[~1000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fee Pool, LP, SSL, Full Precision, and More

[Dobrodav]

Looks like pool have no protection from common pool fraud practise - connection to pool in early stages of new block solving and after est. reward  reach some constant, reconnect to other pool witch is an early stage of solving new block.

[1713561446]

1713561446

[1713561446]

1713561446

[1713561446]

1713561446

[d3athrow]

Code:

[25/05/2011 05:16:13] Result: 9c19a405 accepted
[25/05/2011 05:16:16] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
[25/05/2011 05:16:17] Connected to server
[289.52 Mhash/sec] [56 Accepted] [20 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]

20 rejected and only 56 accepted. i'm used to getting 20 rejected in maybe every 2500 shares.

[Dobrodav]

My statistics on stale shares not that bad, but still higher than on other pool. Looks like there is a bandwich problem from me to pool.

[andrepcg]

my stale count is pretty low. no problems here

great pool btw!!

[eleuthria]

Looks like pool have no protection from common pool fraud practise - connection to pool in early stages of new block solving and after est. reward  reach some constant, reconnect to other pool witch is an early stage of solving new block.

There is no reason that if you submitted 250 shares in the round that your 250 shares are worth less than my 250, just because mine were submitted evenly and yours were submitted in the beginning.  It is not fraud, it is a miner trying to maximize their reward.  No share should be worth more than any other.  Every share had the same chance of being the one to solve the block.

[ensign_lee]

I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.

We're at 231.7 right now. O.o

What's gonna happen I wonder?

[eleuthria]

I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.

We're at 231.7 right now. O.o

What's gonna happen I wonder?

If we cross 250, the server will open a portal to another dimension, releasing unspeakable horrors into our world, which will rape and pillage the lands until man kind is extinct.

Or it will start giving a lot of RPC errors/idles.  I may be mixing up my prophecies.  It could happen at 240, it could hold off until 300, but 250 was my rough estimate of where the next bottleneck will occur.

[CentroniX]

I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.

We're at 231.7 right now. O.o

What's gonna happen I wonder?

If we cross 250, the server will open a portal to another dimension, releasing unspeakable horrors into our world, which will rape and pillage the lands until man kind is extinct.

Or it will start giving a lot of RPC errors/idles.  I may be mixing up my prophecies.  It could happen at 240, it could hold off until 300, but 250 was my rough estimate of where the next bottleneck will occur.

Can you predict a date?  If so, a bunch of us will RV-up and start crossing the country, spreading the word... 

[eleuthria]

Can you predict a date?  If so, a bunch of us will RV-up and start crossing the country, spreading the word... 

Given the rate of growth, about 12 hours.

[Isepick]

Oh, so is now a bad time to add 4.6 Ghash/sec to the pool?

[steelhouse]

Nice to see my prediction for 200 Gh/s for Friday was accurate.  We are already at 237 Gh/s.  I set the new goal at 250 Gh/s by Friday.

[eleuthria]

Nice to see my prediction for 200 Gh/s for Friday was accurate.  We are already at 237 Gh/s.  I set the new goal at 250 Gh/s by Friday.

I'm more inclined to say 250 GH/s by tonight.  Assuming the hardware doesn't explode of course.

[carriun]

Bit of bad luck today to make up for all the good luck we've been having.  Hopefully with the new dedicated hosting provider this weekend, we can surpass 250 gH/sec by the end of the month.  The current hardware will probably stop keeping up around that point.

What type of hardware/bandwidth are you running this on.  I would consider hosting the pool on some dedicated hardware in my datacenter (2 GigE of bandwidth). I'll even accept BTC for payment

[eleuthria]

Bit of bad luck today to make up for all the good luck we've been having.  Hopefully with the new dedicated hosting provider this weekend, we can surpass 250 gH/sec by the end of the month.  The current hardware will probably stop keeping up around that point.

What type of hardware/bandwidth are you running this on.  I would consider hosting the pool on some dedicated hardware in my datacenter (2 GigE of bandwidth). I'll even accept BTC for payment

I have a dedicated server/host lined up, just waiting on them to get the SSD drive I requested.  Still hopeful that the server will go online this weekend.

[IlbiStarz]

252Gh/s.

Yeah, starting to get more idles that usual...
Let's hope that server gets up and running soon!

[eleuthria]

Registration has been temporarily closed to new users until the dedicated server is ready.  The pool grew over 30 GH again within the last 24 hours, and the current hardware is not going to be able to support the load of many more users.  The current hardware was not expected to scale to a 250+ GH server in less than 3 weeks from being opened.

Sorry for the inconvenience for those who haven't yet signed up.  Registration will be enabled the moment the new server is online.

[Prze_koles]

haha! Glad I signed up yesterday  

[Grike_SixEcho]

https://mtgox.com/

Check out the graph from the last 24 hours.  Exchange rate fluctuated by almost 40% today.  Up from 7.6-9.3 down to 8.1 right now... The opportunists must be going crazy.  It's a good time to be mining, not selling.

Also:  NPR (national public radio) did an incredibly uninformative report on bitcoins yesterday.  Related?
Honestly, it was so derpy... They kept talking about how it could be used for money laundering, as there is no record.  Isn't the record accessible and very permanent?  Not to mention in the app data of every person who has the program?  Derp.

[marcus_of_augustus]

https://mtgox.com/

Check out the graph from the last 24 hours.  Exchange rate fluctuated by almost 40% today.  Up from 7.6-9.3 down to 8.1 right now... The opportunists must be going crazy.  It's a good time to be mining, not selling.

Also:  NPR (national public radio) did an incredibly uninformative report on bitcoins yesterday.  Related?
Honestly, it was so derpy... They kept talking about how it could be used for money laundering, as there is no record.  Isn't the record accessible and very permanent?  Not to mention in the app data of every person who has the program?  Derp.

It was the same ditz from Slate, Annie Lowry,  that wrote the hatchet job piece the other day calling bitcoiners "privacy freaks" .... http://www.slate.com/id/2294980

.... maybe someone should invade her financial privacy to give her a taste of what she advocates?

[steelhouse]

Maybe you can keep up 2 servers or more.  I think deepbit uses multiple servers (at least two).  I know webservers like apache start up like 10 instances of the server.