Are you saying multiple addresses of 1500 in wallet better than 1 address with xxx,xxx NAV? Please clarify and if this is the case provide an explanation.
it doesn't have to be multiple addresses, it can be multiple 'chunks' within the same address. I am not sure what the official term for 'chunks' is, but I am referring to a grouping of coins that are the same age. If you look in coin control, a single address can have hundreds+ of chunks in it. I don't really have an explanation other than what I have noticed over the past year and what Remy showed me. Remy did an analysis a while back charting the blocks generated and how many coins it took and how long, etc.... it was very detailed and lined up with what I observed. So no explanation, just observation. Remy could probably provide better details.
I'm just regurgitating what he figured out. On that note, a big kudos to Remy for his continued in depth and very intriguing block chain analysis. I believe this sort of analysis is of great importance when looking ahead into the future of Navajo. Thanks Remy !
A good rule of thumb would be to take a look in coin control every once and a while and sort your coins by smallest size as well as oldest age (you will notice some chunks just don't generate a block for some reason). I then send the 'under performing' chunks together to myself into groups of 1.5k-3k. if you keep your wallet running 24/7 and do the above, you should be pretty close to maximizing your POS returns.
And if Bocyaj after month continues to regurgitate that old post, you can imagine how difficult it was to digest.
With regard to chuncks, they are the results of individual transaction incoming to the own wallet,
and often refers to them with the name of UTXO. I prefer pile, but this is just about me.
In this regard, the number that you see listed in the last column of my unofficial richlist, the C-Pile (Coin Pile),
indicates how many should be the UTXO of that single address.
Each UTXO, has its own independent possibility of generating a stake, partly due to luck,
partly due to the value of UTXO and at his age (here limited to 24 hours).
All this of course is controlled by the POS-Diff, if it is high, the UTXO of low value have tiniest
possibility to produce results, so as Bocyaj wrote, it is useful to send them back to themselves,
so to have a single UTXO of bigger value.
But.. when it is the POS-diff to be at very low levels, as these days, well ... I recently saw in blockchain
also produce a new block in less than 30 hours even by UTXO around 90 Nav.
In meanwhile other UTXO with value of more than 1000 Nav waiting for days.
Matter of luck, sometimes having many small possibility of lower value, gives better results
than a single large probability, sometime not.
There are two schools of thought about pile dimension, few bigger or many middle, both with
their own reason, pros and cons.
The scenarios change, and we must adapt to them.
PS:
Thanks Bocyaj for your kind word.
I try to do what I can, but they are heavy and tedious arguments, often uninteresting for most users.
Today, for the morale of the forum it does not seem the case.
Oh well, maybe next time, after other controls, I'll talk about asymmetries and lost sheep.
Bye Bye
