[HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet

[FlungSpun]

bought some more hyp today to support this great coin it is a bit of a wait till it gets staking but pretty stable

but now that presstab has a flux capicitator i think things will take off at lighting speed

Just wait until he gets his hands on a multiplex demodulator.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Sanyo-LA3330-PLL-FM-Multiplex-Demodulator-DIP16-/270878640196

Welll if that's all it takes .. sheesh .. let all chip in


I might even have one in a draw somewhere .lol

*edit .. lmao .. actually I DO!

[lucv]

Still trying to run this on a raspberry.

key.cpp:358:33: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘ECDSA_SIG {aka struct ECDSA_SIG_st}’
  BN_bin2bn(&vchSig[33],32,sig->s);

As far i found out the reason for this error comes from some new OPENSSL strucs. But not a clue what to do with it 

Anyone is running this on raspberry?

[dac10]

Yes, good things to come for those who hold their TEK. I think time will bear out the truth that TEK,TRK,HYP, high interest pos coins our dev group has been involved with will prove to be some of the best investment vehicles in the crypto world. Contrary to the belief that TEK is an inflationary coin in fact it can be demonstrated that it is the opposite. Just take a look at the rich list and study the block chain. The vast majority of TEK,TRK,HYP went into principle building stake hold, i.e. the coins become part of the virtual mining/staking machinery and for all extensive purposes taken off the market. Ordinary pow investment logic should not be applied to high interest pos coins.The very nature of high pos coins is that they make possible the hoped for, dreamt for, long term yield minus having to be jacked around by pumpers and dumpers and the volatility of bitcoin itself. It makes it possible to actually build significant principle that can be tailored to ones cash flow needs. If you want more yield buy more TEK, let the principle keep staking while selling of enough yield to keep liquidity in the exchanges. My final words; load up on cheap TEK while you have the chance!

TEKcoin, Novaexchange trade on 24.09.2017 in high 93 Sats.

TEKcoin wurde am 24.09.2017 auf Novaexchange im Hoch zu 93 Satoshis gehandelt.

[bitmaster1x]

Getting some nice HYP action today. 

[TupacShakur]

i hear we are going to implement PiVX's new anon tech, you are the developer on PIVX too correct?

[bitmaster1x]

And these movements in HYP? Are good things coming? After 29 days, of the 50 blocks of 19k HYP + 2 blocks of 23k, I got rewards in 13 so far! Is this the average or was I lucky?

As more people come into HYP, there will be more competition. It's dynamic and result can vary dramatically. Keeps everyone on their toes. That's part of the fun.  

[pwpwpw]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

[bitmaster1x]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

[TupacShakur]

talk of a bittrex re-listing is inspiring me 🤝

stocking up hard lm these low levels.

[pwpwpw]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

[bitmaster1x]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Regardless the "up to 750%" is in fact the most accurate representation of what's possible. Will "everyone" be able to achieve 750%? No, but some can get pretty damn close for a short while if they're very lucky and always optimizing their strategy. However, that can easily change as well because everyone might have changed what they're doing.

The annual rates are different for everyone and this is due to how people are implementing their own strategy and that is the whole point. For example, you may get on average 134%, I may get on average 400% and Joe Shmoe may only get 89% because he has a terrible strategy and very unlucky. This is what makes HYP dynamic because there are many factors involved and the result of one individual can vary greatly from everyone else.

So, if Joe Shmoe has a terrible strategy, does that make how successful you are in achieving the 134% over his a scam?  Does that make the presentation of the information a scam? No. See what I mean. This isn't a static coin/wallet so the annual rate cannot be determined, it can only be averaged for most depending on what people are doing and has already done, but there can also be outliers on the low and high end. One thing we know for sure is that it can never be higher 750% (excluding compounding).

As far as people that complain, because they don't bother reading or don't understand what they're reading that is to be expected especially when there are many people that are not native English speakers. Even native English speakers will complain, because they simply don't bother reading. In such cases, you can't fix stupid. That is just the way the world is and the internet just magnifies the idiots / trolls. That's both good and bad depending on one's perspective.  

[SneakyBit]

Still trying to run this on a raspberry.

key.cpp:358:33: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘ECDSA_SIG {aka struct ECDSA_SIG_st}’
  BN_bin2bn(&vchSig[33],32,sig->s);

As far i found out the reason for this error comes from some new OPENSSL strucs. But not a clue what to do with it 

Anyone is running this on raspberry?

Hm. I'm trying the same and got problems, too. I would be happy if someone could give him an answer. Maybe the Linux wallet or the tutorial should be updatet.

[pwpwpw]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Regardless the "up to 750%" is in fact the most accurate representation of what's possible. Will "everyone" be able to achieve 750%? No, but some can get pretty damn close for a short while if they're very lucky and always optimizing their strategy. However, that can easily change as well because everyone might have changed what they're doing.

The annual rates are different for everyone and this is due to how people are implementing their own strategy and that is the whole point. For example, you may get on average 134%, I may get on average 400% and Joe Shmoe may only get 89% because he has a terrible strategy and very unlucky. This is what makes HYP dynamic because there are many factors involved and the result of one individual can vary greatly from everyone else.

