[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[CrazyLeoW]

Chaeplin is actually helping the coin, not hindering it.

It's like some of you don't want any testing or questioning, because you're scared of the price of your bag.

I'm holding a lot too and the only way the coin will move forwards is by rigorous testing.

Guess what, I hold DRK too. Am I now banned from the cult?

+1. Potential bug must be found and fixed before success.

[1714948569]

1714948569

[1714948569]

1714948569

[provenceday]

Chaeplin is actually helping the coin, not hindering it.

It's like some of you don't want any testing or questioning, because you're scared of the price of your bag.

I'm holding a lot too and the only way the coin will move forwards is by rigorous testing.

Guess what, I hold DRK too. Am I now banned from the cult?

+1. Potential bug must be found and fixed before success.

also Chaeplin is somehow the 3rd dev in dark community, so he is capable for doing many tests.

welcome all feedback on the potential bugs, so we can fix this in next update.

[provenceday]

XC China community can join the XC coin QQ group.
XC 中国社区，欢迎大家的加入，致力于推动XC在中国的发展。
负责联系中国的虚拟货币行业的媒体和相关的交易平台。

QQ group: 246338769

here is the link:

http://jq.qq.com/?_wv=1027&k=RoKiLg


focus on promoting XC coin in china and contact chinese social media and chinese main exchange platform.

[CrazyLeoW]

this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid )

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

[provenceday]

this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid )

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.

[520Bit]

this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid )

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.

I reserved some XCs to help the test. I would like to try next release and if somebody could reveal the sender address.

[CrazyLeoW]

this is a scam, does not even have the related source code published...

Code is based on MintCoin, which is an old generation of pow/pos code, does not have many recent pos fixes.

Dude, you are stupid )

you definitely are, as you don't even know what I am talking about. Let dev or someone knows the context answer this.

This project is far from a scam, numerous updates have already been released, and actually it does have some of the PoS fix's, REV2 will have an updated core.  The related source code will be released in the future, if your not interested in the project then don't get involved.  

Hi ATC and all XC holders,
I strongly suggest that the anon design should be reviewed publicly. You know any system design(at least high level design) should be reviewed by other DEVs/QAs before being implemented, otherwise the design might have vulnerability.
Chaeplin just gave us a Red Alarm.
Take action.

yes, so we need a public test.

I guess something happened as below: (forgive me if I were wrong LOL just guess since I don't know the design)
Start, A wants send 1 XC to C, and B is mixer;
A sends 1 XC to B's input address(B-Addr-input);
B waits enough confirm......just wait.....
B gets enough confirm for 1 XC and "split" the 1 XC to 0.9 and 0.1, two parts;
B sends 0.9 XC from its output address B-Addr-Output-No.1 to C;
B sends 0.1 XC from its output address B-Addr-Output-No.2 to C;     (I don't know what relationship the input and output wallet address of B might have)
C gets 2 incoming XC trans from the 2 address above.

Someone could find out the start time of the two incoming trans and search the block chain, finally he will find out just before the 2 trans, there's a trans for 1XC(== 0.9 + 0.1), and he find the sender.
I don't know how does Chaeplin find the relationship between input address and output address of Mixer B.
Seems it's not so anon if the mixer just split the original amount of transaction. it should do some make up job, right? And the input address and output address must not have any link.
Maybe there's too few mixer ATM and DEV should pay attention on this.

[benthach]

to make a coin anonymous the block need to be random number, but it would be hard to track anything or fork would be difficult to fix and explorer would be hard for stalkers to take a glam. random block number would be easier for pow/pos coin then mineable coin. this would be perfect for XC or even DRK, when dark moving to pos

[provenceday]

it seems the block moves slow, how can we speed up the block?

[BADASS]

Dev will work this out, few people starting to get worried over nothing.
These bugs will be ironed out soon enough and we will be back #1
Who needs drugs or a woman when you have crypto to shake all your senses.
Price fall will only last about another 1-1.5 hrs get your cheap XC now.

[marseille]

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

[provenceday]

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

check the ANN post and peer review.

[provenceday]

XC China community can join the XC coin QQ group.
XC 中国社区，欢迎大家的加入，致力于推动XC在中国的发展。
负责联系中国的虚拟货币行业的媒体和相关的交易平台。

QQ group: 246338769

here is the link:

http://jq.qq.com/?_wv=1027&k=RoKiLg


focus on promoting XC coin in china and contact chinese social media and chinese main exchange platform.

join us.

[Taner]

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

[benthach]

stop this nonsense crap, it's only make you look dumb. a working coin can't just copy a few lines from other coin and make it perfect. none of the mixer is working at this moment, XC, Dark, Coinjoin or even Fedora.

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

[marseille]

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

check the ANN post and peer review.

But is it open source? If I compile from the source, I get a different featured client than the one posted in OP, never seen another coin like this.

[marseille]

stop this nonsense crap, it's only make you look dumb. a working coin can't just copy a few lines from other coin and make it perfect. none of the mixer is working at this moment, XC, Dark, Coinjoin or even Fedora.

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

You are simply a stupid sheep having no brain. Because many people like you making this alt coin space like it is today. What can I say?

I did not say XC copied everything, I said he copied the mixer announcement system, that system does not make a coin anonymous, it does not even mix the send. It is simply an announcement system. Do you know what I am talking about? Do you see the code??

[benthach]

you moron is just dumb. copy fedora blah blah blah, did you just read the post somewhere? now go hold your bag.

stop this nonsense crap, it's only make you look dumb. a working coin can't just copy a few lines from other coin and make it perfect. none of the mixer is working at this moment, XC, Dark, Coinjoin or even Fedora.

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

You are simply a stupid sheep having no brain. Because many people like you making this alt coin space like it is today. What can I say?

[BADASS]

He's not stupid he is just uneducated - Inform him guys no need to beat him up, he did say he only heard it through the grapevine.
We all were noobs at some stage.

[cyberhacker]

stop this nonsense crap, it's only make you look dumb. a working coin can't just copy a few lines from other coin and make it perfect. none of the mixer is working at this moment, XC, Dark, Coinjoin or even Fedora.

all the new wallets but no new source?? dev try to hide the code? heard he copied Fedora's mixer announcement system...

You are simply a stupid sheep having no brain. Because many people like you making this alt coin space like it is today. What can I say?

I did not say XC copied everything, I said he copied the mixer announcement system, that system does not make a coin anonymous, it does not even mix the send. It is simply an announcement system. Do you know what I am talking about? Do you see the code??

why ppl can be so stupid??? keeping asking shitty questions but never bothering to looking back few pages back.