[ANN][OC] Orangecoin ★★ POS ★★ Anon Transactions ★★ Masternodes

[Bitcoin_Mafia]

Hey everyone!

I just wrote an article about OrangeCoin on my blog - check it out if you like. I'd love any feedback!

http://bitcoinmafia.com/bittys-blog/orangecoin-juiciest-color-altcoins/

Cheers!

Cynthia

[BitcoinMinerSupply]

Hello,

  Ricky here from BitcoinMinerSupply.com , I sell bitcoin mining equipment, post the latest news in crypto, and do ALOT of Twitter GIVEAWAYS, I would love to be part of hosting a GIVEAWAY to help promote your coin .

You can check my current GIVEAWAYS here -http://mining.mn-ml.co/BitcoinMinerSupply/giveaway/

Ask around if you would like to find out my street creed , no BS here, just promoting crypto to its fullest.  thanks!

@BTCMinerSupply
BitcoinMinerSupply.com

BTC

[Specialkey]

Hey everyone!

I just wrote an article about OrangeCoin on my blog - check it out if you like. I'd love any feedback!

http://bitcoinmafia.com/bittys-blog/orangecoin-juiciest-color-altcoins/

Cheers!

Cynthia

A really great articel. 

Thx

[Specialkey]

Impressiv view 

Dont forget to vote my dear OC friends 

[fonzerrellie]

Impressiv view 

Dont forget to vote my dear OC friends 

Slow and steady wins the race lol and we might be more steady than we are slow

Good morning OC land

[gutz]

@Devs & other involved individuals ,

Is it possible to make the anon transactions more reasonable for "real-world" uses?

I really like this post :

In the second place, 'soft' anonymity is not 'no' anonymity.

I accept that Alice and Bob are not going to do business in the real world without knowing who each other are.  Not for any serious, major amounts of money.

That means Alice cannot keep her financial dealings with Bob private without Bob's cooperation, and Bob, likewise, cannot keep his transactions with Alice private without Alice's cooperation.

As long as they cooperate - as long as neither of them releases the key they can use to prove something - then they have privacy.  

That extends to privacy by mutual consent, but it doesn't extend to ripping someone off with impunity.

It doesn't mean someone can look into your ledger and know exactly what you're doing with a third party, without that third party's cooperation.  That's a completely open ledger with no option for even 'soft' privacy, and that would be a *VERY* radical departure.  

In designing an ideal for an open ledger, 'soft' privacy would be my goal.  In fact, even that much should be optional.  If people really want to get scammed and ripped off with 'hard' anonymity, they have that right.  

And if they want to do without even 'soft' anonymity, they should be able to just publish their damn keyring and then sit back and let everybody who can actually offer them better deals than they're getting, come straight to them without wasting their time and resources on the sounding-out processes we now pay sales staff fifty percent of the produced value to carry out.

The point is, I believe people (and businesses) don't want hard privacy.  Until they have enough experience to learn exactly how much they can save on cost-of-sales expenses, they won't want the completely open book either.  Hell, if the salesmen get to make the decision, they'll NEVER want the open book, because it means they'll be unemployed.  But at least in the short run, they just want protection from scammers, so they want 'soft' privacy rather than 'hard.'  They want to be dealing in things that police can trace and courts can recover.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624223.msg7025123#msg7025123 ( the whole thread is worth reading )

I don't know the feasibility of it code-wise , but the concept IMO is a lot more exciting for OC if were looking for the long run

[fonzerrellie]

@Devs & other involved individuals ,

Is it possible to make the anon transactions more reasonable for "real-world" uses?

I really like this post :

In the second place, 'soft' anonymity is not 'no' anonymity.

I accept that Alice and Bob are not going to do business in the real world without knowing who each other are.  Not for any serious, major amounts of money.

That means Alice cannot keep her financial dealings with Bob private without Bob's cooperation, and Bob, likewise, cannot keep his transactions with Alice private without Alice's cooperation.

As long as they cooperate - as long as neither of them releases the key they can use to prove something - then they have privacy.  

That extends to privacy by mutual consent, but it doesn't extend to ripping someone off with impunity.

