[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[synechist]

People fed up with the XC FUD topic created by supercoin fudsters may or may not wish to read my topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742246.0

Ha ha. Good work sir!

[1714622903]

1714622903

[1714622903]

1714622903

[1714622903]

1714622903

[1714622903]

1714622903

[1714622903]

1714622903

[BrewCrewFan]

looks good:

O dear.

I guess what kind of securities can you have for not having auto withdraws with something like that. See , I feel safe with coinbase, what I did was link a disposable account where no money outside of what money I want in there, goes in there.... or withdrawn. Does not have my main account... would something like that be wise for this too?

[biskyb33]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

if i recall correctly, my first trade was because of moolah (and two other accounts pumping the same coin) ...i only traded twice and lost before i landed on xc and stuck. just from my own limited personal experience, i'm leary of anything moolah says (does he hack too?) ...when is mintpal going to be implementing xctech? have they switched hands yet?

[dannyspk]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

if i recall correctly, my first trade was because of moolah (and two other accounts pumping the same coin) ...i only traded twice and lost before i landed on xc and stuck. just from my own limited personal experience, i'm leary of anything moolah says (does he hack too?) ...when is mintpal going to be implementing xctech? have they switched hands yet?

what's xctech?

[synechist]

The following posts of mine were deleted by timerland on this FUD thread:

TOR DEPENDED POOR COIN  CERTAINLY NOT TRUSTLESS
They cheated people like they are trustless they dont haven even multisig address

I'm not sure what is less appealing about this post:

- the poor linguistic abilities it portrays

- its factual inaccuracy (because XC does use multisig transactions)

- its deceitfulness.


Poor showing sir.

No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.

You are incorrect about this.

I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.

XC has technology that you do not know about.

Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.

Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.

This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.

And in what sense can the following deleted posts possibly be taken as inappropriate?

No, there's only one technology for multisig, there's nothing "different", or it is not multisig. Try to use some other names.

You are incorrect about this.

I repeat: you are not in a position to tell what technology XC has or has not implemented.

XC has technology that you do not know about.

Therefore you are not in a position to make the above statement.

Yes this is the truth from all the above messages.

This is an irresponsibly one-sided remark.

What possible reason would you have for deleting these?

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I understand multisig quite well thank you, and I object to your patronising remarks on this topic.

Proceed as if I understand, and you'll come across less arrogantly.

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I again request you that please on the facts, no fuds, and understand multisig before posting please.

Again here Gavin Andersen showed what is a multisig tx and how to create, sign and spend!
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071

Ah, deleting perfectly relevant posts again are you?

Nice ethics you have.

Go ahead, delete this one too. It'll make you look good.

because while you are arguing and without knowing what is multisig address and what is multisig transaction!

marseille posted Gavin Andersen's example of multisig transaction, go read it and understand it please, before repeating the same thing here!

I again request you that please on the facts, no fuds, and understand multisig before posting please.

Again here Gavin Andersen showed what is a multisig tx and how to create, sign and spend!
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071

I understand multisig quite well thank you, and I do not enjoy being patronised, so kindly stop.

You are not in a position to tell what I do not understand, so kindly refrain from making assertions you cannot substantiate.

I am tired to argue with you guys, please if you want to show facts:

provide us an XC multisig address that has tx associated with it, in the blockchain, so we can inspect and see what is there. This can prove you actually have the capability of multisig.

what you have provided so far are NOT XC multisig addresses, they are regular XC addresses. What I asked is extremely simple, and can be provided in 30 sec.

I've told you this several times: XC DOES NOT USE WHAT YOU CALL "MULTISIG".

It uses multisig transactions, not multisig addresses.

Can we move on?

It uses regular tx in this case, where you can put software to do anything, but it does not require all party to sign in order to spend! mutisig transaction is the transaction created on multisig address (you understand why? well read what is multisig!).

You do not have sufficient grounds to assert that XC uses regular transactions.

You only have sufficient grounds to assert that XC uses addresses that conform to the regular format (but don't necessarily behave that way in XC by any means.

Again, you're making assumptions that go beyond the evidence you have.

You've deleted multiple relevant posts of mine.

I will post them here so that those who wish to pursue this discussion can participate.

[benthach]

Xcurrentcy - flexible coin

it's bendable

[Abrupto]

Gotta love that there's all this FUD and xc price is still stable. Every other coin is being dumped so traders can jump on the syscoin train.

[Abrupto]

Xcurrentcy - flexible coin

it's bendable

FYI, the alphabet is not that flexible...spread the word.

[SushiChef]

edit: I will ask the question again once Moolah has completed the Mintpal take over

[biskyb33]

looks good:

Cool, but I personally don't feel comfortable linking my bank account to any of these exchanges that have been hacked.

if i recall correctly, my first trade was because of moolah (and two other accounts pumping the same coin) ...i only traded twice and lost before i landed on xc and stuck. just from my own limited personal experience, i'm leary of anything moolah says (does he hack too?) ...when is mintpal going to be implementing xctech? have they switched hands yet?

what's xctech?

i'm not a techie, but my sense of it is that the wallets on the exchange can be run with the decentralized/anonymous/end-to-end encryption features of this technology so hackers can no longer access those accounts ...in my mind, it was a good place to go with it. bring confidence back to the market. flawed reasoning?

