jpchrist
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
|
 |
August 12, 2014, 06:29:01 PM |
|
Our next increase is already looking like it will be about 23+ %.
Bring it on, it will separate the Wannabees from the pros and bring lots of bargain hardware to E-bay when everybody panics  Date Registered: July 17, 2014, 08:54:19 PM Haha, i think its clear which one you are. Do you even lift bro? |
|
|
|
|
|
TracerX
|
|
August 12, 2014, 06:31:15 PM |
|
Our next increase is already looking like it will be about 23+ %.
Bring it on, it will separate the Wannabees from the pros and bring lots of bargain hardware to E-bay when everybody panics Date Registered: July 17, 2014, 08:54:19 PM Haha, i think its clear which one you are. Do you even lift bro? Dude, here it's "Do you even math, bro?" |
|
|
|
|
jpchrist
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
16Q3R8NAfK63DvkTUGgLdPScyMU8uSAJUH
|
|
August 12, 2014, 06:37:43 PM |
|
Our next increase is already looking like it will be about 23+ %.
Bring it on, it will separate the Wannabees from the pros and bring lots of bargain hardware to E-bay when everybody panics Date Registered: July 17, 2014, 08:54:19 PM Haha, i think its clear which one you are. Do you even lift bro? Dude, here it's "Do you even math, bro?"  |
|
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
August 12, 2014, 07:05:57 PM |
|
Our next increase is already looking like it will be about 23+ %.
Bring it on, it will separate the Wannabees from the pros and bring lots of bargain hardware to E-bay when everybody panics Date Registered: July 17, 2014, 08:54:19 PM Haha, i think its clear which one you are. Do you even lift bro? Dude, here it's "Do you even math mathematics, bro?" It's still a bit street - but ftfy... |
donations not accepted
|
|
|
Billbags
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Brainwashed this way
|
|
August 12, 2014, 07:13:11 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
oskuro
|
|
August 12, 2014, 07:13:36 PM |
|
just need invoice from bitmain but didnt receive their email yet. For 1 S3, batch 4, price in EUR
|
|
|
|
|
|
nottm28
|
|
August 12, 2014, 07:24:41 PM |
|
 wikid |
donations not accepted
|
|
|
|
|
|
grn
|
|
August 12, 2014, 08:14:32 PM |
|
SP30 aug batch 4.5t x 1000
|
How is that Lexical analysis working out bickneleski?
|
|
|
|
navigator
|
|
August 12, 2014, 08:34:35 PM |
|
BITMAIN,
Is there a difference between July 28th and July 21st firmware? Can you upload please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
xstr8guy
|
|
August 12, 2014, 08:36:27 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense.  "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. |
|
|
|
|
itod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077
^ Will code for Bitcoins
|
|
August 12, 2014, 08:52:25 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. When you see small drop in a hashrate after the large network hashrate rise it's easy to explain: a lot of people turning off their older generations of miners, because they don't mine even for electricity with new hashrate. Some turn them off permanently, some point the miners from bitcoin to other coins, what else they can do? Can't let them burn electricity for negative profit. |
|
|
|
|
|
sjc1490
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:01:53 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. Speculation on some other boards is that it is BitFury bringing it's hardware on-line / offline in it's newest data center it just built. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/08/01/bitfury-asic-maker-builds-20mw-bitcoin-mining-data-center/ |
BTC ADDRESS: 12Qwd8VKLQ4xF44ytHXBpCAKuF9VknG4X2
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 9090
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:13:39 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between. |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4312
Merit: 8869
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:18:30 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. my guess is both variance and the bitfury came online which means 169 is too low and 209 is too high. maybe we are at 185ph . would prefer the rate to jump 15% or less have to wait a while to see whats really up. well my 2 s-3s come soon. will wait for them |
|
|
|
montyfd
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:22:54 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. my guess is both variance and the bitfury came online which means 169 is too low and 209 is too high. maybe we are at 185ph . would prefer the rate to jump 15% or less have to wait a while to see whats really up. well my 2 s-3s come soon. will wait for them Why do you all panic? With the last 25% jump everybody was crying "it will go on like this forever" and the following increase was the smallest since long time with 2 more very low to follow. Even with a big next increase we are still lower than expected a few weeks ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fahlcor
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:25:17 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between. The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large. At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand. I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance. and I really doubt that variance would account for 50 phash. I agree others with smaller miners go elsewhere but as long as they are on a pool doin the same thing they were and there was no difficulty change then they should mine the same amount with and without the 50 phash being on the network. The largest difference that I can see if the difficulty rate will jump sooner. Just my understanding of it. Fahlcor |
|
|
|
|
|
xstr8guy
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:49:11 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. Not to mention that looking at that CoinWarz chart is unhealthy. It seems to be using a small number of blocks to "measure" the hashrate and creates a bunch of meaningless spikes. What matters is the whole 2016 blocks, not what happens in between. The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large. At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand. I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance. and I really doubt that variance would account for 50 phash. I agree others with smaller miners go elsewhere but as long as they are on a pool doin the same thing they were and there was no difficulty change then they should mine the same amount with and without the 50 phash being on the network. The largest difference that I can see if the difficulty rate will jump sooner. Just my understanding of it. Fahlcor A period of bad luck, followed by good luck and then back to bad luck can certainly explain the spike on that chart. Just look at the past on that very same chart... it's one spike followed by a dip, one after the other. I don't disagree that there are dozens of PH being added at this very moment. I just don't believe for one second that someone is switching tons of mining gear off-and-on for no logical reason. The truth lies somewhere between 0 and 50PHs. |
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 9090
https://bpip.org
|
|
August 12, 2014, 09:49:41 PM |
|
The 504 block rate on wisdom is too large. At least the coinwarz one gives a relative speed understand.
I'll tell the cop next time i'm speed well officer I have average 60mph but if oyu say I was doing 120 then I think it was variance.
Too large for what? What "relative speed"? Difficulty adjustment is based on the last 2016 blocks. Not 504 and not whatever CoinWarz is using. Smaller sample == more variance. Comparing distance-over-time calculation to the inherently random process of mining is like apples to androids. |
|
|
|
|
|
chunkyjunkie
|
|
August 12, 2014, 10:36:19 PM |
|
Right, because turning off 50PHs (just for the hell of it) makes a lot of sense. "Nah, we don't need the money, let's just turn them off and let them collect dust. But we'll continue to pay the lease on the 2 massive datacenters that they are in." If there is a sudden large spike in the network hashrate and it suddenly disappears, it's variance... not someone having a play with literally tons of equipment. lol 50 ph in variance Just to make it clear for you how many times has the network gone to say 50k from 100k. If you think the actual hashrate is varying? ( yes it will vary if someone brings new equipment online or takes it off, or chips vary slightly. ) That isn't luck lol. You are not going to see for example your home hardware spiking from 440 ( on an s3 ) to 660 and to 220 for any length of time, much less everyone's at once. Made me smile though. Edit- I am very curious though who/what/where it was. Will probably find out soon if it wasn't any of the major equipment vendors testing. Would be interesting to see it stay up for a while then we start to get a slew of complaints x vendor just shipped me dusty used equipment. Then again it could be some cloud mining operation setting up in Iceland finally and getting it right. |
|
|
|
|
