[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[sorryforthat]

Yes I would like to know how to change or modify the wallet password.

When I open my wallet the first thing I do is enter a password. This is what I would like to change.

Your best bet to be honest, is to just make a new one and send the funds to it. If you want it to have the same name, then you will just need to have them in 2 different folders before you create and send.

[drawingthesun]

Yes I would like to know how to change or modify the wallet password.

When I open my wallet the first thing I do is enter a password. This is what I would like to change.

At the moment there is no option in the wallet to change password.

Make a new wallet and send the funds from your old wallet to your new one.

[cgminer-o]

Yes I would like to know how to change or modify the wallet password.

When I open my wallet the first thing I do is enter a password. This is what I would like to change.

At the moment there is no option in the wallet to change password.

Make a new wallet and send the funds from your old wallet to your new one.

At the moment there is no option in the wallet to change password. !!!!!! +1

[thankful_for_today]

A long lusted update: the fastest optimization of hash rate up to date. Available at http://bitmonero.org

[bitcoinwonders010]

guys does anyone know when we will get a gui wallet

[sorryforthat]

guys does anyone know when we will get a gui wallet

I do hope this takes a very very long time. I like it the way it is, its simple computing at its finest

[eizh]

A long lusted update: the fastest optimization of hash rate up to date. Available at http://bitmonero.org

These are changes merged from QuazarCoin, which themselves were merged from Monero (Noodle deserves credit). And yes, it's probably still slower than Wolf's cpuminer modifications.

[eizh]

guys does anyone know when we will get a gui wallet

You can follow Bitkoot's progress on a .NET GUI wrapper here (Windows only):
https://github.com/BitKoot/CryptoNoteWallet

You can follow jwinterm's progress on a kivy GUI wrapper here (Windows, and probably Linux as well):
https://github.com/jwinterm/cryptonoteRPCwalletGUI

You can follow Neozaru's progress on a cross-platform Qt GUI wallet here:
https://github.com/Neozaru/bitmonero-qt

We also have another person working on a different Qt GUI implementation, but it's not public yet.

[Patel]

Whats the difference between MRO/Monero and BMR/BitMonero?

They seem to have different websites, and different abreviations

[TTM]

Whats the difference between MRO/Monero and BMR/BitMonero?

They seem to have different websites, and different abreviations

BitMonero is just the old name of Monero. Same coin, same blockchain, same dev team.

[Zer0Sum]

Ohhhh, when running bitmonerod...
Lot's of RED ERROR messages for about 40 minutes from the ABSTRACT_SERVER.

[BitcoinForumator]

How do you get Moneros out of https://cryptonote.exchange.to/ if there is no Payment ID option on whitdrawal and the other exchanges require it??

[blaaaaacksuit]

How do you get Moneros out of https://cryptonote.exchange.to/ if there is no Payment ID option on whitdrawal and the other exchanges require it??

You have to withdraw to your wallet first, then to another exchange.

[mr_random]

I wonder if the dev/tacotime would consider lowering the coin emission rate?

XC has sharply reduced the number of coins from 33 million to 6 million. DRK had coin supply changes.

Seems with anon coins, it's the tech that's most important, people don't care much about premines, instamines, coin supply changes.

I for one would be pretty happy with the same amount of coins being produced, but over a longer time scale. So no-one loses out on gaining MRO in the future but the amount mined per day is reduced. There's been a good few weeks mining at the current state as well. Obviously this benefits current holders, what do you guys think?

[Patel]

I wonder if the dev/tacotime would consider lowering the coin emission rate?

XC has sharply reduced the number of coins from 33 million to 6 million. DRK had coin supply changes.

Seems with anon coins, it's the tech that's most important, people don't care much about premines, instamines, coin supply changes.

I for one would be pretty happy with the same amount of coins being produced, but over a longer time scale. So no-one loses out on gaining MRO in the future but the amount mined per day is reduced. There's been a good few weeks mining at the current state as well. Obviously this benefits current holders, what do you guys think?

I agree. We should not have a surplus, slow and steady inflation is better.

[aeiry82]

I agree that Monero has a very steep emission curve. I think this is the only weakness of Monero and is the only chance another coin (like QCN) might overtake it.
Otherwise I think Monero is doing everything right and has the best community / developer team of all cryptonote currencies.

[blaaaaacksuit]

I agree that Monero has a very steep emission curve. I think this is the only weakness of Monero and is the only chance another coin (like QCN) might overtake it.
Otherwise I think Monero is doing everything right and has the best community / developer team of all cryptonote currencies.

QCN cant go anywhere without the MRO devs.

[drawingthesun]

I agree that Monero has a very steep emission curve. I think this is the only weakness of Monero and is the only chance another coin (like QCN) might overtake it.
Otherwise I think Monero is doing everything right and has the best community / developer team of all cryptonote currencies.

Just a question here, I'm just a user and have no association with the developers at all.

What would people say if the emission curve was changed?

So we never change the number of total eventual coins, but the emission is tweaked slightly?

For example, if Monero had two minute blocks instead of one minutes blocks, but kept the reward the same, so that we essentially get half the release per year?

So something like 3,000,000 coins in the first year instead of 6,000,000?

Not that the developers will change it, I just wanted to know what people thought for myself. How many against that idea and how many for?

Because MRO has first mover advantage and a bigger development team we should be leading volume, hashpower and price by far, yet QCN is catching on (Has about 30% of our volume, price and hashpower) just because they do not have to endure 2.5% inflation per day.

Again, I just wanted to see what people thought about that, not that it can be changed anyway.

[TTM]

I agree that Monero has a very steep emission curve. I think this is the only weakness of Monero and is the only chance another coin (like QCN) might overtake it.
Otherwise I think Monero is doing everything right and has the best community / developer team of all cryptonote currencies.

No, i'm against the idea of reducing emission.

There is no way QCN could take over MRO. QCN dev is a scumbag who tried to steal Monero brand, he made an ANN about relaunching Monero, of course people against him and he had to delete that thread. This is Google cache of that thread:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7skSDxQ_yX0J:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php%3Ftopic%3D599580.0%3Ball+&cd=3&ct=clnk

QCN can never go big with that dev, MRO is leading the development of all CryptoNote coin.

[sorryforthat]

I agree that Monero has a very steep emission curve. I think this is the only weakness of Monero and is the only chance another coin (like QCN) might overtake it.
Otherwise I think Monero is doing everything right and has the best community / developer team of all cryptonote currencies.

QCN cant go anywhere without the MRO devs.

And the community that supports the coin is weak, the majority interested are in it for the money. Most of the posts on the thread are questions on how to open the wallet, open the deamon, and Minergate balance