corsaro
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 16, 2014, 11:37:32 AM |
|
sorry, but the latest nis5 release with double hashrate is very, very unstable on my windows machines... everything crashes after 20-50 minutes of work...
Maybe you need to lower clocks of your graphic cards. nothing to do... exe is very unstable i have 3 rigs, and all 3 rigs returned back to old sgminer-talkcoin Weird I don't have such problems. How many hours is running continously your rig ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amacar
|
|
June 16, 2014, 11:47:16 AM |
|
sorry, but the latest nis5 release with double hashrate is very, very unstable on my windows machines... everything crashes after 20-50 minutes of work...
Maybe you need to lower clocks of your graphic cards. nothing to do... exe is very unstable i have 3 rigs, and all 3 rigs returned back to old sgminer-talkcoin Weird I don't have such problems. How many hours is running continously your rig ? Over night, so I suppose about 10 hours. |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:16:22 PM |
|
sorry, but the latest nis5 release with double hashrate is very, very unstable on my windows machines... everything crashes after 20-50 minutes of work...
Maybe you need to lower clocks of your graphic cards. nothing to do... exe is very unstable i have 3 rigs, and all 3 rigs returned back to old sgminer-talkcoin Weird I don't have such problems. How many hours is running continously your rig ? Over night, so I suppose about 10 hours. my six R9-290 do not want to run more then 30-50 min using this optimized nist5 sgminer.exe. I tried lowering gpu-memclock, gpu-engine, intensity but it was not useful. I'll try to recompile a new exe on my windows PC and test it again |
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:18:43 PM |
|
try running without ANY arguements. Just the pools
ANother option - use CGWatcher. Works like charm, set it to restart miner if no shares for 1min or working devices are lower than X.
|
|
|
|
|
|
deathmul
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:20:01 PM |
|
When Poloniex will add TAC? We are on first place from couple of days
|
|
|
|
|
atleticofa
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:24:38 PM |
|
When Poloniex will add TAC? We are on first place from couple of days
This week for sure |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:40:54 PM |
|
try running without ANY arguements. Just the pools
ANother option - use CGWatcher. Works like charm, set it to restart miner if no shares for 1min or working devices are lower than X.
I strongly suspect it hangs when I put --thread-concurrency higher then 8192 Now I am testing again but setting manually --thread-concurrency 8192 to see if my R9-290 are more stable... I'll let you know |
|
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
June 16, 2014, 12:49:34 PM |
|
sorry, but the latest nis5 release with double hashrate is very, very unstable on my windows machines... everything crashes after 20-50 minutes of work...
Maybe you need to lower clocks of your graphic cards. nothing to do... exe is very unstable i have 3 rigs, and all 3 rigs returned back to old sgminer-talkcoin Weird I don't have such problems. How many hours is running continously your rig ? Over night, so I suppose about 10 hours. my six R9-290 do not want to run more then 30-50 min using this optimized nist5 sgminer.exe. I tried lowering gpu-memclock, gpu-engine, intensity but it was not useful. I'll try to recompile a new exe on my windows PC and test it again I had the same issue, my 270s and 280s are fine, the 290s were rebooting using the same core and memclock settings from the old miner... I was using the official miner so I was only playing with intensity. I got one of my 290 rigs stable by bringing clock back to factory spec and lowering intensity to 19. I haven't touched TC or threads or anything yet, I will have a play soon and let you know how I get on... |
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:01:23 PM |
|
sorry, but the latest nis5 release with double hashrate is very, very unstable on my windows machines... everything crashes after 20-50 minutes of work...
Maybe you need to lower clocks of your graphic cards. nothing to do... exe is very unstable i have 3 rigs, and all 3 rigs returned back to old sgminer-talkcoin Weird I don't have such problems. How many hours is running continously your rig ? Over night, so I suppose about 10 hours. my six R9-290 do not want to run more then 30-50 min using this optimized nist5 sgminer.exe. I tried lowering gpu-memclock, gpu-engine, intensity but it was not useful. I'll try to recompile a new exe on my windows PC and test it again I had the same issue, my 270s and 280s are fine, the 290s were rebooting using the same core and memclock settings from the old miner... I was using the official miner so I was only playing with intensity. I got one of my 290 rigs stable by bringing clock back to factory spec and lowering intensity to 19. I haven't touched TC or threads or anything yet, I will have a play soon and let you know how I get on... yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set. I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours... I'll keep you informed |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:11:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:14:36 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:21:48 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. Ok... more tests to come out... |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:30:19 PM |
|
OK, compiled successfully on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit. and working fine with HD7970 at doubled hashrate with old drivers  git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11modcd sph-sgminer_x11mod autoreconf -i CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure make |
|
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:36:32 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate... the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300) on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300 |
|
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
June 16, 2014, 01:52:50 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate... the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300) on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300 I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power... |
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
|
atleticofa
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:37:48 PM |
|
OK, compiled successfully on ubuntu 12.04 64 bit. and working fine with HD7970 at doubled hashrate with old drivers git clone https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11modcd sph-sgminer_x11mod autoreconf -i CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native" ./configure make I'm getting just 6mhs for HD7970 with the last day miner and old drivers. It would be possible this new miner for windows? |
|
|
|
|
|
karimdr2
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:38:08 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate... the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300) on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300 I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power... At 650 your gpu run at the stock clock ! You can check it on Sgminer console ! |
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:47:08 PM |
|
Wallet manager at Poloniex just confirmed TAC will go on Polo today...
|
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
corsaro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:10:39 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate... the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300) on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300 I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power... At 650 your gpu run at the stock clock ! You can check it on Sgminer console ! none of my R9-290 goes under 1300 Mhz as memclock. I can set 1300 as minimum. A couple of them can be set at 1250 |
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:17:32 PM |
|
yes, R9-290 and R9-290X are more difficult to be set.
I am testing with --thread-concurrency 8192 and --gpu-memclock 1250 directly inside sgminer.conf and it seems more stable then before... more tests will come out in the following hours...
I'll keep you informed
thread-concurrency doesn't affect much NIST5-performance (check the source code) I would not touch it. Play with thread-concurrency only bring you 1% more in my experience. Important is delete all the *.bin file in sgminer-nist5 and set proper clock, intensity. anyway, now I am running fine sph-sgminer_nist5 on my windows machines with R9-290 and R9-290X at double hashrate... the secret is to set --thread-concurrency 8192 and gpu memclock at lowest possible value (--gpu-memclock 1250 or --gpu-memclock 1300) on some R9-290 lowest gpu-memclock is 1250 and on other R9-290X it is 1300 I'm running memclock at 650 on all rigs, no difference in speed and saves a little power... At 650 your gpu run at the stock clock ! You can check it on Sgminer console ! none of my R9-290 goes under 1300 Mhz as memclock. I can set 1300 as minimum. A couple of them can be set at 1250 there is some sort of a bug with msi afterburner /amd drivers (kill msi) then restart it should give the possibility to change the clock (or you have to restart the computer) |
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