It doesn't mean someone can look into your ledger and know exactly what you're doing with a third party, without that third party's cooperation.  That's a completely open ledger with no option for even 'soft' privacy, and that would be a *VERY* radical departure.  

In designing an ideal for an open ledger, 'soft' privacy would be my goal.  In fact, even that much should be optional.  If people really want to get scammed and ripped off with 'hard' anonymity, they have that right.  

And if they want to do without even 'soft' anonymity, they should be able to just publish their damn keyring and then sit back and let everybody who can actually offer them better deals than they're getting, come straight to them without wasting their time and resources on the sounding-out processes we now pay sales staff fifty percent of the produced value to carry out.

The point is, I believe people (and businesses) don't want hard privacy.  Until they have enough experience to learn exactly how much they can save on cost-of-sales expenses, they won't want the completely open book either.  Hell, if the salesmen get to make the decision, they'll NEVER want the open book, because it means they'll be unemployed.  But at least in the short run, they just want protection from scammers, so they want 'soft' privacy rather than 'hard.'  They want to be dealing in things that police can trace and courts can recover.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624223.msg7025123#msg7025123 ( the whole thread is worth reading )

I don't know the feasibility of it code-wise , but the concept IMO is a lot more exciting for OC if were looking for the long run

thanks for posting deff good stuff, I'm just worried about scammers...

 I don't care about anon features really, lol I'm no dirty politician trying to hide money or pedo try'n to buy something they probably shouldn't have.

as far as I know anon features are still in alpha so who really knows how long it'll take before the diff types are fully tested, opensourced and trusted.

[Halofire]

Nice stable price with lots of buy support. Very good!

[Specialkey]

ⓄⓇⒶⓃⒼⒺⒸⓄⒾⓃ

Don't forget to vote @ Cryptsy, Mintpal, and Sharexcoin!
https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotes
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
https://sharexcoin.com/votings?coin=OC
https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

Come on over to orangecoins.info/forum/ for the latest updates on everything Orange!
Stop by and check out the giveaways, Art contest with BIGGER OC prizes, bounties, OC paid referral program and more...!

We're on IRC. #orangecoindev

Do you have something to add to Orangecoin? A service or merchandise, perhaps?
Inquire with Orangecoin or myself!

Voting time  

Good morning dear OC world.



Is there anybody which could make a chinese translation for the Orangecoin announcment?
I guess this could be a really good buster for sweet OC  

good morning great idea, translated pages would be good (although I use google transalte quite a bit and it does pretty good)

we just passed "CR" in mintpal votes saddens me a bit... Credits "CR" had/has some really good potential, I mined from the start then the devs just stopped posting, they had an awesome poker site planned which should have been launched near the start of april... hopefully the dev's pick it up again  lol they'll have some work catching up to OC though

Perfect voting time.

[Specialkey]

Nice stable price with lots of buy support. Very good!

+1 

[Orangecoin]

Saturday we will release the minimum coin amounts needed for Masternodes.

Tweet this, share it, post it around.

[Orangecoin]

Orangecoin Masternodes
(info Coming Saturday 7th June)

Added new section to OP will add another section to forums.

[Orangecoin]

Added new section to Forum.

https://orangecoins.info/forum/index.php?board=18.0

[drm]

great work oc, can;t wait for more info on masternodes.
This coin can have so much amazing growth in the coming months..the potential if everything can go according to plan is unreal.. dare i say top10 coinmarketcap..

edit;  logo resize and removing the black square around the logo in qt 1.04?

[coinfinance]

http://coinfinance.com/orangecoin/price

[NutMasterTardd]

Saturday we will release the minimum coin amounts needed for Masternodes.

Tweet this, share it, post it around.

I am so hyped for this!

[Orangecoin]

http://coinfinance.com/orangecoin/price

Very nice I will spread it around.

[coinfinance]

http://coinfinance.com/orangecoin/price

Very nice I will spread it around.

Thank you!

[camcam]

what is masternodes exactly ?

[Specialkey]

Big staking session here 

Vote my dear OC friends