clintar2
|
|
March 26, 2016, 06:58:27 AM |
|
I put together an updated version of cryptonote-universal-pool. It supports running with any version of node.js, and I added Onishin's keepalive that works with his modified miners. I have only tested it with a testnet, though. It's named different because I already have a fork called cryptonote-universal-pool that I've made only work with bbr. https://github.com/clintar/cryptonote-xmr-poolIf you try it, let me know if you have any issues, please.
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:07:16 AM |
|
Never heard of this, so I had a look: Exchange Summary Total Markets: 1535 Total Trades(24 hours): 3938 Haven't heard of 90% of the coins listed either. Not that I look much at that stuff, but still. Trading XMR would likely blow the top right off the exchange. One bot would increase their volume by an order of magnitude I commend the initiative and effort, but can't recommend an exchange that -puts new listings up for a vote, then utterly fails to act on the results (cough, Craptsy, cough) -says XMR is a priority in Oct 2015 and still needs to be gently nudged 6 months later (Craptsy did that) -supports 1500 shitcoins but can't bother with an innovative/fairly launched/top 10 coin (more shades of Craptsy) -needs hand-holding tech support from (potential?) customers to sort their backend (I expect an exchange to know more than I do) -only provides updates (in the form of lame/implausible excuses) on the previously promised pair when prompted by inquiry Actually we have strict rules for fair launch coins, No ICO, no excessive premines, os even coins like DASH and ETH cant be listed on our platform. I understand you are upset that is taken us longer to implement XMR that you would have liked, but Cryptopia is a small team with one dev. We NEVER asked for hand holding, just hours in the day as i have a full time job and a family, we dont have endless budgets like Polo, Bitrex and Crypsty We will happily refund all votes as you seem super upset that this has taken longer than YOU expected The votes were paid? I forgot about that. It's reasonable to refund them when you can't/don't deliver. Craptsy did that to XMR also. That's the reoccurring pattern making me "super upset." It was your responsibility to communicate difficulties and ask for hand holding when (in accordance with the paid "votes") adding XMR started taking an unreasonable amount of time/effort, not to wait until some enterprising member of the community reached out to you. The newest version takes much less system resources to run. I wish your growing exchange great success with XMR and sincerely appreciate your refusal to list insta-mined crapcoins like DASH. I would seriously consider leaving Polo for an exchange that doesn't facilitate IPO scams like MAID and NXT.
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
Mystogan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:11:35 AM |
|
I never buy coins early and regret after, even though I'm late again I'm gonna buy few hundred [XMR] Monero's and hope they skyrocket in few months.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:52:54 AM |
|
on my wallet i tried sweep_dust and transfer 100xmr all failed.
There is a known issue with sweep_dust sometimes not working. That is being addressed in a future update. As far as the other, we're taking a look at your log file, but GingerAle's suggestion about going on IRC is a good one. Sometimes it is best to be able to ask questions and try things in real time. I have a wallet that has been around for a long time and have synced every once in a while. I received an error when I first ran the bc_height command, but the second time I tried it, it ran and went through all the blocks and that was good to see. But now I have the dust fee problem. I tried to sweep a small bit of dust from my wallet, it seems that it did not go through, so now there is a 0.02 fee that is stuck in outgoing. Is there a way to remove it or will it go away? I also tried to sweep it again because it showed dust still there, but it errored. Does it even matter? It's just there in outgoing now for hours. Also the 0.9.3 doesn't refresh automatically or in the background that I could see, but typing refresh does it. Can it auto refresh? kind of a good thing, like it did before with previous versions it is good to see it sync and then check your balance. As far as I know 0.9.3 should auto refresh. As far as asking a bunch of specific questions about your wallet the best bet is to jump onto freenode IRC #monero and ask on there. There are definitely some known issues with sweep dust. In most cases, I would suggest waiting for an update.
