Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 10:17:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 1628 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1483644 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:38:20 PM
 #3221

Ask not what the coin can do for you - but what u can do for the coin !

Hey!  That's from my favorite prez.... Nakamoto !!!   Grin
1715077041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715077041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715077041
Reply with quote  #2

1715077041
Report to moderator
1715077041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715077041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715077041
Reply with quote  #2

1715077041
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715077041
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715077041

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715077041
Reply with quote  #2

1715077041
Report to moderator
mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 419
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:39:20 PM
 #3222

Price hasn't been boring like this loong time... no fireworks, no nothing ? What's up with the bet Smiley ?

I guess all the power is at DRK now...
greyskies
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:44:01 PM
 #3223


Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?
CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:44:49 PM
 #3224


Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

Does DRK have a decentralized multi-path anonymizer that any users can run from their wallet without 10 years+ of IT/Linux experience to setup a Masternode just so they don't get hacked?  

I don't recall that...

Kai Proctor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:48:14 PM
 #3225


Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?

No, DarkSend works, you can use it right now, only the payment of the masternodes has been postponed to mid-June.

PS: No FUD intended it's just fun to deduct the real sender from a mixed transaction.
studio1one
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 500


BintexFutures


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:48:26 PM
 #3226

ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


I hold DRK and I hold XC


I evangelise for neither. I just want the tech behind my coins to be as good as possible, if people break it all the better. Then the dev knows what needs to be fixed.

Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.

BINTEX


















Powered by,
benthach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 09:49:26 PM
 #3227

Wait for 30days and if not staking then post again

Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?

reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
Slaxt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250

Gone......


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:51:13 PM
 #3228


Then people should not repeat that XC delivered now where dark hasn't.
One has to choose between what you say (which makes a lot more sense), and what they do.

DRK masternodes don't work at the moment because the node payment system caused a fork last week. Do I need to link you to the DRK dev's official testing topic where's he's trying to sort it out?

No, DarkSend works, you can use it right now, only the payment of the masternodes has been postponed to mid-June.

PS: No FUD intended it's just fun to deduct the real sender from a mixed transaction.
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-price-turmoil-network-issues-emergency-fork/

TC is the worse thing to happen to default, needs to open his eyes and not jump to conclusions, not everyone lies!!! Anyway as promised I have left, pass word changed to long random which I will forget like that plonker who ruined a perfectly fine account.
Samuray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 291
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:51:40 PM
 #3229

Hello!
For some reson the coins in my wallet r not staking.
I am using last version of wallet and it says your wight is XXXX expected reward is in X hours.(for the past couple of days)
what should I do?

you should wait. the Minimum stake time is 8hrs, the Maximum stake time is up to 30 days. XC was released couple days ago - it can take up to 30 days before your coins begin staking. just wait and don't move them and have the wallet sometimes "opened for minting". opening a encrypted wallet for minting can be done in 2 ways:
a) decrypt the wallet (not so cool and not necessarry)
b) goto help --> debug window --> console  and enter this text: walletpassphrase "your wallet Password without the quotes" 99999999 true

a) fully opens your wallet and b) leaves your wallet encrypted but allows it to stake
Hey! Thanks for the quick answer !
Yes my wallet is ecnrypted and curently unlocked for minting ! I guess i-ll wait some more! Smiley

atcsecure
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 09:53:14 PM
 #3230

ok people listen...

I will pay 0.1 BTC to ONE person who FIRSTLY identify sender address called "1" until tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT)

tomorrow 10:00 AM NY TIME (EDT) or a bit later I post some screenshots of my wallet and transactions...

see what happens
time went... tic tic tic

and btw sorry for my bad English if my English is bad =)

it's working people wooohooo!  Grin
I send 1 real XC to address XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 using:
Code:
walletpassphrase <my password> 60
sendfrommixer "1" XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71 1.0
now try to find my fucking sender address  Grin

dev...
you are a saint  Cool

IMPORTANT:
post your answers on topic (NOT PM)

just a quick guess:
http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF

I find XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF too :
XLXKRnecfvnN6RRtLqM9isygJWWUPTdeSF
sent 0.99999
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c9b6414f9b6cc03a97df485e74bee1fef063f2c66e7ec76839931e522846e8f8#i0
going thru
XVjyeCBgZWfLTjGJxZoa8UE9DYNfRSMCgV
http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/30e6bbf5df8cb9f36a149cfecac959dd7028fd0897b39af2f916b4a20be178d7#i2
To go to
XSQYYwgVVYoGyc23NCTcCvQRCNiidarU71

I don't know if you guys really want to play this game just yet.

