[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[cryptico]

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

1. An article written from the content provided from Synechist, or as he put it, the "scoop".
2. Coin-join killah rah rah rah. I already made it a point to tackle this one, no need to do it again.
3. What truth? The article was derived entirely from Synechist. See point 1.

Face it, you guys brought it on yourselves for inaccurately describing DRK. Everything else made sense in terms of PR material but when there are inaccuracies, especially as it relates to competition, expect that competition to take note.

Functionality-wise, DRK works. That's more than I can say from XC when I used it (granted, back at 2.47h IIRC).

-XC did not bring to itself anything the article was written by a third party company not by XC Pr Team.. off course they used Synech Informations who else will they use informations from. When they write an article about dark where da fuck they take the info from? from the Pr Guy of flappy coin?

-2- where is your point? it is true period.

3- as 1 GOFUKING COMPLAIN WITH BITCOIN MAGAZINE ORGANIZE A PUBLIC PROTEST AGAINST BITCOIN MAGAZINE ARTICLE SO YOU WILL BE RIDICULED BY ALL CRYPTO COMMUNITY

PLEASE GO AHEAD AND DO IT NOW GET TFO OF THIS THREAD

[dida]

We are testing a strong resistance builded from 4 july with many testing without breaking it.

https://cryptrader.com/c/wMHxewsn

If we break out this resitance tomorrow this is going to be another history.

Nice observation there.

It means that 0.002, perceived by many as some sort of ceiling, isn't one at all.

The ceiling on Mintpal is 0.00157 and XC is right on it already.


I can't wait to see what tomorrow's news does to the price.

This coin reminds me of one stock that I buy few years ago ....long story short...it didn't move for 3 years despite good news. I hope that same will not happen here 

....I told you   

XC just broke its 3-month descending wedge and you think it's not going to go up?

While no-one can be certain what it'll do, both price action and fundamentals look pretty great.

Did you see Zach Chester's trading analysis on XC?

there is no volume momentum for that.... if it stays on this volume maybe and I say maybe in 2 weeks we will see the move ...if it doesn't move in next 2 weeks XC will drop to 90K satoshi - mark my words

[synechist]

Hello,

I had another Mixer exchange and I was charged for the transaction.

Status: 1/unconfirmed
Date: 9/18/2014 07:21
Debit: -532.020891 XC
Credit: 528.020881 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Credit: 1.00 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: c416ec449ec555486957cb7a4248ba3fb36040de112d76619b460dde47058245

I just checked port 32348 and it's closed, is this the reason for the Negative amount?

Same problem.... all 7 0f my fucking Mixer Transactions have taken coins from me.... Let me congratulate the XC team for fucking up yet again... First it was overhyping, then missing deadlines... Now You guys make a big fucking deal about this wallet release and get all the fucking publicity and hype over it just to release a broken fucking wallet that debits you for mixing some1 else transactions... You put out broken fucking tech and the market is reacting.... Back to 120.. And never touching this coin again

Calm down, if it's that big of  a deal to you take your wallet offline until problem is fixed.

Ur missing the point.... This is a problem that will turn investors away, u cant fuck up like this when all eyes are on you.... surprise surprise XC team does it again

You've completely exaggerated things and got emotional for insufficient reason.

Come back to your senses, please:

The wallet works pretty damn well.

XC's tech is a very long way ahead of the competition.

There are peripheral niggles we're ironing out.

Man, what's up with you? Why is your take on XC's past releases so negative? I see severely insufficient justification for your interpretation.

[reebokasss]

i throught that we will see huge rise after all good news, but it seems that we are going to the fucking same level as before news (~130k).... so now i dont know what need to happen that price would rise... fucking dumpers!!

[Dungor]

http://bitcoinmagazine.com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Tbh, this was asking for FUD:

CoinJoin generally requires a mixing server or some form of semi-centralised supernode (cf. DarkCoin “masternodes”). XC’s mesh networks are entirely distributed, even with the recent addition of Xmixer.

This was referencing DRK as inferior to XC, and thou this is very true peoples feelings tend to follow where they are invested.

I don't agree.

Point 1- The article was written by a bitcoin Magazine employee, It is not paid PR, If the shills want to complain as they have been mentioned they should complain directly with who wrote the article not involving XC.

Point 2- It is in the right of who wrote the article to mention the coin that implement a semi-decentralized coinjoin supernode approach of anonimity to make the comparison since XC announced the Coin-join Killer with Final REV-2 release. The question is it is true or not? IT IS PERIOD. Dark-nodes ar semi centralized as it is a limit of coinjoin based implementations.

Point 3- Going against what the truth is will be counter productive for an establish magazine as this one in the Crypto world. I think they make their thoughts on what they wrote what do you think?

Now they can go cry back home with their reputation in the trash.

