[SDC] ShadowCash | Welcome to the UMBRA

[fluffypony]

All day long you have spent on this thread and not on your own xmr thread, it means something, whether it is advertising or something else, it is obvious that you do not have good intentions.

What it "means" is quite simple:

[skip60]

fluffypony,

dont you have a coin to develop, u did ur points

and leave us alone now...it it like kindergarden here because of you and erok

cut it guys, you make this thread useless

[SebSebastian]

You know I can read right? Why just make stuff up now?

Reading and correctly interpreting are two distinct skills:)

I initially told you to go to IRC if you can't figure something out about the coin. That literally was my whole point to posting in reply to you. Then you got negative.

No, you said I should go to IRC *if I have a question*. I still don't have any questions:)

You followed that up with a mindless insinuation that I'm only here "advertising".

"and any idiot can look at the first commit and also observe that it didn't contain generateRingSignature(), nor were the verification functions wired up."

In direct response to the idea that I'd looked at the code before it was released. Which clearly I didn't, because logic (see above).

And you made direct condescending coin comparisons "when clearly there is no more NIZKP in the source than exists in Monero's keyimage system"

Well that's just as condescending to Monero - I've stated there that Monero doesn't have NIZKP either (the simple implementation in keyimages aside). Your persecution complex makes you imagine that I'm making "condescending coin comparisons" when instead I'm being pragmatic about both, silly rabbit.

I could post-mortem this more accurately but I would rather play video games.
I responded. I regret nothing.

Enjoy your video games, cheers!

More condescension, awesome...

Again if you wouldn't have used your own coin in the example you were trying to make, it wouldn't have been advertising and I wouldn't have an issue now would I?

He was using it as an example since the argument/discussion has been comparisons of xmr and sdc. But you can lump all Cryptonote coins into it xmr/bbr/bytecent etc

He could have just said cryptonote. Which has been addressed MANY times.

Let's make this the end of that particular discussion please, it's starting to get a bit unpleasant.

[erok]

All day long you have spent on this thread and not on your own xmr thread, it means something, whether it is advertising or something else, it is obvious that you do not have good intentions.

What it "means" is quite simple:

That is literally you. I am just defending a good dev and pointing out your cheap stab at trying to grab some of the SDC market. Sorry skip and seb, I am done. My point is that SDC is legit, if you have concerns or questions, IRC is quite active and a more efficient way.

[fluffypony]

That is literally you. I am just defending a good dev and pointing out your cheap stab at trying to grab some of the SDC market. Sorry skip and seb, I am done. My point is that SDC is legit, if you have concerns or questions, IRC is quite active and a more efficient way.

Hush, my friend. Your time on this topic has ended, continuously trying to have the last word is demeaning to you and you alone.

And my topic on this thread really has come to an end. It's been a fun chat, but clearly there is a distinct lack of people in this thread that know how to braai.

If Ryno ever wants to have a conversation devoid of poesklaps he can look me up.

[skip60]

Let's make this the end of that particular discussion please, it's starting to get a bit unpleasant.

maybe, it is time for someone to moderate the topic and delete kiddish posts 

[SebSebastian]

Let's make this the end of that particular discussion please, it's starting to get a bit unpleasant.

maybe, it is time for someone to moderate the topic and delete kiddish posts  

Let's move on.  

[Coolstoryteller]

That is literally you. I am just defending a good dev and pointing out your cheap stab at trying to grab some of the SDC market. Sorry skip and seb, I am done. My point is that SDC is legit, if you have concerns or questions, IRC is quite active and a more efficient way.

Hush, my friend. Your time on this topic has ended, continuously trying to have the last word is demeaning to you and you alone.

And my topic on this thread really has come to an end. It's been a fun chat, but clearly there is a distinct lack of people in this thread that know how to braai.

If Ryno ever wants to have a conversation devoid of poesklaps he can look me up.

Technical debate is always welcome here bru. This thread belongs to anyone with legitimate inquires, despite the reactionary responses from some of the people here. People are so accustomed to the FUDpacking and trolling on Bitcointalk that sometimes genuine questions get filed into the same category. I'm sure the tension between everyone here is an honest misunderstanding.

Ryno is AFK atm, but will be back later with a response for you.

[UNO_owner]

It's moments like this that really make me hate decentralized "communities".

[fluffypony]

I have in exclusivity some images of the Ryno's response to Fluffy. Enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tizwLJI-Nho

It's pronounced Ray-no, not Rye-no, but good effort.

[CryptoPiero]

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

[SebSebastian]

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

Please don't make lazy generalizations like that. The few people making childish comments aren't representative of the larger community.