|
|
|
|
elrippo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 26, 2016, 08:30:54 AM Last edit: March 26, 2016, 09:26:59 AM by elrippo |
|
Never heard of this, so I had a look: Exchange Summary Total Markets: 1535 Total Trades(24 hours): 3938 Haven't heard of 90% of the coins listed either. Not that I look much at that stuff, but still. Trading XMR would likely blow the top right off the exchange. One bot would increase their volume by an order of magnitude I commend the initiative and effort, but can't recommend an exchange that -puts new listings up for a vote, then utterly fails to act on the results (cough, Craptsy, cough) -says XMR is a priority in Oct 2015 and still needs to be gently nudged 6 months later (Craptsy did that) -supports 1500 shitcoins but can't bother with an innovative/fairly launched/top 10 coin (more shades of Craptsy) -needs hand-holding tech support from (potential?) customers to sort their backend (I expect an exchange to know more than I do) -only provides updates (in the form of lame/implausible excuses) on the previously promised pair when prompted by inquiry Actually we have strict rules for fair launch coins, No ICO, no excessive premines, os even coins like DASH and ETH cant be listed on our platform. I understand you are upset that is taken us longer to implement XMR that you would have liked, but Cryptopia is a small team with one dev. We NEVER asked for hand holding, just hours in the day as i have a full time job and a family, we dont have endless budgets like Polo, Bitrex and Crypsty We will happily refund all votes as you seem super upset that this has taken longer than YOU expected The votes were paid? I forgot about that. It's reasonable to refund them when you can't/don't deliver. Craptsy did that to XMR also. That's the reoccurring pattern making me "super upset." It was your responsibility to communicate difficulties and ask for hand holding when (in accordance with the paid "votes") adding XMR started taking an unreasonable amount of time/effort, not to wait until some enterprising member of the community reached out to you. The newest version takes much less system resources to run. I wish your growing exchange great success with XMR and sincerely appreciate your refusal to list insta-mined crapcoins like DASH. I would seriously consider leaving Polo for an exchange that doesn't facilitate IPO scams like MAID and NXT. Update -> Sender: sa_ddam2133/26/2016 2:47:03 AM
Unfortunately I read the Monero thread and can see a legendary member comparing us to Cryptsty for taking too long.
Kinda sad, I thought the XMR community was better than that,
We are happy to refund all votes since we cant work fast enough for you guys :(
Sender: elrippos3/26/2016 8:23:21 AM
Well, don't get sad about that. Honestly i believe you had 6 months to deploy the coin and obviously you are using the oldish binaries, so that maybe a point from legendary members. If you don't want to deploy Monero, just send back the coins, i am fine with that, it would be your loss guys.
Sender: sa_ddam2133/26/2016 8:56:03 AM
We are adding it, its 90% integrated, like I said we just had a few issues.
We were just offering the refund due to the time it has taken, but we are a small site with so sometimes new features take a bit longer than the other sites with big budgets.
Just seemed a bit hash to be compared against a scam site like Crypsty thats all.
Anyway, should only be a couple more days until monero is live providing the new source works fine :)
Thanks
Sender: elrippos3/26/2016 9:24:40 AM
Now as you have the new binaries, it should be a rather fast deployment of MOnerO :D No Problem, we all just were wondering why the heck it takes you guys so long to deploy it.
Well, don't take that personally, we just want MOnerO on your Exchange and we believe that it will take more ressources than you can handle (just in case, setup some more ressources).
Do you make an announcment to the users that voted for the coin, before the coin get's finally listed?
Kind regards, elrippos.
I tend to like those guys at cryptopia Get it on and XMR at your Exchange, NOW!!!
|
For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
|
|
|
magico
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2016, 09:37:41 AM |
|
on my wallet i tried sweep_dust and transfer 100xmr all failed.
There is a known issue with sweep_dust sometimes not working. That is being addressed in a future update. As far as the other, we're taking a look at your log file, but GingerAle's suggestion about going on IRC is a good one. Sometimes it is best to be able to ask questions and try things in real time. I have a wallet that has been around for a long time and have synced every once in a while. I received an error when I first ran the bc_height command, but the second time I tried it, it ran and went through all the blocks and that was good to see. But now I have the dust fee problem. I tried to sweep a small bit of dust from my wallet, it seems that it did not go through, so now there is a 0.02 fee that is stuck in outgoing. Is there a way to remove it or will it go away? I also tried to sweep it again because it showed dust still there, but it errored. Does it even matter? It's just there in outgoing now for hours. Also the 0.9.3 doesn't refresh automatically or in the background that I could see, but typing refresh does it. Can it auto refresh? kind of a good thing, like it did before with previous versions it is good to see it sync and then check your balance. As far as I know 0.9.3 should auto refresh. As far as asking a bunch of specific questions about your wallet the best bet is to jump onto freenode IRC #monero and ask on there. There are definitely some known issues with sweep dust. In most cases, I would suggest waiting for an update. Yes, the 0.9.3 does refresh automatically.
