[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[interupted]

I would leave the forum open to visitors

[Teka]

Forum is nearly done...

\o/

All new members will be manually vetted

The vetted is not a good idea. Should be open to all.

Only flattery, no objections？
Looks like the Communist Party of China

No people who actually have real concerns not fud will be added. Users will have to post in newbie or request to join the Jr. member group. No users will be able to even read other posts until they join the forum.

Please do not.
This is not good for the development of XC.
Please consider carefully.

I will consider changing to they will be able to see other posts. This thread will unmoderated from the new forum onwards.

Vetting works for me, but I would rather the forum not be hidden.

Good or bad, should be judged by the people themselves

Feedback noted, people will be able to read posts.

[battbot]

The new xc forum should 100% be vetted. XC needs at least one forum where people can go to read news + updates + constructive feedback without having to filter out FUD and trolls

[weedsmoke420]

No people who actually have real concerns not fud will be added. Users will have to post in newbie or request to join the Jr. member group. No users will be able to even read other posts until they join the forum.

Please don't do that, let ppl at least read what's going on. Intransparency is always bad.

+1
[/quote]

I totally agree, or consider email verification, be sure to call it something like Master Account

Also, name change to XCent.

XCent ... Transfer Anonymous

[cryptico]

The forum needs to be viseable by everyone off course but how do we enter it.. I mean for the XC community members that where in here what is the process?

This will be really difficult Teka. I don't know if we should close it at all at this point... maybe we can just try to survive and then smack the Rev2 in their face and everything will be finished by then...

I think it is good to have board members of the XC community that are qualified to Address and respond Promptly and fast for Each new Fud that they will Invent and then we have something like press releases that forum members can post.. then if someone continue to troll against just ban.....

that's my two cents

[JesstersDead]

The new xc forum should 100% be vetted. XC needs at least one forum where people can go to read news + updates + constructive feedback without having to filter out FUD and trolls

This is why I am okay with vetting new members, but having the forum readable by visitors.

[MasterMined710]

i will mark these questions out as i get answers. i'm adding new questions also...

i love the idea of a fully decentralized p2p pos mixing solution. seems that is the only weakness in drk but i'm still gonna get a masternode. i just bought some more xc at .00170! i bought some before but sold it when it doubled to buy more drk because i was out of btc at the exchange (wish i would have held).  anyway i like the idea of the decentralized xnodes and may get one but i have a few questions.

1. is the staking problem fixed? when will it be, what is the fix?  how long should it take to stake?

2. what is the problem with slow pos transactions? i understand it was caused by the end of proof of work. what is the fix and when will it be implemented? i thought this tech was supposed to be super fast? if it can't efficiently perform reg trans how will it do 2.0 type functions?

3.  looks like the anon trans worked on the testnet. did everything look as it should on the testnet block explorer? is there even a testnet exp yet? will theses anon transactions be implemented in rev1 on sun or is that feature 3-4 weeks away. in 3-4 weeks the  Dual Path anon feature will be implemented right? can someone post a roadmap.

4. why are people focused on the logo more than if the tech actually works. seems a bit like misplaced priorities. guess they have full confidence in the dev.

5. what is the fix for the xnodes possibly stealing coins?

[policymaker]

I absolutely think that new forum should be readable by EVERY1 but only serious/senior members should be allowed to reply only.

I also believe that EVERY1 should be given a chance to be promoted, and if community thinks he starts fud/bitching w/e, a poll be created and members vote whether he stays or goes.


Again: constructive critisism to improve coin is welcome, FUD/trolling is not. Thats why I suggest the poll/voting system. Too much work? Perhaps. But transparent, efficient, fair.

[ballzdeep]

Should've kept the original forum. Things settled down after a few days. This new moderated thread already added confusion and doubt among other visitors. Now, blocking new people from seeing or writing content is a terrible idea. You will annihilate FUD-ers and some of the newcomers too.

I agree, remove moderate or move back old thread....

[Grifftech]

I think with a true forum it will be much easier to moderate as things will not be in one giant thread and you can't keep non-sense out once it has been quoted and the like

[Teka]

Should've kept the original forum. Things settled down after a few days. This new moderated thread already added confusion and doubt among other visitors. Now, blocking new people from seeing or writing content is a terrible idea. You will annihilate FUD-ers and some of the newcomers too.

