smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 09, 2014, 02:04:58 AM |
|
If you look at the top 10/100/1000 addresses I've never believed these "top N" addresses things to be worth anything especially for coins with known questionable mining that are going to face scrutiny for it.. The first thing a scammer would do in that situation to try to get away with the instamine (after claiming it to be an accident) is move the coins around to a bunch of addresses and claim they've been redistributed so the instamine doesn't matter any more. As long as addresses are free these lists mean nothing.
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
September 09, 2014, 02:10:19 AM |
|
If you look at the top 10/100/1000 addresses I've never believed these "top N" addresses things to be worth anything especially for coins with known questionable mining that are going to face scrutiny for it.. The first thing a scammer would do in that situation to try to get away with the instamine (after claiming it to be an accident) is move the coins around to a bunch of addresses and claim they've been redistributed so the instamine doesn't matter any more. As long as addresses are free these lists mean nothing. That's a fair point, but it doesn't change the fact the over 70% of namecoins sit in 100 addresses, while that number is about 55% for vertcoin, 53% for litecoin, and less than 20% for bitcoin (the most widely distributed coin according to these metrics).
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 09, 2014, 02:20:41 AM |
|
If you look at the top 10/100/1000 addresses I've never believed these "top N" addresses things to be worth anything especially for coins with known questionable mining that are going to face scrutiny for it.. The first thing a scammer would do in that situation to try to get away with the instamine (after claiming it to be an accident) is move the coins around to a bunch of addresses and claim they've been redistributed so the instamine doesn't matter any more. As long as addresses are free these lists mean nothing. That's a fair point, but it doesn't change the fact the over 70% of namecoins sit in 100 addresses, while that number is about 55% for vertcoin, 53% for litecoin, and about less than 20% for bitcoin (the most widely distributed coin according to these metrics). I still don't believe these lists or calculations of concentration by address (as opposed to owner) mean anything at all. One big factor is how much of the coin is at exchanges (i.e. many owners, few addresses). Bitcoin has the best developed infrastructure for thin wallets, mobile wallets, hardware wallets, paper wallets, cold storage, etc. and is also somewhat less dominated by speculative activity (virtually 100% of activity for most alts) so it stands to reason that less of it would be held at exchanges.
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:05:25 AM |
|
I still don't believe these lists or calculations of concentration by address (as opposed to owner) mean anything at all.
One big factor is how much of the coin is at exchanges (i.e. many owners, few addresses). Bitcoin has the best developed infrastructure for thin wallets, mobile wallets, hardware wallets, paper wallets, cold storage, etc. and is also somewhat less dominated by speculative activity (virtually 100% of activity for most alts) so it stands to reason that less of it would be held at exchanges.
What would you suggest as a better metric? Obviously this analysis is not pertinent to cryptonote coins. Transactions per day? Volume on exchanges per day?
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
September 09, 2014, 08:07:20 AM |
|
I will continue soon, this is messy to explain...
It is messy only if you go into details, but the core is quite simple: if you buy you also push the price higher, if you sell you also push the price lower.
