braxx
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:52:55 PM |
|
ATC... is my thought correct? I think they don't read the entire transaction detail... a multisig is set up between Xnodes (just to verify Xnode ok) (I guess off-blockchain)... just like Xchat (how they find each other) as you know... every wallet is an Xnode
does it say it does a multisig transaction?
I think they are mixing that up...
I don't see their problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:54:30 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. Can someone with the technical knowledge answer this as soon as possible please. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741018.new#newThey are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htmcheers Dan.
|
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:57:27 PM |
|
someone should post that on the thread now or Alt Secure should just go explain it to him if he has the time ofc i know your busy and this stuff is beneath you but someone needs to put these fools in there place.
|
|
|
|
The-C-Word
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:58:01 PM |
|
What added benefit do multisig addresses provide?
|
|
|
|
biskyb33
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:58:22 PM |
|
lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument?? I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions. Can someone with the technical knowledge answer this as soon as possible please. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741018.new#newThey are mixing apples and oranges, XC is trustless based on the signatures of all parties during the private transaction. Its not using MULTI_SIG N OF M Address's. The transactions are SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, if any of the outputs are missing, then it is not signed by all parties. Here is an example of a private decentralized distributed multi-path transaction consisting of 4 parties. >>> http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229236.htm ^^^this explanation and link should be posted on the website (if it isn't already) as we will most likely be referring people to it continuously.
|
XChat XLo9fHrgmhwzUJxQwkvTq1oWAoMqXHwCVi PubKey 2
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 06:59:13 PM Last edit: August 16, 2014, 07:09:19 PM by BrewCrewFan |
|
someone should post that on the thread now or Alt Secure should just go explain it to him if he has the time ofc i know your busy and this stuff is beneath you but someone needs to put these fools in there place.
It was and then got deleted. So that means they have no interests except fud. Case closed. Edit, guess he kept one part of it. They still deny that it is really what it is.
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:12:26 PM |
|
We need that de-FUD post/thread/topic whatever that will de-FUD shit like that, I think synechist was putting the info together? We need this thing in order not to waste any more time, when new FUD appears, we link to that topic where there are definite answers and be done with shitscams.
Dan protect your work and our nerves from these idiots plz :/
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:22:47 PM |
|
i'm going to take a bath! Take care
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:27:13 PM |
|
Quote from: timerland on Today at 07:15:13 PM
Again, please don't waste time here. I can use a simple mixer and you don't be able to trace my transaction. But here we talk about multisig, and let me repeat this simple question for the last time:
provide us a multisig address that has tx associated with it, in the blockchain, so we can inspect and see what is there. This can prove you actually have the capability of multisig.
I have no idea what he is talking about i'm just having fun taken the piss, can anyone provide what he is asking for?
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:29:39 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts FACT 1 XC dev is proven to be lier! FACT 2 XC dev cheated people on website about XC technology. FACT 3 XC dev tried to fud with army of fudster on mammothcoin. FACT 4 XC dev selling something else with different package.[/b] Now they going too far.....
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:30:45 PM |
|
Quote from: timerland on Today at 07:15:13 PM
Again, please don't waste time here. I can use a simple mixer and you don't be able to trace my transaction. But here we talk about multisig, and let me repeat this simple question for the last time:
provide us a multisig address that has tx associated with it, in the blockchain, so we can inspect and see what is there. This can prove you actually have the capability of multisig.
I have no idea what he is talking about i'm just having fun taken the piss, can anyone provide what he is asking for?
I have to wonder if the mixer would make another addy for it and then it would not appear on the chain no matter what. After all, that is the foundation of the coin, being untraceable.
|
|
|
|
shockstar
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:31:03 PM |
|
I'm MAD. They keep deleting my post
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:34:14 PM |
|
i just copied what synechist posted so when they delete i can post it again, these guys are relentless...
|
|
|
|
kewlya
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:38:13 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:39:23 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok.
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:41:55 PM |
|
I would try to defend against those fudsters but I don't have the technical knowledge, like most people here.
A troll with technical knowledge is really the worst kind of troll since it normally takes statements from the dev to put them in place.
Supercoin and mammothcoin are shooting themselves in the foot. New people won't want to invest in a coin which has multiple topics with giant red font talking shit.
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:42:04 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok. Can I call you bob? Would that work? /ducks and hides
|
|
|
|
kewlya
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:43:01 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok. delete ur stupid posts quoting fud now
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:44:34 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok. delete ur stupid posts quoting fud now I am now gonna have to agree with him and agree your being a little dickish here... enough.
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 16, 2014, 07:46:14 PM |
|
Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM XC facts Now they going too far..... stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok. Can I call you bob? Would that work? /ducks and hides call me whatever the fuck you want,no skin off my nose, don't care and never have what people think of me, fact is i maybe an idiot, or a "Bob'' LOL but i'm also a fierce supporter of XC who has been here since almost day 1 so go ahead be an asshole to a member of the community you claim to support, says more about yourselves then it does about me.
|
|
|
|
|