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
March 26, 2016, 10:39:50 AM |
|
3 minutes ago MoneroHash found it's first block since the fork Variance Looks like the network HR has mostly recovered from the drop that occurred just after the fork.
|
|
|
|
|
LOUHIMO
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 11
|
|
March 26, 2016, 12:24:47 PM |
|
XMR.LOUHIMO.CLUBNew Monero mining pool located in Scandinavia, EU. Keepalived supported. 1% Mining fee. Wide range of ports for selecting starting mining difficulty, look at "Getting Started"-page. Join the fun! Connection address is stratum+tcp://xmr.louhimo.club:PORT Use your wallet address as worker name and worker password can be anything. Payout schedules between 15 minutes, your coins will be in the schedule when there is enough matured XMR reserved for your address you are mining to.
|
Louhimo Mining Pool LOUHIMO.NET (http://louhimo.net/)
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
March 26, 2016, 01:20:17 PM Last edit: March 26, 2016, 01:47:36 PM by aminorex |
|
Keep in mind that any software not referenced from the OP in this thread is not software which was recommended for general use by the core team, AFAIK. Please be very careful to vet any software installed on devices which may see the private keys, 2fa, and/or passwords required to access your funds.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
March 26, 2016, 01:45:20 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
wpalczynski
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 26, 2016, 02:23:15 PM |
|
Never heard of this, so I had a look: Exchange Summary Total Markets: 1535 Total Trades(24 hours): 3938 Haven't heard of 90% of the coins listed either. Not that I look much at that stuff, but still. Trading XMR would likely blow the top right off the exchange. One bot would increase their volume by an order of magnitude I commend the initiative and effort, but can't recommend an exchange that -puts new listings up for a vote, then utterly fails to act on the results (cough, Craptsy, cough) -says XMR is a priority in Oct 2015 and still needs to be gently nudged 6 months later (Craptsy did that) -supports 1500 shitcoins but can't bother with an innovative/fairly launched/top 10 coin (more shades of Craptsy) -needs hand-holding tech support from (potential?) customers to sort their backend (I expect an exchange to know more than I do) -only provides updates (in the form of lame/implausible excuses) on the previously promised pair when prompted by inquiry Actually we have strict rules for fair launch coins, No ICO, no excessive premines, os even coins like DASH and ETH cant be listed on our platform. I understand you are upset that is taken us longer to implement XMR that you would have liked, but Cryptopia is a small team with one dev. We NEVER asked for hand holding, just hours in the day as i have a full time job and a family, we dont have endless budgets like Polo, Bitrex and Crypsty We will happily refund all votes as you seem super upset that this has taken longer than YOU expected The votes were paid? I forgot about that. It's reasonable to refund them when you can't/don't deliver. Craptsy did that to XMR also. That's the reoccurring pattern making me "super upset." It was your responsibility to communicate difficulties and ask for hand holding when (in accordance with the paid "votes") adding XMR started taking an unreasonable amount of time/effort, not to wait until some enterprising member of the community reached out to you. The newest version takes much less system resources to run. I wish your growing exchange great success with XMR and sincerely appreciate your refusal to list insta-mined crapcoins like DASH. I would seriously consider leaving Polo for an exchange that doesn't facilitate IPO scams like MAID and NXT. Update -> Sender: sa_ddam2133/26/2016 2:47:03 AM
Unfortunately I read the Monero thread and can see a legendary member comparing us to Cryptsty for taking too long.
Kinda sad, I thought the XMR community was better than that,
We are happy to refund all votes since we cant work fast enough for you guys :(
Sender: elrippos3/26/2016 8:23:21 AM
Well, don't get sad about that. Honestly i believe you had 6 months to deploy the coin and obviously you are using the oldish binaries, so that maybe a point from legendary members. If you don't want to deploy Monero, just send back the coins, i am fine with that, it would be your loss guys.
Sender: sa_ddam2133/26/2016 8:56:03 AM
We are adding it, its 90% integrated, like I said we just had a few issues.
We were just offering the refund due to the time it has taken, but we are a small site with so sometimes new features take a bit longer than the other sites with big budgets.
Just seemed a bit hash to be compared against a scam site like Crypsty thats all.
Anyway, should only be a couple more days until monero is live providing the new source works fine :)
Thanks
Sender: elrippos3/26/2016 9:24:40 AM
Now as you have the new binaries, it should be a rather fast deployment of MOnerO :D No Problem, we all just were wondering why the heck it takes you guys so long to deploy it.
Well, don't take that personally, we just want MOnerO on your Exchange and we believe that it will take more ressources than you can handle (just in case, setup some more ressources).
Do you make an announcment to the users that voted for the coin, before the coin get's finally listed?
Kind regards, elrippos.
I tend to like those guys at cryptopia Get it on and XMR at your Exchange, NOW!!!Sometimes people just need a little nudge
|
|
|
|
birr
|
|
March 26, 2016, 05:33:44 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase. What effect does quantum computing have on ECDSA and EdDSA is the question.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 26, 2016, 06:15:19 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase. What effect does quantum computing have on ECDSA and EdDSA is the question. Both will be broken by it as far as I know. Interestingly, since Satoshi's pubkey is revealed, he has to move this coins in order to "protect" them (i.e. quantum computing will make it possible to steal them).
|
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:02:48 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase. What effect does quantum computing have on ECDSA and EdDSA is the question. Both will be broken by it as far as I know. Interestingly, since Satoshi's pubkey is revealed, he has to move this coins in order to "protect" them (i.e. quantum computing will make it possible to steal them). Since they are traceable, how moving them will protect them?