|
|
|
|
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 09, 2014, 12:54:36 PM |
|
I already posted this in the monero topic, but I think it's worth posting here as well. I have parsed the ANN topic for monero, boolberry, bytecoin, ducknote and darkcoin. Figured it would be interesting to see these results. In this monero topic alone, a total of 1420 unique users has participated. Below are users spread across the different user ranks: Boolberry (198 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 5 | 1.09% | Hero_Member | 19 | 4.14% | Sr.Member | 83 | 18.08% | Full_Member | 150 | 32.68% | Member | 82 | 17.86% | Jr.Member | 52 | 11.33% | Newbie | 68 | 14.81% | Total users: | 459 | Bytecoin (195 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 1 | 0.22% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 4 | 0.87% | Hero_Member | 19 | 4.17% | Sr.Member | 54 | 11.84% | Full_Member | 113 | 24.78% | Member | 101 | 22.15% | Jr.Member | 74 | 16.23% | Newbie | 90 | 19.74% | Total users: | 456 | duckNote (78 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 2 | 0.72% | Hero_Member | 5 | 1.81% | Sr.Member | 40 | 14.49% | Full_Member | 78 | 28.26% | Member | 62 | 22.46% | Jr.Member | 42 | 15.22% | Newbie | 47 | 17.03% | Total users: | 276 | Monero (700 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 1 | 0.07% | Donator | 1 | 0.07% | Legendary | 12 | 0.85% | Hero_Member | 56 | 3.94% | Sr.Member | 210 | 14.79% | Full_Member | 362 | 25.49% | Member | 288 | 20.28% | Jr.Member | 203 | 14.3% | Newbie | 287 | 20.21% | Total users: | 1420 |
now the really interesting comparison.... Darkcoin (3029 pages) Rank | Users | VIP | 0 | 0.08% | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 2 | 0.08% | Legendary | 9 | 0.35% | Hero_Member | 57 | 2.23% | Sr.Member | 291 | 11.40% | Full_Member | 772 | 30.24% | Member | 545 | 21.35% | Jr.Member | 342 | 13.40% | Newbie | 533 | 20.88% | Total users: | 2553 |
Notice the number of hero and legendary members? Darkcoin has 57 (2.23%) hero and 9 (0.35%) legendary versus Monero with 56 (3.94%) hero and 12 (0.85%) legendary. Percent wise monero has attracted more than twice legendary members and almost twice hero members. In other words, it seems oldtimers gravitate towards monero/cryptonote and ignore darkcoin.
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
September 09, 2014, 02:24:42 PM |
|
I have parsed the ANN topics ...
Programmatically? Source code available? (Nice work, BTW). Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
rdnkjdi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 09, 2014, 02:26:40 PM Last edit: September 09, 2014, 02:39:09 PM by rdnkjdi |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
|
|
|
|
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:22:34 PM |
|
I have parsed the ANN topics ...
Programmatically? Source code available? (Nice work, BTW). Cheers Graham Yes, in PHP. I did not make this code to be public so it's crap and pretty messy, but if you want it here it is anyway: https://mega.co.nz/#!RgtBGYgL!Qg7n540VNadNhTa1eaIJj3xdDVCY79mqDROdfnjAI6c
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:35:18 PM |
|
Yes, in PHP. I did not make this code to be public so it's crap and pretty messy, but if you want it here it is anyway:
Thank you, that's most helpful. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
othe
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:41:52 PM |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
That´s no problem to handle from a technical perspective.
|
|
|
|
rpietila (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:44:35 PM |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
That´s no problem to handle from a technical perspective. So Monero can immediately handle 5 million accounts and 100,000 tx/day?
|
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
September 09, 2014, 03:46:51 PM |
|
I already posted this in the monero topic, but I think it's worth posting here as well. I have parsed the ANN topic for monero, boolberry, bytecoin, ducknote and darkcoin. Figured it would be interesting to see these results. In this monero topic alone, a total of 1420 unique users has participated. Below are users spread across the different user ranks: Boolberry (198 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 5 | 1.09% | Hero_Member | 19 | 4.14% | Sr.Member | 83 | 18.08% | Full_Member | 150 | 32.68% | Member | 82 | 17.86% | Jr.Member | 52 | 11.33% | Newbie | 68 | 14.81% | Total users: | 459 | Bytecoin (195 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 1 | 0.22% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 4 | 0.87% | Hero_Member | 19 | 4.17% | Sr.Member | 54 | 11.84% | Full_Member | 113 | 24.78% | Member | 101 | 22.15% | Jr.Member | 74 | 16.23% | Newbie | 90 | 19.74% | Total users: | 456 | duckNote (78 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 0 | 0.00% | Legendary | 2 | 0.72% | Hero_Member | 5 | 1.81% | Sr.Member | 40 | 14.49% | Full_Member | 78 | 28.26% | Member | 62 | 22.46% | Jr.Member | 42 | 15.22% | Newbie | 47 | 17.03% | Total users: | 276 | Monero (700 pages) Rank | Users | Staff | 1 | 0.07% | Donator | 1 | 0.07% | Legendary | 12 | 0.85% | Hero_Member | 56 | 3.94% | Sr.Member | 210 | 14.79% | Full_Member | 362 | 25.49% | Member | 288 | 20.28% | Jr.Member | 203 | 14.3% | Newbie | 287 | 20.21% | Total users: | 1420 |
now the really interesting comparison.... Darkcoin (3029 pages) Rank | Users | VIP | 0 | 0.08% | Staff | 0 | 0.00% | Donator | 2 | 0.08% | Legendary | 9 | 0.35% | Hero_Member | 57 | 2.23% | Sr.Member | 291 | 11.40% | Full_Member | 772 | 30.24% | Member | 545 | 21.35% | Jr.Member | 342 | 13.40% | Newbie | 533 | 20.88% | Total users: | 2553 |
Notice the number of hero and legendary members? Darkcoin has 57 (2.23%) hero and 9 (0.35%) legendary versus Monero with 56 (3.94%) hero and 12 (0.85%) legendary. Percent wise monero has attracted more than twice legendary members and almost twice hero members. In other words, it seems oldtimers gravitate towards monero/cryptonote and ignore darkcoin. That is decent stats gathered. Really impressive!
