[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[chaeplin]

If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ?
After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty.
Lets wait and see IF this is true at all

No luck, pattern.

XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine.

Sent 0.1 XC to XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 by sendfrommixer

Code:

sendfrommixer mixer XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 0.1

Please find out what is the sent address? If you need more information, let me know.

I will go to have a shower and check your result later.

@chaeplin, could you please reveal my sender address to your address XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8?

XGi2KfLRLLMergb2iepfdY4QUcWBnKnfEZ

[studio1one]

I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

People like you harm the coin more than people like him.

[Grifftech]

Just finished adding XC to http://cryptocoinstats.com

awesome, thanks

[atcsecure]

/quote]

You use same amount for test.

Can't tell. 2 address popup.

post the 2 address's

Oh my bad.. Just one

XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn


This one also used XXPwPgua2u7Psa6PCR6noHR7XrsyRVfh1x

But main is XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn

thats not the address I used

Could you post the used address, and do the test with chaeplin again please.
[/quote]

I'm setting up a fresh wallet for a new test.. will post the TX ID# in a few minutes for this test

[evtrmm]

To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

[Grifftech]

I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

People like you harm the coin more than people like him.

lol

[Reese212]

I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

unbelievably clever to offend People trying to verify your code.. please don't do that, it only hurts the community

[BADASS]

https://i.imgur.com/ujB8qYz.gif

[illodin]

Would you rather know sooner or later?

I'm still undecided.

[tat123]

Seriously guys. Let them do the test without the bs. This is needed.

[tuneman1980]

Just finished adding XC to http://cryptocoinstats.com

awesome, thanks

No problem.  Just keep in mind that the metrics will improve as the sample size grows.

[520Bit]

If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ?
After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty.
Lets wait and see IF this is true at all

No luck, pattern.

XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine.

Sent 0.1 XC to XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 by sendfrommixer

Code:

sendfrommixer mixer XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 0.1

Please find out what is the sent address? If you need more information, let me know.

I will go to have a shower and check your result later.

@chaeplin, could you please reveal my sender address to your address XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8?

XGi2KfLRLLMergb2iepfdY4QUcWBnKnfEZ

XGi2KfLRLLMergb2iepfdY4QUcWBnKnfEZ is the correct sender address I used.

@atcsecure, do you need more details to find the root cause?

[studio1one]

I want moderation off.

Who cares what you want. I want you to tongue shovel my stink ditch, doesn't mean it will happen.

People like you harm the coin more than people like him.

lol

whats funny?

Chaeplin is doing useful testing. You are giving out abuse.

Who is helping and who is hindering.

[chaeplin]

To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

At least 4 confirmation needed.

[atcsecure]

To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

this detail would reveal source but not destination

but the key question is documenting that this transaction is linked on the block chain, from A to B to C - I haven't seen any proof of that

[nioccoin]

I agree 100%, I want this kind of feedback and data to resolve any issues, we need real world testing to improve the product

Is there a specific area in which you most need testing?

[ethereal73]

/quote]

You use same amount for test.

Can't tell. 2 address popup.

post the 2 address's

Oh my bad.. Just one

XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn


This one also used XXPwPgua2u7Psa6PCR6noHR7XrsyRVfh1x

But main is XQqodNaA329XvdCUCWuj924zFhkWh5uKpn

thats not the address I used

Could you post the used address, and do the test with chaeplin again please.

I'm setting up a fresh wallet for a new test.. will post the TX ID# in a few minutes for this test
[/quote]

Please post the used address, Chaeplin should be able to verified it the way he want.

[atcsecure]

What chaplin is doing is very basic. He is vetting the blockchain for the transaction amount -0.00001 transaction fee.
Just as an example:
So lets say an amount of 1 XC was sent on block 2135. It will be split and sent to 1 mixer address in multiple payments. What happens next is another mixer address sends 0.99999 to the intended address.
 What he does is then looks in future blocks for an address that received a total amount of 0.99999 and bam he gets it.

I have a system in mind that I can share with the atcsecure if he wants but it should rather be done in an irc page where we can have a flowing conversation.

Yes so in this release we are NOT splitting the output, the code will be in v1.37, v1.37 will split the outputs randomly as well to stop this type of analysis

this is an easy fix

[evtrmm]

To:
XXJCmtW5GEbRRuCh1zhm9WmS1srAuvLSS8
Amount: 3.5 XC

TX 1
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.60939 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.6094 XC
Transaction ID: 762a501de8291ad89e7fabaea30d0a37c8def9be99eb08305ef02f372e4a204b

TX 2
Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -0.25943 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.25944 XC
Transaction ID: 79047709d2c3d75f503cabc15a94307bb5fdef6ef62b55d34685aec401c68927

TX3
Status: 1/unconfirmed, broadcast through 11 nodes
Date: 6/3/2014 10:29
To: XGp6HDkdBjwQunrH2kozC5C4fkcdN8WtpZ
Debit: -2.63118 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -2.63119 XC
Transaction ID: 1e60d662de180030af137fb918129050017a8db58e21999950fb72d468ee7c28



I will give info on this shortly.

At least 4 confirmation needed.

5 of 6 now

probably stupid being that I sent the coins form that address.....  bah.

[illodin]

split the outputs randomly

Is this the multi-path part of the protocol?