ATCSecure has always said that this is just a coinmixer and not "NSA" level type anonymity.   His rev 3 will get to that level.  

If somehow, the answer is correct, you guys will just create a lot of FUD that ATCSecure never said rev 1 will deliver....

you mean. No one should test the anonymity in case they can break it?

bit of an odd way to approach a feature set. In my line of work we have always tested code as hard as we possibly can until it broke. Then we knew how to make it better.


I hold DRK and I hold XC


I evangelise for neither. I just want the tech behind my coins to be as good as possible, if people break it all the better. Then the dev knows what needs to be fixed.

Sure you should test it, but don't take it like it's an official representation of what XC will ultimately deliver at the end.   The test is on the sending of it arriving at the destination, not on how "secure" or "anonymous" the final XC will deliver.  

Everyone knows  that coin mixing isn't 100% anonymous and ATCSecure have already said that for rev 1, it's just a generic mixer that won't deliver 100% anonymity.   DRK trolls will run with this and FUD this to death.   There is no need to create FUD for them.   Now, if REV3 anonymity fails, then that's a different story.


This is good data and actually a very simple fix, which will be included in v1.36....

Thank you!

Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
CryptoClub
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


cryptocollectorsclub.com


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:55:09 PM
 #3231

Price hasn't been boring like this loong time... no fireworks, no nothing ? What's up with the bet Smiley ?

I guess all the power is at DRK now...

It took months for DRK to get where it is. Really, just look at where XC is in weeks. Impressive is an understatement!

Additionally, the FUD on all sides is annoying, to put it mildly, and I actually own DRK and XC as they have the most potential right now. DRK will either be even more successful and eventually people will be too afraid of the price, and XC will be a great choice, or DRK falls some and XC is a great choice. Easy for me to diversify in the best coins out there since that is always what I do. FYI: Cryptonote clones are not even in the race as anyone can clone another one, and "Bytecoin" will never win anything.

...
MiningMinion
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 225
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:56:33 PM
 #3232

I'm on block 23420 in the updated windows wallet.


Do I have to wait a certain time period before my coins stake?


thats the correct block


Yes staking is random and can take up to 30days

So staking begins randomly anywhere from 8hours to 30days.  Does it matter how many coins I have whether I have 100 or 10,000 coins?

I've already updated wallet to 1.33 and is unlocked. When I highlight the minting lcon, it says that I'm minting, but stake is still 0.00.
weedsmoke420
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:56:49 PM
 #3233

The bounty for the logo is now 200XC

a Logo design in 99design website is 299 Dollars:

http://99designs.com/launch

I would give the 200 plus XCs to them rather than Amateours if nothing good is found and it seems you can organize contests there Why we just do not move the Contest in that website so? and we can give exposure to the contest to more designers that hopefully are professional as well?

What do you think?

We need a full identity package not just a logo. Something that is put together as a whole and not piecemeal. I am sorry but you are not going ot get that with a contest nor do I think we will get that from 99design.

I work with people who do this on a daily basis and have the means to deliver what we need.  I have extended an offer to the dev to have this done at no cost to the community or the dev and am awaiting his reply.

I agree on this also would be nice to hear from ATC and the community maybe they can enter the contest for the logo as a start? I have a friend as well that I contacted but he is not into crypto and busy as shit

Dude the devs aren't open to a name change, I've been trying to push this idea. 'that other coin' name changed FROM our one currently, and fucking did very well. Like seriously XClouds sounds damn good, its marketable, easily design able, and revolves around the idea of decentralization and mesh networking. Also you could have a motto on the coin/logo that said 'XClouds ... Transfer Anonymous' to hit BOTH key points of the coin.

