[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[philipvdlinde]

I am happy to own 1150 of these babies (up from 465) , they are all I could afford with my small amount of BTC, but I know the potential of XC and thats why I will be holding this coin for a long time to come.

[Profetu]

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

[evtrmm]

the hourly says "GO"

[evtrmm]

Hey a lot of things happening in the background with this coin,dumpers will feel really silly later.
I'm part of the XC Foundation and have been featured on the World Crypto Network on youtube.

Glad to have you.
so what is going on with the Foundation?

[silverkinguk]

The Foundation's main goals are to bring XC into the mainstream.
XC is still in it's early days of development but we plan to in time follow through with the objectives set in the mission statement.For now enjoy the cheap XC values.
 I myself with a business partner will be helping with the ATM/POS adoption of XC as we have experience with bringing UK first two way Bitcoin ATM in London:

http://www.coindesk.com/robocoin-machine-heats-competition-londons-bitcoin-atms/

[dadon]

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

there may be a problem, and it's small, but you must be delusional if you think cheplin is trying to help us, he is doing his best to find flaws in XC not so we can improve it, but to hurt it, because he is invested in DRK, he may of identified important flaws, even though this is rev 1 and the Dev said from the get go rev 1 would not be 100% anon, but this is not because he has a kind heart and wants to help us, the suggestion of this makes me roll my eyes....rev 2 it will be fixed, and all the drk boys will have to actually work harder  on there product more instead of slapping it together calling them selves king,and slandering any competition that comes along, i'm not concerned still only a month old and we are neck to neck with drk that is 6 months old, so cheplin and all your sad little friends, best think of a better attack plan, concentrate on improving your own product because frankly it's a piece of shit that doesn't work, and Evan just used to get rich off, and soon after rev 2 and you can't trace the transactions anymore, you will have nothing but slanderous tweets to save your sorry excuse for cryto innovation, i would just dump and buy XC because seriously nothing can save DRK.

[policymaker]

The Foundation's main goals are to bring XC into the mainstream.
XC is still in it's early days of development but we plan to in time follow through with the objectives set in the mission statement.For now enjoy the cheap XC values.
 I myself with a business partner will be helping with the ATM/POS adoption of XC as we have experience with bringing UK first two way Bitcoin ATM in London:

http://www.coindesk.com/robocoin-machine-heats-competition-londons-bitcoin-atms/

oh thats a really nice update, are u the PR team atsecure was talking about or different project alltogether?

[silverkinguk]

PR team is different but am in touch with PizPie who is helping with the social network aspects of XC.
My main company is a connected with Crowdfunding for various projects that accepts Bitcoins currently.

[hoertest]

PR team is different but am in touch with PizPie who is helping with the social network aspects of XC.

so there is a dedicated PR team , thats good to hear, any more hints on whats going on in the background?

[silverkinguk]

That's all I know for now.Encrypted messaging sounds good to me.

[Profetu]

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

there may be a problem, and it's small, but you must be delusional if you think cheplin is trying to help us, he is doing his best to find flaws in XC not so we can improve it, but to hurt it, because he is invested in DRK, he may of identified important flaws, even though this is rev 1 and the Dev said from the get go rev 1 would not be 100% anon, but this is not because he has a kind heart and wants to help us, the suggestion of this makes me roll my eyes....rev 2 it will be fixed, and all the drk boys will have to actually work harder  on there product more instead of slapping it together calling them selves king,and slandering any competition that comes along, i'm not concerned still only a month old and we are neck to neck with drk that is 6 months old, so cheplin and all your sad little friends, best think of a better attack plan, concentrate on improving your own product because frankly it's a piece of shit that doesn't work, and Evan just used to get rich off, and soon after rev 2 and you can't trace the transactions anymore, you will have nothing but slanderous tweets to save your sorry excuse for cryto innovation, i would just dump and buy XC because seriously nothing can save DRK.

So besides "but DARK..." and "this is only REV1" "arguments"(that you used again) you brought a 3rd great "argument" : "the guy has a DARK motive and hes not trying to help". Why the hell does that matter? Facts are facts. The guy spent his time proving a bug while you smucks were crying "FUD !". He didn't have to do this, or he could have waited to maybe damage the coin later, he didn't do it for the bounty and I thank him for his contribution. As suspected I didn't see any price drop. Yes there was FUD in the beginning but all I have seen on this thread lately are defensive speculators.