So, if Joe Shmoe has a terrible strategy, does that make how successful you are in achieving the 134% over his a scam?  Does that make the presentation of the information a scam? No. See what I mean. This isn't a static coin/wallet so the annual rate cannot be determined, it can only be averaged for most depending on what people are doing and has already done, but there can also be outliers on the low and high end. One thing we know for sure is that it can never be higher 750% (excluding compounding).

As far as people that complain, because they don't bother reading or don't understand what they're reading that is to be expected especially when there are many people that are not native English speakers. Even native English speakers will complain, because they simply don't bother reading. In such cases, you can't fix stupid. That is just the way the world is and the internet just magnifies the idiots / trolls. That's both good and bad depending on one's perspective.  

I'm not saying it's a scam because it says 750%, I'm saying don't even give them a chance to come up with FUD based on the 750%. If you give people nothing to FUD about and they still do, it becomes obvious to everyone. What I'm saying is sort of like, don't feed the trolls.

[watata]

I would edit the OP to the current actual annual reward (134%) because that 750% is very misleading for new people.

How is, "Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)" misleading?

It's clear as day in what it says.

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Excuse me,I thought that the annual interest rate is 750%, but is actually 134%?
I'm not good at English.(sorry this sentene written by google transtrate.)
If you do not mind, please tell me where 134% is written? m(_ _*)m

[presstab]

I would support just removing the % based calculation in the code and making it 1,000 HYP for every stake. It would be way less confusing.

[presstab]

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Excuse me,I thought that the annual interest rate is 750%, but is actually 134%?
I'm not good at English.(sorry this sentene written by google transtrate.)
If you do not mind, please tell me where 134% is written? m(_ _*)m
[/quote]

Read the first post, it says quite a few times that 750% is the maximum amount, not the average.

2nd sentence in the post (obviously not hiding anything):

Currently inflation is managed through the maximum stake reward of 1000 HYP per stake

Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)

Inflation control limits the maximum amount you can stake to 1,000 HYP for each block. This means that you will want to split your HYP blocks into the appropriate amount of HYP if you want to receive 750% reward, or else you will have your reward capped at 1,000 HYP. Reward is calculated by the following formula:
Code:
Reward = min(HYPamount * (7.5/365) * days-to-stake, 1,000)
Many of us have come to the conclusion that with such high difficulty, it is worth using bigger block size that will definitely hit max reward of 1,000, but will stake faster because of large size.
See the splitting blocks tutorial for assistance. Also visit the inflation control wiki page and the inflation prediction website.

[watata]

Well it's "up to 750%" but it's actually 134%. This "up to" is used as a marketing scam to fool the masses who don't read the small fonts, we don't need such things here. I don't mind up to 750% if you put the actual annual rate there as well. I just don't wanna see in the future posts like "omg, I was promised 750% and it's less than 100%, this is a scam!" because I know it's coming once it's more popular.

Excuse me,I thought that the annual interest rate is 750%, but is actually 134%?
I'm not good at English.(sorry this sentene written by google transtrate.)
If you do not mind, please tell me where 134% is written? m(_ _*)m

Read the first post, it says quite a few times that 750% is the maximum amount, not the average.

2nd sentence in the post (obviously not hiding anything):

Currently inflation is managed through the maximum stake reward of 1000 HYP per stake

Annual Stake Rate - up to 750% (see hyp.presstab.pw for avg paid rate)

Inflation control limits the maximum amount you can stake to 1,000 HYP for each block. This means that you will want to split your HYP blocks into the appropriate amount of HYP if you want to receive 750% reward, or else you will have your reward capped at 1,000 HYP. Reward is calculated by the following formula:
Code:
Reward = min(HYPamount * (7.5/365) * days-to-stake, 1,000)
Many of us have come to the conclusion that with such high difficulty, it is worth using bigger block size that will definitely hit max reward of 1,000, but will stake faster because of large size.
See the splitting blocks tutorial for assistance. Also visit the inflation control wiki page and the inflation prediction website.

[/quote]


In other words, if the amount of HYP possessed is large, will most of you approach the ideal value?
I have divided 81600HYP for every blocks　1600HYP now, but if this is 750% is not it?

[presstab]

Excuse me,I thought that the annual interest rate is 750%, but is actually 134%?
I'm not good at English.(sorry this sentene written by google transtrate.)
If you do not mind, please tell me where 134% is written? m(_ _*)m

i see ~333 here
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/charts.php?type=annualrate

and ~142 here
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/HYP/

why so ?

Different periods that the average is being taken... The entire blockchain vs the last 500 blocks.

[bitmaster1x]

I'm not saying it's a scam because it says 750%, I'm saying don't even give them a chance to come up with FUD based on the 750%. If you give people nothing to FUD about and they still do, it becomes obvious to everyone. What I'm saying is sort of like, don't feed the trolls.

Unfortunately, that is not possible because people will fud about anything and everything whether it is intentional or not. It's like the best of human intelligence and the worst a non utilized brain. For example: Flat Earth. Why this is even a debate in this day and age is beyond intelligence.

I wouldn't worry about the trolls.

[bitmaster1x]

I would support just removing the % based calculation in the code and making it 1,000 HYP for every stake. It would be way less confusing.

...and then there will be fud from the trolls that they're not getting 1000 HYP every time, because "thinking is too dang hard" for some. Dang it... LoL