[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[1blockologist]

Need a new seed node for a new install

none from the last two pages worked for me on a new build


clintar? whats the node behind mining.blue?

[hortse]

Error while updating blockchain:
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.281726 [P2P8]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id = <71b4c9cae739f83a2a0034a5996479adae6a71b01f0b7f92e75bd297183d6afb>
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.281726 [P2P8][5.9.44.154:10101 OUT]Block received at sync phase was marked as orphaned, dropping connection
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.999817 [P2P9]Connecting to 5.9.44.154:10101(white=1, last_seen: d0.h0.m0.s2)...
2017-Dec-13 23:37:43.170339 [P2P8][5.9.44.154:10101 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 561766 -> 933615 [371849 blocks (516 days) behind]
How can I fix this?

[b4h4mu7]

Need a new seed node for a new install

none from the last two pages worked for me on a new build


clintar? whats the node behind mining.blue?

Did you try CZ's repo? He added two new seednodes.

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/commit/887afe2453be3204b480008ca3b9447789dd3022

[1blockologist]

Need a new seed node for a new install

none from the last two pages worked for me on a new build


clintar? whats the node behind mining.blue?

Did you try CZ's repo? He added two new seednodes.

https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/commit/887afe2453be3204b480008ca3b9447789dd3022

its strange, nothing is allowing me to sync with new blocks

I compiled clintar's source from Oct 11th and ran with CZ's latest seed nodes  ./boolbd --seed-node 88.99.193.104:10101 --seed-node 138.201.126.98:10101

cant get above the block height I start with, which is 868290

[doggod]

I have mentioned this before as well.
I am not sure why the clintar version will not work either.

A little disappointing especially for new people maybe wanting to participate.
again, is it possible to have someone compile a working version for the non computer programing literate.
or can some one give step by step instructions.

I had posted my error message a while ago but no one has helped to point me in the direction that would resolve my errors. someone else might benefit.

thanks.

[zjy]

--seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --seed-node 88.197.53.159:10101 --seed-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --seed-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --seed-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --seed-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --seed-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --seed-node 188.226.215.102:10101 --seed-node 128.199.196.65:10101 --seed-node 107.170.228.11:10101 --seed-node 88.99.193.104:10101 --seed-node 138.201.126.98:10101 --seed-node 162.243.210.156:10101 --seed-node 162.243.101.90:10101

[1blockologist]

--seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --seed-node 88.197.53.159:10101 --seed-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --seed-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --seed-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --seed-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --seed-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --seed-node 188.226.215.102:10101 --seed-node 128.199.196.65:10101 --seed-node 107.170.228.11:10101 --seed-node 88.99.193.104:10101 --seed-node 138.201.126.98:10101 --seed-node 162.243.210.156:10101 --seed-node 162.243.101.90:10101

its not working, I'm not getting new blocks

I even compiled CZ's master branch from source and launched with all these seed nodes, not getting anything.

I'm on OSX High Sierra, wonder if that has something to do with it

[b4h4mu7]

I have mentioned this before as well.
I am not sure why the clintar version will not work either.

A little disappointing especially for new people maybe wanting to participate.
again, is it possible to have someone compile a working version for the non computer programing literate.
or can some one give step by step instructions.

I had posted my error message a while ago but no one has helped to point me in the direction that would resolve my errors. someone else might benefit.

thanks.

Hi doggod,

As CZ mentioned in his post, he is working on a new build that will address the synchronization issues. His seed node commit was a first step towards fixing this issue. He asked to give him a couple of days to get this done then he'd update the website with new binary packages (an application package which contains (pre-built) executable, as opposed to source code). After this no one should be experiencing any issues getting started with the wallet.

I hope this helps clarify the situation.

[Newton90]

We're still contining our efforts to get BBR listed on more exchanges to increase access to liquidity and prevent the disaster we experienced at the hands of Poloniex and Bittrex.

any suggestions there are more?

[Smugl91]

Hey. Guys know tell me, from the purse of the local led to the exchange of coins. I specified only the address by mistake, but there is no paymement id. Translation is frozen. Can I do something?