Also I never owned DRK and XC is my main investment. In which I truly believe.

[NewWorldCoiner]

PR team is different but am in touch with PizPie who is helping with the social network aspects of XC.
My main company is a connected with Crowdfunding for various projects that accepts Bitcoins currently.

Hi,

This isn't anything to do with you is it?    http://net-elite.org/xc/

Thanks

[hoertest]

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

there may be a problem, and it's small, but you must be delusional if you think cheplin is trying to help us, he is doing his best to find flaws in XC not so we can improve it, but to hurt it, because he is invested in DRK, he may of identified important flaws, even though this is rev 1 and the Dev said from the get go rev 1 would not be 100% anon, but this is not because he has a kind heart and wants to help us, the suggestion of this makes me roll my eyes....rev 2 it will be fixed, and all the drk boys will have to actually work harder  on there product more instead of slapping it together calling them selves king,and slandering any competition that comes along, i'm not concerned still only a month old and we are neck to neck with drk that is 6 months old, so cheplin and all your sad little friends, best think of a better attack plan, concentrate on improving your own product because frankly it's a piece of shit that doesn't work, and Evan just used to get rich off, and soon after rev 2 and you can't trace the transactions anymore, you will have nothing but slanderous tweets to save your sorry excuse for cryto innovation, i would just dump and buy XC because seriously nothing can save DRK.

So besides "but DARK..." and "this is only REV1" "arguments"(that you used again) you brought a 3rd great "argument" : "the guy has a DARK motive and hes not trying to help". Why the hell does that matter? Facts are facts. The guy spent his time proving a bug while you smucks were crying "FUD !". He didn't have to do this, or he could have waited to maybe damage the coin later, he didn't do it for the bounty and I thank him for his contribution. As suspected I didn't see any price drop. Yes there was FUD in the beginning but all I have seen on this thread lately are defensive speculators.

did he really? as i understand he send his own 0.003 tx to the mixer then linking them in the blockchain cause he knew the amounts. i'm not expert enough to explain but thats how it looks to me. thats not a bug by any means then . he is just nowing all variables . if i tell you how many coins i sent to whom their would be no need for an anonymous transaction anyway.

[jasemoney]

I mentioned I'd repost if it was na issue after 12 hours, its been almost 24.  I have been running an xnode since Friday or earlier, have kept up the updated wallets as theyre released, have many connections, proper conf file, use the batch etc etc.. I have not seen any transactions flow through my wallet as an xnode

[silverkinguk]

Don't know of that fundraiser site it's new to me.Must be  site of the guy raising money for independent wallet on android.

[FoldingTime]

I completely agree with you. Chaeplin has demonstrated a logical flow of the transaction and this needs to be addressed. Simply saying FUD is no counter argument. Either agree that the current system is flawed and will be fixed or prove that chaeplin is wrong.

chaeplin is the only one providing quality QA for this coin. You need these people to find the problems so they can be fixed.

Masternode payments are humming along now and the forking issue is fixed. Looks like we're good to launch masternode payments in 1 to 2 weeks. If all looks good tomorrow I'll push binaries and have everyone upgrade.

http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000c425522d7eba77eeb68b0d3b4713626f10341499eee12395f9378a3a
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000013a358ccbe40851660e650e7ecc9fe9b0b5bb95b893104e6732deeef8
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000057614c43354c6e4f879c7959d9e41e1e76263259f36b70ae556b5c5d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000019929d91dffec6c7636e816da5cd669b5e518c16facae7a8a841471a4
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/000000015add6d1884ccef07093783ebd4cc196ed4b15353a215512fcf36aa2d
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/0000000183cd7cf91eab1c644063550bb6bbfbcb433e55505afc054e31293025
http://23.23.186.131:1234/block/00000000b38bce68707b7c9cbbeffc2ccf767c7238074f18ecb13a10b9ccf075

We have about sixty masternodes on testnet and it looks like we're paying out about 98% of the new blocks. This is great news, everything is working perfectly  .

