|
supercointeam (OP)
|
 |
August 29, 2014, 04:46:06 AM |
|
I'm trying to resynch the wallet for the explorer at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/super/Each time it gets to block 414132 but then no longer progresses, and after that stays at 100% CPU usage. I'm on 1.5.0 (latest github AFAICT), any ideas? edit: seems to be moving now, but very slowly (414632) still 100% CPU tail debug.log looks like InvalidChainFound: invalid block=bf045b91cd64275cffc80679f713990c11f62fd9e12b1a3ba01a4a06f8d1ce97 height=414567 trust=33775047188900044 blocktrust=1838027 date=08/27/14 19:32:47
InvalidChainFound: current best=5498c511ce2f285cae7fb0433026824e470fd4f4c3bcd072c4dae7f3df19a4df height=414632 trust=33775046901464373 blocktrust=2492031 date=08/27/14 20:08:32
ERROR: SetBestChain() : Reorganize failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED You need to wait about 5-10 minutes it will be over. Be patient and dont kill the process it will be ok. It also happens on my desktop at first opening it uses overly the resources. bytheway thank you for updating the version we love to use your block explorer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:50:51 AM |
|
I'm trying to resynch the wallet for the explorer at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/super/Each time it gets to block 414132 but then no longer progresses, and after that stays at 100% CPU usage. I'm on 1.5.0 (latest github AFAICT), any ideas? Wallet Issue!
Just went to move 5500 Super and received a crazy conflict message. It said something about the coins already been spent...these coins have only been staking so not sure what message means.
Sent from Super 2 wallet:
Status: conflicted
Date: 8/27/2014 23:02
To: SQ4hFVWKY4giAwqVXGujLreYGHtoJptpjh
Debit: -5500.00 SUPER
Transaction fee: -0.0001 SUPER
Net amount: -5500.0001 SUPER
Transaction ID: fe0663501606d096b96bada950758302f514cb7463022afeed45bddae9e84313
initially the wallet lost about 6200 coins after the conflict message. Amount now seems to be correct minus the 5500 although strangely now I have 287 unconfirmed coins. Edit: 287 appear to have come from SuperPool minutes ago.
5500 transferred coins have not shown up at destiantion and dont show in block explorer.
Also just upgraded to Super3 and noticed 111 stakes from today that were prior confirmed are now greyed out and show as generated but not accepted.
lil help?
run repairwallet command in help > console we have been alerted about a potential Fork we are following the case. Thanks for response, ran repair wallet and this is what i received.  { "mismatched spent coins" : 4, "amount affected by repair" : 3086.11455064 } We need a more active support team. You will get your answers soon when supercointeam log in. since supercoin launched i had only 1 or 2 times not daily logged in or posted. I have sometimes family issue and businesses. So you can relax. Better community take some of the load off from my shoulders. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:52:45 AM |
|
Ok another problem with someone's wallet. Everytime he tries to open it, the wallet freezes. He tried to restart the computer and the wallet many times and it's always freezing (not answering) What should he do? Do I suggest him to download the new Trustless wallet and open his file in the new wallet, how does it work?  This too, I got a good answer but it seems a bit complicated and my friend is not a geek who can play with files in the backend very easily like you guys. Everytime he opens the wallet, it freezes there and the page is not answering. he should have enough ram or cpu resources. If this is not the case, he can close staking from the supercoin.conf or re install it (after backing up) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:54:49 AM |
|
Today I've had as many as 12k in coins and as few as zip, zilch, nada! I should have 7900 now its showing 8500+/-. I've repaired my wallet twice now, should I shut it down?

{
"mismatched spent coins" : 10,
"amount affected by repair" : 7869.65220069
}

{
"mismatched spent coins" : 1,
"amount affected by repair" : 714.21808219
}
You may try to resync from scratch. (backup first) and use the node list from the OP. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:55:41 AM |
|
I am ahead of the block explorer as well. Staking though.
Using new nodes from OP
Which explorer do you check? I alerted other explorer dev to update. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:59:43 AM |
|
I am also about 200 blocks ahead. Last night around the time the issue first cropped up I had just sent 70k Super and it never arrived. Safe to say there were a few moments of panic. I recovered a backup wallet from a week ago and resynced and my super was back. Phew. But yes, I am having the same issue.
Run repairwallet command in help console it will fix. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 05:00:43 AM |
|
Currently, my wallet wants to update 300 blocks ahead of blockchain.. Weird.
I alerted both explorer devs about updating wallet. It should be ok soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 05:04:06 AM |
|
I don't know if a guy just saw the tweet of Bitcoin Warrior like me but we got a buyer here   Big buy on mintpal aswell, Super has been looking good the last few days! I believe its a natural growth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marseille
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:31:53 AM |
|
I don't know if a guy just saw the tweet of Bitcoin Warrior like me but we got a buyer here Big buy on mintpal aswell, Super has been looking good the last few days! I believe its a natural growth. this is one of the few solid coins with great technologies and a responsible dev team. |
|
|
|
|
|
telematico
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:42:51 AM |
|
FBI investigates JPMorgan hack attack
JPMorgan Chase and at least four other financial institutions were hacked recently in a series of coordinated attacks, a federal law enforcement official told USA TODAY.