[SushiChef]

someone asked me to accept XCurrency on the website in my sig.

what does the XCommunity think about that? There are already 18 other alts accepted btw

I'm asking because we use the Moolah api and it would require them to intergrate XCurrency.. So this would take some time to achieve, but i'm willing to do some negotiations

i'm a prude ...i vote no  

that why I asked. I don't really care what the other coins think but XCurrency is something different

[RW-Stott]

someone asked me to accept XCurrency on the website in my sig.

what does the XCommunity think about that? There are already 18 other alts accepted btw

I'm asking because we use the Moolah api and it would require them to intergrate XCurrency.. So this would take some time to achieve, but i'm willing to do some negotiations

i'm a prude ...i vote no  

that why I asked. I don't really care what the other coins think but XCurrency is something different

I vote yes.  You can't control which currencies payment processors choose to accept.  So, more XC use cases is only a plus, IMO.

[adhitthana]

i won't post here anymore since i'm not welcome, thanks for being a such a mature community lol.

I very much appreciate your contributions here.

[Longenecker]

Is there a guide explaining how to use xchat?

[Abrupto]

someone asked me to accept XCurrency on the website in my sig.

what does the XCommunity think about that? There are already 18 other alts accepted btw

I'm asking because we use the Moolah api and it would require them to intergrate XCurrency.. So this would take some time to achieve, but i'm willing to do some negotiations

i'm a prude ...i vote no  

that why I asked. I don't really care what the other coins think but XCurrency is something different

I vote yes.  You can't control which currencies payment processors choose to accept.  So, more XC use cases is only a plus, IMO.

I agree. This is a free market and if a merchant decides to accept xcurrency as payment the only control we should have is whether or not we want to spend our xc on said merchants product.

[biskyb33]

edit: I will ask the question again once Moolah has completed the Mintpal take over

it must be a different moolah i was thinking of ...in that case, the sooner they're introduced to xc, the better (assuming they can implement dan's tech to stave off hackers on the exchange? i'm unclear right now whether they can? someone please clarify for me).

[biskyb33]

someone asked me to accept XCurrency on the website in my sig.

what does the XCommunity think about that? There are already 18 other alts accepted btw

I'm asking because we use the Moolah api and it would require them to intergrate XCurrency.. So this would take some time to achieve, but i'm willing to do some negotiations

i'm a prude ...i vote no  

that why I asked. I don't really care what the other coins think but XCurrency is something different

I vote yes.  You can't control which currencies payment processors choose to accept.  So, more XC use cases is only a plus, IMO.

I agree. This is a free market and if a merchant decides to accept xcurrency as payment the only control we should have is whether or not we want to spend our xc on said merchants product.

sluts! 

[policymaker]

Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM

XC facts


  Now they going too far.....

stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot

Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok.

delete ur stupid posts quoting fud now

lol yeah its not smart to quote fud but u dont have to be so mean to a proven supporter and holder. In fact I havent really seen ur name here before.

give me a link to the first XC thread and i will show you i was one of the main people debating reducing the number of XC i got called greedy and a bunch of shit for it, i bought my 80k of XC for 10k and still hold 75k of them so i been here a bit not that it matters or anything you don't see my name because i don't sit on my computer all day i have a life and stuff... you will see one of my posts on here and i had been following the thread just not posting as i said doesn't matter because that is just childish shit '' ohh haven't even seen you post here before" what is this? high school? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6871577#msg6871577 i won't post here anymore since i'm not welcome, thanks for being a such a mature community lol.

Policymaker was responding to kewyla and sticking up for you I think mate.

Chill. its all good.

may of read it wrong..sorry everyone for posting FUD was just trying to rally the troops.

yeah ofc I was standing up for you, not that u need it, but long hodlers stick together.

The only thing I regret is not holding even 10% of your XC. I only needed 1 month more in crypto world, and I would have had the funds/experience to either mine or trade more. Just imagine, I was still in doge when XC got released. Yeah, doge.

And since we are measuring our XC p*nises, I think I deserve the award of the day!



155 sat people, I think reverse pizza story confirmed.

[Abrupto]

Quote from: btcsup on Today at 07:11:27 PM

XC facts


  Now they going too far.....

stop quoting fuds from other threads here you idiot

Don't call me an idiot ask me nicely and i will gladly stop ok.

delete ur stupid posts quoting fud now

lol yeah its not smart to quote fud but u dont have to be so mean to a proven supporter and holder. In fact I havent really seen ur name here before.

give me a link to the first XC thread and i will show you i was one of the main people debating reducing the number of XC i got called greedy and a bunch of shit for it, i bought my 80k of XC for 10k and still hold 75k of them so i been here a bit not that it matters or anything you don't see my name because i don't sit on my computer all day i have a life and stuff... you will see one of my posts on here and i had been following the thread just not posting as i said doesn't matter because that is just childish shit '' ohh haven't even seen you post here before" what is this? high school? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg6871577#msg6871577 i won't post here anymore since i'm not welcome, thanks for being a such a mature community lol.

Policymaker was responding to kewyla and sticking up for you I think mate.

Chill. its all good.

may of read it wrong..sorry everyone for posting FUD was just trying to rally the troops.

yeah ofc I was standing up for you, not that u need it, but long hodlers stick together.

The only thing I regret is not holding even 10% of your XC. I only needed 1 month more in crypto world, and I would have had the funds/experience to either mine or trade more. Just imagine, I was still in doge when XC got released. Yeah, doge.

And since we are measuring our XC p*nises, I think I deserve the award of the day!



155 sat people, I think reverse pizza story confirmed.

155 sat? I just threw up in my mouth a little. Hopefully in 2 years people will have the same reaction when I told them where I bought in 

[cyberhacker]

i am so stupid to throw 1 BTC to that gargage mam sucking coin.

cuz i think some idiot will hype it due to claimed advantage.

it turns out i am the one and no one is paying any attention to that shit.