[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[saberu]

I tried using candl`s command to check the transaction ID but it says ID doesnt exist. I added the testnet parameter when executing the program so it should have worked if Candl wasnt spreading Fud.

Most likely the testnet of the new wallet is on a whole new blockchain to the current release wallet testnet, this makes sense as the dev says the new wallet isnt available for testing yet.

So this is definitely fud.

[HansW]

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product.  period.  it has been stated as such.  

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:



I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.  

Troll on.

Glad to hear there is some progress.
Trolls are everywhere, weak hands are selling on good info.
Lol

[Articos]

Its darkcoin kids talking shite, they know darkcoin is about as useful as a chocolate fireguard

[roede94105]

don't get fooled guys. check your download folder if you still have the XCv0.9.1.4x11-coin-1.0.rar release, unzip it, open the .bat file and add "-testnet" to the command. then start the client with the .bat file.

this old release has the centralized mixer implementation in it. and big surprise anon payments work with it...
it is very likely you are getting fooled by screenshots that show these old centralized anon transfers instead of the shiny new xnode transfers...

@atsecure
the mixer node is still exploitable btw...

can anyone confirm this? seems interesting and could explain

[megges]

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product.  period.  it has been stated as such.  

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:



I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.  

Troll on.

this must be fud - that can't be true, if it is, it will be so easyto patch the wallet and comment out the sending, in conclusion i'll recieve the coins from the one whos mixing but i will not send them to the destination and keep them -> easy stealing ...

[mojun7982]

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer?  Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up.  Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

[the_game1224]

not sure what to believe......

[virtualfaqs]

Well I was deciding whether to sell or not. But I couldn't understand any of that!  

[coine_smithe]

not sure what to believe......

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

[the_game1224]

not sure what to believe......

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

I already hold, I just meant not sure what to think of the previous page's developments

[Propulsion]

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer?  Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up.  Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

[Thrash]

not sure what to believe......

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

This statement is kind of true but should say:

If you buy any crypto coin, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

But I sure like these odds.

[saberu]

Definitely something fishy going on. As you can see the two addresses DO exist in the testnet, yet the transaction ID has magically disapeared after the post earlier. Though its possible the new tests are being conducted on a seperate `copied` blockchain from the original testnet, if this is true then I apologise for this post. And Im not trying to spread fud as I own 30k XC myself.


03:22:14

validateaddress mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5


03:22:14

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5",
"ismine" : false
}


03:22:49

validateaddress moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD


03:22:49

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD",
"ismine" : false
}

[evtrmm]

Still looking for anyone to pm me with any questions.  

[saberu]

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

I agree with this, regardless of whether this coin is genuine or not I am planning to dump all my coins somewhere between 400-500k then either buy back at a lower price or stay in BTC until I see some more evidence.

I am fed up of the screenshots, lets get some real evidence here.

[atcsecure]

Definitely something fishy going on. As you can see the two addresses DO exist in the testnet, yet the transaction ID has magically disapeared after the post earlier. Though its possible the new tests are being conducted on a seperate `copied` blockchain from the original testnet, if this is true then I apologise for this post. And Im not trying to spread fud as I own 30k XC myself.


03:22:14

validateaddress mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5


03:22:14

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5",
"ismine" : false
}


03:22:49

validateaddress moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD


03:22:49

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD",
"ismine" : false
}

NO there is only 1 block chain or a fork

[evtrmm]

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer?  Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up.  Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

Pretty sure nobody refused anything. 

[Grifftech]

Can we get a block explorer for the testnet so we can shut these fucking idiots up already.

[atcsecure]

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product.  period.  it has been stated as such.  

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:



I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.  

Troll on.

So that picture is showing that this wallet was chosen for this mixed transaction


This release is a only a test - as the plan was to fix up some key items and release in 3-4 weeks

[cyberhacker]

Can we get a block explorer for the testnet so we can shut these fucking idiots up already.

+1.

i am fed up with those fucktards. sorry to break the rules.

fucking idiots just slow down everything in schedule!