Mist
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
:)
|
|
June 08, 2016, 01:12:47 AM |
|
I notice when I was away, phex (who's always been a helpful member of the bustabit community and script author) has made some pretty strong accusations: http://phex.io/bustabitI suspect it originates from a misunderstanding on how the provably fair works, as it actually definitively rules out the type of attack that phex brings up (it would break the chain). But the point I'd like to address in particular: Whoever notices this and points it out, Ryan either secretly mutes them or even bans them.
Is quite a bizarre accusation, as I have never muted (or banned) a single person for noticing or questioning anything. Phex himself is not, or will not be muted for making accusations (as long as they don't degenerate to troll-level). I've probably engaged a 100+ discussions on explaining why and how the provably fair works, and why it's not rigged. The official provably fair (bustabit.com/faq#fair) is actually a link to bitcointalk, precisely for the express purpose of allowing anyone to comment on it, and read the comments of other people (and as such the thread is not self moderated). Another long time community member here to say this is absolute bullshit. Ryan muting/censoring his chat has never happened, He is very open about this kind of thing. This seems like a guy who either got mad about losing or something, I don't get it.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
June 08, 2016, 01:49:42 AM |
|
I notice when I was away, phex (who's always been a helpful member of the bustabit community and script author) has made some pretty strong accusations: http://phex.io/bustabitI suspect it originates from a misunderstanding on how the provably fair works, as it actually definitively rules out the type of attack that phex brings up (it would break the chain). Looks like after grinding a -ev game for 31,600 games he was up around 600,000 with some 6-1 martingalish system. He took this as solid proof that he was the first person to ever develop a betting system that was capable of overcoming the house edge. With his system, he would be making 60-70 btc a year from RHaver. Then he lost 47 in a row and his account went from almost BTC1 to 1 bit. (which he turned into 7 before 0) Can't blame himself, can't blame the house edge, gotta blame someone. In the poker world we call these guys riggies. They're everywhere. Debating them should be done strictly for entertainment purposes only: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/great-poker-rigged-debate-collected-threads-edition-255990/
|
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
June 08, 2016, 02:30:19 AM |
|
Looks like after grinding a -ev game for 31,600 games he was up around 600,000 with some 6-1 martingalish system.
He took this as solid proof that he was the first person to ever develop a betting system that was capable of overcoming the house edge. With his system, he would be making 60-70 btc a year from RHaver.
Then he lost 47 in a row and his account went from almost BTC1 to 1 bit. (which he turned into 7 before 0)
Can't blame himself, can't blame the house edge, gotta blame someone.
In the poker world we call these guys riggies. They're everywhere.
I've seen my fair share of these guys too. When they're winning they attribute it to skill, and when they're losing they attribute it to the game cheating them. They don't seem to realize that if you play a game a million times you're quite likely to witness a one-in-a-million event. All you can do is answer their ranting with logical verifiably true responses. They're unlikely to listen to reason but hopefully the rest of the players spectating the chat will see who is making the most sense.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
EngiNerd
|
|
June 08, 2016, 02:35:10 AM |
|
I notice when I was away, phex (who's always been a helpful member of the bustabit community and script author) has made some pretty strong accusations: http://phex.io/bustabitI suspect it originates from a misunderstanding on how the provably fair works, as it actually definitively rules out the type of attack that phex brings up (it would break the chain). Looks like after grinding a -ev game for 31,600 games he was up around 600,000 with some 6-1 martingalish system. He took this as solid proof that he was the first person to ever develop a betting system that was capable of overcoming the house edge. With his system, he would be making 60-70 btc a year from RHaver. Then he lost 47 in a row and his account went from almost BTC1 to 1 bit. (which he turned into 7 before 0) Can't blame himself, can't blame the house edge, gotta blame someone. In the poker world we call these guys riggies. They're everywhere. Debating them should be done strictly for entertainment purposes only: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/great-poker-rigged-debate-collected-threads-edition-255990/[clipped] If he had bothered to check "!streak <7" he would have seen that a streak of 47 busts under 7x is by no means spectacular. Martingale always seems like it's beating the system when it's running good, but it's when it goes bad it goes bad in a hurry...
|
|
|
|
marcuslong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 08, 2016, 03:11:23 AM |
|
Bustabit i loss 0,002 bitcoin here and i stopped playing it because i dont want to loss more. Because i think in bustabit he want to win the player in the 1st game and if you win and you didnt withdraw it all of your balance loss. It is risky to gamble here because my friend said if ryan is online all of your bits will gone. So dont play when ryan is online.
|
|
|
|
cazkooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1013
|
|
June 08, 2016, 05:44:03 AM |
|
It is risky to gamble here because my friend said if ryan is online all of your bits will gone. So dont play when ryan is online.
I've heard the same kind of rumours as well however I dont really expect people to believe this. Come on people use your own brains up, if ryan wants to rig the game then he doesnt need to be online on the chat, he could always use another accounnt or even just watch the game through the database
|
|
|
|
habijabi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 250
|
|
June 08, 2016, 06:17:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ravens
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2016, 06:20:54 AM |
|
It is risky to gamble here because my friend said if ryan is online all of your bits will gone. So dont play when ryan is online.
