cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:53:30 AM |
|
Thank you ...by the way why did we jump from RC3 to RC6? lolz
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:11:46 AM |
|
Thank you ...by the way why did we jump from RC3 to RC6? lolz
We went progressively from 3 to 4 to 5 to 6. Just fast.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:14:31 AM |
|
Yes its working , i really like the simple autonode over the top bar ! Good way to show this is working ! The shortcut in the start menu is ok with all the argument but not the one on the desktop there is no argument in it, just to clarify One more question ,you was speaking about "stacking=0" to add in the Xcurrency.conf file to stop the minting of the wallet, i have add it but i always see that its minting , that's right ? With this version, you can stake provided you have enough coins in your wallet.. so you can get stake interest and mixing fee's to turn off staking though use staking=0 (not stacking=0) Dan w8. If some1 has 10k XC and 10 wallets in 10 different environments/IPs he can have 10 xmixers, is that argument correct?(So we got 10 mixers but no staking revenue since each mixer commits 1k, right?) BUT if some1 has 10k XC in 1 wallet setup as a mixer, he can make staking + the mixer fees? which method will provide better, more optimal revenue, is there an estimation to that?(1 mixer but many coins to stake from? and how would coin control relate to that, what coins does the mixer use so it doesnt reset their age?)Good Morning XC brats!! Bumping this up already for some technical answer Morning folks! If you have 10k in a mixer, you might get a stake, but the chances are the inputs will be used as mixer outputs and their age will reset. At the moment, if you run an Xmixer, you can't prevent an address (nor an unspent transaction output) from being used for mixing. You're best off maintaining a separate wallet.dat for your staking. And to address an earlier question, you only need to run a staking wallet once every few days. ok, from what I gather, what we need with this RC is an update with some kind of advanced coin control feature, so we can make a wallet set address for mixing and separate ones for staking, s their age doesnt reset!
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:19:23 AM |
|
Thank you ...by the way why did we jump from RC3 to RC6? lolz
We went progressively from 3 to 4 to 5 to 6. Just fast. yes but where are the downloads links for 4 and 5 lol I did not see those ahaha I was at 3 and then saw the link for the 6 popping in here
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:20:49 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
|
|
|
|
bbr
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:32:32 AM |
|
Gutted I did not hear about this in my home town! : http://www.manx.net/tv/mt-tv/watch/66795/crypto-currency-conferenceI would have gone and told them all about XC. What caught my attention is Brock Pierce talking about Web 1.0 - if he hasn't heard about XC's Web 3.0 then i'm sure he would be seriously interested.
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:41:28 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:38:20 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:39:58 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform. any ETA for REV2?
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:41:58 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform. any ETA for REV2? REV2 is already out Do you mean Linux version?
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:53:33 AM |
|
Just read the bitcoinmagazine and the comments - jeez there are some pretty grumpy people out there. Plenty of frothing at the mouth over that one !
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:10:57 AM |
|
WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....
This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...
Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...
Well done Darkcoin community!
Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:15:48 AM |
|
WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....
This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...
Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...
Well done Darkcoin community!
Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.
Rats on a sinking ship have no concord.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:19:07 AM |
|
WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....
This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...
Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...
Well done Darkcoin community!
Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.
Rats on a sinking ship have no concord. I don't think they made themselves look good by trolling an article on XC. It wasn't about DRK and their reaction was more than a little hysterical. But we shouldn't make a big thing out of this. It's nothing really. Let's continue to be good to "enemies" as the Community Code suggests. They're no threat.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:23:11 AM |
|
I know it just pisses me off.. they are going to mislead noobs into buying in their coin with their approach.. well I suppose they are pretty desperate anyway...pretty sad.
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:24:07 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform. any ETA for REV2? REV2 is already out Do you mean Linux version? yeah, the question is related to my first question. any ETA for the REV2 linux client?
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:26:17 AM |
|
Hello,
I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.
Status: 1/unconfirmed Date: 9/18/2014 07:21 Debit: -532.020891 XC Credit: 528.020881 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Net amount: -0.00001 XC Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245
I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:28:31 AM |
|
WOW Darkcoin Shills Fudders all over the Bitcoin magazine Article... Wasn't there an agreement between the Devs of XC and Dark to stop the FUD yet they fail still To accomplish that once they see that they are behind the competition and do cry baby FUDS on the most established Bitcoin Magazine....
This is a confirmation of the Darkcoin community Ethics as we saw at the beginning with the Fedora clone FUD. I would like Synechist to approach directly Evan And get their trolls back on track and get back to their agreement if they still care about their reputation in the Crypto-world.. How they cannot see that their reputation is getting fucked up over and over again is behind reason...
Well I suppose when they see a better tech implementation then their own they have a childish protective mechanism of bullism against the other Coin...
Well done Darkcoin community!
Edit: I do not want to start another war but just defend XC from yet another attack guess from who? from the same community? I can cancel this comment from this thread if requiered but I am furious at the moment.
where is the fud from the drk people? any link?
|
|
|
|
?!bennscammed!?
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:33:06 AM |
|
Hello,
I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.
Status: 1/unconfirmed Date: 9/18/2014 07:21 Debit: -532.020891 XC Credit: 528.020881 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Credit: 1.00 XC Net amount: -0.00001 XC Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245
I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?
No, its a known bug and Dan fixes this. Maybe your next mix will bring you back to green. Your port is closed? So the opened Port isnt necessary anymore? Can someone confirm this? I would feel better to close it.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:35:19 AM |
|
will a linux client for rev2 be released?
Synechist can confirm this but Dan was talking about a probable release of mac and linux wallets on Sunday Yes there will be a Linux version. XC will always be cross-platform. any ETA for REV2? REV2 is already out Do you mean Linux version? yeah, the question is related to my first question. any ETA for the REV2 linux client? I don't have an ETA for the Linux version yet. Sorry.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|