 million dollar bet on pretty low odds and in gambling that thing happens and it happened in in past.

[ovcijisir]

Is whale.io kyc free? I saw that it is added on bitlist (catalog of kyc free websites) but when I wanted to sign up this was the first thing that popped up:

[Lakai01]

://::

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know,  anyway, good luck with your selection.

I left the 1.02 bet on Bayern in anyway, even though I completely agree with you: The risk vs. reward is simply not worth it, as this hardly increases the multiplier in a combined bet, but the bet destroys the whole combined bet in the event of a surprising defeat.

Nevertheless, I'm quite happy with the outcome, even though I had almost given up on the ManCity game at half-time.

Congratulations on winning the bet!

[Cityhunter34]

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

That's the reality we all should accept. In gambling we can't win all the time, sometimes we lose in those matches where odds are very low and still such matches turn into losses. I read once that a person lost a $1 million dollar bet on pretty low odds and in gambling that thing happens and it happened in in past.

You are absolutely correct that is the real truth about it, because there's no how we can win all our gambling bet at once, their most still be losses. Actually low odds can be crazy sometimes and nothing bad as when you are being lost a bet with low odds, it's always annoing but when you are being lost by a bigger odds is not that painful while because you have already bear in mind that it might result to winning or losing.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Actually low odds can be crazy sometimes and nothing bad as when you are being lost a bet with low odds [...]

In fact, you have to be very careful with the odds, as the bookmakers are sometimes wrong, either deliberately or due to mistakes.

So if you see an odds that is temptingly low, you should know the teams you are betting on very well in order to be able to assess whether the odds are actually justified or whether you are being tempted to bet higher amounts on "sure wins". Such odds are of course fatal, especially in multi/combinational bets, as a failure in a multi bet means that the entire bet is lost.

[Peanutswar]

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know

Let's be honest here, looking at this slip tells me bookies actually make more on these small bets because punters/ gamblers have to put in more money to get a decent profit and if we think about it.. it's unsustainable for the players in the long run because if you can have 99 wins from such game plays and lose only one...then technically this sweeps all your profits and likely to touch some of your capital and you being to chase your loses 

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

.
I used to do the same in the past and betted a lot on odds below 1.2; most of the times it went good, but it can go wrong also easily and in the end I got busted a couple of times so stopped doing it. It is much better to look for value bets with a minimum odd of about 1.6 or 1.7

Even me. In takes of sports betting if the odds are just close to 1.2 or 1.1 I guess it's not way too ideal to take a bet it's like a small gains if you win and a large amount if you lose so most likely I do find a game has a potential with the great odds I guess 1.4 its a good thing already to make a bet. Sometimes I do commit a YOLO so have a higher return most likely in the games has a potential match of underdogs versus well known teams.

[Cityhunter34]

I have stopped including bets under 1.1 in some sports, for example I just lost with one on Swiatek, @1.16, which can sometimes be low but are strong in themselves because of the player or the team, you know

Let's be honest here, looking at this slip tells me bookies actually make more on these small bets because punters/ gamblers have to put in more money to get a decent profit and if we think about it.. it's unsustainable for the players in the long run because if you can have 99 wins from such game plays and lose only one...then technically this sweeps all your profits and likely to touch some of your capital and you being to chase your loses 

Anyway you can't win every time, you gat to win some and lose some..

.
I used to do the same in the past and betted a lot on odds below 1.2; most of the times it went good, but it can go wrong also easily and in the end I got busted a couple of times so stopped doing it. It is much better to look for value bets with a minimum odd of about 1.6 or 1.7

Even me. In takes of sports betting if the odds are just close to 1.2 or 1.1 I guess it's not way too ideal to take a bet it's like a small gains if you win and a large amount if you lose so most likely I do find a game has a potential with the great odds I guess 1.4 its a good thing already to make a bet. Sometimes I do commit a YOLO so have a higher return most likely in the games has a potential match of underdogs versus well known teams.

Actually betting on odds like 1.2 or 1.1 are always though, and even if you get a win with it, will not still yield good profits, and sometimes one normally end up losing. However, I think it's better to use a greater odds so that when you have a win you know that you are converd for that particular bet. Just like as you have said I think odds like 1.5 above are much better than using smaller odds that wouldn't even boost your bet.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Is whale.io kyc free? I saw that it is added on bitlist (catalog of kyc free websites) but when I wanted to sign up this was the first thing that popped up:

I honestly do not know and can't tell, I've been playing on whale, or to better put it, I've played on whale casino for a while before I took a bit of a long break, I've never played through their website, it's always been through their mini app on telegram that I played, never been asked for kyc verification whatsoever, and to be honest, I've never really bothered to read their teams and conditions to tell if the casino is a kyc free one or not.

But from the look of things, whale casinos is a full fledged centralized casino, it's hard to find centralized casino this days that is kyc free. So, I am guessing the casino is definitely a kyc complaint casino.
But to better be sure, maybe take a bit of time out from your schedule and read their term and conditions, there alone can you find out if the casino is truly kyc free or not, and this also means that the information on whale on Bitlist may as well be wrong.