I agree, remove moderate or move back old thread....

Once the new forum is done this thread won't be moderated.

[stealth923]

I know there are many XC investors who are curious of why the dev paid loljosh 0.7btc.  I have seen some posts from XC'ers asking about it and within minutes it gets deleted.  

He bought premium homegrown hydroponic marijuana, a few grams of pure cocaine and threw a party. A jealous neighbor that wasnt invited to appreciate all that delicious coke started spreading FUD from that day on.

Yes i can testify that this is true because i was at the party.

I for one really would like an honest answer from the XC dev to close this once and for all.

The answers have been so vague like he is trying to hide something. "No I didn't pay loljosh for the Xnode code". That's not what we are asking.

Did you pay loljosh 0.7btc to provide you with anything directly or in-directly associated with this coin. Yes or No. If yes, provide details.  

If it was 0.7btc to buy some beer from him, the no worries.

If it was to provide the code base for the coin to work I.e coingen. We as investors have a right To know.

Thank you and look forward to your response.

Can you please add this to the list of questions.
Thanks

[benthach]

forking issues still not fix and is not anon after all;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.2140

sale point is already failed and the bagholders still pumping like crazy!

DRK still trying to resolve their forking issues - https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/

No coin will be 100% anonymous, not dark not XC not monero.

Maybe in the future, but not realistic for now.

All that is being done is add layers of "smoke", but nothing is truly anonymous for at least months to come.

from what i know Darkcoin claimed to be anonymous now dev say it's not anonymous after all, included you.

[Karlheinz1]

Should've kept the original forum. Things settled down after a few days. This new moderated thread already added confusion and doubt among other visitors. Now, blocking new people from seeing or writing content is a terrible idea. You will annihilate FUD-ers and some of the newcomers too.

I agree, remove moderate or move back old thread....

Once the new forum is done this thread won't be moderated.

I would like to have this thread moderated still for the next month. I appreciate it must be a full time job though. Just my opinion.

[Brilliantrocket]

forking issues still not fix and is not anon after all;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.2140

sale point is already failed and the bagholders still pumping like crazy!

DRK still trying to resolve their forking issues - https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/

No coin will be 100% anonymous, not dark not XC not monero.

Maybe in the future, but not realistic for now.

All that is being done is add layers of "smoke", but nothing is truly anonymous for at least months to come.

from what i know Darkcoin claimed to be anonymous now dev say it's not anonymous after all, included you.

Well, if you want to be anal about it, true anonymity is impossible. You're always one of N transactions.

[Karlheinz1]

Well, if you want to be anal about it, true anonymity is impossible. You're always one of N transactions.

I thought that was your speciality? 

[evtrmm]

http://coincraft.info:2750/tx/92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d

Transaction from youtube video.

sent to address was:
msJQ   something.  you can see that in the video and I cannot find it in my wallet?    I had to look at the video.


Sent from was:
mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85



quick edit:  I have not had the opportunity to examine this in the block explorer, so let me know what is found.

[roede94105]

XC testnet blockexplorer seems to be up again, for those interested: http://coincraft.info:2750/chain/XCTestnet

now the trolls are quiet because they can't think of anything else, than wrong code etc. this pretty much confirms the code is real.

Hey Phil, I already posted this in the self moderated thread but I'll post it here as well.
Can you provide the Transaction ID of the "anonymous" Youtube video transaction? Just want to check to make sure it coincides with the blockchain.

bump. let's enjoy the working explorer to get this answered once for all

[benthach]

Well, if you want to be anal about it, true anonymity is impossible. You're always one of N transactions.

I thought that was your speciality? 

Dark sale point is already failed.

[mojun7982]

Forum is nearly done...

\o/

All new members will be manually vetted

The vetted is not a good idea. Should be open to all.

Only flattery, no objections？
Looks like the Communist Party of China

No people who actually have real concerns not fud will be added. Users will have to post in newbie or request to join the Jr. member group. No users will be able to even read other posts until they join the forum.

Please do not.
This is not good for the development of XC.
Please consider carefully.

I will consider changing to they will be able to see other posts. This thread will unmoderated from the new forum onwards.

Vetting works for me, but I would rather the forum not be hidden.

Good or bad, should be judged by the people themselves

Feedback noted, people will be able to read posts.

OMG! Are you sure about this? I think you are crazy