mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor

[raskul]

i'd set the s1 d=128
and the s2 d=512

you should see less rejects with that.

[djemphol]

i'd set the s1 d=128
and the s2 d=512

you should see less rejects with that.

that's great! i will set those diff at my machine now 
thanks a lot raskul.

[raskul]

While 3 of my rented rigs are pulled back to slushpool since the hashing rate are horrible and i'm not quite sure about the machine type,they could be form a farm or something....or do we have to set their diff base according to their advertised hashing speed?

Once again, thank you.

you're welcome

it would help to know what the individual miners are that you are renting, and the only problem i've encountered in mmpool is that you have one single worker to which, all your miners point. being able to specify workers for each miner would be preferable, but i get around it...

I have tried in the past to set an 'overall' difficulty which corresponds to the full hashrate, but gotten many rejects.so.. this is why i set individual difficulty on each miner. mmpool seems to like the setting at a lower difficulty than your hashrate, for some reason.

under 1TH/s, i set d=256 or d=160 or d=128 (depending on the miner hashrate)
so, for up to 1TH/s, i set d=512
for up to 2TH/s, i set d=1024

and so on...

not sure if this will help in your particular scenario but this method works ok for me

[djemphol]

you're welcome

it would help to know what the individual miners are that you are renting, and the only problem i've encountered in mmpool is that you have one single worker to which, all your miners point. being able to specify workers for each miner would be preferable, but i get around it...

I have tried in the past to set an 'overall' difficulty which corresponds to the full hashrate, but gotten many rejects.so.. this is why i set individual difficulty on each miner. mmpool seems to like the setting at a lower difficulty than your hashrate, for some reason.

under 1TH/s, i set d=256 or d=160 or d=128 (depending on the miner hashrate)
so, for up to 1TH/s, i set d=512
for up to 2TH/s, i set d=1024

and so on...

not sure if this will help in your particular scenario but this method works ok for me

My machines are restarting with d=128 and d=512 i'll check for the upcoming hours to be compared with previous diff I've placed. 
I got it now raskul, I've rented 2 machines with 1 TH each and 1 machine with 6 TH, will try to put those diffs at each setting now, hope they'll be good.

Need to add more machines at home i guess, since i rented rigs for trial and error at many pools looking for the best result.....S3 could be rational for me...for now....for a long term.
Thank you.

[raskul]

you're welcome

it would help to know what the individual miners are that you are renting, and the only problem i've encountered in mmpool is that you have one single worker to which, all your miners point. being able to specify workers for each miner would be preferable, but i get around it...

I have tried in the past to set an 'overall' difficulty which corresponds to the full hashrate, but gotten many rejects.so.. this is why i set individual difficulty on each miner. mmpool seems to like the setting at a lower difficulty than your hashrate, for some reason.

under 1TH/s, i set d=256 or d=160 or d=128 (depending on the miner hashrate)
so, for up to 1TH/s, i set d=512
for up to 2TH/s, i set d=1024

and so on...

not sure if this will help in your particular scenario but this method works ok for me

My machines are restarting with d=128 and d=512 i'll check for the upcoming hours to be compared with previous diff I've placed.  
I got it now raskul, I've rented 2 machines with 1 TH each and 1 machine with 6 TH, will try to put those diffs at each setting now, hope they'll be good.

Need to add more machines at home i guess, since i rented rigs for trial and error at many pools looking for the best result.....S3 could be rational for me...for now....for a long term.
Thank you.

try the 1TH/s at d=512 and the 6TH/s at d=3072

i *think* you will see little to no rejects with these difficulty settings.
best luck!

ADD: Oh! PS. when i rent, i go looking for SP-Tech rigs available for rental, with those, you really can just put x as password.

PPS. my S3's were a bitch to get right at mmpool

[djemphol]

try the 1TH/s at d=512 and the 6TH/s at d=3072

i *think* you will see little to no rejects with these difficulty settings.
best luck!

ADD: Oh! PS. when i rent, i go looking for SP-Tech rigs available for rental, with those, you really can just put x as password.

PPS. my S3's were a bitch to get right at mmpool

Will do that raskul, this is great!
SP- Tech is a beast machine! One of my fave machine, hope can have it one day 

hahaha thank you, will avoid that bitch to be rented from now on then

[raskul]

try the 1TH/s at d=512 and the 6TH/s at d=3072

i *think* you will see little to no rejects with these difficulty settings.
best luck!