I've heard the same kind of rumours as well however I dont really expect people to believe this. Come on people use your own brains up, if ryan wants to rig the game then he doesnt need to be online on the chat, he could always use another accounnt or even just watch the game through the database Your right, Ryan doesn't even need to use his own account to rig the game. He could just use an alt account.
|
|
|
|
Ghris
|
|
June 08, 2016, 01:49:10 PM |
|
Haha. Are these accusations all from the same guy or what? Same shitty english.
Anyway, I would trust Ryan with my baby. If I had one heh
|
|
|
|
Shogen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 08, 2016, 01:53:51 PM |
|
It is risky to gamble here because my friend said if ryan is online all of your bits will gone. So dont play when ryan is online.
I've heard the same kind of rumours as well however I dont really expect people to believe this. Come on people use your own brains up, if ryan wants to rig the game then he doesnt need to be online on the chat, he could always use another accounnt or even just watch the game through the database Your right, Ryan doesn't even need to use his own account to rig the game. He could just use an alt account. I would suggest you guys to read https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=922898.0 to learn more about how BaB is provably fair and and how you could verify that the crashpoints are not modified.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
June 09, 2016, 12:04:22 AM |
|
if ryan wants to rig the game then he doesnt need to be online on the chat, he could always use another accounnt or even just watch the game through the database
Nope, he couldn't.
Your right, Ryan doesn't even need to use his own account to rig the game. He could just use an alt account.
If it weren't provably fair yeah. But it is, so nope, he couldn't.
|
|
|
|
Mist
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
:)
|
|
June 09, 2016, 12:24:39 AM |
|
Sounds like a bunch of shill accounts that got pissy, any proof on the losing 500 claim?
|
|
|
|
NeilLostBitCoin
|
|
June 09, 2016, 12:33:16 AM |
|
Really man? I think you're wrong! If you want to gamble, take the risks and always remember that when you go to the casino or online betting sites, remember that the HOUSE always RULES. You just had a bad karma that day because you still don't know how to play bustabit, and like you said, you did it for testing meaning you're new at bustabit, Give up now on gambling now man. :3
|
|
|
|
JasonXG
|
|
June 09, 2016, 09:42:05 AM |
|
Really man? I think you're wrong! If you want to gamble, take the risks and always remember that when you go to the casino or online betting sites, remember that the HOUSE always RULES. You just had a bad karma that day because you still don't know how to play bustabit, and like you said, you did it for testing meaning you're new at bustabit, Give up now on gambling now man. :3 I know right. He is not even giving very good reasons. $500 to "test" noni don't buy that story. If you tests its more like $1 why do you need a lot to test you can even bet 10 bits at a time to test. I'm not sure how fair it is though. I never really trust these sites fairness rating.
|
|
|
|
hopenotlate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1231
Top Crypto Casino
|
|
June 09, 2016, 03:59:10 PM |
|
Really man? I think you're wrong! If you want to gamble, take the risks and always remember that when you go to the casino or online betting sites, remember that the HOUSE always RULES. You just had a bad karma that day because you still don't know how to play bustabit, and like you said, you did it for testing meaning you're new at bustabit, Give up now on gambling now man. :3 I know right. He is not even giving very good reasons. $500 to "test" noni don't buy that story. If you tests its more like $1 why do you need a lot to test you can even bet 10 bits at a time to test. I'm not sure how fair it is though. I never really trust these sites fairness rating. Main problem seems to be that a lot of people , and you likely are one of them, don't spend (I would better say "invest") some minutes of their lives in having a good read here on bitcointalk ( or even somewhere else) to understand how "provably fairness systems " work. In this very same page user "Shogen" suggested one of it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=922898.0Suggest everyone, who still haven't , to have a look at it. It's not a matter of "sites fairness rating", as you wrote, but you may just verify by yourself if a bet was manipulated or not.
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
June 09, 2016, 04:08:10 PM |
|
I played this website back when it first came out. It's a very fun game and unique good to see it's still legit and running. I bet there's probably a lot of people and bots on it now-a-days so it must be like fighting in an arena for money LOL It's not a matter of "sites fairness rating", as you wrote, but you may just verify by yourself if a bet was manipulated or not.
And with hundreds if not thousands that can do this, I really doubt that the admin(s) would even try to rig it once. They don't need to. They have an edge already.
|
|
|
|
Darkwin
Member
Offline
Activity: 191
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2016, 08:59:22 PM Last edit: July 10, 2018, 04:41:26 PM by Darkwin |
|
Nice scam you got going on here
|
|
|
|
Ghris
|
|
June 10, 2016, 09:36:31 PM |
|
You always expect to win? Do you really think that's how gambling works? Atleast you had a nice life lesson
|
|
|
|
Darkwin
Member
Offline
Activity: 191
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2016, 09:44:56 PM Last edit: July 10, 2018, 04:40:58 PM by Darkwin |
|
You always expect to win? Do you really think that's how gambling works? Atleast you had a nice life lesson Its obvious that is foul play involved, Others have pointed out the same issue and whenever they discuss it in chat they're silenced. I'm sorry to burst your bubble but it takes an idiot not to see whats going on. As for your final remark of having a nice life lesson lol, That's not my profile nor have i lost to that extent... i know better than that.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
June 11, 2016, 12:18:50 AM |
|
RHaver, you're more likely to convince the pope that Jesus never walked on water than convince a riggie like Darkwin your game isn't rigged.
|
|
|
|
|