Bitcoin Forum
July 10, 2024, 06:32:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 1628 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1483651 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:06:01 PM
 #3701

Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?

If you lie, it doesn't make him wrong Wink

But the point is you can't prove that I'm lying.  If you were able to prove I was lying, then you truly cracked the anonymity feature.
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:08:01 PM
 #3702


Well... I don't think it would be fair for me enter.
BADASS
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:09:36 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2014, 05:20:31 PM by BADASS
 #3703

I'm sure you could enter Teka.  Cheesy
No biggy.

https://i.imgur.com/ujB8qYz.gif
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:10:19 PM
 #3704


Well... I don't think it would be fair for me enter.

when does the contest end anyway , can we already vote?
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:11:17 PM
 #3705


Well... I don't think it would be fair for me enter.

when does the contest end anyway , can we already vote?

Today 23:59GMT
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:13:10 PM
 #3706


Well... I don't think it would be fair for me enter.

when does the contest end anyway , can we already vote?

Today 23:59GMT

ok thanks
JesstersDead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


I forgot where I put my wallet.dat


View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 05:13:16 PM
 #3707

Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

Yes and no.  If you can't prove it's my address then it can be denied. If I just say your guess is wrong, then what?

If you lie, it doesn't make him wrong Wink

But the point is you can't prove that I'm lying.  If you were able to prove I was lying, then you truly cracked the anonymity feature.

Your basing the concept of an anonymous transaction on the idea that the tracking party would even need verification from you in the first place. What if they never ask if they are right or not?

A third party with no interaction with yourself would not be inclined to ask you if they were right or not. The NSA or other Acronym Agency is not going to ask you if they guessed it correctly or not. At which point, the burden of proof would be on you. IE: Prove it isn't the address.

Again, lying does not change the validity of the guess. It just makes you a liar.

Cryptsy.com - USD markets coming soon. Go validate your account now!
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:16:13 PM
 #3708

wait for the next update from dev,

after Anon feature work smoothly and Xnode also works smoothly, everything will change.
elviselvis101
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 573
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:17:52 PM
 #3709

need help to sync after updating;  its stuck at 203 blocks missing;

addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=162.243.109.24

This from wallet:

blocks" : 23288,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 5205.79639598,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 40851533731,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false

Get info;

"version" : "v0.9.1.5x11-coin-1.0",
"protocolversion" : 71002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
JesstersDead
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


I forgot where I put my wallet.dat


View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 05:18:06 PM
 #3710

wait for the next update from dev,

after Anon feature work smoothly and Xnode also works smoothly, everything will change.

+1 I have no doubt at all about this Smiley

Cryptsy.com - USD markets coming soon. Go validate your account now!
nioccoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:18:58 PM
 #3711

Guys, Chaeplin did in fact find the sender address. Whether he wants to share his process or not, that point cannot be refuted. It would be nice if he did, but that is neither here nor there. Resorting to personal attacks is not going to change anything besides making you look childish. He did it, now the dev knows it can be done, and he can find a solution. End of story. Smiley

Do you even understand that he just waited in the block explorer for an address to receive that amount?

That's just stupid. There are too few transactions for the moment.


Of course I do...

BUT, the community asked for the test. Even the dev put him up to it. If everyone knows how he did it, why give two shits whether he explains it or not? I don't see how arguing, whining, or complaining about it is advancing the discussion in the slightest.


The idea is to test if it can be tracked, not guessed...lol Smiley
That's why he tested it in a stupid way

He guessed.... what's your point. If you guess on a test and get it correct. It is no less correct. At this point you are criticizing the process, not the outcome. Which again, does nothing to further the discussion since everyone appears to already know the means why which he came to his answer.

The point isn't so much whether it is correct or not, but if it's repeatable, and under what conditions.  Guesses may be correct, but they aren't reliable.  If they were, vegas wouldn't be there.

Testing is retesting.  To test a guess, you need the methodology.  If the methodology is replicable, then you should be able to repeat the guess several times, and at that point it ceases to become a guess.

KimmyF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 978
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:23:52 PM
 #3712

Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
No, delete nothing!
Just remind Cheaplin about this post he made today: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7109580#msg7109580 (help Dev.)

For now it looks to me he just scanned a couple of next blocks & combined some deposits till they added up to the original sum - 2x fee on the same address.

But (just for now) there could be a link we are missing, learn first & talk. We all have our own way, lets respect each other
Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:27:07 PM
 #3713

Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
No, delete nothing!
Just remind Cheaplin about this post he made today: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7109580#msg7109580 (help Dev.)

For now it looks to me he just scanned a couple of next blocks & combined some deposits till they added up to the original sum - 2x fee on the same address.

But (just for now) there could be a link we are missing, learn first & talk. We all have our own way, lets respect each other


I said that if his post is constructive it will stay.
KimmyF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 978
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:31:46 PM
 #3714

Teka, can you just delete anything Chaeplin has to say. He can PM atcsecure if he wishes to actually prove his claims but I don't think there is any reason to allow him to continue to toss FUD grenades around the thread.
No, delete nothing!
Just remind Cheaplin about this post he made today: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7109580#msg7109580 (help Dev.)

For now it looks to me he just scanned a couple of next blocks & combined some deposits till they added up to the original sum - 2x fee on the same address.

But (just for now) there could be a link we are missing, learn first & talk. We all have our own way, lets respect each other


I said that if his post is constructive it will stay.
Some (if not most) people will learn you new things by explaining them to you, some will push you to find the solution yourself.
Second way is better imo
chaeplin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:37:27 PM
 #3715

To XC community people.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7112753#msg7112753

I should learn more english.
getmining.info
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:40:57 PM
 #3716

To XC community people.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7112753#msg7112753

I should learn more english.

It's al-right mate, you did a good job. Loads of people here are a bit too quick.

All views are my own, except those that I have subconsciously inherited from my parents and those that I have nicked from far cleverer people.
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:43:05 PM
 #3717

To XC community people.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7112753#msg7112753

I should learn more english.

Since you did get the first one right I will send the 50XC I said I would. Please post your XC addy.
qawzsx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:45:16 PM
 #3718

To XC community people.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7112753#msg7112753

I should learn more english.

It's al-right mate, you did a good job. Loads of people here are a bit too quick.


He did a good job about what?
Seem you don't get what the test is about...

Show me that the transaction can be traced to an address, don't lookup to the address in a blockchain with few transactions, and guess the transaction based on the transferred amount and on the time.

That's just stupid...

He did no job...just some stupid FUD

Its no point in being able to guess an address when there are so few transactions, if you're not able to do so when the blockchain will contain lots of transactions...which will make tracing impossible.


Its like saying ... "yo test this car for me...it does not have all the wheels now, but it will have them..."
And the tester say ... "well, the car will not move...the idea of a car its flawed..."
cryptodaknight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:45:29 PM
 #3719

Love this coin, keep up the great work developers. Not many coins I'd invest in, but gotta say this one is great.
Grifftech
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 05:45:52 PM
 #3720

To XC community people.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7112753#msg7112753

I should learn more english.

In response to what you posted,  How can you tell? What method did you use to determine your end result? Post this so the community can see and verify its repeatability.
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 1628 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!