Great work !!!!!!!!!!

My MasterNode on testnet is behaving well and giving me payouts so all looking good for the fork.

Oooh...  ANOTHER DRK troll caring about XC.   How nice of you...


How's that Masternode working out for you?

I'm running both Masternode and xnode and want both to succeed. I know this comes as a shock to most of you but, hey I don't believe in only just choosing one side. I am probably the most impartial here.

I'm waiting for the Linux xnode code so I can start it up on my VPS.

[NewWorldCoiner]

Don't know of that fundraiser site it's new to me.

It's new to all of us. As far as I know no permission has been given for it by any member of the XC team. Looks like a scam.

[520Bit]

Don't know of that fundraiser site it's new to me.

It's new to all of us. As far as I know no permission has been given for it by any member of the XC team. Looks like a scam.

It should be a SCAM, right?

[NewWorldCoiner]

Don't know of that fundraiser site it's new to me.

It's new to all of us. As far as I know no permission has been given for it by any member of the XC team. Looks like a scam.

It should be a SCAM, right?

I'm calling it a scam because the guy who posted it couldn't tell me who he had spoken to, or who had requested that he launch a website to get donations from the XC community. If he had permission, a contract, even a verbal agreement, he would have said so. Instead, he was just evasive, not a single straight answer.

[dadon]

Seems like indeed there is a blockchain connection. At least in this state. Yes REV2 or the next patch will fix this but the dev made a test because he was sure there is no link. I think he should swallow his ego, pay the bounty and fix the problem. I'm not sure how will he fix this before REV2 without locking the XNODE coins. An address can be deleted from the wallet but it will still be used as a reference for the next transaction.

Thanks to chaeplin and the rest for the work and expertise. He helped this coin more than the defensive speculators in this thread using "arguments" like "but DRK is not anon either..." or "this is only REV1".

@short term speculators in this thread: don't worry, this bug won't affect the price as the whales control the market. It will only make this coin stronger.

there may be a problem, and it's small, but you must be delusional if you think cheplin is trying to help us, he is doing his best to find flaws in XC not so we can improve it, but to hurt it, because he is invested in DRK, he may of identified important flaws, even though this is rev 1 and the Dev said from the get go rev 1 would not be 100% anon, but this is not because he has a kind heart and wants to help us, the suggestion of this makes me roll my eyes....rev 2 it will be fixed, and all the drk boys will have to actually work harder  on there product more instead of slapping it together calling them selves king,and slandering any competition that comes along, i'm not concerned still only a month old and we are neck to neck with drk that is 6 months old, so cheplin and all your sad little friends, best think of a better attack plan, concentrate on improving your own product because frankly it's a piece of shit that doesn't work, and Evan just used to get rich off, and soon after rev 2 and you can't trace the transactions anymore, you will have nothing but slanderous tweets to save your sorry excuse for cryto innovation, i would just dump and buy XC because seriously nothing can save DRK.

So besides "but DARK..." and "this is only REV1" "arguments"(that you used again) you brought a 3rd great "argument" : "the guy has a DARK motive and hes not trying to help". Why the hell does that matter? Facts are facts. The guy spent his time proving a bug while you smucks were crying "FUD !". He didn't have to do this, or he could have waited to maybe damage the coin later, he didn't do it for the bounty and I thank him for his contribution. As suspected I didn't see any price drop. Yes there was FUD in the beginning but all I have seen on this thread lately are defensive speculators.

Also I never owned DRK and XC is my main investment. In which I truly believe.

he didn't prove shit, and he can't wait to damage the coin latter because in rev 2 it will no longer be an issue, and you can say i am repeating the argument over again, but there is nothing more to the argument, and your repeating the same stuff to, what he brought to light is not an issue, were not worried, if you are, dump, and i will buy them, but he should really be working on drk is all im saying he considers himself one of the drk dev team, and it doesn't even work? so why is he here trying to help us fix our nonexistent problem, when the coin he is supposed to be working on has been out 5x longer and works even less, if he can find the addresses in rev 2 we have a problem, until then he should fix his own teams mess.