Nah yo fuck that, well call it two letters, xc

like what?

No disrespect I'm sure the developers have a grasp on the situation but I mean come on.

Listen to flume and xxyyxx4agUdtime
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:58:51 PM
 #3234

Forum installed so hopefully it will be finished tomorrow. There will be a Q&A sections where users can mark the best answer

For example:

PeterPalmBeach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


SellALL, BuyBTC


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:02:01 PM
 #3235

Forum installed so hopefully it will be finished tomorrow. There will be a Q&A sections where users can mark the best answer

For example:



z best answer
sfc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:03:20 PM
 #3236

The bounty for the logo is now 200XC

a Logo design in 99design website is 299 Dollars:

http://99designs.com/launch

I would give the 200 plus XCs to them rather than Amateours if nothing good is found and it seems you can organize contests there Why we just do not move the Contest in that website so? and we can give exposure to the contest to more designers that hopefully are professional as well?

What do you think?

We need a full identity package not just a logo. Something that is put together as a whole and not piecemeal. I am sorry but you are not going ot get that with a contest nor do I think we will get that from 99design.

I work with people who do this on a daily basis and have the means to deliver what we need.  I have extended an offer to the dev to have this done at no cost to the community or the dev and am awaiting his reply.

I agree on this also would be nice to hear from ATC and the community maybe they can enter the contest for the logo as a start? I have a friend as well that I contacted but he is not into crypto and busy as shit

Dude the devs aren't open to a name change, I've been trying to push this idea. 'that other coin' name changed FROM our one currently, and fucking did very well. Like seriously XClouds sounds damn good, its marketable, easily design able, and revolves around the idea of decentralization and mesh networking. Also you could have a motto on the coin/logo that said 'XClouds ... Transfer Anonymous' to hit BOTH key points of the coin.

Nah yo fuck that, well call it two letters, xc

like what?

No disrespect I'm sure the developers have a grasp on the situation but I mean come on.

+1 it s not good that we cannot discuss a namechange openly. there might be a lot work to do but without identity who knows what u are workin on? xcloud is pretty cool if it wasn t taken already.
tr8kr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:04:19 PM
 #3237

Forum installed so hopefully it will be finished tomorrow. There will be a Q&A sections where users can mark the best answer

For example:



Good work teka that's a nice way to get a quick answer !
kewlya
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:05:11 PM
 #3238

i downloaded last wallet, it synced in less than 5 minutes and i withdraw 50 xc from mintpal. got the XC in my wallet in about 10 minutes
atcsecure
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 10:06:03 PM
 #3239


Updated wallet available - for XNODE and XCLIENT users

http://xc-official.com/release/wallets/

grap v1.35 of the wallet - windows users only - Mac XNODE and XCLIENT coming soon



User Guides

http://xc-official.com/XCPlatform/user_guides/




Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
Reese212
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:06:30 PM
 #3240

I'm on block 23420 in the updated windows wallet.


Do I have to wait a certain time period before my coins stake?


thats the correct block


Yes staking is random and can take up to 30days

So staking begins randomly anywhere from 8hours to 30days.  Does it matter how many coins I have whether I have 100 or 10,000 coins?

I've already updated wallet to 1.33 and is unlocked. When I highlight the minting lcon, it says that I'm minting, but stake is still 0.00.


yes, randomly from 8hrs up to 30days. i am pretty sure (but i don't know exactly) that it matters in a way how many coins you own. I think that because if it didn't matter then i couldn't understand what the "weight" should tell me. and you are not allowed to move coins around different wallets/exchanges if you want them to stake. if moving around then you reset the "staking-timer".
example:
-you have got 100000coins (100k)
-you don't move them around
-stake interest is 3.3%/year
-that means you get 3300coins/year if you leave them staking in your wallet
- that means 275/month roughly

Dear Lord, please grant me the ability...
Pages: « 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 [162] 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 ... 1628 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!