[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[CryptoGretzky]

Oh man... why are we wasting bandwidth discussing/engaging about/with a well known troll?!?   It saddens me to no end why whatever he does in our thread matters....

Are you talking to me?

Unless you are pookie's alt... then no.

[_evolution_]

Oh man... why are we wasting bandwidth discussing/engaging about/with a well known troll?!?   It saddens me to no end why whatever he does in our thread matters....

Are you talking to me?

Unless you are pookie's alt... then no.

No I am not (I don't think that there is anyone else from my country involved in this forum.)

[G-Bert]

Oh man... why are we wasting bandwidth discussing/engaging about/with a well known troll?!?   It saddens me to no end why whatever he does in our thread matters....

Are you talking to me?

[counter]

Hi community.... did u miss me real money coming back around after a few pumps!!!!

so when will be it coming

hahah Ive been buyng on dumps who ever the fuck has been unloading soo much.... back above my starting spot thanks to CLOAK!! although i still hold CLOAK as well.... HEDGE is the key word.. but I know of a few whales that just started swimming over here

edit: oblox i could care less if I impress U... 90% of my XC holdings comes from being dumped into.. i never buy to accumulate only get dumped on so... yea thats my good faith buy on the spot!!!But like i said could give a fuck what u think just letting u all know charts look sexi and money is coming in

So, you're basically telling us XC is about to get p&d'd by your pump group?

Yea not sure why someone would think admitting to spreading fud on xc would in anyway translate to them having any type of credibility.  It's nice to see a large purchase and all but how bout you hold them and get others on board the XC train instead of spreading fud and confusing potential investors/adopters just to save a few dollars.

[_evolution_]

Oh man... why are we wasting bandwidth discussing/engaging about/with a well known troll?!?   It saddens me to no end why whatever he does in our thread matters....

Are you talking to me?

Yeah, there are many parodies based on this moment of the movie

[shanuu]

Nice to see some buy suport...

[RW-Stott]

Nice to see some buy suport...

Everyone knows XC is about to run in a big way soon... Could be any day now.

[dadon]

Don't forget to vote https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568166.600

[The-C-Word]

Don't forget to vote https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568166.600

Man, Reading that thread makes me cringe.

[dadon]

Don't forget to vote https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568166.600

Man, Reading that thread makes me cringe.

Me too, just bite your lip  we all know who the real king is, most of this forum wouldn't know innovation if it poked them in the eye, but we can't all retire off crypto investments let em chase there P&Ds.

[Abrupto]

Don't forget to vote https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568166.600

Just voted. It seems the one thing people forget about is branding. Reading through the voting thread I saw repeated use of the word "retail." Most retailers wont accept a currency that carries a negative connotation such as shadow, dark or cloak; in doing so it somewhat illigitimizes their businesses. While many people consider certain products and industries taboo the people who own the companies and work in the industries generally have great pride in what they do and consider their businesses very legitimate, further tarnishing their public image is the last thing they want to do.

From a strictly branding point of view monero has a shot, but possibly for Latin American countries. My wife is Cuban and the first thing she said was it sounds like a combination of moneda/dinero, dont know if that was intentional on their part or not.

Good to see us in the top three over there!

[Abrupto]

Everyone in the thread should read this article, very interesting xcurrency mention in relation to bit licenses.

http://bit.ly/1rjbs5q

[The-C-Word]

Everyone in the thread should read this article, very interesting xcurrency mention.

http://[Suspicious link removed]/1rjbs5q

Nice mention.

It says XC is open-sourced though it isn't quite yet.

[braxx]

Everyone in the thread should read this article, very interesting xcurrency mention in relation to bit licenses.

http://bit.ly/1rjbs5q

nice find

I've isolated the mention of XC:

“One of my greatest fears is that it will actually force innovations around regulation. This means it will drive innovation to a BitLicense-created illicit market. It is so poorly thought out that it creates an incentive for underground and black market technology innovation where only illicit actors will gain and be at the forefront of innovation. We already see the market pivoting in this direction from a proposal alone. Today the most popular Alt currencies (alternative to bitcoin that uses the same protocol) that are skyrocketing are those catering to such innovation. XC (XCurrency), Cloakcoin, Darkcoin and many more are already perfecting anonymity beyond bitcoin’s core. For instance, every XC wallet is itself an Xnode, a peer computer that scrambles the path of delivery and origin of sender. Since it is proof of stake there are no miners just wallets all working in unison to obfuscate transactions, messaging for communications; a positive for personal privacy, and many other untraceable capabilities. A good thing today because law-bidding citizen can benefit from these innovations and since it is open source even authorities can understand its inner workings.”

[laredo7mm]

Everyone in the thread should read this article, very interesting xcurrency mention.

http://[Suspicious link removed]/1rjbs5q

Nice mention.

It says XC is open-sourced though it isn't quite yet.

It is, but on a delayed timeline.

[RW-Stott]

Everyone in the thread should read this article, very interesting xcurrency mention in relation to bit licenses.

http://bit.ly/1rjbs5q

nice find

I've isolated the mention of XC:

“One of my greatest fears is that it will actually force innovations around regulation. This means it will drive innovation to a BitLicense-created illicit market. It is so poorly thought out that it creates an incentive for underground and black market technology innovation where only illicit actors will gain and be at the forefront of innovation. We already see the market pivoting in this direction from a proposal alone. Today the most popular Alt currencies (alternative to bitcoin that uses the same protocol) that are skyrocketing are those catering to such innovation. XC (XCurrency), Cloakcoin, Darkcoin and many more are already perfecting anonymity beyond bitcoin’s core. For instance, every XC wallet is itself an Xnode, a peer computer that scrambles the path of delivery and origin of sender. Since it is proof of stake there are no miners just wallets all working in unison to obfuscate transactions, messaging for communications; a positive for personal privacy, and many other untraceable capabilities. A good thing today because law-bidding citizen can benefit from these innovations and since it is open source even authorities can understand its inner workings.”

