clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
March 19, 2017, 07:45:30 PM |
|
It's time to break this block wide open!
|
|
|
|
beltsniffer
|
|
March 19, 2017, 09:33:59 PM |
|
Block! Thank You Canaan for putting this one out of our misery!
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 19, 2017, 09:34:31 PM |
|
Block! by canaan A7v2
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
March 19, 2017, 09:40:10 PM |
|
Block! by canaan A7v2 Glad to see that one fall!
|
|
|
|
moe7865
|
|
March 19, 2017, 09:42:50 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:02:07 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account.
|
|
|
|
moe7865
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:04:08 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? Edit: I would just like to know why this error is occurring and would rather fix it than make a new account. I wouldn't mind creating a new account long as I get the same username. Also both accounts of mine at Kano (moe7865 and moecarrim) are inaccessible and unable to reset passwords. This doesn't seem like a coincidence
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:08:10 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? You have a financial agreement with another pool and have a large hash rate. Thus in this situation, my luck reporting will start afresh with a new account.
|
|
|
|
moe7865
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:15:40 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? You have a financial agreement with another pool and have a large hash rate. Thus in this situation, my luck reporting will start afresh with a new account. I don't understand why this would result in me having to create a new account. I don't mind you starting your luck reporting from scratch but I'd like to keep my current username moecarrim. So if there is a way to delete that account so I can create a new one with that username it would be nice. Regardless of the agreement I have with another pool I do not see how that would result in the locking of my account instead of just a reset of your luck analysis.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:20:54 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? You have a financial agreement with another pool and have a large hash rate. Thus in this situation, my luck reporting will start afresh with a new account. I don't understand why this would result in me having to create a new account. I don't mind you starting your luck reporting from scratch but I'd like to keep my current username moecarrim. So if there is a way to delete that account so I can create a new one with that username it would be nice. Regardless of the agreement I have with another pool I do not see how that would result in the locking of my account instead of just a reset of your luck analysis. Needs to be a new account.
|
|
|
|
moe7865
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:26:07 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? You have a financial agreement with another pool and have a large hash rate. Thus in this situation, my luck reporting will start afresh with a new account. I don't understand why this would result in me having to create a new account. I don't mind you starting your luck reporting from scratch but I'd like to keep my current username moecarrim. So if there is a way to delete that account so I can create a new one with that username it would be nice. Regardless of the agreement I have with another pool I do not see how that would result in the locking of my account instead of just a reset of your luck analysis. Needs to be a new account. Just feel it's highly unfair locking an account for no apparent reason and without any notification for the simple reason that I partnered with another pool . Regardless of the luck stats you run or whatever the case is, it's no reason to lock a miners account Anyhow I'll keep chugging away with my miners.
|
|
|
|
blacksmithtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:28:15 PM |
|
Kano, by signalling segwit you can significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork and give the market a big relief. It would be huge news. Would you consider doing this, even tho you may not think its a perfect solution?
|
|
|
|
Sr.Urbanist
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:35:05 PM |
|
If BU occurs at the ridiculous level some people are suggesting, 51%, then your wallet will be the last thing you'd have to worry about, coz BTC price will fall badly on both sides of the fork (worse than it has already) It basically means that you can turn the "21 Billion Bitcoins EVER" to 42 Billion. If that happens, then there goes the gold comparison and everyone will question the entire value. It's not that it would be value-less, but the value could take years to recover with transactions showing on both chains. What needs to happen is for proper transition from one protocol to the next using 95% as core does (yes they do some things right ) That's obvious, but do you think some of the larger Chinese corporations would try to deflate the price (and entire BTC economy) for perceived competitive advantage in the long? Why would anybody want to move away ...? we all need to hope that no one is stupid enough to force a fork at 50% ...
