[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[dadon]

Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question.

When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files):

simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
 
 
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
  out = dst;
                                         ^
blake.c:791:1: warning:   initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
 blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
 ^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  blake32(cc, data, len);
 
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  unsigned char *buf;
                 ^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]

etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc

It's normal?

Someone can help me? Thanks xc community!

No idea? any one else know what's up with this? Welcome to the community BTW!! you made a good choice buying XC it has a bright future 

[1714650753]

1714650753

[1714650753]

1714650753

[CryptoGretzky]

Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question.

When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files):

simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’:
simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
     ^
simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  sc = cc;
 
 
blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive]
  out = dst;
                                         ^
blake.c:791:1: warning:   initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive]
 blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc,
 ^
blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’:
blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]
  blake32(cc, data, len);
 
groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’:
groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  unsigned char *buf;
                 ^
groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’:
groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive]

etc
etc
etc
for jk, keccak, skein etc etc

It's normal?

Someone can help me? Thanks xc community!

No idea? any one else know what's up with this?

Seems these are generic X11 codes and the issue is that they didn't do an explicit cast from void * to each of the individual hashing function required type.     

Does the wallet work though?  If so, I don't think it's a big issue.

[MemoryShock]

Tweeted at him since it's more public

- https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674

I'm impressed that he didn't seem even aware of XC....I think things are going to get very interesting in the next month or so when he and others realize that Dan and team is the real deal.

I think that this is a real indicator on just how under the radar XC is...which won't last for too long.

Exciting times ahead.

[dadon]

It's been good for us in the know to accumulate as much as we can before the word spreads because when it does watch out...XC has been completely overlooked by 90% of this forum, it's the perfect storm.

[G-Bert]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

[battbot]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

I agree with this.  They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well.  Hopefully they will do this.

[ssmc2]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

I agree, an AMA on Reddit would be great in addition to the forum one.

[G-Bert]

We need everyone else in crypto land to be asking the questions,  not just the tiny amount of people who read the forum or even this thread.

[RW-Stott]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

I agree with this.  They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well.  Hopefully they will do this.

+1

[Driv3n]

Never thought BTC would be this cheap again, picking up XC at this price is easy money.

[qqNxt]

buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.

[legoman39]

   buy it on the exchanges like everybody else

[infinitechaos]

  buy it on the exchanges like everybody else

The community had been tossing around the idea of proposing buy orders off exchange first so as to help maintain market stability and offer transparency with regards to large sells/buys.

He is free to ask this here IMHO.

[qqNxt]

  buy it on the exchanges like everybody else

I just got scarred from bter exchange. and most big holders don't have their xc on exchanges.

[milkyway]

buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.

7 BTC for 2670 XC, cause we know the price is gonna rise

[520Bit]

buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.

8 BTC for 3200 XC if you want.

[CryptoGretzky]

  buy it on the exchanges like everybody else

I just got scarred from bter exchange. and most big holders don't have their xc on exchanges.

Most big holders also won't be selling their XC at this price level. 

[KimmyF]

Looking at DRK, CLOAK and BC I think its amazing how stable the XC price is. 

I never thought cloak would drop this far, did anything bad happen over there or its just whales leaving after weeks?

It was hype all along. No real support. 700 BTC is all it took to hit the floors. Besides, I never even gave it a 0.1% chance to it due to the name. Who the fuck buys Cloak?

Feel the same about all anon coins, except XC of course. Just the name indicates a single shady market most retailers will avoid like ebola. And think that for XC anon is just an option within a large family of other functionality.
But its part of the base so must be perfected first,  can't wait for the day the framework api opens and thousands of third party developers can start dreaming about developing real products.
and even then I will probably not sell from main wallet, maybe some minted coins but that's it.

[synechist]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

I agree with this.  They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well.  Hopefully they will do this.

I think the intention is to have another Q&A at the end of the week after everyone's had some time to reflect on the first Q&A.

I reckon we should do it on Reddit.

[cryptico]

So the q&a is on the XC forum....  So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions,   just us lot,  who already pretty much know what's going on.

Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure.  Oh well.

I agree with this.  They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well.  Hopefully they will do this.

I think the intention is to have another Q&A at the end of the week after everyone's had some time to reflect on the first Q&A.

I reckon we should do it on Reddit.

Thank you Synechist I think this is the best option. Professional as usual.