The source, who was not authorized to comment publicly, said investigators believe Russian hackers were the source of the attacks. What is less clear is whether the attacks were prompted by U.S. sanctions against the Russian government.
The sophisticated cyberattack resulted in the loss of sensitive data, Bloomberg.com said, citing security experts.
Companies "of our size unfortunately experience cyberattacks nearly every day," JPMorgan spokeswoman Trish Wexler said in a statement without confirming the reports. "We have multiple layers of defense to counteract any threats and constantly monitor fraud levels."
FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said the agency is "working with the United States Secret Service to determine the scope of recently reported cyber attacks against several American financial institutions."
Hackers broke into the networks of the banks, where they siphoned data, including account information. Several security firms are conducting digital forensics of the breached computer networks, The New York Times reported.
It remains unknown whether the digital intruders were financially motivated or part of an espionage campaign.
"The ability to overcome the typical financial defense-in-depth strategy outlined by JPMorgan points to capabilities that go beyond criminal activity and are in the realm of nation state capabilities," said security expert Phil Lieberman, CEO of Lieberman Software.
A report on The Wall Street Journal's website said particulars about the incident — when it began, whom it impacted and its potential costs — were unclear.
Though there's no indication the two are linked, computer security firm Proofpoint on Aug. 21 reported a large-scale computer attack campaign targeting JP Morgan Chase customers.
The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company reported multiple examples of a credential phishing campaign in which authentic-looking e-mails encouraged users to click a link to see a secure message from JP Morgan.
When they did, they were asked to enter their credentials. The Web page was hosted on a server in Moscow and installed a so-called Trojan-program onto their computer, allowing the attackers to compromise the user's computer
Proofpoint identified several other active campaigns that appeared to be run by the same attackers, each of which attempted to install the same Trojan software.
Contributing: Jessica Guynn
|
|
|
|
|
|
ycz
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:47:18 AM |
|
I have a question regarding the source code.
The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?
So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
telematico
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:57:07 AM |
|
I have a question regarding the source code.
The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?
So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!
It would be unwise to release the code, at least not before 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
Smoothmold
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:04:43 AM |
|
To all google experts...
Is there a possibility that we can look at the google searches of Supercoin. Now you see the thread of fudamentally broken, poliniex has rejected, another coin which is calles Supercoin and our old thread. And this thread is also difficult to spot, this thread should be the first one you see when people do a supercoin search.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ycz
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:10:41 AM |
|
I have a question regarding the source code.
The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?
So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!
It would be unwise to release the code, at least not before 1 year First of all, I asked because, if possible, I would like to run the supercoin wallet with my Linux box (arm CPU). It seems to me that there is even no Mac version for V3.0. Currently, only Windows binary distribution. Secondly, isn't "open source" part of the most important attracting force in the cryptocurrency world? If something must remain closed source without being externally examined or audited, its trustworthiness might be challenged. If V3.0 must remain closed source, I would like to ask the dev that: Can I run the V1.5 code on github for only supporting the network and doing the staking (if I don't need to do SuperSend and other advanced stuff)? Are these versions compatible on the fundamental functionality? |
|
|
|
|
telematico
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:30:37 AM |
|
I have a question regarding the source code.
The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?
So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!
It would be unwise to release the code, at least not before 1 year First of all, I asked because, if possible, I would like to run the supercoin wallet with my Linux box (arm CPU). It seems to me that there is even no Mac version for V3.0. Currently, only Windows binary distribution. Secondly, isn't "open source" part of the most important attracting force in the cryptocurrency world? If something must remain closed source without being externally examined or audited, its trustworthiness might be challenged. If V3.0 must remain closed source, I would like to ask the dev that: Can I run the V1.5 code on github for only supporting the network and doing the staking (if I don't need to do SuperSend and other advanced stuff)? Are these versions compatible on the fundamental functionality? The system has to be tested by real hackers, giving code proves nothing serious and very innocent by the dev. Investors would come to this coin if there are 100 equal? It is only my opinion |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:01:20 AM |
|
K.E.E.P P.U.S.H.I.N.G
|
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:02:10 AM |
|
To all google experts...
Is there a possibility that we can look at the google searches of Supercoin. Now you see the thread of fudamentally broken, poliniex has rejected, another coin which is calles Supercoin and our old thread. And this thread is also difficult to spot, this thread should be the first one you see when people do a supercoin search.
These fud will not lessen but increase being successful is a reason to be criticized. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:03:22 AM |
|
I have a question regarding the source code.
The code on github is still V1.5 (non-anon), while the windows wallet is V3.0 (Trustless with Multisig) right?
So the latest version of wallet client software is not open source for now. Is there plan to open the source? Thanks!
There is no plan for short term. |
|
|
|
|
|