If it happens at 50% then your probably best to stop using your Bitcoins until the problems die down and there's a definite winner. That's my plan. I'd like to start mining some AltCoins now but don't know much about any but ETH. Edit: 'sources' say BU requires 75% for 2 weeks, so I guess all the talk around about lower %s is probably trying to scare people into making decisions. But anyway, if BU ever does reach 75%, that means you should have 2 weeks to sort things out. ... and the 2 weeks is probably 2016 blocks, which if there is a fork of any sort would mean more than 2 weeks.
Good info. I agree. There will be a lot of pressure on pools and miners supporting those pools to either switch or 'cause' the fork. I just want Bitcoin to keep working. Transactions backlog every-so-often, but I don't think it's time for changes.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8833
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
March 19, 2017, 10:50:22 PM |
|
@kano Hi Kano, For the past day I've been unable to login to my account (moecarrim). the password is correct but it says login failed. Ive tried resetting the password too but i did not receive the email( i made sure the email was correct). could you please assist me with this
Thanks in advance
Start a new account. I'd rather not start a new account as all 260 of my miners are configured with these current fail over settings. Could you please tell me why I can't login and how could o possibly fix it ? You have a financial agreement with another pool and have a large hash rate. Thus in this situation, my luck reporting will start afresh with a new account. I don't understand why this would result in me having to create a new account. I don't mind you starting your luck reporting from scratch but I'd like to keep my current username moecarrim. So if there is a way to delete that account so I can create a new one with that username it would be nice. Regardless of the agreement I have with another pool I do not see how that would result in the locking of my account instead of just a reset of your luck analysis. could you open new accounts with a small change say moe7865NEW moecarrimNEW I have had to do this on more then one pool it would take less effort to program the failovers I am philipma1957 and philipma1957two on kano's pool
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 19, 2017, 11:09:30 PM |
|
Kano, by signalling segwit you can significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork and give the market a big relief. It would be huge news. Would you consider doing this, even tho you may not think its a perfect solution?
2 things: 1) please stop asking about segwit over and over, your multiple posts on the subject have been answered many times. 2) a currently smaller than 1% pool will not "significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork"
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 20, 2017, 12:06:21 AM |
|
40PH Hmm I wonder how long this will last Edit: oh well, it was a failover.
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
March 20, 2017, 01:18:29 AM |
|
40PH Hmm I wonder how long this will last Edit: oh well, it was a failover. luckyant does seem to control significant hash
|
|
|
|
blacksmithtm
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2017, 09:01:47 AM |
|
Kano, by signalling segwit you can significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork and give the market a big relief. It would be huge news. Would you consider doing this, even tho you may not think its a perfect solution?
2 things: 1) please stop asking about segwit over and over, your multiple posts on the subject have been answered many times. 2) a currently smaller than 1% pool will not "significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork" Thats fine. You do not have the miners of your pools interst then. Bitcoin price will continue to dwindle, and you just stood idly by. Thats fine. But how can you live with that and how can anyone support this pool?
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 20, 2017, 09:17:15 AM |
|
Kano, by signalling segwit you can significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork and give the market a big relief. It would be huge news. Would you consider doing this, even tho you may not think its a perfect solution?
2 things: 1) please stop asking about segwit over and over, your multiple posts on the subject have been answered many times. 2) a currently smaller than 1% pool will not "significantly reduce the likely hood of a contentious fork" Thats fine. You do not have the miners of your pools interst then. Bitcoin price will continue to dwindle, and you just stood idly by. Thats fine. But how can you live with that and how can anyone support this pool? Well can all live without core's centralised financial interests being the reason why they do what they do, we prefer Bitcoin's better interests. ... and again you've been answered many times. I wont ask again. P.S. core is the cause of this problem, clearly ignoring what the majority of Bitcoin want. 70% voiced interest in wanting BIP100 ... no sign of that.
|
|
|
|
IntroVert
|
|
March 21, 2017, 12:12:43 AM |
|
5 consecutive blocks over 100%... Our luck will turn soon
|
|
|
|
|