|
|
|
|
dunchy
|
|
September 09, 2014, 04:03:01 PM |
|
I have parsed the ANN topics ...
Programmatically? Source code available? (Nice work, BTW). Cheers Graham Yes, in PHP. I did not make this code to be public so it's crap and pretty messy, but if you want it here it is anyway: https://mega.co.nz/#!RgtBGYgL!Qg7n540VNadNhTa1eaIJj3xdDVCY79mqDROdfnjAI6c Nice analysis TKT.
|
|
|
|
othe
|
|
September 09, 2014, 04:05:59 PM |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
That´s no problem to handle from a technical perspective. So Monero can immediately handle 5 million accounts and 100,000 tx/day? When the Database is done i would say yes, without it pcs will run out of ram in a matter of weeks/months. Keep in mind its basically the same tech as Bitcoin, the transactions are bigger yes but Bitcoin is nowhere near its limit currently. Of course the Blockchain will need more storage space than Bitcoin. I guess we should stress-test this on a Testnet and make some graphs about it.
|
|
|
|
PestoQuinty
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2014, 04:36:08 PM |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
That´s no problem to handle from a technical perspective. So Monero can immediately handle 5 million accounts and 100,000 tx/day? When the Database is done i would say yes, without it pcs will run out of ram in a matter of weeks/months.Keep in mind its basically the same tech as Bitcoin, the transactions are bigger yes but Bitcoin is nowhere near its limit currently. Of course the Blockchain will need more storage space than Bitcoin. I guess we should stress-test this on a Testnet and make some graphs about it. Time is ticking for me, 90% of RAM usage with bitmonerod opened +1
|
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
|
|
September 09, 2014, 04:57:58 PM |
|
In light of the recent Satoshi hack it made me start thinking about the bitcoin "backup coin".
How long until from a technical perspective a cryptonote coin (Probably Monero or Boolberry) can handle the # of addresses & transaction volume of bitcoin? (Knowing that litecoin COULD is partially where I believe it's value comes from)
That´s no problem to handle from a technical perspective. So Monero can immediately handle 5 million accounts and 100,000 tx/day? Well, to be fair such an exodus wouldn't exactly happen immediately. Many people would be in shock and take a while to decide to move on.
|
|
|
|
rdnkjdi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 09, 2014, 05:13:36 PM Last edit: September 09, 2014, 05:35:15 PM by rdnkjdi |
|
Well, to be fair such an exodus wouldn't exactly happen immediately. Many people would be in shock and take a while to decide to move on.
I guess it seems kinda ingenuous to me for Monero (or boolberry) to think they deserve litecoins spot on the market cap if they can't handle being bitcoins "insurance policy" edit: IF that is the reason that litecoin has the market cap it does.
|
|
|
|
r3wt
|
|
September 09, 2014, 05:34:23 PM |
|
the idiots that read threads like this...
|
My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
September 09, 2014, 06:50:48 PM |
|
Time is ticking for me, 90% of RAM usage with bitmonerod opened Increase your swap file (AKA virtual memory) size. Also, RAM is cheap.
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
|