[Kliv73]

Error while updating blockchain:
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.281726 [P2P8]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id = <71b4c9cae739f83a2a0034a5996479adae6a71b01f0b7f92e75bd297183d6afb>
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.281726 [P2P8][5.9.44.154:10101 OUT]Block received at sync phase was marked as orphaned, dropping connection
2017-Dec-13 23:37:42.999817 [P2P9]Connecting to 5.9.44.154:10101(white=1, last_seen: d0.h0.m0.s2)...
2017-Dec-13 23:37:43.170339 [P2P8][5.9.44.154:10101 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 561766 -> 933615 [371849 blocks (516 days) behind]
How can I fix this?

Ask for the updated blockchain.bin and download
Now everything is synchronized

[b4h4mu7]

Hey. Guys know tell me, from the purse of the local led to the exchange of coins. I specified only the address by mistake, but there is no paymement id. Translation is frozen. Can I do something?

Please open up a support ticket with the relative exchange. This has happened a few times already. They should be able to assist you, if you can provide them with all relative info i.e. txid, address etc.

[b4h4mu7]

We're still contining our efforts to get BBR listed on more exchanges to increase access to liquidity and prevent the disaster we experienced at the hands of Poloniex and Bittrex.

any suggestions there are more?

Binance seems likely. I had some conversations with them a few months back but things didn't end up materialzing because my bandwidth was spread pretty thin between everything we were working on at the time. I reached out to them a couple of days ago so we'll see what happens. I know we'd need to make some API improvements for them to support BBR. In particular, adding off-line signing capability. When I first reached out to them they didn't have any CN projects listed but now that they have XMR listed, a BBR integration would probably be much easier for them.

[MMichaelix]

I have mentioned this before as well.
I am not sure why the clintar version will not work either.

A little disappointing especially for new people maybe wanting to participate.
again, is it possible to have someone compile a working version for the non computer programing literate.
or can some one give step by step instructions.

I had posted my error message a while ago but no one has helped to point me in the direction that would resolve my errors. someone else might benefit.

thanks.

Ask for the updated blockchain.bin and download
Now everything is synchronized

Who would one ask for the updated blockchain?

[ninjacoins]

There doesnt seem to be much volume on the exchanges. Seems like not many people want to sell.

[s1lverbox]

There doesnt seem to be much volume on the exchanges. Seems like not many people want to sell.

We just started offering BBR , volume should pick up slowly. People getting on board BBR slowly. Give it a chance and place order if you looking to buy. Definitely at some point you will get filled.

[Newton90]

We're still contining our efforts to get BBR listed on more exchanges to increase access to liquidity and prevent the disaster we experienced at the hands of Poloniex and Bittrex.

any suggestions there are more?

Binance seems likely. I had some conversations with them a few months back but things didn't end up materialzing because my bandwidth was spread pretty thin between everything we were working on at the time. I reached out to them a couple of days ago so we'll see what happens. I know we'd need to make some API improvements for them to support BBR. In particular, adding off-line signing capability. When I first reached out to them they didn't have any CN projects listed but now that they have XMR listed, a BBR integration would probably be much easier for them.

and what about https://bisq.community/t/request-boolberry-bbr/651/12 ?

[Smugl91]

I'll try. Thanks.

[dwarf0]

People are waiting for better price. I am sure of it is going to get the moon!

[mis255]

I have mentioned this before as well.
I am not sure why the clintar version will not work either.

A little disappointing especially for new people maybe wanting to participate.
again, is it possible to have someone compile a working version for the non computer programing literate.
or can some one give step by step instructions.

I had posted my error message a while ago but no one has helped to point me in the direction that would resolve my errors. someone else might benefit.

thanks.

Hi doggod,

As CZ mentioned in his post, he is working on a new build that will address the synchronization issues. His seed node commit was a first step towards fixing this issue. He asked to give him a couple of days to get this done then he'd update the website with new binary packages (an application package which contains (pre-built) executable, as opposed to source code). After this no one should be experiencing any issues getting started with the wallet.

I hope this helps clarify the situation.

I compiled https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry.git and was able to sync from both linux and osx ./boolbd --add-priority-node 5.9.44.154:10101.

Clintar's source at https://github.com/clintar/boolberry/releases/tag/v0.3a wouldn't let me fully sync. The precompiled Windows version in the zip file sync's though.

Hope this helps.