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
wpalczynski
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:09:37 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase. What effect does quantum computing have on ECDSA and EdDSA is the question. Both will be broken by it as far as I know. Interestingly, since Satoshi's pubkey is revealed, he has to move this coins in order to "protect" them (i.e. quantum computing will make it possible to steal them). Since they are traceable, how moving them will protect them? He will have to move them into Monero of course.
|
|
|
|
vvrroomm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:47:12 PM |
|
on my wallet i tried sweep_dust and transfer 100xmr all failed.
There is a known issue with sweep_dust sometimes not working. That is being addressed in a future update. As far as the other, we're taking a look at your log file, but GingerAle's suggestion about going on IRC is a good one. Sometimes it is best to be able to ask questions and try things in real time. I have a wallet that has been around for a long time and have synced every once in a while. I received an error when I first ran the bc_height command, but the second time I tried it, it ran and went through all the blocks and that was good to see. But now I have the dust fee problem. I tried to sweep a small bit of dust from my wallet, it seems that it did not go through, so now there is a 0.02 fee that is stuck in outgoing. Is there a way to remove it or will it go away? I also tried to sweep it again because it showed dust still there, but it errored. Does it even matter? It's just there in outgoing now for hours. Also the 0.9.3 doesn't refresh automatically or in the background that I could see, but typing refresh does it. Can it auto refresh? kind of a good thing, like it did before with previous versions it is good to see it sync and then check your balance. As far as I know 0.9.3 should auto refresh. As far as asking a bunch of specific questions about your wallet the best bet is to jump onto freenode IRC #monero and ask on there. There are definitely some known issues with sweep dust. In most cases, I would suggest waiting for an update. This board is available to search and documents the answers, so why ask to go to #monero? 0.9.3 doesn't refresh, so why is that? This could be a problem where your coins are stolen and since it doesn't refresh, you may think they are still there, right? Is there a bug or is there a problem with my wallet? I can live with the dust problem. Can someone answer my question about the stuck fee for dust? Will this fix it? Sometimes, your funds will become stuck - you will have some locked funds that never become unlocked. This is how you fix it. Load your wallet in simplewallet. Type seed into the command prompt. Write down your 25 word seed, if you haven't already. This is the best way to make sure you don't loose access to your funds. Close simplewallet by typing exit Backup all of your wallet related files. These include: yourwalletname.bin yourwalletname.bin.keys yourwalletname.bin.address.txt This can be done by copying the files to a new folder. Sometimes, when creating your wallet, you might have named it something without the .bin part. In that case, the wallet file will be called yourwalletname without the .bin at the end. Delete yourwallet.bin Load simplewallet, type in the name of the wallet you just deleted Enter password. The wallet will now refresh and hopefully your locked funds will now become unlocked.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:53:50 PM |
|
Supposedly this is a 5-qubit bitslice processor, hence scalable, although not yet proven by scaling in practice: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04512QC is coming, gradually at first, then quite suddenly. It really is time to panic, before the suddenly phase. What effect does quantum computing have on ECDSA and EdDSA is the question. Both will be broken by it as far as I know. Interestingly, since Satoshi's pubkey is revealed, he has to move this coins in order to "protect" them (i.e. quantum computing will make it possible to steal them). Since they are traceable, how moving them will protect them? Protect them from being stolen. If the pubkey is revealed quantum computing is able to steal his coins. If you move them to a new address it won't reveal the pubkey of that address, unless you reuse it.
|
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
|
March 26, 2016, 07:57:09 PM |
|
Concerning sweep_dust errors, it can be due to tiny inputs for which there is no enough inputs to mixin with. Trying to sweep_dust, daemon says: Tx <...> has too low mixin (0), and more than one mixable input with unmixable inputs. For example, when I am trying to send some xmr that left on my hot wallet, most of which consists of dust gives me an error: Error: not enough outputs for specified mixin_count = 4: output amount = 0.003811120000, found outputs to mix = 1 output amount = 0.007507490000, found outputs to mix = 1 output amount = 0.007723640000, found outputs to mix = 1 output amount = 0.003594340000, found outputs to mix = 2 output amount = 0.003064900000, found outputs to mix = 1 ........ and so on....
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
|
March 26, 2016, 08:13:25 PM |
|
Protect them from being stolen. If the pubkey is revealed quantum computing is able to steal his coins. If you move them to a new address it won't reveal the pubkey of that address, unless you reuse it.
OK, I went and read about it. So, they can't break new 'unused' address, but still they will know that money were moved and now lay at that address. Am I right?
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
|