ADD: Oh! PS. when i rent, i go looking for SP-Tech rigs available for rental, with those, you really can just put x as password.

PPS. my S3's were a bitch to get right at mmpool

Will do that raskul, this is great!
SP- Tech is a beast machine! One of my fave machine, hope can have it one day 

hahaha thank you, will avoid that bitch to be rented from now on then

S3's work fine d=160 at mmpool, it just took me lots of tries to get it right.

[djemphol]

S3's work fine d=160 at mmpool, it just took me lots of tries to get it right.

My s1 and s2 are doing great for last 30 minutes, still too early i guess...but they're good since the rejected is only 1 now, will check the result again this afternoon
S3 are a little bit cheaper in my country now raskul, that's why it'll be my next machine to be placed at mmpool i hope....and with d=160 according to your hard work in trying many diff using S3, there's nothing i can do but THANKS

[raskul]

S3's work fine d=160 at mmpool, it just took me lots of tries to get it right.

My s1 and s2 are doing great for last 30 minutes, still to early i guess...but they're good since the rejected is only 1 now, will check the result again this afternoon
S3 are a little bit cheaper in my country now raskul, that's why it'll be my next machine to be placed at mmpool i hope....and with d=160 according to your hard work in trying many diff using S3, there's nothing i can do but THANKS

no worries, glad to have been of assistance 

[djemphol]

no worries, glad to have been of assistance 

Hi Raskul,
I've placed d=1024 at my S2 and the result is good (according to myself as I've compared to previous 12 hours rejected scores) , i placed 512 on it but the machine got bigger rejected scores, so i replaced it with 1024 and it's good. I think each machine has their own sense regarding diff...mine likes to be used 1024

Accepted
9,983

Rejected
315

Lets work for this pool then, hope it would be good.
Thanks a lot!

[raskul]

Site down?

Scrap that, just my network.

[wasikidding]

hitting this block would be nice

[philipma1957]

hitting this block would be nice

  we will pop it very soon and then come back with one right away .

[raskul]

hitting this block would be nice

  we will pop it very soon and then come back with one right away .

either way, it averages out. the 85 hour round was nice but to earn above the average from small rounds, you gotta just be patient and wait out the long ones.
it's worth it in the end.

[disclaimer201]

hitting this block would be nice

  we will pop it very soon and then come back with one right away .

either way, it averages out. the 85 hour round was nice but to earn above the average from small rounds, you gotta just be patient and wait out the long ones.
it's worth it in the end.

Lucky that the difficulty will stay about the same. Otherwise, if mmpool doesn't find a block every two weeks, or doesn't find two blocks after an unlucky period of two weeks, it won't average out.

[novak@gekkoscience]

hitting this block would be nice

  we will pop it very soon and then come back with one right away .

either way, it averages out. the 85 hour round was nice but to earn above the average from small rounds, you gotta just be patient and wait out the long ones.
it's worth it in the end.

Yeah, this round has been pretty long but part of that is just how few people were mining on it for a while there when it was Tor only after the DDOS.  Hopefully things pick up speed here.

[raskul]

hitting this block would be nice

 we will pop it very soon and then come back with one right away .

either way, it averages out. the 85 hour round was nice but to earn above the average from small rounds, you gotta just be patient and wait out the long ones.
it's worth it in the end.

Lucky that the difficulty will stay about the same. Otherwise, if mmpool doesn't find a block every two weeks, or doesn't find two blocks after an unlucky period of two weeks, it won't average out.

maybe for some   i don't now where you plucked 'two weeks' from but if you can read stats current round average is slightly below 25BTC, so one block per month is more like an average as per shares submitted this round, and last.

[RealMalatesta]

Hm, nice pool. Will stay on it with some machines for a couple of weeks... wondering how they will do :-)

[raskul]

Hm, nice pool. Will stay on it with some machines for a couple of weeks... wondering how they will do :-)

i just ordered another 5TH/s rig so once that arrives, i'll be adding it to my already 4.2TH/s on here.

oi! Phil... watch out, i'm coming for ya!

[RealMalatesta]

Hm, nice pool. Will stay on it with some machines for a couple of weeks... wondering how they will do :-)

i just ordered another 5TH/s rig so once that arrives, i'll be adding it to my already 4.2TH/s on here.

oi! Phil... watch out, i'm coming for ya!

Hehehe, I see both of you with 0 :-p - unless you're hashing away with a new name, of course...

So I have to order 11 TH now?