[child_harold]

I have in exclusivity some images of the Ryno's response to Fluffy. Enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tizwLJI-Nho

It's pronounced Ray-no, not Rye-no, but good effort.

OK

I have been patient.

@fluffypony: would you kindly pls wait for a response to your comments from our dev and stop rubbing members of this community up the wrong way? I think you made ur point. Now await the reply.

@CryptoPiero: this community is maturing nicely thx very much

[LiteBit]

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

I do agree. Unfortunately this forum is a place for people to hide behind masks. Vetting is good for projects, helpful and makes them better. Venting is not good for projects, does no good and pushes away potential ideas and different ways to think about solutions.

Critique on ideas is good and this is one place to vet them. Instead of being so outspoken when someone says "what about this" why not say nothing and learn from what's being discussed. Contribute if it helps, otherwise don't. I'm sure some folks intent is to defend the product. That shouldn't be anyone's mindset with innovative ideas. It's ok to say "but, wait, what about?"

In the real world, innovation doesn't happen in a vacuum. Ideas need to be shared BY ANYONE and should be critiqued BY EVERYONE. Some work some don't. But don't try to figure out "tone" and imply what someone is saying different about an idea just by reading words from an un-faced person in a forum. What good does that do?

Not everyone is going to agree 100%. THAT IS OK! Can we get some thicker skin here and not take every "what if" personally?

[ozkraut]

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

Please don't make lazy generalizations like that. The few people making childish comments aren't representative of the larger community.

+1

+ 1. Could have engaged with a load of silly comments. Waste of time and disrespectful & childish.Block 257nnnn will reveal all soon enough. Fluffys questions seem fair enough IMO and I have all confidence he will get to the answer soon ^^^^^^^

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

As to the above:the more mature can't be bothered going back to high school and engaging. Hence the silly people are the ones highly visible.....

[00Smurf]

The maturity level of this community is quite low. At least fluffypony is a respected developer in the alt coin world. Have some respect guys !

I do agree. Unfortunately this forum is a place for people to hide behind masks. Vetting is good for projects, helpful and makes them better. Venting is not good for projects, does no good and pushes away potential ideas and different ways to think about solutions.

Critique on ideas is good and this is one place to vet them. Instead of being so outspoken when someone says "what about this" why not say nothing and learn from what's being discussed. Contribute if it helps, otherwise don't. I'm sure some folks intent is to defend the product. That shouldn't be anyone's mindset with innovative ideas. It's ok to say "but, wait, what about?"

In the real world, innovation doesn't happen in a vacuum. Ideas need to be shared BY ANYONE and should be critiqued BY EVERYONE. Some work some don't. But don't try to figure out "tone" and imply what someone is saying different about an idea just by reading words from an un-faced person in a forum. What good does that do?

Not everyone is going to agree 100%. THAT IS OK! Can we get some thicker skin here and not take every "what if" personally?

Well stated. This is the vetting process, it happens on all projects.

[Propulsion]

Linux 'anon' branch build "version" : "v0.9.1.0-47-gd14445e" forks on block 249948 with the block hash of 4d36874650143a4f2126dee96491f4f7d2a300ff404be0b542623937dfa1a6d2

The client has forked on this exact block/chain multiple times now. Needs to be addressed.

[Automatic Monkey]

ShadowChat:   SWr23tNRYMvmmCdv7ZiNooeqZVyQjvywjQ
Public Key:   s8UgsT1qPwSET5P1YwxEKypcQVrUPjT1ky1WYUVJ3meY

Back to reality... is there any way to make the ShadowChat work without entering the public key, just the address? An example of what I mean is the NeosCoin wallet chat, that's a really smooth PGP chat. Getting/copying/pasting the public key is onerous.

[Automatic Monkey]

Linux 'anon' branch build "version" : "v0.9.1.0-47-gd14445e" forks on block 249948 with the block hash of 4d36874650143a4f2126dee96491f4f7d2a300ff404be0b542623937dfa1a6d2

The client has forked on this exact block/chain multiple times now. Needs to be addressed.

I've been having the same problem with the Windows wallet on an old install. No problem on another machine with a new install.

[LiteBit]

ShadowChat:   SWr23tNRYMvmmCdv7ZiNooeqZVyQjvywjQ
Public Key:   s8UgsT1qPwSET5P1YwxEKypcQVrUPjT1ky1WYUVJ3meY

Back to reality... is there any way to make the ShadowChat work without entering the public key, just the address? An example of what I mean is the NeosCoin wallet chat, that's a really smooth PGP chat. Getting/copying/pasting the public key is onerous.

Better yet what about assigning nicknames to addresses like STR? then you just have to remember a nickname like irc chat