But the truth hurt their feelings, so of cause they lash out. Their perception of what is true didn't match the article so they see it as an aggression, this is very normal group behavior. Because the technical nature of cryptocurrencies very few people actually understands the features they are buying into, so a lot of people are investing by trust. Also FUD attacks come and go so the different communities has to be defensive not to be manipulated.

[cryptico]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

Pookie How many BTC did you lost when you dumped XC the last time For Cloak? Trader my ass please sell and gtfo for good this time.

[Dungor]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

[pookielax31]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

Pookie How many BTC did you lost when you dumped XC the last time For Cloak? Trader my ass please sell and gtfo for good this time.

HAHAHAH u fucking moron, LOST NONE from cloak.. sold at 275.... Then took that profit to dark... gave chatrts to the communityat told them when to sell at the direct top u dumb fuck... then went to  stelath and said sell at 120 and theycalled me insane now look at my PM inbox begging for info or thanking me... SO u GTFO



PS I told PEOPLE to sell in CLOAK and they called me CRAZY

[reebokasss]

dropping very fast, only 151k left (

[pookielax31]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

Really cause heres some more PMs.... get lost and learn to fucking trade

 

BTW my trading classes are free!!!

[oblox]

-XC did not bring to itself anything the article was written by a third party company not by XC Pr Team.. off course they used Synech Informations who else will they use informations from. When they write an article about dark where da fuck they take the info from? from the Pr Guy of flappy coin?

-2- where is your point? it is true period.

3- as 1 GOFUKING COMPLAIN WITH BITCOIN MAGAZINE ORGANIZE A PUBLIC PROTEST AGAINST BITCOIN MAGAZINE ARTICLE SO YOU WILL BE RIDICULED BY ALL CRYPTO COMMUNITY

PLEASE GO AHEAD AND DO IT NOW GET TFO OF THIS THREAD

Woah fella, take your midal. Nothing can be proven at this time that XC's core privacy feature is better than coinjoin. It's not open source and it hasn't been vetted by anyone for that matter. At this point, it's your assumption that it is ("it's true"). Further, DRK doesn't even follow the structure behind your typical coinjoin. It doesn't mix at transfer, it mixes well in advance, and of similar denominations.

As for the article they wrote, they got their facts wrong, probably due to taking the content from the XC PR team. Looks sloppy. The article would have been fine and solid PR material if it didn't try to take a jab at the competition, yet it did and got it wrong. Sloppy.

[illodin]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

Really cause heres some more PMs.... get lost and learn to fucking trade

 

BTW my trading classes are free!!!

Keep posting graphs and TA imo, it's always interesting.

[sugarboy321]

Sorry Guys I chase charts, and Ours dont look good , Im debating holding my stack, but if not I will be willing to do an off exchange trade as to not hurt the coins already struggling price and volume....... Keeping my hopes up, but glad I hedged XC and didnt chase it all in...

He should sell advice, all people have to do is the exact opposite of him and they will get rich. Pokie´s strategy seems to be buy high, sell low.

bawahahah

[synechist]

Speaking of graphs and TA, XC's price action is as expected. Zach Chester's trading analysis is spot on.

http://t.co/te5ugnLOaD

We're at position (i) on the graph. Google Elliot Waves if you want background.

[Artoodeetoo]

Oblox, you are a DRK fanboy in our thread.. If you carry on like this you will just bring a load of XC comments onto your DRK thread... Either respect the agreement of expect a backlash on the DRK thread with your name all over it.

[Artoodeetoo]

Speaking of graphs and TA, XC's price action is as expected. Zach Chester's trading analysis is spot on.

http://t.co/te5ugnLOaD

We're at position (i) on the graph. Google Elliot Waves if you want background.

Nice find Syn, we are going down on minimal volume and the weak hands are worrying...

[cryptico]

Pookie you are really a Pro Trader. I give you my humble apologise and you came here to save us all for the imminent XC collapse. What a nice Pro trader we have here.. and he is willing to do not make the price collapse as well by offering private trades. Did you find anyone from our community that is willing to sell you their worthless XCs? please PM me if you don't so that I can sell you all of mine for you Jesus between the sharks.

[synechist]

Speaking of graphs and TA, XC's price action is as expected. Zach Chester's trading analysis is spot on.

http://t.co/te5ugnLOaD

We're at position (i) on the graph. Google Elliot Waves if you want background.

Nice find Syn, we are going down on minimal volume and the weak hands are worrying...

Yeah, this is no cause for concern.

Here's the relevant portion of the chart. We're at point i:

[synechist]

Guys, let's stay respectful.

I know it's frustrating to deal with people's posts this morning, but it's no big deal.

[synechist]

I will be willing to do an off exchange trade

I'll buy your XC. How much have you got?