★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!

[weilichesbin]

Which day the supply chain will be updatet?

[1715265942]

1715265942

[hashforce101]

Guys look at the XMR, SDC, ETH, ETC,...
We'll never see 5k again.

LOL, may be 5k will be again, because this pump was caused by xmr anon hype.

NO

Look at the NAV Official Developer Announcement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=679791.msg16149794#msg16149794

I am ready for the trolls 

[hashforce101]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2AC41dglnM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZD982yrmx4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co6WMzDOh1o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjQ9tuuTJQ

NavCoin  - The Unbeakable Code

~NAV Community & Dev Team~
You Deserve every Satoshi
Lets Trade!

[juguelio]

Our press release has been published on https://cointelegraph.com
Read it here: https://cointelegraph.com/news/nav-coin-updates-anonymous-network

NAV on the Press!

[Diego24]

Guys look at the XMR, SDC, ETH, ETC,...
We'll never see 5k again.

LOL, may be 5k will be again, because this pump was caused by xmr anon hype.

It is not a hype. XMR hype made people realize the importance of anonimity. Now everyone is taking NAV seriously. NAV can have a correction but it will not go back to 5k. I wish it did so I could buy some more at that price.

[Maksim Popov]

Hi Nav Coiners

It’s Monday here in New Zealand, which means it’s time for the weekly update!

I’ve had a very busy week optimising the new anonymous scripts (I was up till 3am last night!!!). I have successfully completed all the improvements which I was hoping to get done before tidying up for deployment to the live environments.

I should have the clean up done by tonight or tomorrow, then over the next few days myself and Shahim will begin to roll the new system out to the anonymous network and begin our testing on the live environments. We aim to have our testing completed by the end of this week. If no major issues are encountered we hope to relaunch the Anon network to the public next week. We will of course keep you updated and aware of any changes to this schedule if delays are incurred by our testing results.

A lot of what has been optimised is in preparation for the impending decentralisation and as such, some of the improvements are quite technical, but actually pretty neat. I will be detailing what’s changed and how everything works in a new whitepaper which describes how the new anonymous network functions as well as the plan for implementing decentralisation. My goal is to have these ready for release around the same time as we re-launch the anon network. How much time i get to spend on this documentation over the next 10 days will be largely dependent on how smooth the live deployment and testing goes.

Everything is looking good though. I am confident in this system and I think it makes decentralisation not just a possibility but well within our grasp.

Mark and Sophia have been busy writing a few articles over the weekend. The first one we are releasing is an education piece about how our anonymous system works and largely comes off the back of what I have posted here about it recently. This should give the wider public some understanding of how cool our technology really is and also spread awareness about the upcoming relaunch of the anonymous network.

Soopy and Shahim have been busy finishing the thin client for desktop. They have successfully compiled a near finished version of the thin client which runs using the electrum server instead of having to download the whole blockchain. This will allow anyone who has trouble syncing the blockchain an option to forego the hassle and just use this wallet instead. We are planning to release this wallet later this week if no issues come up in our user testing. Keep your eyes peeled for the announcement with the feature list and wallet download.

After being on the shelf for a while as we focused on more pressing projects, we are also in the process of finishing off the web wallet. This also runs off the electrum server but only requires your web browser to run. We have been pretty close to finishing this for some time with most of the work coming piggy backing on the electrum server / android wallet release. We will keep you posted in regards to release schedules for this also.

That’s about it for the update. We have a lot of content and releases planned for the next couple of weeks, so hold on to your hats and enjoy the ride!

Talk soon,
Craig.

Hey! I can help make design for website and wallet. etherdesign.io

How to get in touch with you?

Also how get to your slack?

[XbladeX]

...
It is not a hype. XMR hype made people realize the importance of anonimity. Now everyone is taking NAV seriously. NAV can have a correction but it will not go back to 5k. I wish it did so I could buy some more at that price.

You never know 1/3 - 1/4 pump price is standard in crypto.

People give shit to anonymity all they want is get profit so now even NAV is great coin with honest people involved but where is pump there is looong dump.
I wish NAV 100k but time will tell.

[Sniper76]

Hi guys,

I would like thanks the NAV team for their help to get back my unswapped coins.

They did the swap for me and really fast.
I lost a lot of other coins because i missed swap, here we have an amazing team who listen and respond to his community !

Long live for NAV team and special thanks for Shahim

[juguelio]

Let's put some pressure on Shapeshift so they add NAV to their exchange and we can trade from Mobile Wallet.
Please re-tweet!

https://twitter.com/Juguelio/status/773480405181792256

[BTCdoaA]

...
It is not a hype. XMR hype made people realize the importance of anonimity. Now everyone is taking NAV seriously. NAV can have a correction but it will not go back to 5k. I wish it did so I could buy some more at that price.

You never know 1/3 - 1/4 pump price is standard in crypto.

People give shit to anonymity all they want is get profit so now even NAV is great coin with honest people involved but where is pump there is looong dump.
I wish NAV 100k but time will tell.

NAV is a good coin but as you said people care only about profit . so hope NAV run over 400 k , it is good for everyone traders and dev team .

[-Lux-]

...
It is not a hype. XMR hype made people realize the importance of anonimity. Now everyone is taking NAV seriously. NAV can have a correction but it will not go back to 5k. I wish it did so I could buy some more at that price.

You never know 1/3 - 1/4 pump price is standard in crypto.

People give shit to anonymity all they want is get profit so now even NAV is great coin with honest people involved but where is pump there is looong dump.
I wish NAV 100k but time will tell.