+1. Don't know why cloak is even mentioned though... Their "anon solution" is laughable to nonexistent

[dannyspk]

So much dumping despite the buy support above 150. I don't get it.

[URSAY]

XCurrency mentioned in BitLicense Petition article...

“One of my greatest fears is that it will actually force innovations around regulation. This means it will drive innovation to a BitLicense-created illicit market. It is so poorly thought out that it creates an incentive for underground and black market technology innovation where only illicit actors will gain and be at the forefront of innovation. We already see the market pivoting in this direction from a proposal alone. Today the most popular Alt currencies (alternative to bitcoin that uses the same protocol) that are skyrocketing are those catering to such innovation. XC (XCurrency), Cloakcoin, Darkcoin and many more are already perfecting anonymity beyond bitcoin’s core. For instance, every XC wallet is itself an Xnode, a peer computer that scrambles the path of delivery and origin of sender. Since it is proof of stake there are no miners just wallets all working in unison to obfuscate transactions, messaging for communications; a positive for personal privacy, and many other untraceable capabilities. A good thing today because law-bidding citizen can benefit from these innovations and since it is open source even authorities can understand its inner workings.”

http://www.ihavebitcoins.com/featured/dear-new-york-state-dont-kill-bitcoin-love-open-source-financial-developers-association/

[BrewCrewFan]

So much dumping despite the buy support above 150. I don't get it.

Dude , I been trying to figure that out myself for a long while now with this coin and have not been able to yet.

[dannyspk]

Im a little off put here.  We had Mindfox review our code as he is a somewhat respected member of the BTCtalk community.

 Now he has his own shit clone which is presenting falsified information about the source we recently opened up.  He is claiming he has bettered our rev1 technology... not by actually doing anything with it but by lying and stating there were all sorts of issues that he and his PnD shit team have fixed. And now how they are moving ahead of our progression.  

 So why again are we opening source?  I get all the high and mighty fucktards on reptiliea or w/e's thread stating they wont look twice at a coin that isnt open sourced fully but who gives a crap.

 Those condescending "Coin analysts" will eventually see the light if they can get each others knob ends out of each others mouths long enough to say something constructive not talk about how much of a crypto hipster they are.

Just hold strong fellow XC'ers  don't let the crypto hipsters get to you!

I did not know that Mindfox copied the XC code from Rev1.  Supposedly he's a great programmer, so instead of stealing the code from XC, why not just create it yourself.  

I hate to say it, but I hope there was something malicious/not working in the open source code that was released.  Boy.....wouldn't that be a lesson to learn for those copy-fucks.  

I wouldn't even bother making any future revs available for open source.  Let this all be a lesson.

You don't trust closed-source?  Fuck off, and invest elsewhere.  

The fact is that this KeyCoin thing is free PR for XC.

And it's good PR because nothing spreads like contention. (In fact, it's my favourite sort of game.)

This is exactly what releasing code on a delayed timeline is good for: showing up stupid coins, helping XC rise to prominence, and providing valuable tech to real devs who want to study it and do some real work.

So all's well. Nothing to worry about. :-)

What?  This is not good PR.  Was the "contention" that occurred after the first big run up when a bunch of Dark coiners said XC tech didn't work good PR?  No.  This is a similar (although much lesser) situation.

XC is valuable because it is differentiated and has better functionality.  Someone with an audience running around saying that the functionality is actually worse and poorly differentiated is not a good thing.  

Also I agree with battbot's prior points about the whitepaper.  At some point after all the Dark sniping the XC team appears to have decided that it doesn't want to compare itself to other coins and make a clear case for why it is the better solution.  But if people do not think it is better, why would they invest in it on the expectation that it will be the market winner?

XC needs a well thought out whitepaper that clearly states why it is a superior solution, and why it will be adopted over competitors.  I agree that there are some challenges doing so without revealing IP, but that is not a reason to avoid the issue until v3.  Note the pretty large fall in price after the v2 launch, as many investors lose confidence that XC has the best solution...  At some point constant investor losses irreparably damage your community (paging battbot to give a Cinni case study here, although I do think it's obvious that Dan is a vastly stronger developer and leader than the Cinni dev, no offense intended).

So strength of community matters, and it is being hurt by people not having a clear case to point to as to why XC is a superior solution.  Pointing vaguely at "multipath" et al is evidently not sufficient.  A real case for what that means in terms of security, reliability, privacy, etc. would be very valuable. Disagree?

I have to agree with you here XC is clearly flying under the radar. Nobody has XC on their lips when they talk about the future winner. We have to compare ourself to the best anon and clearly showing and explaining why it's the best. You guys are trying to build an ecosystem on your side but nobody knows about it.

Even if XC is the best tech out there if people doesn't know about it, it's pointless. VHS vs Beta, BlueRay vs HD-DVD. ETC.

I never see XC mentionned on the twitter feeds, IRC, BCT and that's a REAL problem imo. Everyone should have XC in their top 5 imo.

Just wanted to bring this up as we should highlight the progress made in a little less than two weeks. XC team was right on spot about KeyCoin being good PR for XC. The momentum is building up.. We have been getting more attention on several different platforms across the crypto world. Let me applaud the XC team for their subtle and professional approach during these initial stages.