NAV is a good coin but as you said people care only about profit . so hope NAV run over 400 k , it is good for everyone traders and dev team .

thats so true this is gonna dump hard just look at other coins doing the same shit we are doing Shadowcash yall should be over there

[soulgate]

The coin is becoming to make me rich 

[johnnywoo2015]

NAV is ready to another run 

[soulgate]

NAV is ready to another run 

I hope for correction about to 3 cents. And then it can make another run 

[raphma]

NAV is ready to another run 

definitelly not ready... price still too stretched out. it will go back to at least 5k or less.
i've sold mine and will buy back after the correction.

a few of us are real investors, but the majority just want some profit and they will sell. just wait for the panic sell to buy cheap nav.

[johnnywoo2015]

NAV is ready to another run 

definitelly not ready... price still too stretched out. it will go back to at least 5k or less.
i've sold mine and will buy back after the correction.

a few of us are real investors, but the majority just want some profit and they will sell. just wait for the panic sell to buy cheap nav.

I think Correction to 8k is possible but to 5k is not possible.

[Waldozaur12]

Now whales shaking weak hands...xd

8K bottom confirmed.

[criptix]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin

Can you please tell me main differences?
For me it seems you guys are doing exactly this. (Bolded in your text)

Also can you please explain the last Bolded part in more detail please? I'm not quite sure what you mean with it.

Thank you for your time.

-snip-

Hello package,


Thanks for your answer even though I don't really think you understood me.

So as far as I understand you use two block chains and the second blockchain obfuscate the address of the receiver via encryption.

The second blockchain has nodes that has a certain amount of Nav pooled.

The second blockchain does a mixing like coinjoin/dash mixing etc pp.

I see no difference except it seems the mixing works on the blockchain instead on a single server (coinjoin) but very similar to master nodes (dash).

Correct?

Hey package,

That was my reply you didnt see.

[shahim]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin

Can you please tell me main differences?
For me it seems you guys are doing exactly this. (Bolded in your text)

Also can you please explain the last Bolded part in more detail please? I'm not quite sure what you mean with it.

Thank you for your time.

-snip-

Hello package,


Thanks for your answer even though I don't really think you understood me.

So as far as I understand you use two block chains and the second blockchain obfuscate the address of the receiver via encryption.

The second blockchain has nodes that has a certain amount of Nav pooled.

The second blockchain does a mixing like coinjoin/dash mixing etc pp.

I see no difference except it seems the mixing works on the blockchain instead on a single server (coinjoin) but very similar to master nodes (dash).

Correct?

Hey package,

That was my reply you didnt see.

Hi,

No, not correct like you said. Dash masternode is building a chain of sendings where in the end the tx got send in small chunks to the recipient. But all happens on the same chain and is "traceable". With much affort, of course.

Coinjoin is on a server where you want to send like 2 bitcoin to a person. You send like 3btc and get back 1 while the server sends 2 to the person. I hope i understand that correct. But at the end i think so...

We are using a different system, using a Subchain to transport sending information from one node to a random other node. Using this we break the information on the nav blockchain. There is no transaction between you amd receiver, which can be traced, since the recipient do not get the coins you did send.

So it is not a mixing service. Have you read the original whitepaper?  It is quite good explanation in there.

Google navajocoin whitepaper and the decentralization whitepaper.

Regards
Shahim

Edit: reading your last posts make me think you are German. Ich denke auf deutsch kann ich eine bessere Erklärung geben, wenn du magst per pm.

[criptix]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin

Can you please tell me main differences?
For me it seems you guys are doing exactly this. (Bolded in your text)

Also can you please explain the last Bolded part in more detail please? I'm not quite sure what you mean with it.

Thank you for your time.

-snip-

Hello package,


Thanks for your answer even though I don't really think you understood me.

So as far as I understand you use two block chains and the second blockchain obfuscate the address of the receiver via encryption.

The second blockchain has nodes that has a certain amount of Nav pooled.

The second blockchain does a mixing like coinjoin/dash mixing etc pp.

I see no difference except it seems the mixing works on the blockchain instead on a single server (coinjoin) but very similar to master nodes (dash).

Correct?

Hey package,

That was my reply you didnt see.

Hi,

No, not correct like you said. Dash masternode is building a chain of sendings where in the end the tx got send in small chunks to the recipient. But all happens on the same chain and is "traceable". With much affort, of course.

Coinjoin is on a server where you want to send like 2 bitcoin to a person. You send like 3btc and get back 1 while the server sends 2 to the person. I hope i understand that correct. But at the end i think so...

We are using a different system, using a Subchain to transport sending information from one node to a random other node. Using this we break the information on the nav blockchain. There is no transaction between you amd receiver, which can be traced, since the recipient do not get the coins you did send.

So it is not a mixing service. Have you read the original whitepaper?  It is quite good explanation in there.

Google navajocoin whitepaper and the decentralization whitepaper.

Regards
Shahim

Edit: reading your last posts make me think you are German. Ich denke auf deutsch kann ich eine bessere Erklärung geben, wenn du magst per pm.

Hey mate,

Well your explanations sounds exactly like how i understood it and what i wrote there.
A second blockchain which does the mixing.
The subchain/second blockchain is public and only the encryption obfuscate the final receiver, which is like i said similar to dash masternode/other mixing methods. Especially because you have nav pooled on the "anon-nodes".

Also yes im german, feel free to send me a pm in german!
Maybe i just understood something wrong.

Thanks in advance.